These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

13 year old murdered his mother over CoD

Author
stoicfaux
#21 - 2013-05-07 22:57:04 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?

5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
"A Kentucky mother stepped outside of her home just for a few minutes, but it was long enough for her 5-year-old son to accidentally shoot and kill his 2-year-old sister with the .22-caliber rifle he got for his birthday, state officials said."

If you're dumb enough to let your kids kill each other, that's fine. However, if your stupidity were to get *my* kid killed...

What's the effective killing range of a .22, neighbor?

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#22 - 2013-05-07 23:28:52 UTC
And now we are going into the pro/anti gun debate which has been disallowed from the forums. Time to lock this one.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#23 - 2013-05-07 23:37:02 UTC
stoicfaux wrote:
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?

5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
"A Kentucky mother stepped outside of her home just for a few minutes, but it was long enough for her 5-year-old son to accidentally shoot and kill his 2-year-old sister with the .22-caliber rifle he got for his birthday, state officials said."

If you're dumb enough to let your kids kill each other, that's fine. However, if your stupidity were to get *my* kid killed...

What's the effective killing range of a .22, neighbor?


Depends how crappy your walls are.
stoicfaux
#24 - 2013-05-07 23:54:01 UTC
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
And now we are going into the pro/anti gun debate which has been disallowed from the forums. Time to lock this one.

We're not talking about pro/anti-gun, we're talking about kids, parenting, and responsibility, especially the parenting angle since kids have poor impulse control until they're about twenty years old or so.

Why did a kid have access to a Mature rated game? Why did he have access to a gun? Personal responsibility isn't just about you, the individual, accepting the personal consequences of your actions, it's also about whether the individual gets to decide whether society needs to suffer from additional or unnecessary risks from individuals.

If individual parents can't be trusted to keep their kids away from M rated violent shooters, or to keep their kids from shooting off a gun randomly, when is it permissible for society to step in?

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

OfBalance
Caldari State
#25 - 2013-05-08 00:16:08 UTC  |  Edited by: OfBalance
Adela Talvanen wrote:
Words fail me except OMG, Poor woman. Awful. Cry


She helped to create that monster, so no, not "poor woman," unless you are willing to extend that empathy to the child she damaged.

stoicfaux wrote:

If individual parents can't be trusted to keep their kids away from M rated violent shooters, or to keep their kids from shooting off a gun randomly, when is it permissible for society to step in?


Individuals in society have the prerogative to implore their family, friends, and neighbors in matters of children who are being mistreated. The government (I assume that's what you mean by "society") programs designed as an oversight in this situation clearly failed. I don't know about you, but when my employees fail at their job, I don't simply throw more money at them and assume they'll do a better job next time.

Woman abuses child, child goes insane, child kills her. Sounds like an open and shut case to me. Thankfully, he didn't get the opportunity to pass on HIS genes for psychopathy.
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
#26 - 2013-05-08 00:47:55 UTC
At the risk of being very unpopular....

This holds true across the spectrum with people being fundamentally broken by their parents. Reading the childhood of the Norwegian mass shooter Anders Breivik.... Seems that that entire thing could have been avoided if his far more mentally stable and reliable father (a diplomat in the Norwegian civil service) been awarded custody over his mother. I'm fairly certain the details aren't for on these forums, but even a cursory glance its a wonder he didn't snap sooner.

[center]Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /人◕‿‿◕人\ Unban Saede![/center]

Alara IonStorm
#27 - 2013-05-08 01:02:39 UTC
Kirjava wrote:
At the risk of being very unpopular....

This holds true across the spectrum with people being fundamentally broken by their parents. Reading the childhood of the Norwegian mass shooter Anders Breivik.... Seems that that entire thing could have been avoided if his far more mentally stable and reliable father (a diplomat in the Norwegian civil service) been awarded custody over his mother. I'm fairly certain the details aren't for on these forums, but even a cursory glance its a wonder he didn't snap sooner.

I know of one postpartum mom who tried to drown her kid in a steam, went to a psych clinic, got out, sued for custody from the father and got it, even before she had slept around on the father while they were married. This is with the child protests to stay with the father whom is the only parent they knew.

