These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

DO SOMETHING CCP, STOP BEING A SCARED B*TCH

First post
Author
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#101 - 2013-04-29 03:01:59 UTC
Fact: Sov in 90% of systems is decided by rabbits. I call that broken. Maybe you don't. It doesn't matter how we characterize that fact, we both agree its a fact.

You keep talking as though people care to hold on to 2 or 3 "home systems." Rational people don't care. If amarr holds onto 2 systems and recruits people to orbit buttons 24/7 in those 2 systems we are still tier 1. Better to not waste time having alts spin buttons and just base in egg. That way you can spend your time in this game doing what you signed up for fw to do -PVP.

In order to win enough systems to even make it to tier 2 or 3 you need to have rabbit plexers on your side. That is why pvpers think fw sov is broken.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#102 - 2013-04-29 03:19:54 UTC
Juan, I guess we're doing it all wrong. Let's move to nullsec, err, non FW low sec, err.. non sov 0.0, err. high sec, and get some real fights. Roll

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#103 - 2013-04-29 03:31:29 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Juan, I guess we're doing it all wrong. Let's move to nullsec, err, non FW low sec, err.. non sov 0.0, err. high sec, and get some real fights. Roll






So far this thread has hit most of the main arguments against making fw pvp:

1) If you don't like fw leave!

and if you leave,

2) Your not even in fw so your opinion doesn't count!

3) Its better than it was before, when it was also broken

4) There is already so much pvp in fw no one could possibly want more.

and here is a new one by xg:

5) you get more pvp in fw than you do in high sec so that proves its not broken.

There are a few more arguments against making fw sov pvp that need be mentioned to make this thread complete.

Meanwhile keep ignoring the fact that sov in over 90% of systems is decided by rabbits.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#104 - 2013-04-29 03:33:41 UTC
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Please comment more about how EPA was factional warfare.


I never said it was. Lol
Cosmo Raata
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#105 - 2013-04-29 04:12:19 UTC
Juan Rayo wrote:
Here´s another try at this discussion...

1. No, FW is not perfect and far from it. It is however MUCH better than it ever was in the past, and CCP has done a great job in the past iterations. Does it need fixing? for sure (as everything in Eve. I mean come on look at Nullsec and count your blessings) but it´s not "broken".

2. That some -or even many- people come to post threads about FW being broken doesn´t mean it is, because their opinion is not that of all the people playing the FW game. On the flip side, if people came here to post threads about how it´s perfect, they would also be wrong to generalize their own particular and personal opinion and try to impose it on others.

3. If you have problems holding on to your systems, instead of yelling at ccp and calling them "scared bitches"... have you really stopped to consider yelling at the many many amarr that have minmatar plexing alts and are thus ******* you over? if yo have problem holding on to systems because the alt plexers come plex it up when you are not online, have you considered recruiting for that particular problematic tz and or talking to corps on that problematic timezone and getting them to move and help defend the system?

Have you stopped to think that there are so many Amarr (and caldari and some gallente too) corps and alliances that live in highsec or non fw lowsec that if they moved into their own FW system they might easily hold it down thus helping raise the tier status for the whole militia? and that those corps could also share intel channels and help each other out?

Note that these are all PLAYER actions that can influence the warzone without whining to CCP about it. Now if you want to whine and cry about the need for a timer rollback and maybe corp LP tax yeah sure I¨ll be holding signs and shooting structures in Jita right there with you.

Maybe that just not possible on the minmatar/amarr front, I am not familiar with the area, but it seems to work for some caldari corps and it certainly works for Gallente corps. Hell, there are even Amarr corps defending their systems right now.

You say faction warfare is "broken" when CCPs own numbers show there are more fights happening, more stuff getting blown up. I say faction warfare is a mechanic created to do just that: give people the chance to duke it out in losec, and from that particular point of view, I´d say it´s working.

Just because your particular experience is ****** up do not pretend to impose it on others, nor build strawmen about us being interested in keeping it that way and being full of isk. If anything, Gallente has less systems to plex since the squids have been laying down for a bit, and thus less isk.

It is perhaps inevitable that we will find ourselves kicked out of our home systems. Faction Warfare has gone thru cycles since it started, with one side being dominant and then getting kicked in the nuts. Gallente spent months not too long ago at Tier 1, and we are barely into t2. You won´t hear us bitching about it tho, because even if we ARE kicked out of our home systems, it´ll be fighting and having tons of fun in the current imperfect in need of fixing but also great version of Faction Warfare.


