These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Your New CSM is!

First post
Author
ACE McFACE
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#21 - 2013-04-05 06:00:43 UTC
Meh, CSM hardly does anything anyway, if the CSM says "Make high-sec have only veldspar and level 2 missions" CCP will just say "NOPE".

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.

Andracin
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-04-05 06:33:44 UTC
CSM to CCP : here is a list of things people want fixed the most
CCP: Interesting list. We will be serious about it so our serious faces get recorded in the minutes
CSM: So...when will we see any of the things on this list
CCP: We don't have resources alocated for any of them. Besides we read the forums and know what players want anyway
CSM: So when will you have the resources to work on any of these game improvements?
CCP: Soon
CSM: Well...thanks for the trip to Iceland
CCP: Anytime. Go tell the players to be happy because their voice was heard...and make sure they don't notice we are totallly ignoring them....
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#23 - 2013-04-05 06:44:17 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
and people still think CSM elections are relevant and fair ?

Sheesh CCP just stop this CSM fetish you not only your time but ours aswell


The CSM elections are fair, the other point though is in contention.
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#24 - 2013-04-05 11:53:01 UTC
At least Riverini isn't on that list...

...

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2013-04-05 12:29:08 UTC
Goons really have the using the useful idiot thing down pat, don't they?

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Akiyo Mayaki
Perkone
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-04-05 13:46:01 UTC
My list is almost identical.. Pirate

No

Winter Archipelago
Autumn Industrial Enterprises
#27 - 2013-04-05 13:51:23 UTC
WORD OF WARNING (as if anyone would read through the second page before clicking the link...): The ads on that page are a bit NSFW.
EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#28 - 2013-04-05 14:26:40 UTC
Winter Archipelago wrote:
WORD OF WARNING (as if anyone would read through the second page before clicking the link...): The ads on that page are a bit NSFW.

can someone rehost it on a not terrible image host like imgur so i can see how much of our plot against democracy leaked
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#29 - 2013-04-05 14:54:47 UTC
http://i.imgur.com/z9kQMPq.jpg

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#30 - 2013-04-05 15:02:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
That link used the correct spelling for "bloc." Not the EO forums standard accepted dunderhead misspelling, "block." Seems kind of suspicious....
Artctura
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#31 - 2013-04-05 15:02:38 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Calls by the CSM to get CCP to provide linkable ballots (like the Vote Me links last year) to make this sort of thing accessible to everyone were unfortunately ignored.

maybe next year :s


The problem isn't so bad with a single account voting. And I'm sure they wanted that experience to be "exceptional". The problem is, this interface is absolutely atrocious for those voting multiple accounts.

At least allow double clicking a name to move it to the next open spot.
Artctura
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#32 - 2013-04-05 15:04:28 UTC
Andracin wrote:
CSM to CCP : here is a list of things people want fixed the most
CCP: Interesting list. We will be serious about it so our serious faces get recorded in the minutes
CSM: So...when will we see any of the things on this list
CCP: We don't have resources alocated for any of them. Besides we read the forums and know what players want anyway
CSM: So when will you have the resources to work on any of these game improvements?
CCP: Soon
CSM: Well...thanks for the trip to Iceland
CCP: Anytime. Go tell the players to be happy because their voice was heard...and make sure they don't notice we are totallly ignoring them....


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625&find=unread

led to

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/odyssey-summer-expansion-starbase-iterations/

Hmmm..
Josef Djugashvilis
#33 - 2013-04-05 18:32:41 UTC
Virtually unknown for the most part, outside of their immediate family.

This is not a signature.

celebro
Ember Inc.
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#34 - 2013-04-05 19:29:17 UTC  |  Edited by: celebro
Thanks for the info Op , now I know who not to vote for.
EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#35 - 2013-04-05 19:56:56 UTC
celebro wrote:
Thanks for the info Op , now I know who not to vote for.

its a trick the official goonwarm candidate is Trebor, The Official Mouth Of Goonswarm On The CSM

they just want you to vote for him

Ovv Topik
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#36 - 2013-04-05 22:54:34 UTC
Man I wish I could join Goons.
All the time I waste thinking for myself like a chump!

"Nicknack, I'm in a shoe in space, on my computer, in my house, with a cup of coffee, in't that something." - Fly Safe PopPaddi. o7

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#37 - 2013-04-05 23:07:26 UTC
Ovv Topik wrote:
Man I wish I could join Goons.
All the time I waste thinking for myself like a chump!

Just send me a 500mil safety deposit and I'll facilitate your transfer.
Hoban Gallifrey
New Eden University
#38 - 2013-04-05 23:13:32 UTC
Slate voting is nothing new to STV. If players are happy to follow commands like sheep and not take an active interest in the CSM candidates that's their problem.
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2013-04-05 23:35:12 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
and people still think CSM elections are relevant and fair ?

Sheesh CCP just stop this CSM fetish you not only your time but ours aswell


Well I was going to vote for the CSM, but then some guy on the forums told me not to, so I didn't.
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#40 - 2013-04-06 07:03:15 UTC
Hoban Gallifrey wrote:
Slate voting is nothing new to STV. If players are happy to follow commands like sheep and not take an active interest in the CSM candidates that's their problem.


At least the sheep people are motivated enough to vote. The vast majority of people will either a) not vote, b) not vote and c) vote but not on their alts. y) and z) occupy the realm of bloc voters and people who vote with their alts as well.
Previous page123Next page