Courts are fundamentally biased towards mothers even sometimes at the child's peril.
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
#28 - 2013-05-08 01:08:41 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
I know of one postpartum mom who tried to drown her kid in a steam, went to a psych clinic, got out, sued for custody from the father and got it, even before she had slept around on the father while they were married. This is with the child protests to stay with the father whom is the only parent they knew.

Courts are fundamentally biased towards mothers even sometimes at the child's peril.

This is quite a terrifying prospect. Heck if the mentalities of my parents had been the other way around and custody awarded on which one was the mother....

This kind of thing had been dumped into my sphere of interest since Adria Richards and the Dongle joke firing. It's quite surreal how the law is structured to leave judgement by the door in favour of preconceived notions. But that's a whole other kettle of fish.

[center]Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /人◕‿‿◕人\ Unban Saede![/center]

NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#29 - 2013-05-08 01:50:03 UTC
Kirjava wrote:
At the risk of being very unpopular....

This holds true across the spectrum with people being fundamentally broken by their parents. Reading the childhood of the Norwegian mass shooter Anders Breivik.... Seems that that entire thing could have been avoided if his far more mentally stable and reliable father (a diplomat in the Norwegian civil service) been awarded custody over his mother. I'm fairly certain the details aren't for on these forums, but even a cursory glance its a wonder he didn't snap sooner.


Because of the extremely sensitive subject, please keep in mind this is my own opinions and guesses, and is not ment to criticise anyones opinions or views. Its simply ment to express my own thoughts around the subject

I will not say that his upbringing did not affect him or what he did, but i would not blame it all on it.
There is people out there that grow up in a stable home with loving parents, good family relationship, good friends and on the outside, not a care in the world.

These people can still snap.

But it makes everyone (including the family im guessing) feel...better being able to point to something and say "This! This right here can have caused it!" You dont need any real proof of it but as long as you have that straw to hang onto, it can help support you trough a rough time.

I will use an example to explain it a bit better.
When i was a teenager my brother had a friend that was in his early 20's. Good family, good grades, known for the fact that he was always happy and friendly to everyone. No one would have suspected that he could be suffering from any mental disorders, including depressions.
He had been out drinking the night before, came home and fell asleep on the couch. He was supposed to take care of the farm that day. His father woke up and (please keep in mind that i can only judge by what i have been told) his father basically "rolled" him off the couch. From what i have been told they think he might have hit his head on the table next to the couch.
He went out and did his work, went back inside a couple of hours later and shot him self.
To this day both his family and friends are clinging on to the idea that maybe he was just a bit out of it..a combination of being hungover and the hit in the head,because it gives the whole thing a..reason..something to blame. But then again, there is no way to know for sure.

But then you have other people who grow up in the worst imaginable homes,with bad violent parent(s), abuse, drug addicts, mental abuse and no direction or confirmation that they are worth something beyond a punching bag.
Some of these people can go from a situation like that, that would ruin most people, and they come out on the other side and create a good and stable life for them self and people around them.

Mental illnesses is simply... not a thing that you can find a reason for that is "true" in all or most cases. Is it possible that someone like Breivik would not have done what he did if he grew up with his father? Sure. Is there a chance he would not have done it if child care had actually taken him away when they where advised to do so? Of course there is.
But there is also a chance that it would not have made any difference at all, and he would still have ended up doing something like this.

What happened to that woman and the boy in the article is terrible, and the father and family will spend years trying to figure out what they did wrong and what they could have done differently. But in the long run...He would most likely have snapped at some point anyway, no matter what they had changed.
Zeko Rena
ENCOM Industries
#30 - 2013-05-08 01:55:57 UTC
Video games are not the problem, but if they banned CoD I would not weep, I would cheer.
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2013-05-08 04:12:08 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
stoicfaux wrote:
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?

5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
"A Kentucky mother stepped outside of her home just for a few minutes, but it was long enough for her 5-year-old son to accidentally shoot and kill his 2-year-old sister with the .22-caliber rifle he got for his birthday, state officials said."