Another pilot happy with mediocrity.

Starting to really love this argument; More fights equals all fixed. lol

P.S. Did 20 minutes of typing up this rubbish make your nose more brown that it already was?
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#106 - 2013-04-29 04:18:53 UTC
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Starting to really love this argument; More fights equals all fixed. lol

Nah just mostly fixed.
Flyinghotpocket
Small Focused Memes
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#107 - 2013-04-29 04:31:09 UTC
Cearain wrote:


Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war.

idk what war youzone you been fighting in the past few years. sahtogas has always been a hot area, being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all.

and most of the saht locals dont give a **** about d-plexing.

Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro

Taoist Dragon
Okata Syndicate
#108 - 2013-04-29 04:45:14 UTC
After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.

It is textbook whining to CCP.

Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)

If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.

Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately

Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want.

That is the Way, the Tao.

Balance is everything.

Cosmo Raata
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#109 - 2013-04-29 04:54:47 UTC
Taoist Dragon wrote:
After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.

It is textbook whining to CCP.

Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)

If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.

Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately

Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want.



You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses.

So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#110 - 2013-04-29 05:04:24 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Quote:

Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.


My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol)

The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't.
Lin Suizei
#111 - 2013-04-29 05:50:43 UTC
Cosmo Raata wrote:
You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea


Wrong forum then, this should've been in GD because no-one from CCP seems to be listening (or if they are, acknowledging the problem) here.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#112 - 2013-04-29 06:12:19 UTC
Rommell Drako wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.

The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.

maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always.


FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe...

If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name.

If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt...


CCP has said many time in their streams from fan fest etc... that they are happy about fw.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#113 - 2013-04-29 06:18:02 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
And +1 to Amarrian VENGEANCE who actually have the balls to live in FW space. .

Requoting for truth. Full apologies to Dan and hotpockets for getting name wrong. Will update original post.
Taoist Dragon
Okata Syndicate
#114 - 2013-04-29 06:23:19 UTC
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Taoist Dragon wrote:
After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.

It is textbook whining to CCP.

Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)

If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.

Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately

Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want.



You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses.

So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.


So yes this is basically a whine thread cos you are not getting cookies right?

That is the Way, the Tao.

Balance is everything.

Tsobai Hashimoto
State War Academy
Caldari State
#115 - 2013-04-29 06:42:40 UTC
Rommell Drako wrote:
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:
Rommell Drako wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.

The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.

maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always.


FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe...

If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name.

If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt...




that is exactly what im thinking about doing

how much would two pilots cost me at the bazzar that can fly sb?

wouldnt even need extra accounts
to pay for plex. transfer one to my main one on my alt and bam....run minnie missions once or twice a week. make a bill a week and get **** killed

**** thats a great idea lol




I actually do this already. Honestly all you need is a meta 4 torp launcher and t2 fit purifier. Character bazaar can probably pull for like 1-2bil. Its super easy and you can actually make around 1 bil per 6 hours. notice how i PVE on my minni alt and pvp on my amarr main. Because that shows the system is working as intended.


Oh I know its easy, I moved back into FW onto minnies side to soak up a fat pile of isk and then get back to the side where I can get a fight after every undock......

but just having pve alts sounds even better..... i already own two accounts and when I pvp I take out my purifier and hound and run missions, goes pretty quick.

just did some price checks on char bazaar, looks like i can get a perfect SB pilot for around 2.5 -3.5 billion isk, buy two of them, slap them on my same accounts,

PVE when needed, FW PVP when I want

win win


FW isnt broken lol Roll
Albercheck
Crossfire Incorporated
#116 - 2013-04-29 06:55:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Albercheck
X Gallentius wrote:
Quote:

Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.


My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol)

The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't.


Yet, Fweddit last week scored the 2nd most kills out of every [non-npc] Faction Warfare corporation -- In Exile was first place. And, upon a closer examination of the killboards, virtually zero of those FW kills happened in Egghelende. So, I think your initial notion is incorrect. Egghelende kills account for a large amount of iWhip kills for sure, but obviously Fweddit & Company PvP outside of Egghelende.

Moreover, did you consider the lack of FW kills could perhaps be due to Eve's rampant risk aversion? Yesterday I plexed in a hull tanked, auto-cannon bantam. Yet, on two separate occasions, I warped into a plex with a single enemy Minmatar inside. The Minmatar warps out even with no one else in local. This isn't a typical "ONLY MINMATAR ARE PUSSIES" rant, but just showing that just because some groups may be "lacking" kills does not mean they are not actively trying to look for kills.

