These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The new Tags system: Tag4Sec

First post First post
Author
Hae Sung
#61 - 2013-04-27 16:03:09 UTC
ITT:

1. A discussion of the effects of outsourcing an old activity(time spent ginding) for an existing currency set(isk) subject to market forces, manipulation by people able and willing to put the time into farming it, and sandbox game play taken to a new economic level. Yay!

2. People who don't like the PLEX system.


Overall looks to be an innovative way to address the tedium of sec status grinding and allows less fewer NPC-oriented penalties for player to player interaction. Win all around.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2013-04-27 16:08:35 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Oh, and the italicised part is 100% untrue. The penalty is still there and it must be paid. You're just given a choice how to pay it; you choose what kind of penalty you want to suffer.

can i have checkbox:

Which penalty you want to suffer for attacking in high-sec:
1) being CONCORDOKKEN
2) being paid XXX ISK

?

I think this is perfectly inside your theory about penalties and suffering. And many people would love to have it. Guess which option it would be every time? Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2013-04-27 16:19:07 UTC
This is ridiculous.

There is no information about quantities or spawnrates given, thus these talks are completely nonsense.

Besides that, it reads as if people believed prices wouldn't go through the roof
if their horror-scenarios actually came true. In any way, if suddenly ALL THE GANKERS
would buy tags for PLEX, prices would SKYROCKET making it unaffordable !

Even IF there are rich people who could buy PLEX to no ends,
these people are definitely NOT the majority !

You people are just batshit crazy about things not even happening yet
and probably never happening, because the market will prevent that !
Kharamete
Royal Assent
#64 - 2013-04-27 16:25:24 UTC
Even if prices did go through the roof, it would mean more people in the belts in lowsec. Yay.

CCP FoxFour: "... the what button... oh god I didn't even know that existed. BRB."

My little youtube videos can be found here

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#65 - 2013-04-27 16:25:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Kharamete wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
So essentially certain players will be able to pay CCP and get rid of the consequences of their actions against other players.
No.


1. Lose sec status, suffer consequences
2. Buy PLEX
3. Sell PLEX for ISK
4. Buy tags with ISK
5. Buy sec status with tags, get rid of consequences
6. Back to 1

Yes.


Someone still has to farm the tags. You're only moving the burden somewhere else. If nobody farms the tags, there will be no tags.

Just like you probably don't mine every mineral for your ship. You just buy it off the market. Does your reasoning mean that you pay to win when you buy a ship?


Buying a ship is not the same as avoiding a consequence of what I did to another player.

But It really doesn't matters. I am fine with this change, it's another nail on the coffin.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#66 - 2013-04-27 16:26:03 UTC
Way to ruin the party Solstice.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#67 - 2013-04-27 16:29:07 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Way to ruin the party Solstice.
*lol*
Karig'Ano Keikira
Tax Cheaters
#68 - 2013-04-27 16:36:13 UTC
while I can understand reasons behind this feature, cannot sat I like it - unless entire process will be prohibitively expensive, (and somehow I doubt it) buying, it kinda cheapens entire concept of security status - what is point of sec status if I can just pay a bit of ISK and remove all consequence of 'bad actions'

however, if entire process is expensive (low drop rate of tags and order of magnitude of 100m ISK payout to concord per 1 point of sec rating restored), it might be decent ISK sink
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#69 - 2013-04-27 16:37:29 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
But It really doesn't matters. I am fine with this change, it's another nail on the coffin.
Hopefully in yours. Ingame.
Because you have no clue about this game,
else you wouldn't say such bull.

People should hunt you down and the likes of you down
and shoot you until you leave, because your attitude doesn't fit.

THAT's how the game works and THAT's why people love it !


(i, personally, really don't care about you people or what you think,)
(but the very fact that it's possible to make this happen is why this)
(game is still alive and why we love it. It's alive and well, not because)
(of people like you, but because of people like me.)
Dave Stark
#70 - 2013-04-27 16:38:31 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Way to ruin the party Solstice.


like i didn't say the same with the very first reply in the thread :P
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#71 - 2013-04-27 16:44:35 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
This is ridiculous.

There is no information about quantities or spawnrates given, thus these talks are completely nonsense.

Besides that, it reads as if people believed prices wouldn't go through the roof
if their horror-scenarios actually came true. In any way, if suddenly ALL THE GANKERS
would buy tags for PLEX, prices would SKYROCKET making it unaffordable !

Kharamete wrote:
Even if prices did go through the roof, it would mean more people in the belts in lowsec. Yay.

Pretty much. No matter how you turn it, it's a self-reinforcing circle of goodness, which, at worst, means everyone has to keep grinding for sec like they do today.

March rabbit wrote:
Which penalty you want to suffer for attacking in high-sec:
1) being CONCORDOKKEN
2) being paid XXX ISK

?

I think this is perfectly inside your theory about penalties and suffering. And many people would love to have it. Guess which option it would be every time? Lol
Seeing as how the two options are the same, this already exists in the game. Blink
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#72 - 2013-04-27 16:45:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Dave Stark wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Way to ruin the party Solstice.


like i didn't say the same with the very first reply in the thread :P
Actually, the whole thing is nonsense.
People just don't have the brain to realize that no ganker ever actually needs to sec up for anything except PvE in highsec,
which i'm sure most gankers don't actually care about anyways. (mostly, probably, because they are cowards hiding behind alts)

For ganking, besides cost, there is simply nothing keeping anybody from ganking candy asses
even in 1.0sec in battleships all day, if he wanted ...

