These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject)

First post
Author
Skill Training Online
Doomheim
#241 - 2013-06-20 02:18:22 UTC
Close your local window, Problem Solved.

Thank You Obama!

Halcyon Ingenium
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#242 - 2013-06-20 02:23:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Halcyon Ingenium
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
Halcyon Ingenium wrote:
The only real problem with local is that anyone in a cloaked ship can ruin the day of a botter simply by sitting in the system. This is only a problem for the botter. Which means there is actually no problem.



Actually, bots don't have feelings, so it doesn't even ruin their day. If they did have feelings, they would still be happy knowing they got safe and stayed safe like their code told them to. A job well done and all that.


I didn't say bot. I said botter. If his bot is nice and docked up, he isn't making money. If he isn't making money for RMT, he is soon so butt-hurt he comes here and makes **** posts. And its always the people who have just had the teat of easy money pulled from their suckling lips who are screaming the loudest.

By the way, since we're already talking, do you want to buy a rifter? I've got the cheapest rifters in Metropolis. If you can find a cheaper rifter, buy it!

Skill Training Online
Doomheim
#243 - 2013-06-20 02:25:23 UTC
Halcyon Ingenium wrote:
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
Halcyon Ingenium wrote:
The only real problem with local is that anyone in a cloaked ship can ruin the day of a botter simply by sitting in the system. This is only a problem for the botter. Which means there is actually no problem.



Actually, bots don't have feelings, so it doesn't even ruin their day. If they did have feelings, they would still be happy knowing they got safe and stayed safe like their code told them to. A job well done and all that.


I didn't say bot. I said botter. If his bot is nice and docked up, he isn't making money. If he isn't making money for RMT, he is soon so butt-hurt he comes here and makes **** posts.


Bot Programs greatly inflate the value of ISK. Why would we want to stop that, by January it'll be 1b/PLEX

Thank You Obama!

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#244 - 2013-06-20 02:26:03 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
I still don’t understand why it would be an issue for a cloaker to press a button to remain cloaked every 15-30 min. Most of these people argued in other threads against afk mining yet argue for afk cloaking, Seems a bit hypocritical to me.



The great thing about the internet is that it has a memory.

So, please post a link to where I said anyhting about afk anything. It's simply incredible to me that you would hang you entire argument on the idea of a double standard that you could prove with a very simple google search, but won't (and can't).

The siple fact of the matter is that the only people who have problems with AFK cloaking are people who , rather than play creatively, would rather get some kind of I win buttons from the devlopers.

The poblem th making someone push a button every 30 minutes to stay cloaked is that is fixes a problem...by SCREWING people who legitimately cloak for prolonged periods in hostile space. Why nerf ninja ratters/explorers to get at "afk cloakers" who stop people from ratting? Cloaking allows grown folks in null to walk away for a bit to deal with real life issues without having to bother with the pain of relogging.

The game allows afk mining, it doesn't bother me a bit, but if you destroy people's ability to ninja rat and such, then those afk miners and autopilot haulers need to go away too. Because unlike the afk cloaker, the haulers and miners ARE making isk.
Skill Training Online
Doomheim
#245 - 2013-06-20 02:30:28 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
I still don’t understand why it would be an issue for a cloaker to press a button to remain cloaked every 15-30 min. Most of these people argued in other threads against afk mining yet argue for afk cloaking, Seems a bit hypocritical to me.



The great thing about the internet is that it has a memory.

So, please post a link to where I said anyhting about afk anything. It's simply incredible to me that you would hang you entire argument on the idea of a double standard that you could prove with a very simple google search, but won't (and can't).

The siple fact of the matter is that the only people who have problems with AFK cloaking are people who , rather than play creatively, would rather get some kind of I win buttons from the devlopers.

The poblem th making someone push a button every 30 minutes to stay cloaked is that is fixes a problem...by SCREWING people who legitimately cloak for prolonged periods in hostile space. Why nerf ninja ratters/explorers to get at "afk cloakers" who stop people from ratting? Cloaking allows grown folks in null to walk away for a bit to deal with real life issues without having to bother with the pain of relogging.

