These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Bridges and Swamp Land for Sale

Author
Adunh Slavy
#1 - 2013-05-23 15:09:53 UTC
Here's an idea that got kicked around in SCC, so thought I'd write it up.

There are two pieces to this to make the whole, so before you jump out of your seat and start flaming, read both parts please.

First part of this is NPC corp shares. Place all the NPC corp shares on a market, and let the players buy them and sell them as they wish. After a month, we should have a pretty good idea of what they are worth. Of course dear reader, they are worthless so far, until the second part. Which is ...

In order for a corp to rent an office at an NPC station, the corp must be the owner of some number of shares. These shares are not used in payment, they are instead used as a simple gate keeper, or 'key' if you like. The proof that a corp owns equity in the NPC corp.

Renting an office will require shares be held by the renting corp. This number will be dynamic and use the same mechanism used now, but instead will be expressed in shares instead of ISK, and instead of being the rent, it is instead the 'Equity Value Required'. The monthly rental fee of any and all offices will be reduced to a measly 50,000 ISK a month, even for Jita.

So for instance, to rent an office in Jita right now, it costs 1,987,242,731 ISK a month. Let's suppose shares had a market value of 500,000 ISK. To be allowed to rent an office at Jita, a corp would need to be in possession of 3,975 shares of Caldari Navy Stock. Furthermore, the renting corp would need to maintain the amount of equity required on a monthly basis, so will need to buy (or sell) as needed.

If the corp has the required amount of equity expressed in the applicable NPC corp shares, they can rent the office and pay their 50,000 a month rent. If they are not in possession of the required equity, they can not rent an office.

An office that has an 'Equity Value' of less than the value of one share, would simply require one share of stock.

This feature would give NPC shares some tangible value, create new markets and possibly new professions, add a new dynamic to the economy and perhaps, give CCP a testing ground for further financial market ideas and features.

Have at it, find the holes, the errors, thought experiment it ... ya'll know the drill.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Samroski
Middle-Earth
#2 - 2013-05-23 15:22:22 UTC
What happens to the shares held by accounts that become inactive?

The idea is intellectually amusing. Not sure whether I want it in the game though.

Will certainly add another facet to the complexities of Eve. The idea should probably be implemented so that it effects big corps. Newbies should be able to rent offices and go about their business without bothering too much about shares.

Any colour you like.

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#3 - 2013-05-23 15:42:24 UTC
The idea is very useful for the purpose of introducing both shares, real estate and exchange trade into our current ecology.

A few details will ofc be needed to have a workable and ready feature.

The rental price dynamic still needs to move and be similar in nature as it is now, the difference would be that it would be reduced to a fraction of current price. So the rent would be 5% of current price, but demand the shares value of 2-3 months. In Jita case this number becomes a bit crazy, but the intention is to grant players the ability to indirectly trade the underlying asset of their real estate.

From a fundamental "clean slate" view all stations would cost 10.000 isk to rent. And to rent a slot you would need 100.000 nominal value shares, per office.

If you buy shares but dont rent an office you get monthly dividends from the players renting Office slots. the idea is to pay back 50% of the rental profits as dividends.

Now as rental prices goes up on a mechanic similar to the current one, maybe with a bit of tweaking that means the dividends will increase and the cost to hold the original 100.000 nominal shares go up.

This would fundamentally be the first integration of npc in a dynamic player active economy. Later factional warfare, market seeded goods etc could become a part of this npc dynamic economy, and be the template for the player equivalent.

The shares would need to be handled initially in some "fair" manner maybe via an IPO dutch auction system, or by just granting an offer based on standing, and the number of shares bought would set the price.. This is a bit "technical" if we get into the details, but the system is well known and should not be rocket science to ccp devs and economists. (If they can understand the latest CSM voting system, I am sure IPO pricing will be a piece of cake)

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#4 - 2013-05-23 15:48:35 UTC
Samroski wrote:
What happens to the shares held by accounts that become inactive?

The idea is intellectually amusing. Not sure whether I want it in the game though.

Will certainly add another facet to the complexities of Eve. The idea should probably be implemented so that it effects big corps. Newbies should be able to rent offices and go about their business without bothering too much about shares.


Shares in inactive accounts just collects dividends. (Or get forced buybacks after 3 months unless player actively rejects the buyback) Basically an automated reset for inactive accounts. If players want to keep they can put in player driven holding corporations that are active and thus still get interest.

