These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The old Stuff back - including improvements

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sparky11080
Repercussus
#221 - 2012-08-04 09:01:46 UTC
I remember reading this months ago...it was a stupid request then, and it's still a stupid request now.

Just let it go, it's over. Let this thread finally rest in peace, it's tired, and dead.
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#222 - 2012-08-06 15:54:51 UTC
edited improvements in this thread

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#223 - 2012-08-07 15:34:00 UTC
bump

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
marVLs
#224 - 2012-08-07 15:59:14 UTC
Will someone delete this stupid thread already?! Evil
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#225 - 2012-08-08 06:44:54 UTC
marVLs wrote:
Will someone delete this stupid thread already?! Evil



no, this thread dont violates any rule here.

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#226 - 2012-08-09 06:20:53 UTC
bump

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Miss Furry
Doomheim
#227 - 2012-08-09 17:18:29 UTC
(Incoming irony)

Stop bumping this stupid ******* thread, and learn to speak English properly if you're going to suggest things on a features forum. The last thing we need is some poorly translated idea turning into a shithole of misconception.

CCP doesn't post in most of the threads on this particular forum. What makes you think they'll post in this one if you keep bumping it to the top of the list?
Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#228 - 2012-08-09 18:02:21 UTC
Omfg it's this thread again. Is it not closed already?

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#229 - 2012-08-10 06:32:03 UTC
Hannott Thanos wrote:
Omfg it's this thread again. Is it not closed already?



closed? no

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#230 - 2012-08-11 16:52:53 UTC
bump

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Lys Freeman
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#231 - 2012-08-13 15:59:51 UTC
Wow. You are a persistent troll Gustav.
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#232 - 2012-08-15 14:32:13 UTC
bump, and i gnore the offtoptic post above me

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Miss Everest
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#233 - 2012-08-15 16:41:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Miss Everest
Gustav Mannfred wrote:
bump, and i gnore the offtoptic post above me


That was NOT off topic. You are just in denial. This thread is dead and was dead long ago you just dont like the answer.

EVERYONE just click on his name and click "Ignore posts" and that will make this go away. I am off to do that right now.

CCP for the love of all that is holy let us DISLIKE things and possibly even mute people and threads all together!!
Rhianna Ghost
Ghost Industries Inc.
#234 - 2012-08-16 07:01:24 UTC
OK, I will continue feeding the troll, just for the lulz...

What do you think you will get with this thread?


  • you got almost everyone in this thread telling you that the new artwork is nicer than the old one.
  • you got told multiple times that it would be too much work on CCPs side to maintain 2 to 3 sets of artwork (and yes, you have to maintain it, if you give players the option. Otherwise they start complayning "Feature X does not work if I have Option Y switched on, but Option Z switched off". Testing grows exponentially with options.)
  • You got Devs posting in your thread, telling you to use Petitions instead of this thread.
  • In the last few weeks you got nothing but people telling you to shut up.


Taking all of this into account there are only two options left:

One:
You are too dump to grasp these facts or mentally not able to draw the conclusion.

Two:
You are trolling.

I'll vote for two, but if it is one: quit Eve, its no game for you.

Harden the f... up, adapt or leave.

In love,

Rhi
Easthir Ravin
Easy Co.
#235 - 2012-08-16 10:41:01 UTC
Gustav Mannfred wrote:
that are players, but i anywhere dont know, if CCP find this a good idea


Yes because they spent time and money to have it all changed back thanks to your lone voice in the wilderness. Good luck with that.

Someone lock this thread Please.

2 cents

IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES:  " I drank WHAT?!"
Oberine Noriepa
#236 - 2012-08-16 14:51:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Oberine Noriepa
I see you've updated your OP. There are some decent suggestions in there. I'm not in favor of bringing back older content, however.

I really dislike how many of the nebulae currently look so flat and low quality. It would be great if they appeared as objects in space with depth. It would also be great if they influenced system lighting to a degree. I have voiced this opinion quite a bit. Hopefully the nebulae will receive improvements once the V3 project is complete.

∃
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#237 - 2012-08-16 16:38:54 UTC
the only thing I agree with is the inventory system which is still crap and much more confusing than the older system.

the new missile launchers and nebula are fine, granted a bit darker.
Gustav Mannfred
Summer of Mumuit
Remember Mumuit
#238 - 2012-08-18 08:41:34 UTC
bump

i'm REALY miss the old stuff. 

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=24183
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#239 - 2012-08-18 16:35:55 UTC
Oberine Noriepa wrote:
I see you've updated your OP. There are some decent suggestions in there. I'm not in favor of bringing back older content, however.

I really dislike how many of the nebulae currently look so flat and low quality. It would be great if they appeared as objects in space with depth. It would also be great if they influenced system lighting to a degree. I have voiced this opinion quite a bit. Hopefully the nebulae will receive improvements once the V3 project is complete.

Turning nebulae into objects in space would probably end up being "giant dust clouds", and we all know what happens to people's framerates when you add dust clouds.
GeeShizzle MacCloud
#240 - 2012-08-18 18:40:50 UTC
u know the nebulas were rendered from 3d models of stellar clouds etc.. made by a very professional motion picture special effects studio and rendered on their supercomputers.

they look a hell of a lot more realistic than those flat artsy nebulas we used to have... and guess what gustav? space IS dark, u watch any space programmes? is there a very definite colour theme in most of those programmes? is it black? why yes it IS!

the only thing id change which correlates with what ur OP said is the granularity of the nebula background changes. and i do believe that was a legitimate concern from a few other people in the comments thread about it, asking if there could be a possible optional extra pack they could download to add new HD nebula backgrounds to every constellation rather than region.

the reason why its region changes only is because if it was constellation changes the size of the tranquillity client download would skyrocket to ridiculous proportions.

other than that ur ideas and notions are almost devoid of merit.