These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

House Sarum “gearing up for next stage in Reclaiming”, aggressive warnings from Federation and Repub

Author
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#101 - 2013-05-03 16:18:31 UTC
Sepherim wrote:
Right, so the Minmatarr Republic apologized afterwards and sent all the slaves back to their proper owners didn't they?

No. Why would they do that?

Sepherim wrote:
No, what I'm saying is that the elections of a democratic leader in a state doesn't mean it gets legitimacy in others, or that we view them in any specific way. We may consider Maleatu Shakor, or Tibus Heth or anyone else as tyrants for not following the proper path to leadership. Or we may not. The thing is, you can't argue for global legitimacy using democratic principles, because democratic principles are not globally accepted.

But the simple fact is that Maleeatu Shakor has been acknowledged both by democratic election and by the Tribal Council as the head of state, meaning that whichever path to power was "proper," he followed it. The simple fact here is that you Amarrians won't acknowledge him as a legitimate head of state because he refuses to be cowed by Amarrian self-importance and consistently acts against your interests.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#102 - 2013-05-03 16:31:05 UTC
Andreus said all that needed to be said about the true nature of the Amarrian "religion". Bravo.

I'd just like to say one thing to you imperials; if you attempt to launch a full-scale "reclaiming" you'll fail and your failure will ultimately lead to the demise of your civilization. With the vast size of your military there's no doubt that you could defeat the Republic in a one on one confrontation. However, the cost to do so would be extraordinarily high. What would remain of your resources would be spread so thinly that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other empires, from criminal groups like the Angels or, terrorists like the Blooders, EoM, Nation, etc. The aftermath of an attack and attempted subjugation of the Matari would make your defeat at Vak'Atioth look like a debutante ball as all of your old enemies rose up simultaneously to finish off what was left of your empire. This would be a best case scenario. More likely, however, the Federation would join us against you and your Caldari allies and plunge the entire cluster into a war that would decimate humanity.

Consider your next actions well, imperials. If not for the sake of the rest of us who resist you then, for the very survival of your civilization.



When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#103 - 2013-05-03 16:51:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
Anabella Rella wrote:
Andreus said all that needed to be said about the true nature of the Amarrian "religion". Bravo.

I'd just like to say one thing to you imperials; if you attempt to launch a full-scale "reclaiming" you'll fail and your failure will ultimately lead to the demise of your civilization. With the vast size of your military there's no doubt that you could defeat the Republic in a one on one confrontation. However, the cost to do so would be extraordinarily high. What would remain of your resources would be spread so thinly that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other empires, from criminal groups like the Angels or, terrorists like the Blooders, EoM, Nation, etc. The aftermath of an attack and attempted subjugation of the Matari would make your defeat at Vak'Atioth look like a debutante ball as all of your old enemies rose up simultaneously to finish off what was left of your empire. This would be a best case scenario. More likely, however, the Federation would join us against you and your Caldari allies and plunge the entire cluster into a war that would decimate humanity.

Consider your next actions well, imperials. If not for the sake of the rest of us who resist you then, for the very survival of your civilization.





Maybe you should take the advice of your good friend Andreus Ixiris:

You.. ...want peace, in which case you should be looking to make whatever concessions are neccessary for it to happen

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#104 - 2013-05-03 16:56:16 UTC
We're not the ones looking to start a "new reclaiming", Blake. You need to point that quote out to your marginally sane empress and whoever is running House Sarum now.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#105 - 2013-05-03 17:03:00 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Andreus said all that needed to be said about the true nature of the Amarrian "religion". Bravo.

I'd just like to say one thing to you imperials; if you attempt to launch a full-scale "reclaiming" you'll fail and your failure will ultimately lead to the demise of your civilization. With the vast size of your military there's no doubt that you could defeat the Republic in a one on one confrontation. However, the cost to do so would be extraordinarily high. What would remain of your resources would be spread so thinly that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other empires, from criminal groups like the Angels or, terrorists like the Blooders, EoM, Nation, etc. The aftermath of an attack and attempted subjugation of the Matari would make your defeat at Vak'Atioth look like a debutante ball as all of your old enemies rose up simultaneously to finish off what was left of your empire. This would be a best case scenario. More likely, however, the Federation would join us against you and your Caldari allies and plunge the entire cluster into a war that would decimate humanity.

