EVE Information Portal

I had a few idea for stuffs that might be interesting.

How about a ship or a module (probably fit for BS or capital class) That allows for a small 'bubble' area of space to be stealthed to ship scanners and probes for a durational period. Maybe even make the ship have to stay anchored like a cyno or seige/triage. Sure it would need to cost fuel and stuff and eat cap up if ran to long. BUT it might be interesting for fleets. Potentially OP but if you could build it right it could have limited usage even if there are 2 or 3 ships fitted.

Also WH people need somethign more solid to work out of then a pos itself. I had a idea for a small 'outpost; like structure. While not invulnerable has a longer reinforce time than a pos as well as alot of hp similar in scale to a large tower but marginally higher. With capability to dock a hundred pilots or more, corp hangars with large capacity. Although limited space ultimately. As well as repair facilities. that isnt very large of a order but docking caps would be a very beneficial thing for some wh groups. Maybe even allow some sort of sov type system. But utilize a shorter/different set of rules and call it colonization. Possibly at max lv let them anchor pos guins outside the thing like sentries. I dunno just a idea.

SUPER CAPS! ok i read on a blog about the posibility of anchoring these thigns FINALLY to a pos. Then no more. Well this is a long over due idea that was great to hear. Although i dont have real life time to sit and read forums about alot of things. I think you should really consider this idea. After training for years and avoiding this due to the isk factor but more largely to the your too is stuck in 1 ship forever till u train a alt thing. This is asking alot out of someone who has spent years playing the game to not ever fly anythign else or to buy/train a whole new toon to sit in it. The anchoring to poss idea is a perfect solution. Make it cost more fuel and use soem grid. Even make pos batteries have to reinforce power grid. Or something similar. Make it take a hour to anchor so you have to scout and plan it. Give something to us on this i think there would be a handful or 10 of super cap pilots who have trained toons for other ship whod love to fly them lol. Response?

Ill also chime in on the idea mentioned ages ago about the T3 frigs and or BSs. Well? Did that idea get torpedoed or what? T3 frigs sound tasty.

Some questions, first for CCP Mannbjorn:

Chronicles had some great artwork produced in the past - is there any likelihood that someone can provide some potential wallpapers and eye candy of this sort?

Will the nebulas for wormholes be altered at any point?

What's going on the with EVE Store?

Will DUST players have access to their own APIs so that we can spend productive hours at work looking at the stats of our alter egos (Chribba's made a start that needs cultivating)?

Imagine the pain in the ass of someone who can only afford 1 account and wants to be a pirate being locked out of the core trade systems (lowsec markets blow) because of these changes. He's relatively new and doesn't have much cash. He gets an unlucky lag spike on his way back with his hauler full of supplies and gets killed by CONCORD, then the mail gets paraded around a big news service to shame him.

That's bullshit.

Lots of ships have been improved with the various stages of rebalancing but personally I rather liked the fact that quite a few were square pegs in a round hole. I agree that it makes sense for everyone to have, eg, a combat battlecruiser, a fast battlecruiser and so on but if you remove the idiosyncracies then you also remove a lot of the flavour. The purists (and there are many) who pore over every +5cpu and -1dps may well applaud the changes but not everyone plays like that. Many are *gasp* casual players who rather liked having 2 rails and 2 missiles on their merlins.


So: given that we already have multiple versions of individual shiptypes (Iteron I-V I'm looking at YOU) my question is this:


Is there a technical reason or compelling game balance reason why the old ship versions could not be retained as a 'Mk I' version? Let the purists use the new improved versions and the dinosaurs have their fun with the old. Everyone's happy.


caveat: where stat nerfs have been deemed necessary (drake losing a launcher, etc) then fair enough those shouldn't be sidestepped. I'm talking about where there has been a substantial role change (tristam, Prophecy, original 'mining' frigs, etc).




Thanks for stepping into the line of fire you guys - should be interesting viewing!

Ecc

When Wil Fighter bombers be able to shoot at pos towers

When will you guys take getting rid of bots seriously and I mean more than just lip service? I've been reporting the same 2 bots in my system for like 9 months now and they are still mining away?

Larry

hello ccp, thanks for the awesome game.

Are there any plans to close the gap between black ops/Carrier and a jump freighter/rorq in terms of jumpable cargo space and price?
Something like a Orca with jump drive or something like that. i find it a pain to jump around 50-75m³ through null.

Some kind of Hisec nerf? any boost to lowsec? lowsec is dying!

Corporation Roles.

Will there be a fix so that I can rent out lab lines to corpies or other individuals without worrying about person A cancelling the job of person B?

When will the corp roles interface have a proper fix to make it easier to use, like everything else you're changing?

Will there be a fix for the built in calculator (example, making it larger and easier to read and use)?

Do you have a plan to increase skills training queue?