The reason for wanting it ingame is to make rental a bit more "interesting" and use it as a preparation and catalyst for a stock exchange and real estate pricing.


Newbies can still rent in "simple" ways most stations will still have cheap rents and the only difference is when renting the first time you pay a down-payment which is to get shares and the first months rent. So they wont notice if they arent using the game feature..



Adunh Slavy
#5 - 2013-05-23 15:49:00 UTC
Samroski wrote:
What happens to the shares held by accounts that become inactive?

The idea is intellectually amusing. Not sure whether I want it in the game though.

Will certainly add another facet to the complexities of Eve. The idea should probably be implemented so that it effects big corps. Newbies should be able to rent offices and go about their business without bothering too much about shares.



Good questions.

For newbies: I agree that the cost of shares could possibly become prohibitive for new players. But we have to keep a couple of things in mind. First, there are a lot of stations and NPC corps in Eve. Less desirable NPC corps will have share prices that are relatively inexpensive. Caldari Navy, Emperor Family, Brutor Tribe will likely be rather expensive. But Native Fresh Foods and that ilk will likely not be too expensive.

Having goals in Eve is not a bad thing, being able to move your offices from Baltic Avenue to Boardwalk is an accomplishment. Eve is not about social justice. If it turns out that all share prices just go insane, there is nothing stopping CCP from having the NPC corps issue additional shares, which brings us to your other question.

Zombie Shares: Corps do go inactive at times, people leave the game and so forth. So there could be an issue where shares are consumed by inactivity. To alleviate this problem, CCP could institute a policy by which NPC corps issue 2% a month of new shares. These new shares would be sold by the NPC corps, on the market, at the 20 day moving average.

Also, a corp that officially closes, would have all NPC shares confiscated and put back into possession of the NPC corp which then sells them on the market at the 20 day moving average.

For corps that go inactive and do not close, they simply become zombie shares. After a year CCP would have a pretty good idea of how much zombification there was, and could adjust that 2% mentioned above, to whatever value is appropriate.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Tinu Moorhsum
Random Events
#6 - 2013-05-23 16:16:39 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:

Have at it, find the holes, the errors, thought experiment it ... ya'll know the drill.


Soo... If I understand correctly you're proposing floating NPC corps based on their supply of office slots.

The first thing that jumps to my mind is that a stock market only works if stocks can be traded.

Thinking to the next step. NPC stations have a fixed supply of offices and would therefore offer a fixed supply of stock that would subsequenty get locked up in the corp assets of corps that buy them.

Since this is a game and not real life, corps fold, assets get stolen or trashed, people go inactive..... and the supply of stocks will initially go to zero (at least in popular stations) and then acutally go negative as they essentially vaporize as people fold their corps up or quit playing.

so you'd need two mechanisms to make this toy stock market look real:

1) you'd need a way for corps to sell NPC stock to one another. For example, a corp with stock to sell for a slot in a popular station could put it on the market and corps wanting to buy a slot would have to put up a buy order. This way buyers and sellers could find each other.

2) You would need some kind of a mechanism for creating new stock as old stock is vaporized so that you wouldn't end up with stations where offices are permanently locked up by virtue of people going inactive. Some way to for a corp to sell back stock to the NPC and/or for the NPC to repossess stock might be needed.

And then you'd have to try to find a way to explain to the 99% of eve players that this is supposed to be fun. I think most people would just end up viewing it as yet another mechanic as opposed to the mini-stockmarket-game I believe you intended it to be.

Block Ukx
Pator Tech School
#7 - 2013-05-23 16:28:32 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:

Renting an office will require shares be held by the renting corp.



Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?



Adunh Slavy
#8 - 2013-05-23 16:31:09 UTC
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

Since this is a game and not real life, corps fold, assets get stolen or trashed, people go inactive..... and the supply of stocks will initially go to zero (at least in popular stations) and then acutally go negative as they essentially vaporize as people fold their corps up or quit playing.


Yep, quite true. This is addressed in post number 5 of this thread. There may perhaps be better methods, but that one seems pretty simple, IMO.

Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

1) you'd need a way for corps to sell NPC stock to one another. For example, a corp with stock to sell for a slot in a popular station could put it on the market and corps wanting to buy a slot would have to put up a buy order. This way buyers and sellers could find each other.


Absolutely correct, and the point of this idea.

