These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

The False Idol of the Syndicate

Author
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-10-18 17:30:55 UTC
The Intaki Syndicate is often held up by various parties as an example of Federal opression, of the ingenuity of the Intaki race independent of the Federation or other similar things - I have even seen some Federalists hold up the Syndicate, through some bizarre interpretation, as an example of Federal values upheld independently of the Federation. To all of them I say - find another exemplar. The Intaki Syndicate are poor rolemodels for seccessionalist and Federalist alike, and you would do well to distance yourselves from such associations. They will, in the long term, do you no good.

Let us first look at the formation of the Syndicate. Roughly five thousand individuals, comprising the majority of the exiles, the remaining minority of whom formed the famous Mordu's Legion. The Intaki population thoughout the Federation at the time of the Gallente-Caldari war numbered in the billions, a large fraction of that number residing on Intaki itself. Are we to seriously believe that out of these many billions of people, less than ten thousand (remember, if five thousand is a majority, the number cannot have been larger than double that) Intaki had political feelings strong enough for the Federation to find problematic? No, this hypothesis alone doesn't hold water. Certainly I feel compelled to concede that some of the exiles were treated unfairly, but are we to seriously believe they are simply guiltless victims of political whimsy? That of what must have been countless millions of Intaki dissatisfied with the Federation, the Federal government picked a handful at random to serve as examples? Please. We're all smarter than that. One suspects that the exiles were a little more than just political dissidents.

Next, we have to take a look at what those who formed the Syndicate chose to do. While the Mordu's Legion went and joined the opposing side, the exiles moved into the space now known as the Syndicate region. The Syndicate, unable to colonise moons or planets, built sprawling orbital habitats to house their people. This, of course, is laudable in and of itself, but one has to look at who they started associating with. The Syndicate grew from appropriating the various castaways who were not given leave to enter Federal space. This, too, is laudable enough in itself, but one has to consider that in comparison to the other three empires, the Federation is ludicrously tolerant of immigrants, their cultural and social mores and their past histories. Rejected entry to the Federation generally doesn't happen without a reason - not always a valid one, of course, but persona non grata in the Federation don't "just happen".

Most telling, of course, are who their closest allies happen to be: the Angel Cartel and the Serpentis Corporation, those organisations who, I would be quick to remind seccessionalists and Federalists alike, cause the most trouble in the Viriette constellation. The Serpentis often use the radical Intaki death cult, the Aenebra (a deeply unpleasant group, with whom many of the ILF and other Intaki-heavy associations have unpleasant history with) as enforcers and death squads for their operations on Intaki Prime. The Syndicate provides safe haven, funding and materials for these low-lives. While certainly a profitable relationship, it makes their supposed moral high-ground look more than a little unstable.

Let's also take a look at the de-facto leader of the Syndicate, Silphy en Dabiel. Technically each station in Syndicate space is an autonomous, independently-governed enclave, but Ms. En Dabiel, governor of the Poitot V, Moon 14 station, has held unofficial, hegemonic control of the Syndicate for years now. Certainly a competent strategist, a charismatic leader and an intelligent politician, this woman is nonetheless a ruthless schemer and a fantastically dangerous individual to cross. She has absolute control of her own station and her political savvy and clandestine power ensure the obedience of the rest of the Syndicate. On her own station, she is "governor for life", and ruthlessly destroys any threat to her supremacy. She's also possessed of rather close ties to various members of the Sarpati family, those drug-pushers of abominable merit - an estranged member of the family, Santimona Sarpati, once publicly stating that Salvador and Silphy "compliment each other perfectly in their exploitation and contempt of their fellow humans".

One other minor but exceptionally telling point is the awful relationship between the Syndicate and the Mordu's Legion, who would, one might expect, be one of the Syndicate's closest ideological parallels. For two groups supposedly having suffered the very same indignities at the hands of the Federation, there doesn't seem to be an awful lot they can agree on.