Consider your next actions well, imperials. If not for the sake of the rest of us who resist you then, for the very survival of your civilization.




I've heard this argument before.

To be fair to Rella, an interesting risk.

However this point of view fails to take into account the staggering amount of new resources that would be gained by conquering the Republic.

Hundreds of planets worth of raw materials, billions of new subjects.

More than enough assets to replenish lost manpower and material, and make possible replenishing war assets for possible counter-attacks by the Federation or State.

In my scenario the State and Federation would take entirely too long to cooperate against the Empire (so much bickering!), by which point defenses are shorn up, and all of the new Matari territory and subjugated populace is put to task for feeding the Imperial war machine.

This sort of scenario relies heavily on speed and surprise to work. The slow and ponderous Imperial Navy of old would take too long, and the other Empires would likely get their acts together before the Matari were conquered.

The assault would more resemble Heth's assault on Caldari Prime or the Elder Invasion, albiet with 10x the number of ships.

An interesting challenge.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#106 - 2013-05-03 17:19:16 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
We're not the ones looking to start a "new reclaiming", Blake. You need to point that quote out to your marginally sane empress and whoever is running House Sarum now.


In other words, you want us to make concessions, but aren't prepared to make any yourself.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#107 - 2013-05-03 17:34:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Sepherim
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
No. Why would they do that?


If you illegally capture citizens of another state, it's called kidnap. It doesn't matter what rank or position they hold. Those slaves were amarrian citizens, plain and simple, and the Minmatarr Republic's Fleet kidnapped them on a massive scale. So, if they're claiming they had "nothing to do" with it, they should return them, instead of housing them and keeping them... makes their points quite hard to believe.

Sepherim wrote:
But the simple fact is that Maleeatu Shakor has been acknowledged both by democratic election and by the Tribal Council as the head of state, meaning that whichever path to power was "proper," he followed it. The simple fact here is that you Amarrians won't acknowledge him as a legitimate head of state because he refuses to be cowed by Amarrian self-importance and consistently acts against your interests.


Again, it's a question of semantics, which you keep trying to spin beyond it's scale. To the Minmatarr, he is a propper leader. To us, he can be called a tyrant. Point is you can't claim to be right one-sidedly because neither of the two hold the common values to dictate which understanding of his deeds is correct. He can be both legitimate and appropriate (in the Republic) and a tyrant (in the Empire).

As for our interests, I acknowledge the Ray of Matar as a leader of her people, just as I recognize the heads of corporations as the heads of the Caldari State. and I wish all of them the best. Unfortunately, those that came after them are quite more... debatable.

Anabella Rella wrote:
We're not the ones looking to start a "new reclaiming", Blake. You need to point that quote out to your marginally sane empress and whoever is running House Sarum now.


No, you already did it when you invaded the Empire.

Quote:
I'd just like to say one thing to you imperials; if you attempt to launch a full-scale "reclaiming" you'll fail and your failure will ultimately lead to the demise of your civilization. With the vast size of your military there's no doubt that you could defeat the Republic in a one on one confrontation. However, the cost to do so would be extraordinarily high. What would remain of your resources would be spread so thinly that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other empires, from criminal groups like the Angels or, terrorists like the Blooders, EoM, Nation, etc. The aftermath of an attack and attempted subjugation of the Matari would make your defeat at Vak'Atioth look like a debutante ball as all of your old enemies rose up simultaneously to finish off what was left of your empire. This would be a best case scenario. More likely, however, the Federation would join us against you and your Caldari allies and plunge the entire cluster into a war that would decimate humanity.


Actually, there is no military power in the cluster capable of stopping the might of the Empire should we decide the Navy should wield it. Only the Jove have been able, up to this day, to defeat the Imperial Navy, and I doubt they'd come to your aid selflessly again. You would do well to remember that your Republic exists because the Jove were there to stop us, not thanks to your "mighty deeds in batte". So any attempt of conquest of the Republic with the full force of the Empire would probably just end as it once did: with you as your slaves.

You should remember this when you speak about Emperor Heideran or Empress Jamyl I, which have been working towards a peaceful solution of the conflict. Not because we can't win through war, but because there may be other paths. And remember that in the Empire there are many claiming to bring back the Reclaiming, not only Heir Merimeth Sarum, who's victory would bring the downfall of the Republic. I believe there are other paths, maybe wiser ones, peaceful ones, and so seems to think the Empress as well... but you would do well to remember that you only exist because she rules that other paths be sought. You would do well to remember that she is not your enemy, but working towards a better relationship with your people, and freeing our slaves. And it has been the Matari which, once and once again, have made it more and more difficult, not the least by invading the Empire.

