These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A proposal for FW

Author
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#81 - 2013-06-03 22:15:30 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

As said instead of doing some thinking about the system and doing tweaks where it was needed ccp just started over with faction war tiers and replaced the cashout system with a worse one.

The current system is superior - at least in the opinion of everybody who is in FW except you. You, on the other hand, are not in FW.



Ok every point you made against a cashout system was demonstrated to be wrong.

So now you just claim "everybody" in fw likes the current stagnant system more. Since you appearantly can read everybody's mind can you tell me what they like about the current system more than a cashout system?

I can tell you a few problems with it:

1) It rewards the people who join a militia *after* the militia is already at a higher tier - exhibit A is the fact that amarr is about as close to as many pilots to minmatar as they ever were. It rewards parasites.

2) It does not have any real goals. Its just an endless grind.

3) It encourages people to have alts for both sides the minmatar/gallente and the amarr/caldari. Economically you will want to play the alt that has the highest pay at the time. Under cashouts you were just as well off by having a character in one side of the conflict and always fighting for them.

4) For the above reasons fw has not had as much apathy about who has sov in 90% of systems since before inferno.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#82 - 2013-06-03 22:20:30 UTC
how is the new system which has seen amarr and caldari come back a few times and earn isk not better than during inferno when amarr was rofl stomped for fun and only managed 1 cash out in 5 months? id say that was more stagnent imo
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#83 - 2013-06-03 22:22:26 UTC
cearain wrote:
2) It does not have any real goals. Its just an endless grind.



Sov is always going to be an endlees grind one person takes it one way the others take it bk its a forever war ( this applies to before inferno and after)
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#84 - 2013-06-03 22:35:09 UTC
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
how is the new system which has seen amarr and caldari come back a few times and earn isk not better than during inferno when amarr was rofl stomped for fun and only managed 1 cash out in 5 months? id say that was more stagnent imo


The problems amarr had with inferno had nothing to do with a cashout or the current type of tier system. The amarrs problems with inferno generally were:

1) They started out with most systems being bugged and in the minmatars control. So amarr had to move. This early start where minmatar were able to make huge amounts of isk through a not yet completely devalued lp store was very demoralizing.

2) The rats were badly unbalanced for a considerable time in fw where due to ewar amarr had essentially kill all the rats while the minmatar could speed tank them.

3) The amarr ended up with lots of people like Cynthia nezmor telling people to defensive plex instead of offensive plex. And also to flip systems right away. This just fed the minmatar farm.

4) There was a legitimate issue whether amarr would have been able to hit a tier 5 cashout due to the speed that the minmafarm would plex back systems. Could amarr flip 80% of the systems before minmatar started farming them back? The problem there was more of the massive number of farmers drawn by the huge amount of isk just as much as the cash out system per se. But yes it was something that may have been a problem with the cashout system. CCP did away with the whole system before we could find out. But if was a problem ccp could have done some things to help in that regard. Like say that a system would not spawn plexes for x amount of time after it was flipped. That would have added to the time amarr needed to get through the structures. There were other tweaks that could have been done.

Thats just a few. Of these problems only the last is at all attributable to the cashout system.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#85 - 2013-06-03 22:37:18 UTC
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
cearain wrote:
2) It does not have any real goals. Its just an endless grind.



Sov is always going to be an endlees grind one person takes it one way the others take it bk its a forever war ( this applies to before inferno and after)



Yeah but there were some medium term goals - ie. tier 5 cashouts - that gave players a sense of accomplishment (or failure if they didn't make it) in the mean time. Now its just a forever grind with no medium term goals to aim for and accomplish.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#86 - 2013-06-03 22:50:14 UTC
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

As said instead of doing some thinking about the system and doing tweaks where it was needed ccp just started over with faction war tiers and replaced the cashout system with a worse one.

The current system is superior - at least in the opinion of everybody who is in FW except you. You, on the other hand, are not in FW.



Ok every point you made against a cashout system was demonstrated to be wrong.

So now you just claim "everybody" in fw likes the current stagnant system more. Since you appearantly can read everybody's mind can you tell me what they like about the current system more than a cashout system?

