These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

WH "Coalitions" Blobs, Blue Lists, and bob.

First post First post
Author
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#141 - 2013-04-10 20:53:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Thanks for the replies. It was a question, not a proposal.

I find it interesting that the replies so far are against the idea, even though most people are against the idea of blue blobs...
Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#142 - 2013-04-10 21:17:18 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Thanks for the replies. It was a question, not a proposal.

I find it interesting that the replies so far are against the idea, even though most people are against the idea of blue blobs...

Blue blobs are born out of formal agreements. Formal agreement not to blue blob is like dividing by zero.
Vincent Gaines
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#143 - 2013-04-10 21:40:33 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Thanks for the replies. It was a question, not a proposal.

I find it interesting that the replies so far are against the idea, even though most people are against the idea of blue blobs...




  • Not for NIP
  • Not for blue donut


I think you don't even understand your own point.

Not a diplo. 

The above post was edited for spelling.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#144 - 2013-04-10 21:45:05 UTC
so delicious tears and dividing be zero... Straight

Are you for or against the idea of players discouraging blobbing during invasions, Godfrey?
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2013-04-10 21:51:34 UTC
Vincent Gaines wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Thanks for the replies. It was a question, not a proposal.

I find it interesting that the replies so far are against the idea, even though most people are against the idea of blue blobs...




  • Not for NIP
  • Not for blue donut


I think you don't even understand your own point.


sorry, where did i try to make a point?

I thought i was asking a simple question that would get a simple answer but apparently you thought it would be a better use of your time to post some crap about your screwed up childhood to try and make your self look cleaver...
Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#146 - 2013-04-10 21:52:51 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
I have a question for everyone:

Should the major wormhole alliances sign some sort of non intervention pact to help govern invasions/evictions?

Effectively this would mean if one alliance invaded another wormhole, the defenders would be "breaking the rules" if they batphone for help.



Sure and while we are at it lets all sign a lease on this particular bridge in Brooklyn. Might as well RP the entire thing, I say we elect our own President of the Major Wormhole Alliances and appoint a cabinet for him.
Vincent Gaines
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#147 - 2013-04-10 21:53:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Gaines
Rek Seven wrote:

I thought i was asking a simple question that would get a simple answer but apparently you thought it would be a better use of your time to post some crap about your screwed up childhood to try and make your self look cleaver...



I think you're the only person who didn't get the point of the story. Should I use smaller words?

Not a diplo. 

The above post was edited for spelling.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#148 - 2013-04-10 22:04:07 UTC
Ah there's the other troll Big smile

It's a shame that you two lack the ability to have an intelligent discussion and resort to endless trolling when you lose an argument. It only shows that your logic and reasoning skill are flawed and that people have no reason to listen to anything you have to say.

I feel sorry for you guys and anyone that has the displeasure of knowing you but i won't be wasting ye time on you any more. Blocked.

Vincent Gaines
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#149 - 2013-04-10 22:06:50 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Ah there's the other troll Big smile

It's a shame that you two lack the ability to have an intelligent discussion and resort to endless trolling when you lose an argument. It only shows that your logic and reasoning skill are flawed and that people have no reason to listen to anything you have to say.

I feel sorry for you guys and anyone that has the displeasure of knowing you but i won't be wasting ye time on you any more. Blocked.




Words cannot describe this hilarity.

Not a diplo. 

The above post was edited for spelling.

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#150 - 2013-04-10 22:16:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Godfrey Silvarna
Rek Seven wrote:
Are you for or against the idea of players discouraging blobbing during invasions, Godfrey?

I am all for players using persuasion, misdirection and military power to discourage things they disapprove of and to encourage things they approve of. I for one approve of doing everything you can to win without any chivalric agreements, but also very strongly disapprove of getting evicted myself. I however do not believe that making any kind of systematic rules for wormhole space is ever going to work.

My point kind of is that trying to create any kind of chivalric honour system is bound to fail.
Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#151 - 2013-04-10 22:37:53 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Ah there's the other troll Big smile

It's a shame that you two lack the ability to have an intelligent discussion and resort to endless trolling when you lose an argument. It only shows that your logic and reasoning skill are flawed and that people have no reason to listen to anything you have to say.

I feel sorry for you guys and anyone that has the displeasure of knowing you but i won't be wasting ye time on you any more. Blocked.




Op success.
Sith1s Spectre
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#152 - 2013-04-10 23:51:25 UTC
Far out guys, this thread is still going. You should be out killing nullseccers invading our space not other notiable WH groups.