If you're dumb enough to let your kids kill each other, that's fine. However, if your stupidity were to get *my* kid killed...

What's the effective killing range of a .22, neighbor?


Depends how crappy your walls are.


On the ammo box it says a .22 LR can travel up to 2 miles if fired at the right angle

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Commissar Akiga
Perkone
Caldari State
#32 - 2013-05-08 06:37:44 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?


There's no harm in teaching them young, but 4 is incredibly irresponsible.

A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volitional and are the portals of discovery.

OfBalance
Caldari State
#33 - 2013-05-08 06:52:15 UTC  |  Edited by: OfBalance
Commissar Akiga wrote:
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?


There's no harm in teaching them young, but 4 is incredibly irresponsible.


Actually, it is incredibly RESPONSIBLE to have a kid learn to respect firearms at that age. If they're well aware of how to handle themselves by age 6, you won't have them going off the rails when they reach more hormonal years.

NightCrawler 85 wrote:

There is people out there that grow up in a stable home with loving parents, good family relationship, good friends and on the outside, not a care in the world.

These people can still snap.


This kind of murky anecdote floats around too much and frankly, I've never seen it substantiated. Every single killer I've ever heard of had some kind of abusive past. Even the so-called "warrior genes," aren't fully expressed unless the carrier is exposed to a LOT of duress in their formative years.

Sure, every initial news report is "oh I never knew this person would do such a thing-" but the in-depth investigation always turns up some fantastically messed up childhood.

Of course you can simply wring your hands and say that mental-illness is some mystical unknown, but that doesn't explain anything and in-fact seeks to obscure the verifiable hypotheses that could shed some light on the situation.
NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#34 - 2013-05-08 08:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: NightCrawler 85
OfBalance wrote:


This kind of murky anecdote floats around too much and frankly, I've never seen it substantiated. Every single killer I've ever heard of had some kind of abusive past. Even the so-called "warrior genes," aren't fully expressed unless the carrier is exposed to a LOT of duress in their formative years.

Sure, every initial news report is "oh I never knew this person would do such a thing-" but the in-depth investigation always turns up some fantastically messed up childhood.

Of course you can simply wring your hands and say that mental-illness is some mystical unknown, but that doesn't explain anything and in-fact seeks to obscure the verifiable hypotheses that could shed some light on the situation.


Someone snapping does not have to include them killing someone. It can be everything from becoming a rapist, a pedophile, abusive, control freak, torture of animals or people and so on. All these things can cause severe damage to someone, some long term, some for a short period of time. And yes, i realize that the person will still be alive, but does that mean its right, or that the person who commits these actions is mentally sane?
In my opinion its not right, and the person doing these things most likely have some sort of mental issue. But i do not agree that this person has these issues purely because of their childhood.
As an example of this; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Andersen_(child_molester) Please note that the article does not mention his childhood at all so hard to guess, and im to tired to do research on it right now.

Now for people who kill without having an obviously bad childhood (again to tired to do a lot of research on it) i can just point to this. I do realize that class mates say he was a loner, but honestly if being a loner is a sign of a bad parenting... well there is a lot of people out there that do prefer to do their own thing and is not into sports Lol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Harvey

I would also like to add that there are many murders you simply wont hear anything about in the media. The extreme ones will make it, but that random person who got killed during a bar fight, drug deal, out of anger, random argument that went to far and so on has a much lower chance of reaching the media. The ones you DO hear about are the extreme ones, the ones with severe mental issues and of course its even better when there is a sad back story that makes you question weather or not you should feel sorry for the killer or the victims.

So, im not saying that a bad childhood cant mentally ruin someone and make them evolve disorders or mental issues that can cause them to become dangerous. What i am saying is that in some cases there simply is nothing to put the blame on and someone simply just snapped for no obvious reason.

Edit; Just remembered another case. As far as i know there was no mental issues in this case, and i cant remember if anything was said about their upbringing being unusual in any way or form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baneheia_murders
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#35 - 2013-05-08 11:46:12 UTC  |  Edited by: silens vesica
Alara IonStorm wrote:


Courts are fundamentally biased towards mothers even sometimes at the child's peril.

