These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Odyssey] Large Energy Turrets

First post First post First post
Author
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#421 - 2013-04-19 18:42:35 UTC
Pelea Ming wrote:
Scorch... in and of itself, very isolated case, and has no real immediate bearing to this topic as we aren't discussing ammo but the guns that use it. Pulse lasers do not need to be balanced in regards to them using Scorch crystals, 'nuff said.

You cannot talk about gun balance and ignore everything they relate to.
Regolis
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#422 - 2013-04-19 19:19:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Regolis
Gun "balance" he says .. How about this mr gun balance

YOU CANNOT FIT 8 MEGA BEAM IIs on an APOC and an armor repairer ... Go to Duality fit ship ... DOESN'T FIT


Rokh can fit 8 425s and a XL shield rep ... WTB "Balance" please


Oh and that is with MAX fitting skills ...
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#423 - 2013-04-19 20:30:25 UTC
Regolis wrote:
Gun "balance" he says .. How about this mr gun balance

YOU CANNOT FIT 8 MEGA BEAM IIs on an APOC and an armor repairer ... Go to Duality fit ship ... DOESN'T FIT


Rokh can fit 8 425s and a XL shield rep ... WTB "Balance" please


Oh and that is with MAX fitting skills ...

And what the point of this ? If your ship is more effective with 2ACR, why should it be able to fit the guns without the ACR ?

Isn't the abaddon a better ship for your job for example ?

What about the cap life of this Rokh BTW ? I bet it's not even half of your apoc !
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#424 - 2013-04-19 21:14:03 UTC
The energy turret changes aren't live yet, make sure you factor in those numbers before yelling about the fitting in all caps.
Regolis
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#425 - 2013-04-19 21:17:25 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Regolis wrote:
Gun "balance" he says .. How about this mr gun balance

YOU CANNOT FIT 8 MEGA BEAM IIs on an APOC and an armor repairer ... Go to Duality fit ship ... DOESN'T FIT


Rokh can fit 8 425s and a XL shield rep ... WTB "Balance" please


Oh and that is with MAX fitting skills ...

And what the point of this ? If your ship is more effective with 2ACR, why should it be able to fit the guns without the ACR ?

Isn't the abaddon a better ship for your job for example ?

What about the cap life of this Rokh BTW ? I bet it's not even half of your apoc !



Since apparently you have trouble reading ... MEGA BEAMS not Tachyons ... M-E-G-A-B-E-A-M-S

Even the Megathorn has enough grid for 8 425s and an armor repairer ...
Pelea Ming
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#426 - 2013-04-19 21:48:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Pelea Ming
Guys, remember, Duality does NOT yet have the new laser changes on it. It has the new Navy Cruisers, Navy Frigs, and Battleships. It has the Tracking Enhancer and Remote Sensor Booster nerfs... but that is all that it yet has updated to it!

(Ergo, beams have not yet had their PG need reduced!)
Pelea Ming
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#427 - 2013-04-19 21:51:21 UTC
as for Mega Beams vs 425's... the proper comparison is with Tachyons. They are in the Large Beam Laser grouping, ergo, they are not (flavor text to the contrary) actually an "over-sized mod". These beam lasers were always intended to be fit to Battleships, and as such when the largest long range turrets of the other races are held up for comparison, the proper Beam Laser to use is the Tachyon.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#428 - 2013-04-19 22:24:08 UTC
Pelea Ming wrote:
as for Mega Beams vs 425's... the proper comparison is with Tachyons. They are in the Large Beam Laser grouping, ergo, they are not (flavor text to the contrary) actually an "over-sized mod". These beam lasers were always intended to be fit to Battleships, and as such when the largest long range turrets of the other races are held up for comparison, the proper Beam Laser to use is the Tachyon.

I made the comparison. You would see it if you didn't had ignored me...

@Regolis
I don't care about the name of your weapon, I want actual fits to made a comprehensive comparison : something which make sense in the actual game we play, because obviously none of you care about comparing relevant thing between themselves and stoped at the "my ship is too difficult to fit, that's unfair" observation.
Regolis
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#429 - 2013-04-19 22:33:46 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


@Regolis
I don't care about the name of your weapon, I want actual fits to made a comprehensive comparison : something which make sense in the actual game we play, because obviously none of you care about comparing relevant thing between themselves and stoped at the "my ship is too difficult to fit, that's unfair" observation.