And take Commander Blake's words as a good example of it. We may be willing to compromise and seek a solution, you are not.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#108 - 2013-05-03 17:48:39 UTC
Natalcya Katla wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
Your statements imply that she had any choice in the matter, however. She did not. "Rejection of cultural norms" was not one of the memeplexes that was deeply included in her growth, as it was in yours.

"Rejection of cultural norms" was included in my growth only because I chose to include it. It was not something that was given to me. It was something I had to create and take and fight for on my own.


Here lies the heart of the difference, ma'am. Your adoption of "rejection of cultural norms" was adopted in your life not because you chose it. It was adopted because of sufficient and significant long-term potentiation of structures within your hippocampus in the presence of glutamate and lack of neuron exhaustion. These memeplexes were necessarily extant in your culture, and you were exposed to them in a positive fashion, or more likely, exposed to their inverse in a negative fashion. This created an overbias in the neocortical columns associated with the memeplex leading to more frequent activation.

It may seem like quibbling over details, but I think it is important to remember that we cannot simply decide to change our beliefs - if you feel that "the time has come to change my beliefs" then that time has passed, and you are simply consciously acknowledging the change.

We are a part of our history and carriers of our cultural heritage -even those of us who reject that heritage. We are the legacy of our ancestors. This is more than poetry.
Adreena Madeveda
Sebiestor Tribe
#109 - 2013-05-03 18:13:47 UTC
Captain Catillah, as much as I respect you :

Sepherim wrote:


Those slaves were amarrian citizens[...]



I don't even know where to start.

...................\o\ /o/...................

Natalcya Katla
Astropolitan Front
#110 - 2013-05-03 18:30:37 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
We are a part of our history and carriers of our cultural heritage -even those of us who reject that heritage. We are the legacy of our ancestors. This is more than poetry.


I am my own creation, Captain. I am my own creator. I carry no heritage, my history extends backward only to my birth and no farther. I am who I am because I have chosen it. I am what I am because I have chosen it. I am where I am because I have chosen it. I hold the allegiances I do because I have chosen to do so - I and nobody else! I am the captain of my mind. I am the tyrant of my body. I am the first and only member of my race.

And this conversation is over, Captain. Good day.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#111 - 2013-05-03 22:40:36 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
In other words, you want us to make concessions, but aren't prepared to make any yourself.

The Minmatar aren't the ones who should be making the concessions because they aren't the ones who need to make the concessions.

And, you know, all things considered, the Minmatar seem pretty alright with war. I get the impression that it isn't their optimal solution to this issue, but the thought of war with the Amarr certainly doesn't seem to upset the Minmatar anywhere near as much as the Amarr claim the thought of war with the Minmatar upsets them.

If the Amarr want peace as much as they claim the ball's in their court - although it'd be just about the only one.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#112 - 2013-05-03 22:44:17 UTC
Where to begin with this drivel?

Sepherim wrote:
If you illegally capture citizens of another state, it's called kidnap.

Indeed. Meditate on this.

Sepherim wrote:
Again, it's a question of semantics, which you keep trying to spin beyond it's scale. To the Minmatarr, he is a propper leader. To us, he can be called a tyrant. Point is you can't claim to be right one-sidedly because neither of the two hold the common values to dictate which understanding of his deeds is correct. He can be both legitimate and appropriate (in the Republic) and a tyrant (in the Empire).

And yet the Empire demands that we hold its laws and faith as sacrosanct everywhere.

Sepherim wrote:
Actually, there is no military power in the cluster capable of stopping the might of the Empire should we decide the Navy should wield it.

Incorrect.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#113 - 2013-05-03 23:01:33 UTC
Natalcya Katla wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
We are a part of our history and carriers of our cultural heritage -even those of us who reject that heritage. We are the legacy of our ancestors. This is more than poetry.


I am my own creation, Captain. I am my own creator. I carry no heritage, my history extends backward only to my birth and no farther. I am who I am because I have chosen it. I am what I am because I have chosen it. I am where I am because I have chosen it. I hold the allegiances I do because I have chosen to do so - I and nobody else! I am the captain of my mind. I am the tyrant of my body. I am the first and only member of my race.