The game allows afk mining, it doesn't bother me a bit, but if you destroy people's ability to ninja rat and such, then those afk miners and autopilot haulers need to go away too. Because unlike the afk cloaker, the haulers and miners ARE making isk.


I don't need proof to know your a terrible person, I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER.

Thank You Obama!

Halcyon Ingenium
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#246 - 2013-06-20 02:33:27 UTC
Skill Training Online wrote:


Bot Programs greatly inflate the value of ISK. Why would we want to stop that, by January it'll be 1b/PLEX


We? Do you have someone standing over your shoulder?

By the way, since we're already talking, do you want to buy a rifter? I've got the cheapest rifters in Metropolis. If you can find a cheaper rifter, buy it!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#247 - 2013-06-20 02:42:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Sarcasim wrote:
Good luck with that. They will do do what they do for every thread they dislike.
Not really no. Threads that I dislike, I just report outright. What I'm doing here is the same thing I always do when I spot unfounded claims and assumptions: I question them until I get an answer or until the claimant outs himself as a troll.

Quote:
I still don’t understand why it would be an issue for a cloaker to press a button to remain cloaked every 15-30 min. Most of these people argued in other threads against afk mining yet argue for afk cloaking, Seems a bit hypocritical to me.
This has already been answered. Try reading it?

Also, as has also been explained already, unlike AFK mining (which artificially skews the entire economy of the entire game), AFK cloaking doesn't actually do anything. Finally, I suppose you can dig out some support for that claim that there is any kind of correlation between pro-AFK-cloaking and anti-AFK-mining…?

Oh, and you don't see the connection between being against making money while AFK (anti-AFK-mining) and being against making money while AFK (pro-AFK-cloaking, since with them gone, people could make money in null AFK as well)…? Really? You don't? Really?
Skill Training Online
Doomheim
#248 - 2013-06-20 02:44:47 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
Good luck with that. They will do do what they do for every thread they dislike.
Not really no. Threads that I dislike, I just report outright. What I'm doing here is the same thing I always do when I spot unfounded claims and assumptions: I question them until I get an answer or until the claimant outs himself as a troll.

Quote:
I still don’t understand why it would be an issue for a cloaker to press a button to remain cloaked every 15-30 min. Most of these people argued in other threads against afk mining yet argue for afk cloaking, Seems a bit hypocritical to me.
This has already been answered. Try reading it?

Also, as has also been explained already, unlike AFK mining (which artificially skews the entire economy of the entire game), AFK cloaking doesn't actually do anything. Finally, I suppose you can dig out some support for that claim that there is any kind of correlation between pro-AFK-cloaking and anti-AFK-mining…?


I think Tippia is wrong about this.

Thank You Obama!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#249 - 2013-06-20 02:46:01 UTC
Skill Training Online wrote:
I think Tippia is wrong about this.
You know what's even better than thinking?
Proving it…
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#250 - 2013-06-20 02:47:32 UTC
And while Im at it let me once again comment on the insane butt hurt of a few people in this thread.

When I was a kid, i came up with some of the dumbest ideas you could imagine, in games, in real life, whatever. I told people these wonderful ideas that couldn't fail.

They laughed their asses and MY ass off. i'm seriousl i got no ass left after all that ass related laughing. I got butt hurt for a bit. Then I grew up and realized that the way to avoid glutious related laughing was to not say stupid things in the 1st place.

I learned that lesson years ago, then i come to a forum of supposedly grown folks and a siezable minority of them never quite learned the same lesson I did. But rather than learning how to avoid being a laughing stock, they find every way under the sun for the issue to be about me (or Tippia, or Goons, or Nullsec in geneal, or the CSM, or with whatever their pet peeve is).

It thusly strikes me that these people play the game the exact same way they post. Rather than learning from thier mistakes and innovating new solutions/new paths to victory, the latch on to some external cause as the root and reason for their personal failure, and they beg the powers that be to fix it for them instead of fixing the real problem...themselves.