I can tell you a few problems with it:

1) It rewards the people who join a militia *after* the militia is already at a higher tier - exhibit A is the fact that amarr is about as close to as many pilots to minmatar as they ever were. It rewards parasites.

2) It does not have any real goals. Its just an endless grind.

3) It encourages people to have alts for both sides the minmatar/gallente and the amarr/caldari. Economically you will want to play the alt that has the highest pay at the time. Under cashouts you were just as well off by having a character in one side of the conflict and always fighting for them.

4) For the above reasons fw has not had as much apathy about who has sov in 90% of systems since before inferno.


Why not play the game for yourself and not worry so much about what everyone else is doing?
Just let the farmers farm and go do whatever you like to do.

They are not exploiting or breaking the EULA so it's all just bitching for nothing.
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#87 - 2013-06-03 23:03:27 UTC
Cearain wrote:
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
cearain wrote:
2) It does not have any real goals. Its just an endless grind.



Sov is always going to be an endlees grind one person takes it one way the others take it bk its a forever war ( this applies to before inferno and after)



Yeah but there were some medium term goals - ie. tier 5 cashouts - that gave players a sense of accomplishment (or failure if they didn't make it) in the mean time. Now its just a forever grind with no medium term goals to aim for and accomplish.



If we want a goal, we take a home system it provides more sense of accomplishment than getting paid imo
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#88 - 2013-06-03 23:05:01 UTC
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
If we want a goal, we take a home system it provides more sense of accomplishment than getting paid imo

Cearain thinks the only motivation people have in game is to maximize isk return.
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#89 - 2013-06-03 23:07:50 UTC  |  Edited by: ALUCARD 1208
cearain wrote:
But if was a problem ccp could have done some things to help in that regard. Like say that a system would not spawn plexes for x amount of time after it was flipped. That would have added to the time amarr needed to get through the structures



Bending mechanics to suit one side isnt very sandboxie i mean can u imagine ccp saying ermmmm amarrs have it bad were going to help them.....

We all played under the same mechanics

I was in the amarr/minnie warzone at the time we moved there months before inferno and i saw first hand how so much onsidedness crushed them to the point of them all making minnie alts to get paid and dogpiling there own situation.

CEARAIN wrote:
The rats were badly unbalanced for a considerable time in fw where due to ewar amarr had essentially kill all the rats while the minmatar could speed tank them.



The rats were not imbalanced during inferno and the cashout times were talking about
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#90 - 2013-06-04 12:58:13 UTC
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
cearain wrote:
But if was a problem ccp could have done some things to help in that regard. Like say that a system would not spawn plexes for x amount of time after it was flipped. That would have added to the time amarr needed to get through the structures



Bending mechanics to suit one side isnt very sandboxie i mean can u imagine ccp saying ermmmm amarrs have it bad were going to help them.....

We all played under the same mechanics

I was in the amarr/minnie warzone at the time we moved there months before inferno and i saw first hand how so much onsidedness crushed them to the point of them all making minnie alts to get paid and dogpiling there own situation.


Sure there were people who did that at first because getting the huge reward before the lp market adjusted to the new mechanic meant much more isk. That is another reason the minmatar got such a huge benefit from the short 5 months we had cashouts. Since there wasn't enough time for the market to adjust it was better to be in the side that hit tier 5 quicker. But if they would have waited for the market to adjust it would have been fine to be any militia assuming they could all hit tier 5.

I'm not saying there needed to be changes to help amarr specifically - just changes to make sure the side with fewer players had the ability to hit the higher tiers for a cashout. Otherwise the war will just be imbalanced.
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:

CEARAIN wrote:
The rats were badly unbalanced for a considerable time in fw where due to ewar amarr had essentially kill all the rats while the minmatar could speed tank them.