And this conversation is over, Captain. Good day.


Oh dear. It wasn't my intention at all to upset you, I apologize fully. You should not take anything I say as more than opinion, in any case, and a poorly calibrated opinion at that. I apologize and will disturb you no more.
Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#114 - 2013-05-03 23:53:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ava Starfire
Sepherim wrote:
If you illegally capture citizens of another state, it's called kidnap. It doesn't matter what rank or position they hold.


You mean, exactly the same thing that the Empire did for 700 years, right?

Edited, cause spelling is hard.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Tamiroth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#115 - 2013-05-04 00:13:27 UTC
Cool and Soft, meet Orange Polka Dot .
Orange Polka Dot, meet Cool and Soft.

This whole thread illustrates our (as in "we, the humanity") problem probably as good as many other similar threads on IGS.

There is a twenty-thousand-year wide cultural and historical gap between us. We just can't hear and understand each other, because of the memeplexes and... (whatever else Scherezad said, but after reading that I must admit I like this person. Must re-read 2x more to fully understand.)

We may share the same genes - the genes of our firstborn ancestors that (whatever stuff you believe in) came to be in New Eden. But our minds are aeons and light years apart.

We are aliens to each other.

Sometimes, and more often than not, that means hostile aliens.

I am sorry.
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#116 - 2013-05-04 01:06:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Anabella Rella
Incorrect, imperials. Your ancestors started the war when you invaded our peaceful worlds.

Also, please get your historical facts straight. The Jovians didn't intercede on our behalf during the occupation. They did however kick your asses at Vak'Atioth which was a devastating blow to your morale and military doctrines. The defeat led to a prolonged period of introspection and paralysis by analysis. During this period there was a massive and organized uprising of the Matari people that your demoralized and outnumbered military wasn't able to quash. While we did receive support and training from the Federation it was the effort and sacrifice of our people that forced your ancestors from our worlds, not the Jove.

I believe that a similar scenario would play itself out if the Empire tried another invasion. Assuming no Federal involvement you'd be able to overrun our military forces. You'd then be in for a prolonged and bloody guerilla resistance that would strain your military and economy to the point that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other nations. And believe me, you've made enough enemies over the years that they'd all jump at the opportunity to attack a weakened Empire.

Finally, just what are these concessions you keep rattling on about, Blake? What is it that you'd request of us? I imagine that it the Empire sincerely wished to negotiate peace and came up with a reasonable list of issues that our government would at least consider them. I won't hold my breath waiting for the Empire to sit down at a negotiating table, however.

Oh, and we exist because of our will to survive not the grace of your phony deity or your rulers.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#117 - 2013-05-04 01:22:23 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:

I've heard this argument before.

To be fair to Rella, an interesting risk.

However this point of view fails to take into account the staggering amount of new resources that would be gained by conquering the Republic.

Hundreds of planets worth of raw materials, billions of new subjects.

More than enough assets to replenish lost manpower and material, and make possible replenishing war assets for possible counter-attacks by the Federation or State.

In my scenario the State and Federation would take entirely too long to cooperate against the Empire (so much bickering!), by which point defenses are shorn up, and all of the new Matari territory and subjugated populace is put to task for feeding the Imperial war machine.

This sort of scenario relies heavily on speed and surprise to work. The slow and ponderous Imperial Navy of old would take too long, and the other Empires would likely get their acts together before the Matari were conquered.

The assault would more resemble Heth's assault on Caldari Prime or the Elder Invasion, albiet with 10x the number of ships.

An interesting challenge.



And in the end they'd still have to hold onto all the new territory and subdue all the potential manpower. I doubt they'd be able to do so while fighting an asymmetric guerilla war on foreign soil with long supply lines vulnerable to attack and/or interdiction.

While the imperials would likely win the initial battles, in the longer term, they'd lose the war. Again.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#118 - 2013-05-04 02:28:01 UTC
Adreena Madeveda wrote:
Those slaves were amarrian citizens[...]
I don't even know where to start.[/quote]

I'm afraid the irony there you see because of your own point of view, but doesn't exist in the Empire. The Empire holds many ranks for its citizens, from Heir to slave, but all are subject to imperial law, customs, etc. as appropriate to their rank. Thus, fom the highest position to the lowest, they're all citizens of the Empire.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Indeed. Meditate on this.


