These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Proposal for CSM Chairman, Secretary.

First post
Author
Frying Doom
#181 - 2013-05-03 22:43:55 UTC
GallowsCalibrator wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:
Just to keep you up to date,

At the prompting of CCP we are in the midst of a very polite discussion as to who will be saddled with which extra tag and workload.

Names are being bandied about and it is all pretty lowkey. Once we know, we'll let you know but it IS an internal thing and you've had your votes. Now is when we start to show whether you made the right choices or not.

m



but but but but you can't make such decisions without Goonswarm, being Master of CSM and CCP and ahahahahahaha oh god I can't keep this up

FTFY

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#182 - 2013-05-03 23:05:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Mike Azariah wrote:
Names are being bandied about and it is all pretty lowkey. Once we know, we'll let you know but it IS an internal thing and you've had your votes. Now is when we start to show whether you made the right choices or not.

Yes Mike it is an internal thing, it is not like the appointment to offices by elected officials in governments, or even tennis clubs is ever commented on by people or the media.Lol

Nor is the poor performance of those people ever related back to those who chose them to be in that office.Big smile

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

dark heartt
#183 - 2013-05-04 03:52:50 UTC  |  Edited by: dark heartt
Frying Doom wrote:

mynnna wrote:
Also has the same problem as giving gifts. 50,000 uninformed and thus basically randomized votes has the same effect as those 50,000 not voting, statistically speaking. Might as well not have them vote.

The idea that compulsory voting is just making random votes, so you seem to believe countries like Australia, with compulsory elections have just got random votes, you should also not this is the country they got the STV system from that they used.



There is a quantifiable portion of the Australian population that does just randomly vote. A lot of young people simply don't care or really don't want to pick one over the other because they can't see either person being better for them, so they randomly pick some people off the cards. Wikipedia actually has a full article on the Donkey Vote a term used to describe what those people are doing.

Yes there are people who vote seriously, but there is also a large portion of the population here who just don't care, because our leaders have all been jokes for some time now.
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#184 - 2013-05-04 04:11:36 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

Yes Mike it is an internal thing, it is not like the appointment to offices by elected officials in governments, or even tennis clubs is ever commented on by people or the media.Lol

Nor is the poor performance of those people ever related back to those who chose them to be in that office.Big smile


Wasn't trying to hush you (not sure I could)

Just was letting all of you know that we were working on it, AAAAAAND we still are.

A lot of the past few days has been getting to know each other. Figuring out active times and who know what, who says what. Which does help when it comes time for the internal vote.

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)

Frying Doom
#185 - 2013-05-04 07:52:11 UTC
dark heartt wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

mynnna wrote:
Also has the same problem as giving gifts. 50,000 uninformed and thus basically randomized votes has the same effect as those 50,000 not voting, statistically speaking. Might as well not have them vote.

The idea that compulsory voting is just making random votes, so you seem to believe countries like Australia, with compulsory elections have just got random votes, you should also not this is the country they got the STV system from that they used.

There is a quantifiable portion of the Australian population that does just randomly vote. A lot of young people simply don't care or really don't want to pick one over the other because they can't see either person being better for them, so they randomly pick some people off the cards. Wikipedia actually has a full article on the Donkey Vote a term used to describe what those people are doing.

Yes there are people who vote seriously, but there is also a large portion of the population here who just don't care, because our leaders have all been jokes for some time now.

The Australian Electoral Commission reported a national informality rate of 5.55% in the 2010 House of Representatives election, and of 3.95% in the 2007 House of Representatives election.[1] It is said that parties used to deliberately select candidates with a high alphabetical ranking. In 1984 voting reforms were introduced to lessen this effect, including listing names in a random order.

Yes our leaders are a Joke. Lets face it little Johnny Howard was knee high to a grass hopper. Ketting was full of himself and lets just leave she who shall not be named out of it.

But the percentage of Donkey votes in this country is actually quiet small. Surprising really being most of the political parties are more suited to a Monty Python scene than running a country.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#186 - 2013-05-04 07:57:54 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

Yes Mike it is an internal thing, it is not like the appointment to offices by elected officials in governments, or even tennis clubs is ever commented on by people or the media.Lol

Nor is the poor performance of those people ever related back to those who chose them to be in that office.Big smile


Wasn't trying to hush you (not sure I could)

Just was letting all of you know that we were working on it, AAAAAAND we still are.

A lot of the past few days has been getting to know each other. Figuring out active times and who know what, who says what. Which does help when it comes time for the internal vote.

m

I was not under the impression that you were trying to shusssh me, but it is nice to know you guys are communicating and subsequently communicating with the playerbase.

It is however refreshingly different to see a CSM member respond to a thread that

  1. You did not create yourself
  2. You are not trying to use to get re-elected


Very refreshing, well almost strange tbh.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#187 - 2013-05-04 13:29:59 UTC
Try reading threads which are not created by and primarily about you.

