EVE Information Portal

This sentiment.

Also I recently posted on related issue, and gave a few ideas for how a more latteral integrated system could be applied. The ide Personal Division Hangars: Which would be a potential mechanic that could be reused in these PSH

PDH Concept

A variation on that theme would help more types of players imho..

The PSH is a great idea to complement the already existing CHA(or whatever it's acronym is if I got that wrong, the current one for storing crap in). you get a small amount of completely secure storage, if someone leaves **** in it (go on vacation, leave corp, quit eve, whatever) and later on wants it back but the pos had to be moved, well, they knew when they first put their stuff in it it could be lost, on their own heads be it.

Well, 75% of currently active members. The longer your pos is up, the more bays full of stuff from not currently active members you're going to get.

CCP is always sending out emails to inactive subscribers, trying to get them to rejoin. Sometimes this works. But, if someone decides to resub, find that their items were all just destroyed by the CEO, well, that resub has a good chance of not lasting very long.

And sure, the upside does outweigh the downside. This is a great new pos module which many people, including myself, are going to put up. It just has one major glaring flaw that's going to effect almost every corp that uses it, unless it gets fixed within a reasonable period of time.

People have been saying that you can tell people to remove their stuff before they unsub. Well, sure, you can ask. From my experience though, this rarely happens. Many times when people let their subscription lapse(from what I've seen), it's after a period of inactivity. They log on less and less often, then one day when they try to log in, they find out that their subscription has ended, and decide to take a break from EVE.

I plan to set up methods in my corp to reduce the chances of this happening, but I can't eliminate it entirely. And, our corp policy has always been that RL comes first. If you have to leave EVE suddenly, without having time to conclude your affairs in game, well, we'd like to be able to take care of the stuff they left in our care until their return.

Great News CCP. Keep up the good work!

This is a good idea.

I'm happy you finally decided to commit to fixing this issue.

However I'll be holding you to this one, so no returning to the 'we're-not-going-to-do-it-since-we're-not-sure'- stage. As that was ******* annoying.

When is CCP going to bring capital-class ships back to high-sec in EVE? I've heard stories of huge mining operations being run from Rorqual platforms that just make my mouth water, and frankly, I don't see the point in keeping them out. The benefits of going to low/null/neg-sec aren't going to change. You have to go to this sort of space in order to mine your "ABC" ores to get the rarer minerals for production of just about anything. Forcing carebear pilots like myself to take on increased risk and danger in those areas of space just to use a bigger/better ship to mine the same ores that we would in high-sec is pointless!
If you want to keep the PVPers from invading high-sec with capital-class vessels so as to "muscle out" smaller corporations/alliances, a modified version the CONCORD security system which restricts pilots with low ratings from entering certain areas or all of high-sec, already in place, could be used. If a pilot's Kill/Death ratio is high, then they can't bring their capital into high-sec. Also, you could restrict pilots from using capital-class weapons or weapons fitted to capital-class ships against other capsuleers in high-sec. That way, PVE gets a big boost, especially in the Incursion area, and miners are able to use their Rorquals in high-sec without incurring the increased risks of being subjected to PVP pilots. All carebears are happy, and with the increased supply of ore/minerals, thus ships and modules, on the market, prices will inevitably drop, which I don't think any PVPer would mind at all.

I share this sentiment though not as harshly.

I think what CCP need to do is stop being afraid of player outcry. Some fixes and added complexity or depth will not be received well by a habit engrained playerbase. Any big new change will cause a lot of raging, and to some extend the CSM is potentially hindering big changes when representing this rage. We are lucky that some really visionary players have had access to CSM and been open to shaking the boat a lot.

We have 3 problems atm that ccp seem to not want to comment on. The Blue Donut, The Hi-Freq Trading, and The WH Cricket Wars. Any attempt to resolve these things will make those benefiting from them rage. The question is can and will ccp tank that rage and just bloody fix it. Scarcity and competition is really something CCP have been afraid to take to the next level, its been like dragging a mule. The SLOT problem on stations have only been partially resolved and the same with office rental. Please lets get some big changes SOON, instead of these small tweaks and work arounds.

One little thing I would like to see as well, well one of several is a distance counter showing how far out a gun, ecm, ect.. is from the tower when you are anchoring, just to make it easier.

Also just a little marker in the manage screen to show what percentage of full a guns ammo is.

How about allowing the SMA to repair damaged modules?