These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

In-Game Events and Gatherings

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Mine Teck's Fate Voting Thread
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#1 - 2013-05-04 20:23:42 UTC  |  Edited by: James 315
This shareholder voting thread is in reference to the MinerBumping post, "Shareholder Vote on Mine Teck's Fate". Additional details as to the background of the vote, the New Order of Highsec, and shareholder opportunities may be found at that link. Only Shareholders of the New Order may vote.

The Vote

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[ ] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.

Shareholders may vote either by replying in this thread, or by sending me an EVEmail. Shareholders have one vote per share; the amount of votes possessed by each shareholder will be tabulated at the time the voting period ends. The voting period will last from now until Thursday, May 9th at 01:00 EVEtime.

RESULTS

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

No -- 18,556 votes (80.8%)
Strawberry -- 4,301 votes (18.7%)
Yes -- 100 votes (00.4%)
Abstain -- 169 votes

MinerBumping.com
BillMurray
Do Not Fear Jazz
Gooseflock Featheration
#2 - 2013-05-04 20:40:51 UTC
No.
500 shares.

From what I can tell, Mine Teck has still not fulfilled the base requirement of any miner in the New Order: The purchase of a New Order Mining Permit. It would be unfair to other miners that have come under our fold if we were to make an exception for him. I could see some leeway had he been more polite during conversations, but he has also been nothing but rude.

Also, 50 shares to Strawberry.

Agent BillMurray, New Order of Highsec www.minerbumping.com

Mining Permits: 10m ISK per character for One (1) Year of mining in New Order systems. Contact an Agent today to purchase one!
Sulzer Wartzilla
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2013-05-04 20:45:55 UTC
100 shares for strawberry. What an apt colloquialism.
290xanaots
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-05-04 20:54:16 UTC
Justice be done!

I split my votes equally (25 each) between

[X] Strawberry

[X] No.

May Mine Teck finally find peace in the ruling of this assembly.
Droopsack
Huitloxopetl Inc.
#5 - 2013-05-04 20:57:36 UTC
Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[X] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.

Mine Teck should be given his just desserts, let him finally feast upon his strawberry - 100 shares.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#6 - 2013-05-04 21:04:26 UTC
The Vote

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[ X ] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.
Marcion Cravik
Phoibe Enterprises
#7 - 2013-05-04 21:26:16 UTC
[ X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.
Daltzi
Midwest Commodity Financial Exchange Services
#8 - 2013-05-04 21:43:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Daltzi
NO

8000 Shares
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#9 - 2013-05-04 22:39:31 UTC
[ X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code. 50 shares

[X] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY. 20 shares

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#10 - 2013-05-04 22:56:36 UTC
From where I stand, the evidence is incontrovertible.

336 votes for:
[X] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

1 vote for:
[X] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Levarris Hawk
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2013-05-04 23:03:37 UTC
The Vote

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?


149 Votes for

[ X] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

1 Vote for

[ X] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.
Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#12 - 2013-05-04 23:18:26 UTC
[ X] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

I still have no idea what this actually means, but I feel compelled to vote for it. 250 votes.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!
Sara XIII
The Carnifex Corp
#13 - 2013-05-04 23:42:07 UTC
The Saviour of Highsec works at his own pace in his own good time. Mine Teck has repeatedly put deadlines on James 315. This cannot stand!

The Vote

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[ ] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.

100 Votes
Between Ignorance and Wisdom
R0me0 Charl1e
Easy A Industries
#14 - 2013-05-05 00:02:05 UTC
[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[ X ] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.

All 990 votes.
foxnod
Perkone
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-05-05 00:08:41 UTC
No

30 votes
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#16 - 2013-05-05 00:09:18 UTC
James 315 wrote:
This shareholder voting thread is in reference to the MinerBumping post, "Shareholder Vote on Mine Teck's Fate". Additional details as to the background of the vote, the New Order of Highsec, and shareholder opportunities may be found at that link. Only Shareholders of the New Order may vote.

The Vote

Should Mine Teck be treated as a member of the New Order family in good standing?

[ ] YES, he probably paid for mining permits to begin with, and he has already been through enough of an ordeal.

[ ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

[ ] He can run where he's highest when he picks up STRAWBERRY.

[ ] ABSTAIN.

Shareholders may vote either by replying in this thread, or by sending me an EVEmail. Shareholders have one vote per share; the amount of votes possessed by each shareholder will be tabulated at the time the voting period ends. The voting period will last from now until Thursday, May 9th at 01:00 EVEtime.



400 votes for STRAWBERRY

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com
Ayuren Aakiwa
When i Look Up At The Stars I Am Filled With Rage
#17 - 2013-05-05 00:26:43 UTC
[ X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator, resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

x50
terzslave
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-05-05 00:32:40 UTC
100 SHARES STRAWBERRY!!!
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-05-05 01:41:21 UTC
[ X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator and resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.

Mine Teck needs to be ganked repeatedly for threatening space treason against the "New Order."

100 shares.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Phoenix Bibbs
Fweddit
Free Range Chikuns
#20 - 2013-05-05 01:52:03 UTC
[X ] NO, he is an impenitent Code violator and resistance communications network backbone, and he should be ganked and/or bumped on sight as is proper under the Code.
123Next page