I do. And I don't say we didn't kidnap. I'm just pointing to the hypocrisy of decrying amarrian capturing Minmatarr citizens, and then not doing the same when the tables are turned. We haven't captured any minmatarr citizen for many years, outside illegal trade which is illegal in the Empire as well; the Minmatarr, on the other hand, have, and quite recently and in very big numbers.

Meditate on this.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
And yet the Empire demands that we hold its laws and faith as sacrosanct everywhere.


You can continue to put words in my mouth as much as you like, captain Ixiris, records show easily what I said or didn't say. I challenge you to look into my words and find proof of your claim. Then again, you are quite known for making things up, so I guess you won't bother and no one will be surprised either.

Quote:
Incorrect.


Lovely: a statement without any argument! You really are a gold mine, captain Ixiris, on how not to do communications in public channels.

Ava Starfire wrote:
You mean, exactly the same thing that the Empire did for 700 years, right?


So, we making it wrong allows you to make wrongs as well. Specially when we have stopped doing it? Shaman Starfire, I believe your position is as hypocritical as that of captain Ixeris as it stands, and that is something!

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#119 - 2013-05-04 02:28:34 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Firstly, I don't hear anyone in the Republic asking the Gallente for a godsdamned thing. Just where do you get this impression?

What indeed. How much military and economic aid has the Federation bleed into the failed Republic, how many Minmatar have found sanctuary?
Anabella Rella wrote:
Secondly, while we have a disagreement with the Federation over the handling of the terrorist shooting investigation, we remain steadfast allies and are united as ever. You and other provocateurs may wish otherwise but, your wishes do not equate to reality.

Reality is what we make it my dear. A crime occurs within the Federation and the Tribals paint their faces, beat their drums while making demands and threats. Perception is the mother of opinion and opinion often becomes policy.
Anabella Rella wrote:
Lastly, why the hell do you even care about what's happening in the Federation? Your national loyalties now surely lie with the Angel Cartel, no? Or are you trying to serve two disparate masters?

I serve one master and my actions further his will.
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#120 - 2013-05-04 02:38:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Sepherim
Anabella Rella wrote:
Incorrect, imperials. Your ancestors started the war when you invaded our peaceful worlds.


Incorrect. That war was finished when the Minmatarr Empire ceased to exist. You cannot wage war against nothing. Following it, your people started an uprising, which is not a war, followed by a tense situation that came to become a peace with the Yulai Convention. Which you then broke starting the current war by attacking Yulai first, and then the Empire. So no, you started this war, it's a simple historical matter.

Quote:
Also, please get your historical facts straight. The Jovians didn't intercede on our behalf during the occupation. They did however kick your asses at Vak'Atioth which was a devastating blow to your morale and military doctrines. The defeat led to a prolonged period of introspection and paralysis by analysis. During this period there was a massive and organized uprising of the Matari people that your demoralized and outnumbered military wasn't able to quash. While we did receive support and training from the Federation it was the effort and sacrifice of our people that forced your ancestors from our worlds, not the Jove.


Right. Now, the Jove are capable of closing their own space, as anyone who tried to reach them knows. And they are cunning, probably the only ones that can rival the Empire. If they didn't want us to invade them, they'd have closed their borders and that would have been it, we would have taken the Federation, and there would have been no uprising, nor anything. End of story.

If they decided to wage war it's because they didn't want that outcome, and to some extent they planned it. Not saying that the first khuumak raised was by a jovian hand, but an uprising needs ressources, people, ships. The Federation helped, sure, but it was the blow of the Joev in Vak'Athioth that made it possible. You owe your freedom to them, and one day they'll come to collect the price.

Quote:
I believe that a similar scenario would play itself out if the Empire tried another invasion. Assuming no Federal involvement you'd be able to overrun our military forces. You'd then be in for a prolonged and bloody guerilla resistance that would strain your military and economy to the point that you'd be vulnerable to attack by the other nations. And believe me, you've made enough enemies over the years that they'd all jump at the opportunity to attack a weakened Empire.


That may be true, or maybe not. Current military development allows the bombing of planets from orbit, all you need to secure is space control. The titan over Caldari Prime already prooved how willing the population are to work with the invaders to secure their lives.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander