These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

lolworthy alliance charter?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
RUSROG
Avalanche.
#41 - 2011-10-18 13:59:36 UTC
stationmonkey wrote:
ROFLMAO!! God I love you guys. And in case you haven't figured it out yet. I am here to be laughed at. Which is why I keep posting. Keeping Rus's post alive has become my new hobby! Besides this is helping me restructure the list to something a little more player friendly. (I didn't write the rules) But this gives me ammo to change them. Please keep giving me input.

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!

Stationmonkey



Dude. Seriously. Fail CVA lapdogs will always be fail CVA lapdogs, no matter how hard you try and hide it.
Your little circle of systems is empty. We went in about 12 hours ago and they all docked up and peed themselves.
They even refused to talk to us! Would you believe that! In LOWSEC!

For all those who are interested they hang out in the Teshkat loop.

Oh and the scout on the gate is asleep all the time - ignore him.

Otherwise, good luck with keeping the "No Fun" Alliance going.

All the best.
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#42 - 2011-10-18 16:07:37 UTC
RUSROG wrote:
Dude. Seriously. Fail CVA lapdogs will always be fail CVA lapdogs, no matter how hard you try and hide it.
Your little circle of systems is empty. We went in about 12 hours ago and they all docked up and peed themselves.
They even refused to talk to us! Would you believe that! In LOWSEC!

For all those who are interested they hang out in the Teshkat loop.

Oh and the scout on the gate is asleep all the time - ignore him.

Otherwise, good luck with keeping the "No Fun" Alliance going.

All the best.


hehe. So, setting up in the same area makes us lapdogs? How interesting your logic is. Let's see, we don't fly with them, we aren't helping them take any space. We aren't making some sort of coalition with them, and we aren't giving them anything. (yep were lapdogs alright!!!) We just appreciate their hospitality in letting us come into their area as long as we aren't trying to gank them and take their stuff.... If that's the definition of a lap dog then RUF RUF little buddy! You go on and continue to help me keep people reading this wonderful post because its the most fun I have ever had in EVE!

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!

Stationmonkey
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#43 - 2011-10-18 16:20:13 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:


Still Laughing, Whats the Point of a Sandbox if there are Rules xD


The point of the sand box is......

As much as I find that list of rules cumbersome and lolable you really do need to realize that a sandbox game also means that their are no rules against making a list of rules to follow P


Slade
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#44 - 2011-10-19 01:18:24 UTC
Cpt Fina wrote:
Errr, alot of these rules are found thruout alot of other alliances in Eve and most of them makes sense – so either people don't know what the **** their talking about in this thread or they behave like assholes because they want to hop on the bandwagon.

It's up to each and every corp to decide how much they want to commit to an alliance. Some alliances are a loose formation of corporations, orhers are more strict and have more rules. Both versions have benefits and drawbacks imo.



We understand that alliances come with rules, and when they make sense, we don't mind following them. But when approached by the alliance in question we were told that they were a lowsec pvp alliance that wanted to dabble in piracy.

This charter seems slightly counter-intuitive to the yarring arts, and as such we decided to make a slight mockery of them. The fact that they had decided to 180 on their goals, and become a CVA pet alliance, all the while still trying to entice us to join them, has only given us some ammo to fuel the fire.

It seems Stationmonkey is taking it in good stride, and is by the sound of it, using this thread to push for changes to their charter to make life a little better for the members of his corp that may also feel a little stifled by these fun gagging rules only reinforces our duty to ridicule it.

And you are correct, a lot of the rules do make sense, it is the ones that are blindingly stupid that we are making a mockery of.

TL;DR
Don't sell yourself as a pirate alliance then post this crap.


And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.
Greasy Meat Curtains
#45 - 2011-10-19 01:34:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Greasy Meat Curtains
You should read the rules AND SOPs over at Eve University. Talk about bureaucracy. Puke.
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#46 - 2011-10-19 02:56:14 UTC
stationmonkey wrote:
I am here to be laughed at. Which is why I keep posting

Your charter says you're not here to be laughed at so it sounds like you're violating the rules and should be removed from the alliance.
kiemai
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#47 - 2011-10-19 03:04:41 UTC
Tallianna Avenkarde wrote:
Don't sell yourself as a pirate alliance then post this crap.


