These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Nerfing ships everyone loves to fly

Author
Fornic McKraken
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#1 - 2013-04-30 13:23:56 UTC
It seems CCP has the wrong idea of how to balance ships. When a ship or style of fighting becomes OP, they need to improve other ships and styles rather than make the ships everyone loves to fly (cough cough... Hurricane) worse. If many pilots are flying a ship because it is successful, why nerf it?

Tracking enhancers are a large part of PVP and removing the optimal range bonus will make many ships close to impossible to fly. Almost none of the ships that change will impact the most have the mid slots to add tracking computers. Furthermore, when people have skilled into certain ships, such as Minmatar, the last thing they want to see is all of their favorite ships nerfed.

CCP Stop nerfing minmatar ships. Seriously. What is the point? All you are doing is pissing people off instead of making the game more fun. How about you increase armor HP. Or increase the bonus for the honeycombing skill. Or improve web drones. I have been playing Eve for a year and a half, (I know that isn't long compared to some) but it seems CCP is trying to make small gang PVP worse. And if you are going to nerf something how about nerf jamming. Nothing else in EWAR takes a ship completely out of the fight. That could easily be balanced by creating targeting assist drones that significantly increase your sensor strength.
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2013-04-30 13:28:24 UTC
They answered this many times.

to avoid power creep.

it really is that simple. They have buffed a lot of ships in the past, and if you dont see that TEs are way to good then I feel sorry for you.

And small gangs are well and fine atm, we regularly take small gangs out late US timezone with just a few cruisers and have a blast. Something you couldnt have done a year ago.
Lavida Misu
Doomheim
#3 - 2013-04-30 13:34:02 UTC
navy hurricane is the old hurricane. :P
Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2013-04-30 13:35:26 UTC
another one ......
Kosetzu
The Black Crow Bandits
Northern Coalition.
#5 - 2013-04-30 14:00:50 UTC
You do understand that the reason everyone loves to fly those ships is because they were considered better than the rest? That the balancing of them puts them more in line with others, making each ship a solid choice?

Or are you one of those who hate thinking and can't deal with having multiple good ship choices?
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2013-04-30 14:04:38 UTC
So Cynabals being able to kite you outside of web range and hitting you for full damage with autocannons is completely good game design right.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2013-04-30 14:57:30 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
So Cynabals being able to kite you outside of web range and hitting you for full damage with autocannons is completely good game design right.



Cynabals haven't been looked at for balance yet right?
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#8 - 2013-04-30 15:04:45 UTC
I think she was talking about TEs.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-04-30 15:17:25 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
I think she was talking about TEs.


^ I was :D
Mirel Dystoph
Perkone
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-04-30 16:02:13 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
So Cynabals being able to kite you outside of web range and hitting you for full damage with autocannons is completely good game design right.

ITT what is falloff general

"Nothing essential happens in the absence of noise." 

Goldensaver
Maraque Enterprises
Just let it happen
#11 - 2013-04-30 16:40:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Goldensaver
The 'Cane was nerfed with good reason. The Rifter was nerfed with good reason. The Rupture was not buffed as much as the other cruisers with good reason. The Drake (and HM's) was nerfed with good reason. The TE's getting nerfed with good reason.

They were overpowered, and tiericide is already bringing enough power creep.

Also, I think you're overreacting over the TE nerf. Anybody who used a TE is getting nerfed as well, so comparatively ranges will remain about the same, but now that one module doesn't give too much of a bonus.


**Edit: that is not to say, exactly that the Rifter is fine where it is. There could be some touch ups for a few different ships. I'm just saying that it kinda deserved it. Same applies for other ships as well, which I won't bother specifying because I'm lazy.
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-04-30 16:49:25 UTC  |  Edited by: sabre906
Cane needed the nerf badly. It's a cheap disposable boat that's way too good for its price. Something like the Mach would not need the nerf because few ppl have the balls to fly it (not 1400 sniping bubble camp from far away, where the victim is dead either way, real flying) and risk the entire region come over for the km. The more cost-effective something is, the better it must be balanced.