No, the Federation is not perfect. No, seccessionalism is not an invalid or criminal ideology. However, exemplification of the Syndicate as a blueprint for an independent Intaki is a truly awful idea. The Syndicate were most likely not guiltless at the time of their formation and they are most certainly not guiltless now. They're criminals, and they facilitate criminals - criminals who, in many cases, hurt other Intaki. The Syndicate cares for nothing but itself. This is, of course, its perogative - it doesn't live in the Federation and is not subject to its laws. By all means, strive to make a better Intaki, under Federal flag or under its own, as is your preference. But do not strive to make it more like the Syndicate. A nation of criminal financiers and hegemons is not a place I'd want to live.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Jev North
Doomheim
#2 - 2011-10-19 16:20:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jev North
First pilot Inhonores, and now you.. hm. Is there some kind of essay contest going down in the Federation?

Even though our love is cruel; even though our stars are crossed.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-10-19 16:37:48 UTC
Jev North wrote:
First pilot Inhonores, and now you.. hm. Is there some kind of essay contest going down in the Federation?


You know what? You didn't have to read it.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Josh Vermanek
Doomheim
#4 - 2011-10-19 19:16:17 UTC
Jev North wrote:
First pilot Inhonores, and now you.. hm. Is there some kind of essay contest going down in the Federation?



What is the point of an intergalactic forum if not this?

As for what was said, I do not see the decision to live primarily in stations as oposed to settling planetside a reason for denouncement. I also hesitate to frown upon them taking in people who noone else would. However the ugly association with parasites like the Serpentis and Cartel thugs should be more than enough to make one rethink any romantic imagery of the Syndicate. It matters less how you were formed and more what you do in the present and future.
Jon Engel
Machete Carbide
#5 - 2011-10-21 14:14:47 UTC
Concord and both the Federation and Caldari State interfere with the Syndicate's internal affairs. Of course Serpentis would be a likely candidate for a partner. The Federation and Concord barred the Intaki of Syndicate from settling worlds, it's a situation the Gallente created and now seek to criticize and use as fodder for blatant propaganda against an entity who has prospered without a DED contract?

Pfffft, keep trying.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2011-10-21 14:38:53 UTC
The DED didn't even exist at the time of the Syndicate's formation. I'm not even going to say "nice try" - you're just peddling straight misinformation.

I-RED needs to buff its recruiting standards. Hiring you was a mistake.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Jon Engel
Machete Carbide
#7 - 2011-10-22 02:20:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Jon Engel
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
The DED didn't even exist at the time of the Syndicate's formation. I'm not even going to say "nice try" - you're just peddling straight misinformation.

I-RED needs to buff its recruiting standards. Hiring you was a mistake.


Peddling? You mean the fact that the Federation barred the Syndicate from settling worlds? Than Concord takes over the reigns of such "policing".

I'm not quite sure what you ramble on about. The Syndicate has not tried to invade the Federation. The Federation has sent Navy ships to Syndicate, and still does. No Intaki Space Police can be seen in Federation space other than those few who act as advisors to the Intaki assembly.

This whole anti-syndicate jibber jabber has done before, it doesn't work...


http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/The_Syndicate God damn, learn your history if you want to play the hero.
Jon Engel
Machete Carbide
#8 - 2011-10-22 02:26:41 UTC
Lastly, the Syndicate and Mordus Intaki where not the only or even the majority of the Intaki who joined up with the State or rebelled. They where merely the most "dangerous" to the Gallente's ambitions to not have the Empire of Luminaire stripped apart. I'm not gonna sit here and dissect your "essay" on the evils of the Syndicate.

The Syndicate is open (even in my views) to some very serious criticisms. You can also talk on and on about Intaki Nationalist. Just get some facts Andreus. They help out a bit.
Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#9 - 2011-10-22 19:46:27 UTC
Hm... I have to admit I don't see much point to the essay, besides serving some kind of a gallentean expansionist propaganda. I find it rather ironic and hilarious how some Federation bureaucrats are rather quick to bash certain political systems and call them 'opressive', but have no pause in doing the same to their Intaki brethren.
If Intaki moved from the Federation, I believe they did it for a reason. To quote, not always a valid one, of course, but persona non grata in the Federation don't "just happen".
Live and let live. As mr. Engel already pointed out, no Intaki Space Police can be seen in Federation space, but vice versa doesn't really work.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Bastian Valoron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2011-10-28 21:44:20 UTC
Perhaps the prevalence of anti-social behaviour in the Syndicate is related to the role of charismatic leaders among the hard-boiled Intaki traditionalists. The hegemony of mademoiselle en Diabel, or that of mademoiselle Sundari could be seen as warning examples of this sort of group think. Open discussion and ongoing clash of different opinions and viewpoints are a solid way to avoid this pitfall. This might be one of the blessings that a stronger presence by the Federation could bring to the lives of the people in the area.

