These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

What is up with the hacking changes?

Author
Sipphakta en Gravonere
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-04-27 21:27:09 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:

Someone posted something you disagree with. Boo-hoo. Cry me a river.


Not so much that I disagree with it, your facts were simply wrong.

Quote:

I have no interest in mining nor do I have any interest in being easy picking for players who higher skills. All sites besides radar are indeed worthless from my perspective. I understand you disagree due to your own particular play style, likes/dislikes, etc., but you can't honestly think anyone who thinks differently than you is worthy of scorn and contempt for no other reason than that they don't share your perspective.

I think there are over the counter medication for Pointless Nerd Rage Syndrome.


In your OP you make claims that are wrong. You get told that you are wrong, by more than one person. You then proceed to insult these people. I can already see that you are a valuable and worthy addition to any corporation and wish you a bright future in Eve Online.
Judge Magister Zeiram
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2013-04-27 21:30:36 UTC
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?
Judge Magister Zeiram
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2013-04-27 21:32:11 UTC
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:


In your OP you make claims that are wrong. You get told that you are wrong, by more than one person. You then proceed to insult these people. I can already see that you are a valuable and worthy addition to any corporation and wish you a bright future in Eve Online.


Please quote the insults I've spewed toward "these people".
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#24 - 2013-04-27 21:32:59 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?
Oh, this guy is going to be FUN.
Twisted

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Sipphakta en Gravonere
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-04-27 21:38:31 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:

Please quote the insults I've spewed toward "these people".


Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:

...people so angry...
...Boo-hoo. Cry me a river...
...Pointless Nerd Rage Syndrome...
...irrational anger that some people have...
...kind of immature...
...unresolved psychological issue(s)...
Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2013-04-27 21:42:18 UTC
Mag sites, even in high sec present a nice concentration of salvage, and yes even in high sec they can give you T2 salvage. The high end sites in high sec are easily worth the time, and that value only goes up as you go to low sec and 0.0. Of course being part of exploration it also currently can be very random and potentially have cruddy payouts.

Grav sites provide not only for allowing low sec ores in high sec, but also for allowing you to find ores that aren't present in certain racial regions. Likewise low sec grav sites can have 0.0 ores.

Wormholes don't just lead to Anoikis. Wormholes that cut across to the other side of the galaxy can be rather lucrative in and of themselves for providing trade opportunities as well as allow you, the explorer, to explore a whole other region you might not explore otherwise. I can't tell you how many times I used a wormhole in high sec to pop into areas of low sec or 0.0 for a day of exploring in those areas.

Ladar sites are indeed extremely rare in high sec and ladars in known space are used for booster production. That can be an amazingly profitable business if you know what you are doing. Sure, it's "just another kind of mining" but if you want to get technical so are missions. Some people pop asteroids, some people pop gas clouds, some people pop red crosses, and some people pop other people. All are valid pursuits regardless of if anyone else doesn't like them.

Radar sites can be some of the most profitable sites out there for their relative time and manpower investments, and while I'm not 100% on the upcoming changes with Odyssey if the change of making sure each can has loot in it guaranteed is true, then that is something to be happy about. Very few things in EVE are worse than empty cans.

You didn't even touch on anomalies or combat signatures, which are perfectly valid and profitable options for explorers as well. As a month old player you most likely aren't going to be able to do a 4/10 complex on your own, plain and simple. But the potential rewards are nice enough that working with a friend is still profitable, and once again that all scales up as you get into low sec and 0.0.

Now then, if you are going to call someone out on being rude and condescending to you because you think differently than they do, it seems pretty obvious that you should be able to look back at your original post and see that your statements of worth regarding various activities and sites are exactly the sort of thing you are decrying. Calling certain activities worthless can reasonably lead to the assumption that you also think the people that do those activities are stupid. Doesn't matter if you intended that or not, if they thought you were being rude and condescending in your original post that sort of validates a rude response. Of course, the whole idea that there are ever "valid reasons" to be disrespectful is sketchy from the get go. If there are valid reasons for it...it isn't really disrespectful, it's just the appropriate response.

I get that you don't want to mine or you don't want to pop into wormholes or scoop up salvage or run combat sites. But just think about how much you are hemming yourself in by limiting yourself to such a tiny window of activities. By just doing radar sites you are literally doing only 1/5th of Exploration and arguably only even bothering to compete for 1/5th of the potential ISK from Exploration. Keep in mind that Hacking is considered a mini-profession that is part of the wider profession of Exploration.
Din Chao
#27 - 2013-04-27 21:45:37 UTC
Recruiting standards for E-Uni have really become lax in Kelduum's absence...
Kalanaja
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2013-04-27 21:56:58 UTC
Din Chao wrote:
Recruiting standards for E-Uni have really become lax in Kelduum's absence...