Consequences ... avoiding consequences ... ridiculous !


Masses of people are dumb ... this thread proves it again.
Dave Stark
#73 - 2013-04-27 16:46:14 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Way to ruin the party Solstice.


like i didn't say the same with the very first reply in the thread :P
Actually, the whole thing is nonsense.
People just don't have the brain to realize that no ganker ever actually needs to sec up for anything except PvE in highsec,
which i'm sure most gankers don't actually care about anyways. (mostly, probably, because they are cowards hiding behind alts)

For ganking, besides cost, there is simply nothing keeping anybody from ganking candy asses
even in 1.0sec in battleships all day, if he wanted ...

Consequences ... avoiding consequences ... ridiculous !


Masses of people are dumb ... this thread proves it again.


PATCH CHANGES, DA SKY IZ FALLING!
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#74 - 2013-04-27 16:54:31 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
PATCH CHANGES, DA SKY IZ FALLING!
Oh btw ... with "anybody" i was talking about any *outlaw*.
Just added for clarification.
Karig'Ano Keikira
Tax Cheaters
#75 - 2013-04-27 16:55:10 UTC
fact is that sec statuc atm does not stop ganking (is that good mechanic or not is discussion I will not go into),
and it is unlikely that 'dedicated ganker' char will pay any amount of ISK to buy back sec status,
however for 'normal low-sec players', sec status does have (at least some) impact as it does to visitors to low sec - when you see someone with -10 in local, saying 'pirate' is a good guess, while when you see someone with +5, it is quite likely he won't actively go after you. So sec status is at least somewhat part of character and playstyle - making it arbitrarily changable does take a bit of EVE from EVE (not much however, I really doubt seeing any significant impact from this, but still... )
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#76 - 2013-04-27 17:30:20 UTC
RICH PEOPLE CAN USE ALL THEIR REAL MONIES TO BUY ITEMS IN EVE!!!!1!! THEY'RE CIRCUMVENTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS!!!!1 PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN!

This is all I'm hearing right now. Same argument, just tweaked a bit. These people actually take issue with the entire idea of the PLEX system. Good luck getting CCP to abandon that lol.

I don't like to shoot red crosses, and you can't make me.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#77 - 2013-04-27 17:45:31 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
RICH PEOPLE CAN USE ALL THEIR REAL MONIES TO BUY ITEMS IN EVE!!!!1!! THEY'RE CIRCUMVENTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS!!!!1 PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN!

This is all I'm hearing right now. Same argument, just tweaked a bit. These people actually take issue with the entire idea of the PLEX system. Good luck getting CCP to abandon that lol.

I don't like to shoot red crosses, and you can't make me.


Its like sending a kid to his room for timeout after he does something bad, but still allowing him to play video games. It defeats the purpose of a punishment if they enjoy it. Its the same here. People want to be able to gain isk in a manner they enjoy in order to circumvent the residual effects of their actions. There for rendering the consequences to almost nothing.

Then again the whole sec status system is pointless in the first place. Sec loss should only apply to aggressive actions taken in high sec, you know the area Concord actually patrols. Using sec loss as a risk factor for individuals in what is considered "safe space". Lowsec on the other hand shouldn't accrue sec less since it is not actively patrolled by concord. Let bounties in lowsec dictate who's a pirate or not, and let lowsec be the lawless empire it was meant to be.


CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

MystLynx
Lulzsec Space
#78 - 2013-04-27 17:52:25 UTC
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
I dont see why low seccers need special treatement. They should just grind up standing the way everybody else does it. Put more valuable rats in low sec, but don't allow them to buy the tags from market. I guess its too late now though anyway.

May be because you loose your sec status mainly in low sec?
And anyway why would you care as you will be able to buy tags too?
Looks like whines from a 0.0 bear.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#79 - 2013-04-27 22:30:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Pig
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
RICH PEOPLE CAN USE ALL THEIR REAL MONIES TO BUY ITEMS IN EVE!!!!1!! THEY'RE CIRCUMVENTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS!!!!1 PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN! PAY TO WIN!

This is all I'm hearing right now. Same argument, just tweaked a bit. These people actually take issue with the entire idea of the PLEX system. Good luck getting CCP to abandon that lol.

I don't like to shoot red crosses, and you can't make me.


Its like sending a kid to his room for timeout after he does something bad, but still allowing him to play video games. It defeats the purpose of a punishment if they enjoy it.



Believe it or not, I don't enjoy forking over large sums of ISK. So... argument destroyed.

I think this stems from the carebear narrative that the "bad" things people like me do in this game are actual, literal, BAD things. I 'play' the "bad guy" and this is essential to EVE Online, but that doesn't stop carebears from labeling me an actual BAD GUY who must be stopped, it's inconceivably ridiculous.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Josef Djugashvilis
#80 - 2013-04-27 22:34:12 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
But It really doesn't matters. I am fine with this change, it's another nail on the coffin.
Hopefully in yours. Ingame.
Because you have no clue about this game,
else you wouldn't say such bull.

People should hunt you down and the likes of you down
and shoot you until you leave, because your attitude doesn't fit.

THAT's how the game works and THAT's why people love it !


(i, personally, really don't care about you people or what you think,)
(but the very fact that it's possible to make this happen is why this)
(game is still alive and why we love it. It's alive and well, not because)
(of people like you, but because of people like me.)


My, Solistice, you always seem to be so angry.

Surely, the range of player opinions is one of the things which makes Eve so interesting

This is not a signature.