We didn't sell ourselves as a pirate alliance, you were the ones who misinterpeted the charter.
SmileSmile
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#48 - 2011-10-19 03:08:55 UTC
Were not pirates friend, we are Buccaneers! So there is a little bootlegging, and maybe some swashbuckling... But *Pirates*? Nah, we don't blow someone up after they pay us not to... That would just be wrong. HAHAHAHA Obviously my little Tallianna you are a little confused as to what was told to you. There are times when its right to be a little rough around the edges. But that's just because its all some people understand. (Call us flexible) We I will say again are not CVA pets. I know your going to label us as that because it gives you a warm gooey feeling in your tummy. But living in the same area as someone is not being a "pet"... We just like the idea of having semi secure space where we can move around, and still have a fair number of targets to shoot at. Teshkat gives us all that and more. So we have to share the space... Big deal its frugal, and were interested in profits. OHHH were fricken FORENGI!!!!!! LOL




Fly Sure, Strike True, and Keep Up!


Stationmonkey
Jiska Ensa
Estrale Frontiers
#49 - 2011-10-19 03:27:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Jiska Ensa
Didn't you used to be a lead-corp in an alliance that's only claim to fame was becoming pets of pets of -A-? And still failed at even that?

Also, pretty sure I used to know you...are you drunk/high, or did you get brain damage or sell your character to a 12 year old?
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#50 - 2011-10-19 03:54:27 UTC
Jiska Ensa wrote:
Didn't you used to be a lead-corp in an alliance that's only claim to fame was becoming pets of pets of -A-? And still failed at even that?

Also, pretty sure I used to know you...are you drunk/high, or did you get brain damage or sell your character to a 12 year old?


Well.. I was in **** yes. Never a lead corp in any alliance. Yep they were pets of IO... =-( fricken artards those bumbleheads were. I don't drink, but yep I am high! hahaha And as far as the brain damage, an IED can do a lot of damage to a person. So, if your picking on me for that kudo's on your tact. And, nope never sold my toons. I am wayyyyyy too attached to them!! So, I guess in short your close but that only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. =-)~


Fly Sure, Strike True, and Keep Up

Stationmonkey
Jiska Ensa
Estrale Frontiers
#51 - 2011-10-19 04:08:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jiska Ensa
stationmonkey wrote:

Well.. I was in **** yes. Never a lead corp in any alliance. Yep they were pets of IO... =-( fricken artards those bumbleheads were. I don't drink, but yep I am high! hahaha And as far as the brain damage, an IED can do a lot of damage to a person. So, if your picking on me for that kudo's on your tact. And, nope never sold my toons. I am wayyyyyy too attached to them!! So, I guess in short your close but that only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. =-)~


Fly Sure, Strike True, and Keep Up

Stationmonkey


Two out of three ain't bad :) (My implication was you seem to have gotten weirder, which, in my experience, brain damage can do.. :)

But I'm pretty sure something derailed here. I have no idea what's being discussed anymore.
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#52 - 2011-10-19 04:59:19 UTC
Ahh the joys of arbitration! Whats being discussed is how completely terrible our charter is because it looks for a specific kind of person. *rolls eyes* I guess in short it was RUSROG trying to goad us or something. I only know that this has been an incredibly fun experience for me. I have had more laughs than I can count from this. (the charter really is a little stringent) But *dun da daaa!* The MONKEY is here to save the day! While I am not looking to strip the rules completely. I do agree one that has to go or at least be amended is the talking in local. (I do it all the time rule or not!) but! and I stress but... I don't believe in $hit talk that's just pointless, and leads to things that can easily be avoided with just a little mediation.

p.s. I soooo don't like this NRDS crap.. I am an NBSI pilot. but I am putting that behind me for the opportunities this little piece of space has to offer. (I will continue to be NBSI in other parts of space though!!!!) *pet* not likely I BITE!

