These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What do you think CCP's next expansion going to focus on?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-06-08 12:10:48 UTC
It desperately needs to focus on suicide ganking.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Grog Barrel
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-06-08 12:25:20 UTC
probably more ridiculous ships changes based on some sheetty lobbyist's opinions and keep messing up the already failcascading sandbox.
OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2013-06-08 12:33:24 UTC
5'th empire.
Content.
Content.
Content.
Content.
Content.
Content.
Content.
...
Content.
darmwand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2013-06-08 12:50:04 UTC
A new skin for the Navy Comet?

"The pen is mightier than the sword if the sword is very short, and the pen is very sharp."
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#25 - 2013-06-08 12:51:33 UTC
darmwand wrote:
A new skin for the Navy Comet?


Just needs the flashy blue light.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#26 - 2013-06-08 12:53:06 UTC
Srs, tho: Seagull told us at fanfest.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Shadow Lord77
Shadow Industries I
#27 - 2013-06-08 12:57:51 UTC
Nullsec.
Naomi Hale
#28 - 2013-06-08 12:59:04 UTC
For the people wanting/hoping for ring mining, I'm sorry...

Sentinel zx wrote:
probably not this year

Dev Talk Live - Marc Scaurus and Xander Phoena talk to CCP Fozzie

http://de.twitch.tv/themittanidotcom/c/2379640

CCP Fozzie answer the question about ring mining at 43:45min


I feel your pain, as I wanted that too (here).

I'm Naomi Hale and this is my favourite thread on the forums.
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
#29 - 2013-06-08 13:00:05 UTC
Grog Barrel wrote:
probably more ridiculous ships changes based on some sheetty lobbyist's opinions and keep messing up the already failcascading sandbox.


How dare the community pressure for functional balance...

You make it seem as if the balancing that has taken place came out of no where and was not needed. The unquestionable reality is that balance has been broken for years and what we currently have (odyssey) is the most well polished/balanced iteration of this game by far.
Implying Implications
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2013-06-08 13:01:29 UTC
pos mechanics

hello
Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries
Forgers United
#31 - 2013-06-08 13:02:37 UTC
Naomi Hale wrote:
For the people wanting/hoping for ring mining, I'm sorry...

Sentinel zx wrote:
probably not this year

Dev Talk Live - Marc Scaurus and Xander Phoena talk to CCP Fozzie

http://de.twitch.tv/themittanidotcom/c/2379640

CCP Fozzie answer the question about ring mining at 43:45min


I feel your pain, as I wanted that too (here).



I thought there was some serious threadnought created some time ago which actually forced CCP to think about replacing passive moon income with something with more player interaction, they basically promissed so and now they just pulled back? FFfsss, shame on you
Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-06-08 13:12:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jada Maroo
Malcanis wrote:
Srs, tho: Seagull told us at fanfest.


If you believe what CCP says at Fanfest I've got an establishment to sell you.
Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-06-08 13:15:34 UTC
can I have a slider for range on my D-scan please?

don't tell me eve is getting too easy, they even did the conversion from radians for you Roll

forums.  serious business.
Naomi Hale
#34 - 2013-06-08 13:34:08 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Srs, tho: Seagull told us at fanfest.

If you mean 'space colonization,' that's a little vague. If you mean building stargates, that's further away than winter 2013. So I'm guessing you mean a middle ground.

Manufacturing? Piracy? A link between the two?

I'm Naomi Hale and this is my favourite thread on the forums.
Hessian Arcturus
Doomheim
#35 - 2013-06-08 13:35:28 UTC
I would love to see some sort of Guristas content. Guristas attack outlying hisec systems to try and gain a foothold. Or something similar. Would be cool...Big smile

It's human nature to want to explore. To find your line and go beyond it. The only limit, is the one you set yourself.
Adunh Slavy
#36 - 2013-06-08 13:40:17 UTC
Corp Roles so they they can properly move on to POSes, Sov, Dust, etc.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Grog Barrel
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2013-06-08 14:30:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Grog Barrel
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
Grog Barrel wrote:
probably more ridiculous ships changes based on some sheetty lobbyist's opinions and keep messing up the already failcascading sandbox.


How dare the community pressure for functional balance...

You make it seem as if the balancing that has taken place came out of no where and was not needed. The unquestionable reality is that balance has been broken for years and what we currently have (odyssey) is the most well polished/balanced iteration of this game by far.


seriously? so caldari has a place somewhere again? snipah rohks? brawler ravens? Oh god how glad i am scorpions are no longer cannon fodder. Oh you might be talking probably about low sec small engagements, where the falcon is the only caldari ship able to do something serious while forum-quality-whining-posters call for "balance" because, of course, the drake wasn't enough.
Neo Hal
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#38 - 2013-06-08 14:32:24 UTC
Honestly, I'd most like for them to just clean up what's already there!

As a new player, my initial impression of EVE is positive. I think it's a great game with a lot of potential. But right now, my biggest gripe with the game is it's inconsistent level of quality. It's almost like it's hacked together with various incomplete ideas and it doesn't know for sure what it wants to be when it grows up.

The little things matter. Things like a "Loading" dialog appearing on top of a screen that also already says "Loading" on it. The new login screen is quite a step backwards from the Retribution login screen. There are sometimes 3-4 different ways to get to the same thing...on the Neocom, on the Station Services window, in the EVE Menu, by mousing over the coffee table, etc. It's busy and confusing (at least to a new player).

Team Pony Express...there's nothing going on at CCP right now that is more important to me than what you guys are doing...Godspeed!
Krakhen
Praetors of Orpheus
#39 - 2013-06-08 15:12:15 UTC
Lets see.

-Ship collision?
-Ship hull degradation as they get damaged
-NOS/NEUTS/REPS modules actually showing up on ships instead of just shooting out from the relative center of the model.
-Some king of limited WIS (please don't flame)


this is more of a wish list, meh :)
Sarah Nahrnid
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2013-06-08 15:33:49 UTC
Fairly sure the next expo is based on Exploration given stargates ect