You might find that almost as refreshing.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Frying Doom
#188 - 2013-05-04 13:35:58 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Try reading threads which are not created by and primarily about you.

You might find that almost as refreshing.

Do you mean other threads where you sound exactly the same

Malcanis wrote:
Just FYI, I've already told him this, and even showed him that there was a GTC trade forum on the EVE-O website before PLEX were introduced. Despite this, he maintained that GTC trading wasn't permitted by CCP.

He's not someone to be persuaded out of his ideas by little things like "facts", "evidence" or "reason".

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#189 - 2013-05-04 15:57:38 UTC
Ah, he's one of your alts?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#190 - 2013-05-04 16:02:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Snow Axe
Didn't you get the memo, Malcanis? "Communication with players" is just a nice way of saying "stop telling Frying Doom how mindnumbingly stupid he is". Anything short of that might get you branded a poor communicator!

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#191 - 2013-05-04 17:10:17 UTC
dark heartt wrote:
There is a quantifiable portion of the Australian population that does just randomly vote. A lot of young people simply don't care or really don't want to pick one over the other because they can't see either person being better for them, so they randomly pick some people off the cards. Wikipedia actually has a full article on the Donkey Vote a term used to describe what those people are doing.

Yes there are people who vote seriously, but there is also a large portion of the population here who just don't care, because our leaders have all been jokes for some time now.

i draw a **** on the ballot
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#192 - 2013-05-04 18:19:50 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Didn't you get the memo, Malcanis? "Communication with players" is just a nice way of saying "stop telling Frying Doom how mindnumbingly stupid he is". Anything short of that might get you branded a poor communicator!


I've added this valuable information to our working notes.

PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#193 - 2013-05-04 20:03:16 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.

A sure sign that the CSM has their priorities straight.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

None ofthe Above
#194 - 2013-05-05 02:41:20 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Snow Axe wrote:
Didn't you get the memo, Malcanis? "Communication with players" is just a nice way of saying "stop telling Frying Doom how mindnumbingly stupid he is". Anything short of that might get you branded a poor communicator!


I've added this valuable information to our working notes.

PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.


You've elected Frying Doom chairman, haven't you?

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

James Arget
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
#195 - 2013-05-05 05:50:41 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

I was not under the impression that you were trying to shusssh me, but it is nice to know you guys are communicating and subsequently communicating with the playerbase.

It is however refreshingly different to see a CSM member respond to a thread that

  1. You did not create yourself
  2. You are not trying to use to get re-elected


Very refreshing, well almost strange tbh.

I would post more, but I don't have the face for it.

To actually say something on topic, we've been working on the officer topic, as well as general organizational bits, as you could expect from a dozen people getting to know each other.

CSM 8 Representative

http://csm8.org

Frying Doom
#196 - 2013-05-05 07:45:57 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.

The only way to guarantee that would be to elect Trebor to all 4 positions. Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#197 - 2013-05-05 07:46:50 UTC
James Arget wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

I was not under the impression that you were trying to shusssh me, but it is nice to know you guys are communicating and subsequently communicating with the playerbase.

It is however refreshingly different to see a CSM member respond to a thread that

  1. You did not create yourself
  2. You are not trying to use to get re-elected


Very refreshing, well almost strange tbh.

I would post more, but I don't have the face for it.

To actually say something on topic, we've been working on the officer topic, as well as general organizational bits, as you could expect from a dozen people getting to know each other.

Crap that is almost more communication that we got out of CSM7 and all in one threadLol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#198 - 2013-05-05 08:49:11 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.

The only way to guarantee that would be to elect Trebor to all 4 positions. Lol



Blink

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Prince Kobol
#199 - 2013-05-05 08:52:25 UTC
What I find Ironic is that if it wasn't for Frying Doom posting then Jita Park would be a graveyard Big smile
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#200 - 2013-05-05 08:53:41 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Snow Axe wrote:
Didn't you get the memo, Malcanis? "Communication with players" is just a nice way of saying "stop telling Frying Doom how mindnumbingly stupid he is". Anything short of that might get you branded a poor communicator!


I've added this valuable information to our working notes.

PS We're pretty much decided on who's going to do what; we promise to make as many people as angry as possible with our decision.


You've elected Frying Doom chairman, haven't you?


We wanted to but Dolan said no Cry


Srs tho, we're all working together very nicely, and there's a very good atmosphere in the CSM8 channel. Some good ideas on how we're going to work with CCP are bubbling up and being implemented, and we're looking forward to getting on with the job and helping them make EVE (and helping them avoid mistakes too ofc)

I'm afraid this is likely to be an extremely low-drama CSM8. Perhaps FD would like to christen us appropriately? I personally favour "The CSM who sold the world", but just as he has to respect our decisions in our jurisdiction, so must we respect his.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016