And the TE nerf was pointless. Just use scripted TCs, and fill lows with dmg mods and nano. Real men fly paper hard and fast.
Ginger Barbarella
#13 - 2013-04-30 16:57:32 UTC
Easy solution: stop flying the flavor of the day. Be--- *gasp* --- original.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-04-30 17:18:07 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Easy solution: stop flying the flavor of the day. Be--- *gasp* --- original.


Fly like a masochist loser.Lol

"Original" fits are bad. All the working fits have already been invented by someone else. You are not a special snowflake. Whatever you come up with will either be not original, or crap.
Fornic McKraken
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#15 - 2013-04-30 17:25:37 UTC
Wow a lot of minm haters. Yeah Minm was OP.

and Lady Naween you are right. There are plenty of ways to do small gang pvp that are fun and don't involve cynabals, talos or vagas.

That doesn't mean they should nerf an entire style of fighting. How much tank will a vaga have now that is has to use a mid slot for range? 17K EHP? . I offered several options that would give ships that fall victim to kiting a better chance and I'm sure there are plenty more out there.

and Kosetzu, there is no need try and attack my intellect instead of making decent points. There will always be ships that are better at some things, like pvp, than others. Even after the changes.

Part of what is fun about Eve is there are so many different ways to fight. If you are trying to take down a spider tanking Ishtar fleet, you use blackbirds or lockbreaker bombs. If fighting a cynabal gang, you use huginns, lachs and oracles. There are many ways to pvp and there will always be ones that are more often successful than others.

If TEs make ACs OP then don't nerf missles to begin with. Take a mid slot from the drake instead of crushing HM dps. A cane vs drake used to be a good fight if you were any good at flying them.

nahjustwarpin
SUPER DUPER SPACE TRUCKS
#16 - 2013-04-30 18:14:02 UTC
eve needs some new ship setups.For most of the ships we have now there is 1 setup, mostly shield based with TE. CCP tries to balance this a bit and make armor more viable. Also, i think you wasn't here when everyone was crying about TE but now we have this *don't nerf this* thread from someone that doesn't know what is/was happening
Kasutra
No Vacancies
No Vacancies.
#17 - 2013-04-30 18:26:14 UTC
Fornic McKraken wrote:
Part of what is fun about Eve is there are so many different ways to fight. If you are trying to take down a spider tanking Ishtar fleet, you use blackbirds or lockbreaker bombs. If fighting a cynabal gang, you use huginns, lachs and oracles. There are many ways to pvp and there will always be ones that are more often successful than others.

Yes. There are many different ships to fly.

The thing you're not seeing is that there being many ships to fly isn't automatic. It's a result of balancing work. Thanks to the Hurricane/Rifter/Drake/Tengu/whatever now not being a dominant option, we have more viable options.

Fornic McKraken wrote:
If TEs make ACs OP then don't nerf missles to begin with. Take a mid slot from the drake instead of crushing HM dps.

Please look up the term "power creep" as it applies to game design. You seem to be unaware of the ramifications.
Fornic McKraken
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#18 - 2013-04-30 19:43:09 UTC
Thank you for a more productive reply.
Liam Inkuras
Furnace
Thermodynamics
#19 - 2013-04-30 20:26:33 UTC
On a fairly unproductive note, fly Blasters, give not a single fu*k when TE's get nerfed.

I'm talking proper blaster flying here, not shield tank "Blaster Kiting" only the Talos can do that really well, and that ship will be fine.

I wear my goggles at night.

Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2013-04-30 20:31:26 UTC
Liam Inkuras wrote:
On a fairly unproductive note, fly Blasters, give not a single fu*k when TE's get nerfed.

I'm talking proper blaster flying here, not shield tank "Blaster Kiting" only the Talos can do that really well, and that ship will be fine.


You want more ppl for easy kms? It'll be turkey shoot... But alas, these stupid enough to take your expert advice would already have been popped before you got to them.Cool
123Next page