As I would know from personal experience.

Fortunately, I survived the court's criminal malfeasance. My younger siblings are severely damaged. To be fair, it's not my mother's fault, either - *SHE* was raised by a monster - She did the very best she could, and has never stopped trying to be better. But she will still be damaged goods to the end of her life. And she should NEVER have been allowed custody in the condition she was when granted it.

My father has faults enough, but compared to my mother, he's the very bedrock of stability.

All that said, they both had some understanding of discipline and parenting - and they can serve as bad examples in areas where they were failures. Bad examples can be useful. Kids these days are subject to the results of decades of fuzzy-headed feel-good social tinkering, and they're at a terrible disadvantage.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#36 - 2013-05-08 11:54:38 UTC  |  Edited by: silens vesica
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:


On the ammo box it says a .22 LR can travel up to 2 miles if fired at the right angle

Under ideal ballistic conditions, sure. But lethal energy range is very much shorter. Still, up to 300 yards is 'at risk,' depending on the ammo. Unless you put something like a typical suburban wall in the way, in which case 'next room' is pretty much the limit.

Edit:
100ft-lbf ranges for a number of brands (100-ft-lbf being the lower end of reliable lethality):

118 yards - CCI Velocitor
97 yards - Aguila Supermax
92 yards - CC Stinger
80 yards - Rem Viper
73 yards - Rem Yellow Jacket

All of that, of course, is in open air. Put even flimsy structural materials in the way and ranges drop precipitously.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#37 - 2013-05-08 11:57:15 UTC
Commissar Kate wrote:
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?


Like respect and discipline? It seems like almost all children lack those two things now days.


Boy ain't that the truth. Even a trip to the grocery store works to get an idea of the degree of non-parenting going on. Pretty unbelievable stuff going on.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#38 - 2013-05-08 13:19:35 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
stoicfaux wrote:
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
I'll be giving my kid my .22 when it turns 4 but I plan to actually raise it and do that thing that makes kids not shoot people.... parenting I think it's called?

5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
"A Kentucky mother stepped outside of her home just for a few minutes, but it was long enough for her 5-year-old son to accidentally shoot and kill his 2-year-old sister with the .22-caliber rifle he got for his birthday, state officials said."

If you're dumb enough to let your kids kill each other, that's fine. However, if your stupidity were to get *my* kid killed...

What's the effective killing range of a .22, neighbor?


Depends how crappy your walls are.


On the ammo box it says a .22 LR can travel up to 2 miles if fired at the right angle


Some years ago, there was a freak accident in my country... a hunter was unloading his .22 carbine from his car's trunk, and the weapon case slipped, hit the floor and the carbine accidentally fired a round.

That was almost on top of a slopped street, and some 800 meters away and below, a little girl aged 4 was hit by the bullet and died almost instantly as the bullet tore her aorta.

Freaky as hell.
Random McNally
Stay Frosty.
A Band Apart.
#39 - 2013-05-08 13:48:07 UTC
In 1988, my 15 year old younger brother was shot and killed in a stupid gun accident. Two other boys of similar age were involved and ALL of them had attended and passed gun safety training. All of them were also boy scouts and came from good homes where parenting actually did take place.

Just knowing gun safety is not enough.

Sometimes, parenting isn't enough.

Host of High Drag Podcast. http://highdrag.wordpress.com/

Space music http://minddivided.com

I G Channel HighDragChat

Broadcast4Reps

Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#40 - 2013-05-08 13:48:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Slade Trillgon
All I will say is, that all the safes, trigger locks, and lock down of ammo, would only postpone this individuals actions.

While I am at it, all the above precautions were never in use in my house and there were at least 10 guns I knew about from the ages 8+. Same with a majority of fellows I new. Just remember my friends, that for all the negative news about violent and uruly children there are numerous stories of extraordinarily great kids that get little publicity. The powers that be prefer a scarred and fearfull populace that wants to be protected from all the meanies.


Slade