These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Half way out of the darkness or is that just an illusion. Candidate Qualification Tally.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Frying Doom
#41 - 2013-04-01 04:46:31 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
rodyas wrote:
I think I would prefer more of a lighter industrial tool then a POS. At least for collecting materials and stuff.

I mean a POS can serve as a base of operations, but you don't need a strong base for everything you do though. So its just becomes burdensome and annoying.

Especially with a theme of exploration, no one carries their home with them, when they explore. So it would be nice to have something you wouldn't mind sacrificing to move on, but also doesn't take a lot of ISK or setting it up. At least for extraction and collection or something.

I think of a POS as a caravan, annoying to drive, capable of pissing every other road user off and a liveable play while you are out and about.

The step below that is a tent and I don't know if I would want to live in one of those with armed nutters running around.


Well exploration means you are moving around, not staying in one spot. Which helps to mitigate the threat. Of course living in a wormhole, POS can be the best choice because a base might be able to be set up and stuff like that and you don't explore or keep moving as much anymore.

I wouldn't say that the standard POS should be removed, just extra options added, for different play styles and uses.

You can live in your caravan, and I can come visit you for a bit in a tent, then move on afterwards. If I stayed longer, most likely I would be attacked and ruined or I would have to change to a standard POS or something.

I can see a place for a smaller easy to move base, kind of what I was hoping starbases and POS would become under a modular system, where you can just take some small parts to begin with.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Frying Doom
#42 - 2013-04-01 04:51:16 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Also, it doesn't look like you are too popular in Trebor's thread. Might have to go like your statements, so it doesn't look so bad. :)

Thanks for that Smile

I will admit I am more perplexed than before as to why they willvote for Trebor

they seem to just be praising him without really knowing why.

They cannot seem to grasp that he failed in his roles most noticeably communication in CSM 7 as vice-chairman.

Lets face it we had discussions going for well over a month with no interruptions from any CSM members, except Issler chiming in.

let alone the fact that neither Trebor nor his followers have any idea why he is actually running for the CSM this year other than for the fact he will be the only CSM 7 member likely to be elected.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#43 - 2013-04-01 09:16:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Alekseyev Karrde
Three pages of two trolls talking to one another and Frying wonders why people dont participate more on the forums. Shocked

EDIT: also I dont think Issler had much to do with the mining barge HP buff. I could be wrong. I'm sure she wouldnt mind the credit for it though.

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM
Frying Doom
#44 - 2013-04-01 09:29:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Three pages of two trolls talking to one another and Frying wonders why people dont participate more on the forums. Shocked

EDIT: also I dont think Issler had much to do with the mining barge HP buff. I could be wrong. I'm sure she wouldnt mind the credit for it though.

Well seeing as you turned up into our little hole would you explain your position on the STV system as apparently it was also dicussed by CSM6 and thrown out. allow me to quote

Meissa Anunthiel wrote:


The changes to the CSM
I'm not a big fan of the idea of there being 7 members only, especially since the top 7 are usually representatives of large 0.0 alliances, but it's not something I can do much about (budget is budget). I insisted vehemently that STV would be a very bad thing until voter turnout increases, because with low voter turnout, STV gives an advantage to blocs (you can read the rest of my argument in the minutes :p). That message was well received, at least for now...
I agreed with the requirement to get a number of "likes" in a forum thread prior to the elections, the number I thought would be appropriate was at least 50 and no more than 100.


Oh and just to note after the months me and Rodyas had this forum all to our selves, well possession is 9/10s of the law. Maybe you guys shouldn't have let it rot so much, but in all fairness you did pick up in the last few months.

Just just to cap, it was CSM 7s abandonment of these forums that resulted in myself and Rodyas treating them as our own private forum, not the other way around. As members of the CSM you guys should have been posting here regularly and myself and Rodyas should have felt like you guys were the ones using Jita park speakers corner as your own forums.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Frying Doom
#45 - 2013-04-01 10:23:33 UTC
User statistics for Alekseyev Karrde
Total posts: 2565
Jita Park Speakers Corner: 312 posts

User statistics for frying doom
Total posts: 4090
Jita Park Speakers Corner: 1299 posts

User statistics for Rodyas
Total posts: 2987
Jita Park Speakers Corner: 628 posts

and a couple of your CSM 7 Comrades the Chairman and Vice-Chairman responsible for communication with the player base.

User statistics for Seleene
Total posts: 7263
Jita Park Speakers Corner: 470 posts

User statistics for Trebor Daehdoow
Total posts: 1619
Jita Park Speakers Corner: 662 posts

And this is including the fact that a large number of these posts include your running for CSM in the first place, with Trebor being on CSM 5,6 and 7 and is now running for CSM 8

So don't claim that you don't post here because of myself and Rodyas

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#46 - 2013-04-01 21:16:33 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Also, it doesn't look like you are too popular in Trebor's thread. Might have to go like your statements, so it doesn't look so bad. :)

Thanks for that Smile

I will admit I am more perplexed than before as to why they willvote for Trebor

they seem to just be praising him without really knowing why.

They cannot seem to grasp that he failed in his roles most noticeably communication in CSM 7 as vice-chairman.