The real reason these discussions tend to devolve into theses kinds of messes isn't some Tippian/Jennian Trolling Conspiracy (Trollspiracy? :) ), its litterally (and you'll have to excuse me if this sounds self serving, it is, but it's also true) the forces of logic reason and personal responsiblity vs the forces of weakness, welfare-queenish entitlement and externalizing of internal failure.

This isn't to say that the game is perfect and can't progresss (it can), but most ideas people have are easily dismissable trash. you'd think a nerd hobby like EVE would have smarter participants. Or maybe it does but they are so smart they skip the forums lol.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#251 - 2013-06-20 02:48:52 UTC
Skill Training Online wrote:


I don't need proof to know your a terrible person, I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER.


i know what I'm doing right this moment.... and so do you. I know what you did under your Avatar's hoodie last night!
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#252 - 2013-06-20 03:05:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Quote:
They laughed their asses and MY ass off. i'm seriousl i got no ass left after all that ass related laughing.


I'm curious, do you experience Phantom Limb Syndrome from this? :P

Quote:
The real reason these discussions tend to devolve into theses kinds of messes isn't some Tippian/Jennian Trolling Conspiracy (Trollspiracy? :) ), its litterally (and you'll have to excuse me if this sounds self serving, it is, but it's also true) the forces of logic reason and personal responsiblity vs the forces of weakness, welfare-queenish entitlement and externalizing of internal failure.


So right. It's the typical reaction of the self esteem obsessed, participation trophy society to criticism. Attack, demonize, invalidate them from the discussion at large, and silence dissenting viewpoints.

Quote:
This isn't to say that the game is perfect and can't progresss (it can), but most ideas people have are easily dismissable trash.


But when told that their idea is trash, they interpret this to being an attack on themselves, and that you are saying THEY are trash. It's a natural consequence of the "everyone is entitled to their opinion" rubbish, and the concept of the equality of thought. I was raised on the precept that an opinion not backed with facts and logic is a delusion. Too many people were raised on "Well, that's my opinion anyway! *stomps off and locks self in the bathroom*".

[Edit: Also, to keep this on topic, I propose that Local be removed, and replaced with Regional. That way, everyone is screwed equally by the change. It's the only fair solution. :P

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#253 - 2013-06-20 04:17:34 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


So right. It's the typical reaction of the self esteem obsessed, participation trophy society to criticism. Attack, demonize, invalidate them from the discussion at large, and silence dissenting viewpoints.


On a side note, my kid once came home with a 7th place trophy (she was in the 2nd grade). To her credit, she was basically like "WTH is this" and it wa sone time I excused her use of a curse word before adulthood lol.

But yea, it just amazes me the same people who have the kooky ideas tend to be the ones who are the most sensitive to criticism.

Quote:


But when told that their idea is trash, they interpret this to being an attack on themselves, and that you are saying THEY are trash. It's a natural consequence of the "everyone is entitled to their opinion" rubbish, and the concept of the equality of thought. I was raised on the precept that an opinion not backed with facts and logic is a delusion. Too many people were raised on "Well, that's my opinion anyway! *stomps off and locks self in the bathroom*".


My parents had another word for it (I think the filter will overload and kill the servers if I type it , and I don't wanna be responsible for a crash lol), but "delusion" works well too Cool

Well said Kaarous.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#254 - 2013-06-20 09:51:05 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:
Shizuken wrote:
So I ask you this. Do you think it is fair that one guy can spend his $15/month to sequester the enjoyment of 7 people for a total $105, while we have no technical way to hunt, track, or eliminate him. Cloaking needs a soft counter. Because right now it causes too much disruption for too little investment.



And my answer is simple, if you and the other 6 guys are unable to get the hot droper/cloak dude you don't belong where you are and you will loose everything you have sooner than later.

C'mon, 6 guys that can't take on a single cloak ship or even a hotdrop with cheapo throwaway stuff and still kill some of them?

You know what's fine when you answer back? -the hotdropers will know you guys will undock shite and kill some of their shinies, they will avoid cyno on your system because they're not there to loose ships but to kill ships.

Just man up or move to high sec if you can't handle with this.

