These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

CSM 8 Election is live, go vote!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Frying Doom
#41 - 2013-04-10 02:34:37 UTC
Rhavas wrote:
Go vote dammit!

Vote for all of the WH 5 at the top of your ticket to make sure we get 1-2 people on.

So vote first

James Arget
Cipreh
Nathan Jameson
Chitsa Jason
Ayeson

And remember, failure to vote in this CSM election, makes you a Null sec stooge.
In STV number of votes required to get elected is tied to the total number of votes, so you don't vote it obviously means you like wormhole stabilizers.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Castor Troyy
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#42 - 2013-04-10 05:08:12 UTC
Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...

You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...

But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.

@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict

evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted)
1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out

The word you should be using is vandalise

vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised)
1. To needlessly destroy other people’s property or public property; to commit vandalism.

We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up

mercenary (plural mercenaries)
1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.

We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...

Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa

The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get.
Helgrind Wolf
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#43 - 2013-04-10 05:51:12 UTC
voted Big smile
Senn Denroth
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#44 - 2013-04-10 05:58:14 UTC
Castor Troyy wrote:
Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...

You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...

But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.

@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict

evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted)
1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out

The word you should be using is vandalise

vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised)
1. To needlessly destroy other people’s property or public property; to commit vandalism.

We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up

mercenary (plural mercenaries)
1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.

We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...

Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa

The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get.


Ok so what you're saying is that you were paid to vandalize TL from their home and not actually looking for goodfights? Playing on words doesn't change what it was..

4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip.
Castor Troyy
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#45 - 2013-04-10 13:44:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Castor Troyy
Senn Denroth wrote:

Ok so what you're saying is that you were paid to vandalize TL from their home and not actually looking for goodfights? Playing on words doesn't change what it was..

4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip.


Castor Troyy wrote:

We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...




[IE Not for profit, as in 4 NO ISKIES]

Senn Denroth wrote:

4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip.



Lol..don't be mad bro..remember its just a game...read a post completely..and read it again before you rage reply...you miss stuff Big smile
JoostSkywalker
Lionheart Investments
#46 - 2013-04-10 17:13:54 UTC  |  Edited by: JoostSkywalker
Castor Troyy wrote:
Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...

You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...

But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.

@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict

evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted)
1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out

The word you should be using is vandalise

vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised)
1. To needlessly destroy other people’s property or public property; to commit vandalism.

We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up

mercenary (plural mercenaries)
1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.

We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...

Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa

The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get.



In WH-space the effiction is the state of destroying or attempting to destroy all assets including the towers.
This will cause most wh corps to leave that mentioned system and when they will rebuild it happens in most cases in a different system.

If you think you are not evicting someone when you destroy all their assets and their home. Then you only consider that to soften your own concious. Even doh you can tell yourself that it is not an eviction, in most cases it will have that effect.

Considering otherwise is either a lag of knowledge about whspace and its people or like i said earlier a way to justify your own actions.

Vote for WH space

Vote for James Arget
Castor Troyy
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#47 - 2013-04-10 18:49:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Castor Troyy
JoostSkywalker wrote:


In WH-space the effiction is the state of destroying or attempting to destroy all assets including the towers.
This will cause most wh corps to leave that mentioned system and when they will rebuild it happens in most cases in a different system.

If you think you are not evicting someone when you destroy all their assets and their home. Then you only consider that to soften your own concious. Even doh you can tell yourself that it is not an eviction, in most cases it will have that effect.

Considering otherwise is either a lag of knowledge about whspace and its people or like i said earlier a way to justify your own actions.

Vote for WH space

Vote for James Arget


lol..come one dude...you know better than that..you know they logged those carriers in, w/ most of their T3s etc...if you don't want to recognize that...them i guess its your lack of knowledge about wspace. These guys are alive and well and building back the few ships that that SD'd [few in comparison to what they saved/lost]

I don't have to justify my actions to anyone..neither do you...my only point was my view on evictions...maybe you have a different opinion about it than i do..that's ok too...but enought with the QQsand boo hoos...these guys werent "evicted" they were invaded got some assests destroyed. They are still in wspace and moving on...you should too...

As far as the topic of this thread goes....

whspace needs as many seats at the table as we can get..just going from the number of endorsments I saw..Chitsa had more than all of the other 4 [im not sure what the final results were..so if i am incorrect sorry in advance]

...hell..I endorsed Ayeson b/c chitsa already had the 200 he needed...the whole point of this is to get as many guys who can be a voice for us no matter what you think about how they play the game or what alliance flag they fly under...they can all do good things for wspace...they are all good candidates..they all have a pretty good knowledge of whspace...

you guys that dont vote for all 5 could end up shooting whspace in the foot...take a step back and read what the posts say what the ideas are and dont look at the author...w/ the exception of some of the topics as far as specifics go...most are all in line w/ the general direction whspace needs to go...and the changes we as a wh community want

EDIT: corrected quotes
Frying Doom
#48 - 2013-04-11 00:06:49 UTC
Castor Troyy wrote:


you guys that dont vote for all 5 could end up shooting whspace in the foot...take a step back and read what the posts say what the ideas are and dont look at the author...w/ the exception of some of the topics as far as specifics go...most are all in line w/ the general direction whspace needs to go...and the changes we as a wh community want

EDIT: corrected quotes

Still better than the wormhole dwellers that are appearing in GD, saying that they are not voting at all.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Previous page123