EVE General Discussion

First of all i want to start with a quote
The Melian Dialouge
we can all agree their are flaws with the war dec system. Some believe one way and some the other. the one thing i noticed is that no one sees the fundamental problem with them. You see in other mmos wardecs are used to gain something or to force people to do things. In this mmo war decs are used to either troll, or have a good time. The problem is not the system, but high low and null itself. No other game has a system like that. Yet we are trying to use a war dec system like other games, The two systems themselves are imcompadible(sic) currently. For how can you have a safe area, that people can be easily killed in. And an area for war, where wardecs do not matter.it defies the very nature of a wardec. It defies its purpose. It is a square circle. War decs should be done to give you a bonus in a null/low war, or in the war zone. Instead of having their only purpose be to kill people in a "safe" area. That could/should be a bonus. Not the only purpose. I will state it again. The problem is not the system. The system is fine. The problem is that the system was made for another type of game. Not a sandbox as complex as EVE. In comparison that would be like using a tablets ios on a computer or vise versa. Either way it makes the device useless for its intended purpose. Who would want a big computer that can not do much, or a small comp that can do a lot but is slow and over-complex.
below is some personal conjecture relating to my idea. A.K.A. i don't care if these suggestions are heeded (the ones below)
As you know if your read it, i think they should make war decs give you bonus' in war. Some simple ideas for these are below
10% (or less) faster locking time. If you are at war, you would know who your enemy was, so you can identify them faster
Assoscite identifier: this would let you see things like who they did business with the most, who they fought ect.. because in war you should know this. As such, you would know exactly who to target. Instead of just killing everyone you could be more precise.
Radar: finally some sort of tracking thing that can track ships you are at war with within a light year(besides black ops). I know they have agents for that, but in real life we have satellites for that.
That is my two cents, i know it may make wars more complex, but such is war irl, and such is EVE. These ideas may be great, or horrible from your standpoint. And i hope that you will tell me what you think in the comments below.
That is all

it's just group duelling. you can decline with the leave corp button.

I hear they have dueling in WoW........

OP is piloting a ****-fit thread.

{citation needed}

High Sec (high security)
Security "freedom from danger. safety "
High"lots"
Translation "lots of safety, freedom from danger"
tis in the name

lots is not all. I am not against ganking. I am not against fighting in higsec. I am just pointing out the arguments of both sides, for to know yourself it tis best to know the other.

it is not made up, check the dictionary

the war is against the corp not the player so you can ditch the war by ditching your corp. the NPC holding corp you default to when you do this can't be a war target. there's no way for a player corp to force a single player to fight them in high sec.

Could say the same for you....

High
I think 4 provides the best adaptation:

4. exceeding the common degree or measure; strong; intense: high speed; high color.

Using the definition of High as per the dictionary, the security is higher than that of low or null. This is true. But is does not make High Sec safe, it makes it safer.

By undocking you have acepted the terms and conditions that at any point in time you may be aggressed by another player.

Note that the word has a link and that it is cited.