Even further, do you know how difficult it can be for a larger group like Fweddit to get a fun-sized skirmish? Fweddit can regularly roll with 40+ pilots, but will [understandably] rarely find a tango partner. In my experience, the decently sized skirmishes actually come mostly from neuts, local pirates, or the occasional visiting 0.0 entities. This isn't meant to be a bash at other Minmatar FW organizations, but I think speaks to the larger point raised in this (and many other threads) that larger, more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success.

Instead, Factional Warfare success seems to involve coordinating a mass-scale effort orbiting beacons for 15+ minutes and upgrading systems every once in a while. If you're doing it right, you are actually trying to minimize conflict so you can complete more plexes. This sort of success is noteworthy considering the scale, but does not necessarily speak to "Warfare" part of Factional Warfare. Thus, in its current form, Faction Warfare seems to be a bit of a misnomer.

Edit: Source for statement in first paragraph: https://api.eveonline.com/eve/FacWarTopStats.xml.aspx
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#117 - 2013-04-29 08:59:06 UTC
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Taoist Dragon wrote:
After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.

It is textbook whining to CCP.

Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)

If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.

Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately

Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want.



You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses.

So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.


CCP does not see any problems on current FW, their goals may be different from yours. And all thing CCP wanted to achieve seems good results so they are not going to 'fix' anything.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#118 - 2013-04-29 09:09:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Albercheck wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Quote:

Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.


My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol)

The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't.


Yet, Fweddit last week scored the 2nd most kills out of every [non-npc] Faction Warfare corporation -- In Exile was first place. And, upon a closer examination of the killboards, virtually zero of those FW kills happened in Egghelende. So, I think your initial notion is incorrect. Egghelende kills account for a large amount of iWhip kills for sure, but obviously Fweddit & Company PvP outside of Egghelende.

Moreover, did you consider the lack of FW kills could perhaps be due to Eve's rampant risk aversion? Yesterday I plexed in a hull tanked, auto-cannon bantam. Yet, on two separate occasions, I warped into a plex with a single enemy Minmatar inside. The Minmatar warps out even with no one else in local. This isn't a typical "ONLY MINMATAR ARE PUSSIES" rant, but just showing that just because some groups may be "lacking" kills does not mean they are not actively trying to look for kills.

Even further, do you know how difficult it can be for a larger group like Fweddit to get a fun-sized skirmish? Fweddit can regularly roll with 40+ pilots, but will [understandably] rarely find a tango partner. In my experience, the decently sized skirmishes actually come mostly from neuts, local pirates, or the occasional visiting 0.0 entities. This isn't meant to be a bash at other Minmatar FW organizations, but I think speaks to the larger point raised in this (and many other threads) that larger, more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success.

Instead, Factional Warfare success seems to involve coordinating a mass-scale effort orbiting beacons for 15+ minutes and upgrading systems every once in a while. If you're doing it right, you are actually trying to minimize conflict so you can complete more plexes. This sort of success is noteworthy considering the scale, but does not necessarily speak to "Warfare" part of Factional Warfare. Thus, in its current form, Faction Warfare seems to be a bit of a misnomer.

Edit: Source for statement in first paragraph: https://api.eveonline.com/eve/FacWarTopStats.xml.aspx


TL;DR - CCP please fix it so that 40 people in a single plex under little or no risk are more effective than 40 single people in 40 plexes looking for solo and small gang fights.

TL;DR 2 - CCP dont encourage blobs in FW like they do in dullsec and this upsets me. Please fix FW so its not broken like dullsec!
Albercheck
Crossfire Incorporated
#119 - 2013-04-29 09:31:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Albercheck
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Albercheck wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
[quote]
stuff.


more stuff


TL;DR - CCP please fix it so that 40 people in a single plex under little or no risk are more effective than 40 single people in 40 plexes looking for solo and small gang fights.

TL;DR 2 - CCP dont encourage blobs in FW like they do in dullsec and this upsets me. Please fix FW so its not broken like dullsec!


Uh, nothing in my post was prescriptive at all -- did you ever see me say "should"? My post was completely descriptive and a response to highlight an entity that was being wrongly characterized by another poster.
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#120 - 2013-04-29 09:39:22 UTC
Milton Middleson wrote:

Why should kills directly affect a war?


seriously?

Ships in space blow each other up - its what the entire game revolves around.

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.