Anyhow, it's always a pleasure to read thoughtful in-depth analyses on topics that sometimes receive inaccurate and misleading treatments in alternative news media. This kind of fact-based information is precisely what needs to be taught to all children in schools.
Jon Engel
Machete Carbide
#11 - 2011-10-29 02:44:21 UTC
Bastian Valoron wrote:
Perhaps the prevalence of anti-social behaviour in the Syndicate is related to the role of charismatic leaders among the hard-boiled Intaki traditionalists. The hegemony of mademoiselle en Diabel, or that of mademoiselle Sundari could be seen as warning examples of this sort of group think. Open discussion and ongoing clash of different opinions and viewpoints are a solid way to avoid this pitfall. This might be one of the blessings that a stronger presence by the Federation could bring to the lives of the people in the area.

Anyhow, it's always a pleasure to read thoughtful in-depth analyses on topics that sometimes receive inaccurate and misleading treatments in alternative news media. This kind of fact-based information is precisely what needs to be taught to all children in schools.



The current Federation "presence" in Syndicate hinders the regions economic development away from narcotics and Serpentis and the Angel Cartel. Tell your masters in Luminaire to stop the blockades and end the prohibition on planetary settlement.

Peace with the free Intaki of Syndicate is in Luminaire's hands. They refuse peace at every turn.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#12 - 2011-10-29 03:07:15 UTC
Jon Engel wrote:

The current Federation "presence" in Syndicate hinders the regions economic development away from narcotics and Serpentis and the Angel Cartel.


And that's a bad thing because?

Let's face it, slowing down the produciton of narcotics and dealing with two of the biggest pirate organisations in all of New Eden is something every good citizen of the Empires should aspire toward.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2011-10-29 04:24:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
I wouldn't listen to Engel. He's very eager to blame the Syndicate's problems on anyone other than themselves, and very eager to excuse or outright ignore their misdeeds.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#14 - 2011-10-29 21:31:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Bataav
So the Intaki of the Syndicate are to be guilty by association?

I agree that when it comes to the nefarious industries of the Serpentis and Angel Cartel it makes sense to challenge them where and when possible, but the difficulties of the Syndicate in terms of trade and industry are the responsibility of the Federation and not the exiles themselves. The planetary restrictions that still exist to this day are an example of Federation spite and bitterness towards the decendants of those who dared challenge the political status quo generations ago.

I assume then that with the apparant capsuleer consensus being displayed here regarding actively working against those who support Serpentis, for example, we can expect to witness a boycott of ORE vessels by Federation aligned mining corporations. After all they openly line Serpentis' coffers in return for "security" and by the logic being argued above regarding the Syndicate's guilt any capsuleer buying the blueprints from ORE are doing the same thing.

No, the Intaki Syndicate is not responsible for it's own difficulties as others would have us believe. In the interests of balance then I invite people to read an insightful essay by The Cosmopolite of Star Fraction back in early YC109. I recently discovered his work myself and it's message resonated deeply with me. It addresses the Intaki question in general, but with some of it's focus looking at the Syndicate I believe it's well worth referring to and recommending in this discussion.

The Cosmopolite wrote:
What then of those exiles who made their homes in the region that came to be named for their syndicate? The Intaki Syndicate began as a band of those Intaki who most loved freedom and sought to fight for it during the tumultuous years of the Caldari-Gallente War for which actions they were suppressed and transported beyond the limits of civilisation. Not content with expelling them from the territory of the Federation, the authorities forbade them from settling on the surface of those moons or planets within easy reach. Why the Federation chose to impose this vindictive condition on the 5,000 Intaki they had cast out is a matter for speculation but if it was intended to limit the potential of these people the plan backfired.

Forced to embrace space, the founders of the Intaki Syndicate built themselves numerous space stations throughout the region. The Syndicate arose as an association of station-owners, each sovereign and operating their stations as freeports beyond the purview of the Federation or anyone else. The Syndicate does not seek to close the space in which its stations are set like so many diamonds on a sable background and does not discriminate on grounds of race, national politics, religion or any other of the many stupidities that set human beings one against the other. Rather the Syndicate deals with people in terms that are universal, rational and equitable: free and fair trade in goods and services.