My personal preference would be a global, that is to say galaxy wide, stock market, that is not regionally specific. A player in Hemitar could buy and sell on the same market as a player in Domain, with out having to fly from one region to another.

Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

2) You would need some kind of a mechanism for creating new stock as old stock is vaporized so that you wouldn't end up with stations where offices are permanently locked up by virtue of people going inactive. Some way to for a corp to sell back stock to the NPC and/or for the NPC to repossess stock might be needed.


Yes, this is quite true. As mentioned above, post five has some ideas on part of this issue. The other issue you bring up is something solved now in the game. An inactive corp will fail to pay their rent and all of their items in corp hangars are impounded. This same mechanic would remain. So the only new issue involved is the zombification of stock. Freeing up office slots due to inactivity would function in the same manner that it functions today.

Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

And then you'd have to try to find a way to explain to the 99% of eve players that this is supposed to be fun. I think most people would just end up viewing it as yet another mechanic as opposed to the mini-stockmarket-game I believe you intended it to be.


Considering that many Eve players spend hours upon hours staring at blue lights shooting at brown blobs known as asteroids, or pressing buttons, for hours on end, to splat red crosses with space ammo, I don't consider this to be much of an issue.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Adunh Slavy
#9 - 2013-05-23 16:33:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Adunh Slavy
Block Ukx wrote:


Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?




Explain why it is bad.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#10 - 2013-05-23 16:35:42 UTC
Block Ukx wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:

Renting an office will require shares be held by the renting corp.



Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?





No no no its not.. and your opinion without arguments is just touchy feely based.

Its the next best thing to actually owning the real estate in high sec, and the simplest way to bring in a shares system working from npc mechanics.

Adunh Slavy
#11 - 2013-05-23 16:41:13 UTC
Caleb Ayrania wrote:

Its the next best thing to actually owning the real estate in high sec, and the simplest way to bring in a shares system working from npc mechanics.


Not only high sec, but NPC null sec as well.
Maybe, in some far off date in the future, if this idea were implmented, it could extend to player owned stations. Who knows.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Block Ukx
Pator Tech School
#12 - 2013-05-23 16:59:42 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Block Ukx wrote:


Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?




Explain why it is bad.




Do you really believe that FORCING people to play the stock market to rent an office is a good idea?

Automatic billing was put in place because people got tired of having to pay the bill each month. Now you want them to play the market daily to keep an office?






Tinu Moorhsum
Random Events
#13 - 2013-05-23 17:35:44 UTC
Block Ukx wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Block Ukx wrote:


Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?




Explain why it is bad.




Do you really believe that FORCING people to play the stock market to rent an office is a good idea?

Automatic billing was put in place because people got tired of having to pay the bill each month. Now you want them to play the market daily to keep an office?


It didn't sound to me like that was his proposal. It sounds like he's proposing rental as it works right now but that the RIGHT to rent an office in a given system will depend upon owning enough shares of stock.

For example (if I get what he's saying) you could buy say 100 shares of an NPC corp and then have a right to rent an office in any station where that corp holds the offices. However, in Station #1 you would only need 2 shares to rent an office because maybe it is in the ghetto in the middle of solitude but in station #2 you might need 200 shares to rent an office because the demand is very high.

In order to not lose the isk sink effect from office rental then you would still need to pay rent via the existing mechanic but the level of rent would have to be based on some kind of nominal price calculated over a rolling average of the stock price for that NPC corp * the number of shares you have.

Buying and selling shares wouldn't be "forced" because once you have them you have them. Maybe you would want to re-sell some of them at a later date if you weren't using them or maybe you'd want to buy more shares if you wanted to upgrade to a more popular station, but that's the extent of playing the market you would be "forced" into.

correct me if I didn't understand it.

The truly magical thing about a stock market is that it has an amazing ability to sort of "calculate" the ACTUAL value of something without anyone doing anything. So floating NPC corps based on this sounds like an oustanding idea to me because the market would very quickly hone in on the optimal price for an office in every station in EVE without some CCP dev sucking an arbitrary number out of his thumb. it would become completely player driven content.

It really does work like that. The RL stockmarket does this too. There are some problems with a free market like monopoly forming that you'd have to deal with mechanically in EVE but the basic idea at it's core has a lot of potential in my mind. In fact, it's the only "lets-have-a-stockmarket" idea I've every heard of on the forms that made any sense to me.