To quote our great leader Kynric, "Right now there is someone out there doing somthing dumb in an expensive ship. Find them."

Resident forum troll and fashion consultant

QT McWhiskers
MultiPass Inc.
The 5th Seal
#153 - 2013-04-11 00:58:34 UTC
First off, Father Herrbert thank you for enlightenment on the scriptures of bob. Your guidance has taught me that the only blood that would make bob more happy is the blood of the carebear. Other than that he does not discriminate on how the blood is obtained or where it comes from. Only that it sates his thirst.

Now on the the fun question for everyone. If you heard that goons/test/solar/whoever else from null we all hate were invading *Insert name of most hated WH corp here* would you team up to drive out the null sec scum from our space? Or would you sit back and laugh as your most hated enemy is destroyed. Or would you go further and offer to help drive out your enemy, helping null sec in the process, from their home.

Would TL form up to help Polarized/Exhale/EA if they were invaded by test or goons? Would W-Space form up to help Hard Knocks if we were invaded by CVA (I had to stop laughing for a few minutes on that one lol cva.)

We always say that we would team up if Null Sec ever invaded WHs. But would we truly? Or do we all just say this to comfort ourselves after our stomach hurts from too much blue icing on our donut?
Max Leadfoot
Insurgence.
Tactical Narcotics Team
#154 - 2013-04-11 01:26:24 UTC
We attacked a null settled C5 earlier today, Red Alliance, which is a pretty common routine for us. Some of you may dislike a choice in one of our latest targets, but the truth is you didn't like one out of sixty seven.... or whatever the running total is at this point.

If we were asked to help against a large outside power we would show. We've faced down huge gangs and held our ground before, (one vid is earlier in this thread) and there would be no hesitation. We hold no grudges, regardless of all the recent crying.

QT McWhiskers
MultiPass Inc.
The 5th Seal
#155 - 2013-04-11 01:33:03 UTC  |  Edited by: QT McWhiskers
Attacking a carebear hole is a lot different than forming up a 40-50 man fleet from your own allaince to team up with people you generally do not like to come help defend someone who is being invaded by said null bears.

We've all attacked ratting null bears in WHs.

Also we dont care if you attack null bear holes because they dont fight. They pos up the instant something comes on D-scan and dont come back until the "bad men" are gone. WHs lose nothing when these infidels are killed off.
Max Leadfoot
Insurgence.
Tactical Narcotics Team
#156 - 2013-04-11 02:17:47 UTC
QT McWhiskers wrote:
Attacking a carebear hole is a lot different than forming up a 40-50 man fleet from your own allaince to team up with people you generally do not like to come help defend someone who is being invaded by said null bears.

We've all attacked ratting null bears in WHs.

Also we dont care if you attack null bear holes because they dont fight. They pos up the instant something comes on D-scan and dont come back until the "bad men" are gone. WHs lose nothing when these infidels are killed off.


It may be "a lot different" in such a situation for you, per bitterness and haste, but not for us. We also clearly have very opposing views on null expos, we try to remove them... and you "don't care". I don't have much else to say on this but.. wow. Just wow.
Senn Denroth
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#157 - 2013-04-11 02:30:56 UTC
Gnaw LF wrote:
Upset, not upset. Mad or not, its all irrelevant, this thread is tons of fun. I guess what I'm trying to figure out is why Polarized. is trying to put a spin on this eviction, is there some sort of beauty pageant they are trying to win? Big smileBig smile


Not, not a beauty pageant, an election. Terrible publicity, just terrible.

At the end of the day, a person shows their true colors by their actions, not by what they say or lead people to believe.

We've had good fights with the TL C5 guys, they were evicted from their home due to a grudge, was lied about and tried to cover up etc.. so people are going to vote based on their belief of whether TL deserved it or not.

If they did it due to a grudge and not a payable contract, this is no better because you can only justify it with the people that held the grudge, I had no grudge with TL so I think they didn't deserve it. Same with the rest of EVE.

This thread is really funny though :)
Will read again.
Rengas
AQUILA INC
#158 - 2013-04-11 02:41:41 UTC
Whatever, we all voted for Riverini anyways right?
Senn Denroth
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#159 - 2013-04-11 03:05:50 UTC
Rengas wrote:
Whatever, we all voted for Riverini anyways right?


Yea, sure. Big smile
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#160 - 2013-04-11 03:13:00 UTC
Senn Denroth wrote:
I had no grudge with TL so I think they didn't deserve it. Same with the rest of EVE.



Considering the amount of people wanting to help us/stayed neutral, I would say that statement is dubious.

No trolling please