In highsec we go about our pvp with systems full of nuetrals who may or may not be spies, RR or suiciders.




Clearly, high sec pvp I just hate it because you never now who is abusing this or that mechanic and bring 1 to--->undetermined number of alts etc., whatever when I meant high sec it's NPC corps of course.

Null sec it's simple, at least where I am it's NBSI: not purple, not green, not blue *cough*, kill it.
The local and afk cloak argument is a poor minded jelly kiddo complaining "you don't play my game", well bad news for them not only I do not play their game but I'm here to harass and destroy THEIR game, and I'll do whatever it takes to make their day, a bad day.

This is how things go, they can't handle? -fair enough, it's the game.

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#255 - 2013-06-20 10:10:37 UTC
Skill Training Online wrote:
Close your local window, Problem Solved.


If doing that removed me from everyone else's local, then I would.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

WhipDiddyWhip
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#256 - 2013-06-20 11:08:51 UTC
i have only been playing 2 weeks, and my first thought when i heard about local was "that's just silly that i can instantly know if im in danger due to a CHAT CHANNEL!"

ppl are using it as an itelligence tool which it wasn't designed to be

also why are ppl moaning about cloaking afk? if someone wants to go do somwthing while cloaked what's the problem? it's up to them if they wanna do that
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#257 - 2013-06-20 11:14:44 UTC
WhipDiddyWhip wrote:
i have only been playing 2 weeks, and my first thought when i heard about local was "that's just silly that i can instantly know if im in danger due to a CHAT CHANNEL!"



In Eve you have an option to turn it off: move to WH's.

No problem with local of AFK cloaks, everything is fine.

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Eeio
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#258 - 2013-06-20 11:17:05 UTC
MailDeadDrop wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
They can be both, because to the risk averse and those unwilling to adapt, it has an effect, but to those who are more daring or simply know how to deal with it, it has very little if any affect at all. It's all perspective, and the bottom line is an afk cloak physically has zero effect, and has the potential to have a mental effect.


You may be on to something, but the statements are still at odds: neither implied a dependency on perspective. Both were absolute statements. I'm hoping one or both of them will revise their statements. I'm also hoping to get past the absolute pronouncements in this thread (not just theirs) and into the reasoning behind them.

What I suspect is closer to an absolutely true statement is this combination of facts:
1. an AFK cloaked ship is indistinguishable from an actively piloted cloaked ship
2. an actively piloted cloaked ship piloted by a non-blue pilot is most likely up to no good Lol
3. the first indicator that the pilot of a cloaked ship is active and not AFK is when they uncloak to execute their plan
4. the active pilot of a cloaked ship dictates the time and place of the encounter; the "recipient" of the event
has no opportunity to dictate to the pilot of the cloaked ship the time of the encounter (short of "never",
i.e. dock up) and limited opportunity to dictate the place.


MDD


Im still waiting for these people to come up with some proper replies to this thread. They keep advocating well thought through suggestions and observations, and these points are still at the core of the whole problem.

And still havent been adressed.


Quote:
Also, as has also been explained already, unlike AFK mining (which artificially skews the entire economy of the entire game), AFK cloaking doesn't actually do anything. Finally, I suppose you can dig out some support for that claim that there is any kind of correlation between pro-AFK-cloaking and anti-AFK-mining…?


You know, one could argue that afk mining in itself does nothing as well. Refining your ore and then selling it or building something with it, will.

In anycase, I just noticed that other thread where someone wants to pay new players ISK every month, if they are willing to go camp a designated nullsec system whenever they are offline.

Surely thats making ISK while being afk Big smile



WhipDiddyWhip
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#259 - 2013-06-20 11:32:25 UTC
afk cloaking simple solution

make cloak use a small amount of cap to run and add -100% cap recharge to it's attributes
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#260 - 2013-06-20 11:39:47 UTC
WhipDiddyWhip wrote:
afk cloaking simple solution

make cloak use a small amount of cap to run and add -100% cap recharge to it's attributes


What "problem" does this "solve".

Also congrats on an idea that is an unimaginably huge nerf to active players.