How then did the Federation choose to respond when it became clear that the Intaki of the Syndicate were making their own way free of the Federation and its strictures? With police actions and military incursions. With seizures of goods and the capture and trial of Syndicalists as 'criminals'. Not content to see these men and women cast out, the Federation has spitefully pursued a vendetta against the Syndicate under the usual tawdry and ragged cloak of 'maintaining order'.

Yet this is a grotesque fiction when set against the state of Placid region, where the green jewel that is the Intaki homeworld hangs in the midst of stagnation and underdevelopment, mindless chaos and unthinking neglect. In the 200 years since its foundation, the Intaki Syndicate has spread nearly 70 stations through its region on its own account, with dozens of stations belonging to organisations as diverse as Thukker Mix and even the Quafe corporation.

All this was achieved with no help from a paternalist state but rather through the independence of the Intaki who made their lives in the space of Syndicate region. While it is hardly perfect, the Intaki Syndicate and its constituent stations represent achievements anyone can take pride in as the fruits of the free human spirit but most especially the Intaki people can do so. Compared to the stations of the Syndicate, the insurance brokerages, storage facilities and mining depots that tumble about the Intaki system are simply banal outposts of a society that seeks to impose its values to the exclusion of all others.

I spoke with the author after and he granted his permission for the Intaki Liberation Front to include the work in the relevant section our own Galnet portal and I'm sure he would be pleased to find his words in use here to challenge a return to classic Federation propaganda that seeks to undermine the importance, the influence of the Intaki Syndicate and the source inspiration it is for the Intaki of Placid.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2011-10-29 22:50:36 UTC
Bataav wrote:
So the Intaki of the Syndicate are to be guilty by association?


Yes. In fact, no, actually - when you openly associate with and openly arrange and secure finance for criminal organisations, it's a lot more than simply guilty by assocaition.

Quoting the words of an entirely irrelevant anarchist and terrorist from a faction now so irrelevant its own leader - known only for her ability to talk - has stopped talking, will win you no favours with me, and given that your organisation just shot down a proposal that would actively benefit legitimate trade in the Intaki system, don't you ******* dare talk to me about the difficulties of legitimate trade.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Jon Engel
Machete Carbide
#16 - 2011-10-30 03:10:30 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Bataav wrote:
So the Intaki of the Syndicate are to be guilty by association?


Yes. In fact, no, actually - when you openly associate with and openly arrange and secure finance for criminal organisations, it's a lot more than simply guilty by assocaition.

Quoting the words of an entirely irrelevant anarchist and terrorist from a faction now so irrelevant its own leader - known only for her ability to talk - has stopped talking, will win you no favours with me, and given that your organisation just shot down a proposal that would actively benefit legitimate trade in the Intaki system, don't you ******* dare talk to me about the difficulties of legitimate trade.


If you take a small rodent and back him into a corner and poke him with a stick for a few minutes. Put the stick down and try to pet him or comfort him or offer him some food. Most likely, you will be bitten.

It's kind of absurd to suggest that the Syndicate would not align with an enemy of the Federation when it's the Federation who decided the Syndicate was to exist in the first place.

Now lets quit this game of everything the Federation does is good nonsense, it has not worked in a while and is wearing thin even in the streets of Gallente Prime. Nobody expects the Syndicate to do anything differently until the Federation makes right what it has done to the people of the Syndicate.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2011-10-30 03:22:47 UTC
Jon Engel wrote:
If you take a small rodent and back him into a corner and poke him with a stick for a few minutes. Put the stick down and try to pet him or comfort him or offer him some food. Most likely, you will be bitten.


Rodents? Well, I'm glad that we're at least being honest with our metaphors now.

Jon Engel wrote:
It's kind of absurd to suggest that the Syndicate would not align with an enemy of the Federation when it's the Federation who decided the Syndicate was to exist in the first place.


Yes, criminals and exiles co-operating with criminals and exiles. It's to be expected. It doesn't surprise me. What surprises me is that people are pretending that the Syndicate are somehow honourable or exemplary when they very clearly aren't. They managed to take everything that was wrong with the Federation and amplify it. I look to the Syndicate as a cautionary tale, not a great huddled mass of oppressed unfortunates.

Jon Engel wrote:
the Federation makes right what it has done to the people of the Syndicate.