That's an understatement, it all most seems like he's learned nothing at all about the game. I'm surprised he's even capable of scanning anything period.
Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
#29 - 2013-04-27 21:57:20 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?
Oh, this guy is going to be FUN.
Twisted


Can we keep him and cuddle him and make him learn stuff?
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#30 - 2013-04-27 22:01:19 UTC
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:
silens vesica wrote:
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?
Oh, this guy is going to be FUN.
Twisted


Can we keep him and cuddle him and make him learn stuff?

We'll call him George, and hug him and squeeze him and never let him go.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#31 - 2013-04-27 22:02:07 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
However, it is all very much true from my perspective in regards to my immediate interests. It's not a matter of anyone disagreeing with or correcting someone.


I can't imagine how you are still alive if you treat real life this way, with a total disregard of the facts of reality in front of you.

With your attitude when experienced players are trying to give you accurate information.......I honestly think yo should not be playing this game at all. Period.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#32 - 2013-04-27 22:03:42 UTC
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.



I can't believe the guy really. Pretty astonishing is it not ?

We need some Goonies to grief him out of the game, methinks, if he thinks THIS is bad. Just wow.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#33 - 2013-04-27 22:05:51 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?



Again, it's not that we are disagreeing because what you type is a matter of opinion. IT is just flat out and clear cut wrong.

With this attitude of yours, you will be griefed out of the game eventually. Better to leave now.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Damion Rayne
Panoptic
#34 - 2013-04-27 22:08:51 UTC
As has been stated many times over,

All of your conclusions are wrong. While I feel there is nothing in the next expansion other than "Polish" and "Tweak" and wonder what the blazes CCP is spending their money on (Oh wait, *looks at dust. monuments and a vita application that no one wants) I see the merit in a lot of this polish and tweak. I only want exploration to be building star-gates and exploring brand new star systems, building civilization, etc. Bitter old vet syndrome I have.

Anyway,
Pretty much every single point you made was wrong, and you are sorely misinformed about exploration and what the changes can do for new and old players alike. For someone so new who is also in the uni, you should have spoken with your instructors about this before coming on the forums.
-DR

ROA

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
#35 - 2013-04-27 22:12:20 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Spare me the condescending attitudes. Never seen a forum of people so angry for no other reason than anger it.


Don't be so defensive. If you look past the other posters attitudes you will find a lot of helpful information.

Drunken Bum
#36 - 2013-04-27 22:15:01 UTC
Judge Magister Zeiram wrote:
Drunken Bum wrote:
No need to get your panties in a bunch because you were wrong and it was pointed out. Most people dont take too kindly to listen to others whine, especially when the whiners barely know what they're talking about.


You're the ones whining. I'm not the one behaving disrespectfully and making condescending remarks because someone posted something I didn't agree with about a video game, of all things.

Certain people (I assume you are one) are angry (for no reason) and you are trying to deflect. What message were you trying to convey in your post? "I know you are, but what am I"?

The panties. They are bunched so hard.

"Everyone else is obviously just a buncha meanies and I'm right about everything"

You're on a roll OP, please continue.

After the patch we're giving the market some gentle supply restriction, like tying one wrist to the bedpost loosely with soft silk rope. Just enough to make things a bit more exciting for the market, not enough to make a safeword necessary.  -Fozzie

Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
#37 - 2013-04-27 22:30:53 UTC
Please keep posting, OP. I believe in you.

Everyone here is just posting opinions. They can't stand up to your irrefutable factual arguments.

Don't sink to their level either. They are Ill informed and rude; you came here to instruct, and maintained a patient and thoughtful tone throughout.

Whatever any other troll says in this thread, dear OP, you ARE a special snowflake and they are too dumb to realize it. The truth (which hurts) is that nobody should ever run anything (ANYTHING) other than radar sites because everything else literally makes you gay (not that there is anything wrong with that).

But while I've got your attention, can I ask a quick question? Have you ever played FarmVille? 'Cause for serious, it's a really fun game and I think you should try it out.

I am not an alt of Chribba.

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#38 - 2013-04-27 22:41:14 UTC
They're changing it so that the radar sites won't require combat ships anymore, which is a BUFF to exploration.

And while I can't confirm this, my understanding/theory of the new system is that for solo players, your profits won't change. Meanwhile, if you or I bring our friends along to explore WITH us, it's no longer a waste of time and a huge cut to profits. Overall, an interesting change as far as I'm concerned.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Elizze Scoggins
Cut-throat Imperial Economic Agenda
#39 - 2013-04-27 22:52:38 UTC
Suprised the Uni have not closed the OP down yet?
Setaceous
Nexus Prima
#40 - 2013-04-27 23:01:23 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:

I can't imagine how you are still alive if you treat real life this way, with a total disregard of the facts of reality in front of you.



Maybe he's a politician.
Previous page123Next page