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!


Stationmonkey
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#53 - 2011-10-19 07:22:30 UTC
stationmonkey wrote:
Ahh the joys of arbitration! Whats being discussed is how completely terrible our charter is because it looks for a specific kind of person. *rolls eyes* I guess in short it was RUSROG trying to goad us or something. I only know that this has been an incredibly fun experience for me. I have had more laughs than I can count from this. (the charter really is a little stringent) But *dun da daaa!* The MONKEY is here to save the day! While I am not looking to strip the rules completely. I do agree one that has to go or at least be amended is the talking in local. (I do it all the time rule or not!) but! and I stress but... I don't believe in $hit talk that's just pointless, and leads to things that can easily be avoided with just a little mediation.

p.s. I soooo don't like this NRDS crap.. I am an NBSI pilot. but I am putting that behind me for the opportunities this little piece of space has to offer. (I will continue to be NBSI in other parts of space though!!!!) *pet* not likely I BITE!

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!


Stationmonkey

Now you're trying too hard. This was a horrible post.
RUSROG
Avalanche.
#54 - 2011-10-19 07:55:32 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
stationmonkey wrote:
Ahh the joys of arbitration! Whats being discussed is how completely terrible our charter is because it looks for a specific kind of person. *rolls eyes* I guess in short it was RUSROG trying to goad us or something. I only know that this has been an incredibly fun experience for me. I have had more laughs than I can count from this. (the charter really is a little stringent) But *dun da daaa!* The MONKEY Rollis here to save the day! While I am not looking to strip the rules completely. I do agree one that has to go or at least be amended is the talking in local. (I do it all the time rule or not!) but! and I stress but... I don't believe in $hit talk that's just pointless, and leads to things that can easily be avoided with just a little mediation.

p.s. I soooo don't like this NRDS crap.. I am an NBSI pilot. but I am putting that behind me for the opportunities this little piece of space has to offer. (I will continue to be NBSI in other parts of space though!!!!) *pet* not likely I BITE!

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!


Stationmonkey

Now you're trying too hard. This was a horrible post.



Even goons think you're trying too hard.
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#55 - 2011-10-19 10:34:06 UTC
There was no goading, it was deemed lulsworthy, and so Rus decided to post it for all to see...

And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#56 - 2011-10-19 11:29:37 UTC
That'e better than not trying at all! so PHOOEY TO YOU ALL! =-)~
Ogi Talvanen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#57 - 2011-10-19 12:09:28 UTC
You need a new rule. No posting on eve forums.
stationmonkey
Synthetic Arbitration
#58 - 2011-10-19 12:53:52 UTC
Ogi Talvanen wrote:
You need a new rule. No posting on eve forums.



Aww! But that would make it so I can't keep RUS's post alive. I am having so much fun man! And I don't think I am trying hard enough. After all I have only one objective with this whole thread. And that is to play around with RUS because he is such a little crybaby. Got mad at us because after his diplo smacktalked us we decided to shoot him. Poor RUS he came directly to the forums so he could troll us! Its been fun and the best part is defaced or not were having a blast. I love being LOLWORTHY!! It makes my universe spin. OOHHH SHIP SPINNING IS BACK YO! (wow that was random) Well anyway guys keep giving us feedback so we can continue to have ourselves a good laugh at RUS's expense.

Fly True, Strike Sure, and Keep Up!

Stationmonkey
Killer Gandry
The Concilium Enterprises
#59 - 2011-10-19 13:04:34 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
I'm sure people are lining up around the block to join a corp that treats them like a spoiled child...



Uhm... isn't that what Goons are all about? Acting like spoiled bratts.
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#60 - 2011-10-19 13:52:10 UTC
Hardly would call that conversation smack talk. I believe the worst I said was "needs moar alpha".

Didn't even know you had set us red til halfway through the conversation, I was under the impression that we were blue peding talks over the alliance. In hindsight explains the hyp continually attempting to bump me off gate. Didn't even read charter til after it was all over.

No matter now, did find a new place to come for ***** and giggles, that is, if you guys ever undock.


And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.