[Translation]
I don't care about lasers or balance I want railguns buffed.
[End Translation]

I don't understand why you're even in this area of the forums ... take it to the Gallente are awesome area and let those of us that actually use lasers and Amarr ships to find a balance ... at no point have I been irrational about a balance point ... I just want some parity .. if my gun is going to do the same damage as yours .. it shouldn't take 50% more grid and 3x the power


Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#430 - 2013-04-19 22:45:15 UTC
Regolis wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


@Regolis
I don't care about the name of your weapon, I want actual fits to made a comprehensive comparison : something which make sense in the actual game we play, because obviously none of you care about comparing relevant thing between themselves and stoped at the "my ship is too difficult to fit, that's unfair" observation.




[Translation]
I don't care about lasers or balance I want railguns buffed.
[End Translation]

I don't understand why you're even in this area of the forums ... take it to the Gallente are awesome area and let those of us that actually use lasers and Amarr ships to find a balance ... at no point have I been irrational about a balance point ... I just want some parity .. if my gun is going to do the same damage as yours .. it shouldn't take 50% more grid and 3x the power




But, but, but railguns! That would put something on par with railguns, and being equal isn't fair!

/sarcasm

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#431 - 2013-04-19 23:31:40 UTC
Regolis wrote:
I don't understand why you're even in this area of the forums ... take it to the Gallente are awesome area and let those of us that actually use lasers and Amarr ships to find a balance ... at no point have I been irrational about a balance point ... I just want some parity .. if my gun is going to do the same damage as yours .. it shouldn't take 50% more grid and 3x the power

Could you actually read what I write please ? It's boring.

I already said it : I don't want railguns to be buffed, because they are in a good place. I only want them to not lose their place because of selfish amarr carebears.

Yes it should take more PG and more cap to use beams than railguns. That's life in EVE, deal with it. If you want to know why, just look at the stats of your ships.

Know, if you actually want to discuss the proportions of the cap and PG beams need, through a fit, so we can actually have a base to discuss on. I won't do it, because 1) you don't care about what I write ; 2) I'm not good at pve fitting ; If you show me fit, I'll actually be able to work on it and see the problem.

I'm here to help, because you are unable to build a constructive argumentation, based on facts which matter, to prove that beams need less fitting, if they do.
Naso Aya
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#432 - 2013-04-19 23:34:44 UTC
You know, I hid Bouh's comments, but when I get bored, I click on one, hoping it'll add some clarity to his arguments, or let me understand his point of view.

Nope.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#433 - 2013-04-19 23:50:33 UTC
Naso Aya wrote:
You know, I hid Bouh's comments, but when I get bored, I click on one, hoping it'll add some clarity to his arguments, or let me understand his point of view.

Nope.

[translation]I tryed to understand, but my brain overloaded, so prefer to insult.[/translation]
I may be wrong, my english is not that good, but I don't see how this kind of coment could contribute to the thread in any, not even insignificant, way.
Kethry Avenger
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#434 - 2013-04-20 00:49:41 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Regolis wrote:
I don't understand why you're even in this area of the forums ... take it to the Gallente are awesome area and let those of us that actually use lasers and Amarr ships to find a balance ... at no point have I been irrational about a balance point ... I just want some parity .. if my gun is going to do the same damage as yours .. it shouldn't take 50% more grid and 3x the power

Could you actually read what I write please ? It's boring.

I already said it : I don't want railguns to be buffed, because they are in a good place. I only want them to not lose their place because of selfish amarr carebears.

Yes it should take more PG and more cap to use beams than railguns. That's life in EVE, deal with it. If you want to know why, just look at the stats of your ships.

Know, if you actually want to discuss the proportions of the cap and PG beams need, through a fit, so we can actually have a base to discuss on. I won't do it, because 1) you don't care about what I write ; 2) I'm not good at pve fitting ; If you show me fit, I'll actually be able to work on it and see the problem.

I'm here to help, because you are unable to build a constructive argumentation, based on facts which matter, to prove that beams need less fitting, if they do.


I bolded the important part. So you don't know how to fit ships. Yet your keep talking about ship fitting? An intelligent person would just remain silent.
Kethry Avenger
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#435 - 2013-04-20 00:54:59 UTC
If there is some worry by CCP that giving the Apoc and the Abaddon more PG so they could fit Tachyons because that would make MegaPulse fits overpowered. Then I would propose they just add a little PG to Large pulse lasers to compensate.

But there still should be an across the board decrease in laser cap use about 37.5% for large lasers. Or make them about twice as cap intensive as Hybrids three times as much.

Ideally this ratio of cap use would trickle down to Med and Small lasers.
Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
#436 - 2013-04-20 00:55:48 UTC
Guys, it's hopeless, just drop it. Amarr will be a neut-missile-drone race come Odissey.

Two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison

Naso Aya
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#437 - 2013-04-20 00:57:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Naso Aya
Here you go. I'm not that great with fits, but I'm curious what you'll think. I'm not that smart either, apparently. First up, the Rokh.