The Federation owes the Syndicate precisely nothing.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Nola Doyle
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-10-30 09:05:27 UTC
Despite what the originator of this thread would have you believe, the Intaki Syndicate, while certainly not as glamorous as its predecessor, stands testament as a symbol of Federation oppression, Intaki Independence, and free trade policy.

One doesn't need to look far into Syndicate to see the lasting impact Federation influence has had upon this minor nation state. Restricted from establishing colonies on Syndicate worlds, a luxury even capsule pilots are afforded by CONCORD in recent years, Syndicate has suffocated without the necessary infrastructure to maintain a substantial populace beyond the independently operated stations dotting the region. In this move, the Federation has all but ensured the Syndicate would remain an underdeveloped area of space kept anemic by their oppressive policies, left to fend against the criminal elements and their sworn enemy, the Caldari State. It is rather evident that the Federation had neither good intentions nor an interest in seeing their neighbor prosper, and more than likely expected the free Intaki dissidents would come crawling back desperate to be taken under their wing. And much to their dismay, this has not yet happened.

Why, one might inquire? As Mr. Ixiris had mentioned above, we see the free Intaki forming alliances with local factions considered criminal to the Federation, such as the Angel Cartel and the Serpentis Corporation. Coupled with their no questions asked trade policies and the skilled diplomacy of its representative (Ms. Silphy en Dabiel), one can see how such a relationship might flourish in an environment with few friends and many hungry nation states hoping to absorb their region. Perhaps if the Federation was less heavy-handed in their negotiation with the Syndicate, the free Intaki could have prospered as a close trade partner (or even an ally) rather than being forced to cooperate with such unsavory elements.

Instead, the Intaki Syndicate remains a painful thorn in the back of the Federation, not only as a notoriously unregulated region of space for smugglers to import their illicit goods, but as a sorrowful reminder of a much less tolerant period of history for the Gallentean people. Only more disheartening is to witness the same resentful attitude levied by Federate loyalists in today's age to remind us that the Federation has a long way to go in absolving itself of past failures.

Regards,
Nola J. Doyle
Jev North
Doomheim
#19 - 2011-10-30 09:39:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jev North
You know what? Never mind.

Even though our love is cruel; even though our stars are crossed.

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#20 - 2011-10-30 11:23:04 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Bataav wrote:
So the Intaki of the Syndicate are to be guilty by association?


Yes. In fact, no, actually - when you openly associate with and openly arrange and secure finance for criminal organisations, it's a lot more than simply guilty by assocaition.

Quoting the words of an entirely irrelevant anarchist and terrorist from a faction now so irrelevant its own leader - known only for her ability to talk - has stopped talking, will win you no favours with me, and given that your organisation just shot down a proposal that would actively benefit legitimate trade in the Intaki system, don't you ******* dare talk to me about the difficulties of legitimate trade.





I find it entirely predictable that rather than addressing those words; rather than engaging with the argument made, rather than debating or putting your own logical points, you choose instead simply to insult and slur and attack the man who frankly has achieved more in a morning's writing than you have throughout your entire capsuleer career to date.

I did chuckle at the concept of an irrelevant terrorist though - and did spend a moment or two wondering how such a thing might come to past and what acts of terror such an irrelevancy might accomplish. Then strangely the realization dawned that I was looking at one in the originator of this thread! Simply words without action, insults without capability, noise without influence. It seems you hoped to hold a mirror to the Syndicate Andreus Ixirus and ended up with the reflecting surface close to your own distorted features instead.

As for the usual nonsense we've heard from Amarrian quislings like Mixed Metaphor since time immemorial - while we have been relatively quiet on the summit recently you might tell from some other posts made by our recent war opponents that matters have not necessarily been so in space. The summit for the Star Fraction is a means of publicising the results of propaganda of the deed.

The summit for Andreus? Empty posting is the only “deed” there will ever be.

And that is the difference.

So I echo monsieur Bataav’s words and advise the audience wishing to learn more of the Federation and Syndicate to begin with a reading of my colleague’s essay: A considerably more productive pursuit than listening to the gum-flapping drivel of Mixed Metaphor information ministers endlessly repeating “you never had it so good.” (while the provosts quietly take over the senate and take the dangerous toys of democracy away from the masses).


The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

123Next page