The rats were not imbalanced during inferno and the cashout times were talking about


I'm not sure what you mean. You were talking about being in the minmatar amarr zone before inferno. The rats were not balanced then. The rats were not balanced until after inferno hit. The earlier cashouts were worth more than the later cashouts because the market was not yet adjusted. The early imbalances and bugs ensured that the minmatar had a huge farming horde that lasted through the short time we had cashouts. its only now that the lp market is finally starting to adjust (combined with other changes unrelated to the cashout system) that we are seeing the minmifarm possibly start to lose its dominance.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#91 - 2013-06-04 14:21:07 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
If we want a goal, we take a home system it provides more sense of accomplishment than getting paid imo

Cearain thinks the only motivation people have in game is to maximize isk return.



We could take home systems with the cashout system too. Taking home systems is something that is completely beside the point of comparing a cashout tier system with the current one.

It may seem that taking home systems is more of a goal now because it is basically the only goal left. Get a large enough fleet that your enemy cant fight and sit in plexes until you flip the system. Is it much different than null sec where you get a big enough fleet that yoru enemy can't fight and bash structures?

Achieving the goals of the cashout tier system could be more interesting than that IMO. This would be especially true if ccp worked at making fw sov a pvp centered game.

Yes you can go for a medal as a goal. But again you could go for a medal any time even before inferno.

As for me and isk, you might know that I quit fw despite the large amounts of isk it brings, because the way I pvp I get more fights outside fw.

Is isk a large motivator for others? I think this has been proven so many times that people who don't accept that are just refusing to look at the data. The side that has the ability to make the most isk has always had a huge increase in their numbers. But we don't have to look back in the past too far. Look even now at how the gap between minmatar and amarr narrowed as amarr started hitting higher tiers.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#92 - 2013-06-04 15:18:18 UTC
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
If we want a goal, we take a home system it provides more sense of accomplishment than getting paid imo

Cearain thinks the only motivation people have in game is to maximize isk return.

....
Give me the tl;dr version please.
chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate
Of Essence
#93 - 2013-06-04 17:42:35 UTC  |  Edited by: chatgris
Cearain wrote:
Yes you can go for a medal as a goal. But again you could go for a medal any time even before inferno.


Not if your main Faction presence was outside of the 2 hours after downtime. Once plex spawns no longer heavily favoured downtime (they still favour it a little now), and the rats were balanced, then the path was clear for Gallente to coordinate and achieve that goal. Not before.
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#94 - 2013-06-05 00:23:37 UTC  |  Edited by: ALUCARD 1208
cearain wrote:
Achieving the goals of the cashout tier system could be more interesting than that IMO. This would be especially true if ccp worked at making fw sov a pvp centered game.



No you just want to make it an LP/ISK centered game

cearain wrote:
As for me and isk, you might know that I quit fw despite the large amounts of isk it brings, because the way I pvp I get more fights outside fw.



Hold on didnt you admit to having alts in fw for making isk.... ?


Big smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smile

So pvp on ur pirate main and cry for ccp to bring back cashouts so you can score with ya alts i get it now all the while someone else does the hardwork for you (Real Fw Pilots)
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#95 - 2013-06-05 00:27:41 UTC  |  Edited by: ALUCARD 1208
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#96 - 2013-06-05 01:41:32 UTC
chatgris wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Yes you can go for a medal as a goal. But again you could go for a medal any time even before inferno.


Not if your main Faction presence was outside of the 2 hours after downtime. Once plex spawns no longer heavily favoured downtime (they still favour it a little now), and the rats were balanced, then the path was clear for Gallente to coordinate and achieve that goal. Not before.


If I remember correctly the downtime issue was actually fixed before inferno. Balancing the rats didn't happen until after inferno though, thats true.

ALUCARD 1208 wrote:

Hold on didnt you admit to having alts in fw for making isk.... ?


Big smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smile

So pvp on ur pirate main and cry for ccp to bring back cashouts so you can score with ya alts i get it now all the while someone else does the hardwork for you (Real Fw Pilots)


I did have some alts in fw but those subscriptions have expired. Funny thing is what you suggest I do only works with the current system and not the cashout system. The current system encourages parasite alts to join the militia after the regular members brought it up from a lower tier. The parasites then procede to get 2xs as much lp for their time as the regular members got.