ROKH SNIPER FIT PVE (220 dps tank, 544 damage/sec w/ antimatter, 408 w/ thorium and you can't target further than that- I don't know if hybrids use tech II ammo or not.)

x8 425mm Railgun II's

x1 MJD
x2 Adaptive Invuln Field II
x2 Large Shield Extender
x1 Tracking computer II

x3 Mag Field Stab
x2 Shield Relay Control

x2 Large Core Defense Purger I
x1 Large Hybrid Collision Accelerator

Obviously I have no idea what I'm doing with shield tanks, but seems...respectable. A decent tank, though it's designed to MJD away if things get to close. Cap lasts for 6 min 57 seconds, a bit longer than most people aim for when doing missions, but not too bad. needs a 2% PWG mod to fit everything, but hey, could just take off the collision accelerator instead.

Now the Abaddon. Those of you who avoid battleclinic may want to avert your eyes. This is ugly. Keep in mind post-patch this could be swapped out for an Apoc, but the damage would go down, as would the tank.

ABADDON-SNIPER FIT PVE (774 dps with Gleam, and 442 with Aurora, 239 dps tank)

x8 Tachyon II's

x1 MJD
x3 Cap Recharger

x2 "Trebuchet" Heat Sinks (No room on cpu for tech IIs)
x1 Reactor Control Unit II
x2 EANM
x1 Large Armor Repairer
x1 Tracking Enhancer I

x1 Ancillary Current Router
x2 Capacitor Control Circuit

Wow! So much more damage! Well... kind of. The Abaddon has a 25% damage increase, but not like that damage increase matters because WITHOUT the repairer going, just firing it's guns, it lasts for 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

Does that help draw a comparison in your mind, Bouh? The Rokh is passive regeneration, which means it can't turn a repper off to gain more cap, only guns. But the Rokh lasts for twice as long, with 5 slots devoted to cap regeneration.

I can't believe I actually made these fits, someone shoot me.

Anyways, even after the Powergrid changes, there will still need to be at least that Ancillary Current Router, maybe a second one. If anything, with this current iteration of changes, my "fit" might by flyable with all skills at level 4, if only because a second low slot would be open (not that this fit can do anything with another lowslot, given the cap). I dunno, I doubt I changed your mind since the sheer damage is so different, even after explaining that the Abaddon has a 25% increased damage bonus.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#438 - 2013-04-20 02:49:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Kethry Avenger wrote:
I bolded the important part. So you don't know how to fit ships. Yet your keep talking about ship fitting? An intelligent person would just remain silent.

An intelligent person actually gather informations, make hypothesis and test them to acquire knowledge. Also, an intelligent person is able to recognize she doesn't know something.

Besides, I haven't made missions for ages, so my pve knowledge is a bit outdated, but as much as I can see from these fits, not so much.

About the fit : so, as you can see, performances are not that far, despite the terrible fitting of tachyon, and you didn't even considered the 10% PG and 20% cap use buff they will receive.

Looking at these stats with disdain because of the damage bonus of the abaddon is hypocritical though : the weapons only exists to be fitted on ships. That's why you cannot balances beams without any consideration to the hulls they will be mounted on, and without comparing them to the other ships, to actually see if you achieve balance or made something OP.

But the real questions are : is that abaddon so bad it's not good for pve ? Is the Rokh better ?
Naso Aya
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#439 - 2013-04-20 03:43:02 UTC
Rokh is definitively better in this case. Only by swapping out the low slots for more cap recharge do we get something that is cap stable guns firing for an "acceptable" amount of time, while the damage done with gleam is limited to 18+20km or so. The Rokh (which does have a range bonus) with antimatter has a min range of 50km. With the MJD, they should never be close enough to hit you (ideally) anyways, or for very long.

Tracking doesn't matter as much, since the guns aren't going to follow smaller ships that well anyways, and current NPC intel is "fly straight at the dude".

With a 20% cap buff, things get better, but keep in mind this is with all skills level 5- I shouldn't need a max skillpoint character to run level 4 missions.

The reason I mentioned the damage bonus is because a better comparison would be the Apocalypse, though with my version of EFT, I can't fit Tachyons onto the Apoc accurately. The Abaddon has the same powergrid, and is a "better" platform for tanking/damage. The tanking numbers get worse on the Apoc, as does the damage, both of which will fall to lower than the Rokh, while the range might be comparable.
Asa Shahni
Inevitable Outcome
E.C.H.O
#440 - 2013-04-20 06:29:51 UTC
YESSSS !
I can fire my guns on my baddon for a few seconds more so i can stop cross-tranning now can I ?