Aside from what's already been said, I think there would be some other issues as well. For example, as populations migrate in EVE you would expect the number of shares required to rent an office to go up and down as stations become more and less popular. It's unclear to me what would need to be done to account for this in the toy-market concept.

But still. I'm going to vote +1 on this idea, at least in concept.
TornSoul
BIG
#14 - 2013-05-23 17:42:40 UTC
Must say I'm with Block on this one.

Outside of MD I really don't see much interest in this.




Also:

Today (apparently) an office in Jita costs 2B ISK.

If an office is free - I could simply go an buy that (as I happen to be able to afford it)

With the suggested system - Even if i *had* the ISK (necessary for the amount of shares) and IF an office was available, I might not be able to actually rent one - As no shares are (potentially) for sale...

That would suck...

TornSoul
BIG
#15 - 2013-05-23 17:46:38 UTC
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:
the market would very quickly hone in on the optimal price for an office in every station in EVE without some CCP dev sucking an arbitrary number out of his thumb. it would become completely player driven content.


Which is how it already works...

Hence Jita offices at 2B ISK...
Tinu Moorhsum
Random Events
#16 - 2013-05-23 17:50:52 UTC
You know... come to think of it....

Deep in my brain there's this little kernel of an idea forming that it should be possible to totally eliminate ownership of offices by NPC corps.

Just taking Adunha's idea one step further.... In nullsec stations, player corps rent the offices.

So... as an alternative to an NPC stock market, a much simpler idea would be to allow player corps to build offices in stations and rent them via selling "rental certificates" on the open market. A rental certificate could be like a contract that was made for a certain amount of time for a certain price.

Floating rental certificates would have the same "calculating" effect in terms of honing in on the optimal price for office rental provided

- an unlimited number of offices could be built in a station if players decided to.
- no restrictions on who can dock at that station.

The isk sink would have to be worked out but this idea comes close to what Adunha was saying and allows us to create even more player driven content.

Tinu Moorhsum
Random Events
#17 - 2013-05-23 17:52:21 UTC
TornSoul wrote:
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:
the market would very quickly hone in on the optimal price for an office in every station in EVE without some CCP dev sucking an arbitrary number out of his thumb. it would become completely player driven content.


Which is how it already works...

Hence Jita offices at 2B ISK...


You mean office prices keep going up until people decide it's not worth it?

Adunh Slavy
#18 - 2013-05-23 18:41:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Adunh Slavy
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

Buying and selling shares wouldn't be "forced" because once you have them you have them. Maybe you would want to re-sell some of them at a later date if you weren't using them or maybe you'd want to buy more shares if you wanted to upgrade to a more popular station, but that's the extent of playing the market you would be "forced" into.

correct me if I didn't understand it.



Yep, you got it, just missing one bit of it.

The "Equity Value Required" number can and will change over time, so will the price of stocks. From time to time a corp might need to adjust its number of NPC shares held when these two numbers move.

Let's assume a station costs 1000 isk to hold, and shares are 1000 ISK each. So that "Equity Value Required" is one share. Corp buys one share, and can now rent the office.

Let's assume for whatever reason, share values drop to 500 ISK a share. Let's also assume the Equity Value Required changes to 2000 ISK because for some reason that station has become more popular. The renting corp would need to purchase three additional shares for that next month. 4 shares at 500 each, matching the 2000 equity requirement.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Adunh Slavy
#19 - 2013-05-23 18:45:31 UTC
Block Ukx wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Block Ukx wrote:


Bas, bad, bad Idea. Did I mention it's a bad idea?



Explain why it is bad.


Do you really believe that FORCING people to play the stock market to rent an office is a good idea?

Automatic billing was put in place because people got tired of having to pay the bill each month. Now you want them to play the market daily to keep an office?



Yep, but it's not exactly force is it? The players choose to rent an office. No one is forcing them to do it.

Should I be forced to deal in LP with an NPC agent?

Should I be forced to put fuel blocks in my POS?

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Adunh Slavy
#20 - 2013-05-23 18:59:30 UTC
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:

Floating rental certificates would have the same "calculating" effect in terms of honing in on the optimal price for office rental provided



This is more or less the genesis of the stock market idea in this thread. We stumbled across the idea of "hey what if a corp could auction off something like a deed to its Jita office instead of, or in addition to, this rent thing?"

Then as the conversation progressed, someone brought up the idea of using NPC shares, and a thread was born.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

123Next page