In the cashout system it was the regular militia members who fought through the lean times that got the big payday. Joining a militia after they hit a high tier often meant you were too late.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#97 - 2013-06-05 01:52:29 UTC  |  Edited by: ALUCARD 1208
im sorry it was much worse before you may not have got more lps back then but you certainly got more bang for your bucks..

Oh yeah those fw accounts woulda expired now we talk about them .... SURE

cearain wrote:
In the cashout system it was the regular militia members who fought through the lean times that got the big payday. Joining a militia after they hit a high tier often meant you were too late.



Dont be silly most null sec corps and most of eve were making fake corps and fw alts bk then cos it was so much more farmable riding the coatails of the actual FW pilots who put the work but then they also diluted the hardworkers LP more.

If you joined minmatar youd get a t5 payout every 2weeks at first then every week toward the end, Yes people got filthy rich who was there from the beggining but even after the markets crashed all you had to do was trade in your lp at t5 and sit on it till ccp hit that **** with the nerfbat and wait for prices to rise again
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#98 - 2013-06-05 02:12:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
im sorry it was much worse before you may not have got more lps back then but you certainly got more bang for your bucks..

Oh yeah those fw accounts woulda expired now we talk about them .... SURE

cearain wrote:
In the cashout system it was the regular militia members who fought through the lean times that got the big payday. Joining a militia after they hit a high tier often meant you were too late.



Dont be silly most null sec corps and most of eve were making fake corps and fw alts bk then cos it was so much more farmable riding the coatails of the actual FW pilots who put the work but then they also diluted the hardworkers LP more.

If you joined minmatar youd get a t5 payout every 2weeks at first then every week toward the end, Yes people got filthy rich who was there from the beggining but even after the markets crashed all you had to do was trade in your lp at t5 and sit on it till ccp hit that **** with the nerfbat and wait for prices to rise again


With the cashout the alts were doing the work to hit tier 5. The fact that inferno was very conducive to farming is a seperate issue from the cashout.

Now for example you have amarr regulars doing the work to get to a higher tier and then the alts come and make several times the lp per plex that the regulars received. Its completely backwards now.

Again lots of people stuck with minmatar after inferno because the lp values did not fully adjust in the first 5 months and people didn't really understand the system. It was such crazy amounts of isk everyone was trying to cash in as fast as possible before the lp values bottomed out. If you could make 1 billion per hour per account plexing now you would see just as many people farming under the current system. But the lp values have stabilized so farming is not as much of an issue.

Getting 5k isk per lp was pretty standard before inferno. Then they gave the crazy price cuts so you were getting 20k isk per lp. How long before the market would crash? No one knew so there was a rush to whatever side looked like it provide the most lp market items at tier 5 right now. But that wouldn't be the case forever, specifically after the market bottomed out. And eventually people would learn that those few unique amarr items would be very worthwhile if they got up to tier 5. But ccp changed everything before this could be tested.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#99 - 2013-06-05 02:24:57 UTC  |  Edited by: ALUCARD 1208
So then the farmers / isk hunters realise that the amarr stuff are going to be worth something switch sides as amarr start flipping systems a few at a time earn some lps plexing over vuln systems and cash out on the flip. Then the farmers stay with amarr (running missions or plexes in opposite warzone) hoping for more t5s and if they come they bottom out amarrs items aswell as killing all other items like implants and stuff even more like the minnies did and also in the process killing every other profession in the game because all othe lp stores in the game were fkd by it

Also the marrs were never going to comeback they were all making bank on there minnie toons to be bothered which side was winning tbh
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#100 - 2013-06-05 03:35:14 UTC
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
.....

Also the marrs were never going to comeback they were all making bank on there minnie toons to be bothered which side was winning tbh


I am not sure what you are saying in the first part of your post.

With no lp for defensive plexing it would have happened eventually. After the market fully adjusted (it never did before 10/22/12) and the rush to cash in fast ended the amarr would have realized they would make just as much isk plexing for amarr. But again the plug was pulled before the lp market adjusted and people fully understood the mechanics. Even at the end there were some amarr still arguing we should defensive plex.

The current system, on the other hand, is structured so that you are better off having an alt ready to farm lp for the enemy when they hit a high tier.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815