Lets face it we had discussions going for well over a month with no interruptions from any CSM members, except Issler chiming in.

let alone the fact that neither Trebor nor his followers have any idea why he is actually running for the CSM this year other than for the fact he will be the only CSM 7 member likely to be elected.


Eh, this election is more player based. So they want their player issues and stuff to work and be implemented by CCP. They might care more about the roles of CSM, if those roles helped their issues be dealt with.

But just as long as they get a CSM who supports their views and tells CCP them, I doubt they would really ask for more then that. Roles would be secondary to that.

I mostly like Trebor, since he is the only one so far who doesn't seem to get bogged down by content and game mechanics, and can actually hold a conversation on other issues.

But that said, I probably will just vote for troll candidates and just feel bad about me not voting for decent people.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#47 - 2013-04-01 21:20:59 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Three pages of two trolls talking to one another and Frying wonders why people dont participate more on the forums. Shocked

EDIT: also I dont think Issler had much to do with the mining barge HP buff. I could be wrong. I'm sure she wouldnt mind the credit for it though.


I am totally sure, one bad thread totally shat on everyone's forum and EVE experience.

All the bad threads, I have seen come and go, but yet this one was just too much, just too heavy for everyone.

I honestly don't think I am worthy as the reason, people don't talk on the forums anymore or the reason for the decline in posting. And if Frying Doom and I are the reason for it, we stand on the shoulders of giants, Giants who if stood on our small shoulders, would crush us underneath them.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#48 - 2013-04-01 21:23:30 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:


let alone the fact that neither Trebor nor his followers have any idea why he is actually running for the CSM this year other than for the fact he will be the only CSM 7 member likely to be elected.


The CSM is too smart that is why.

They all want to run off and play games while Trebor does the work to hold things together.

Isn't that pretty much the dream of every game player. Have someone who will hold things together and do the work, so you can run off and play.

They all want to believe in the CSM dream, and have the same experience, so they will vote for trebor.

If I had half a mind, I would vote for him as well. With Trebor in the office, I can AFK mine ice to my hearts content, knowing the game will take care of itself.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#49 - 2013-04-01 21:34:31 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:


Oh and just to note after the months me and Rodyas had this forum all to our selves, well possession is 9/10s of the law. Maybe you guys shouldn't have let it rot so much, but in all fairness you did pick up in the last few months.

Just just to cap, it was CSM 7s abandonment of these forums that resulted in myself and Rodyas treating them as our own private forum, not the other way around. As members of the CSM you guys should have been posting here regularly and myself and Rodyas should have felt like you guys were the ones using Jita park speakers corner as your own forums.


Well snow axe isn't here posting either. That is why Kardde is chiding us. We don't have the other owner of the forum present in our troll thread.

He is just doing the job of the CSM, by keeping things fair, and reminding us to not cut people or ideas out and if we do start a thead, we should include the other people we post with, just out of decency.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#50 - 2013-04-01 21:36:11 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
Frying Doom wrote:

I can see a place for a smaller easy to move base, kind of what I was hoping starbases and POS would become under a modular system, where you can just take some small parts to begin with.


Mind clarifying the modular POS and what it would be like?

I mostly see different kinds of POS that could be manufactured and used, kind of like ships and the roles they have.

How would a modular POS be different. Or is that more of a Strategic cruiser design rather then different ships with different roles?

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Succendus Tegimens
Hey Fatty With Your Thick Face
#51 - 2013-04-01 21:51:48 UTC
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?
Frying Doom
#52 - 2013-04-01 22:05:18 UTC
Succendus Tegimens wrote:
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?

Hours of practice,

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Frying Doom
#53 - 2013-04-01 22:08:22 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


let alone the fact that neither Trebor nor his followers have any idea why he is actually running for the CSM this year other than for the fact he will be the only CSM 7 member likely to be elected.


The CSM is too smart that is why.

They all want to run off and play games while Trebor does the work to hold things together.

Isn't that pretty much the dream of every game player. Have someone who will hold things together and do the work, so you can run off and play.

They all want to believe in the CSM dream, and have the same experience, so they will vote for trebor.

If I had half a mind, I would vote for him as well. With Trebor in the office, I can AFK mine ice to my hearts content, knowing the game will take care of itself.

Yeah and if your lucky his concept of non consensual pvp will come to being and then you don't have to worry about war decs or ganking

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#54 - 2013-04-01 22:10:16 UTC
Succendus Tegimens wrote:
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?


I just masterbate and watch Fox news too much.

So its mostly natural.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Frying Doom
#55 - 2013-04-01 22:12:01 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

I can see a place for a smaller easy to move base, kind of what I was hoping starbases and POS would become under a modular system, where you can just take some small parts to begin with.


Mind clarifying the modular POS and what it would be like?

I mostly see different kinds of POS that could be manufactured and used, kind of like ships and the roles they have.

How would a modular POS be different. Or is that more of a Strategic cruiser design rather then different ships with different roles?

the modular idea was to split up the current POS system and then make one that fits together like lego

So you start with a basic and then add storage space then a larger reactor and then maybe some guns and you just keep building adding more CPU and power grid as you go. So that way you can have a small little pos or something the size of a city, and of course the bigger it is the more it costs.

Then CCP was talking about the ability for it to jump and cloak.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#56 - 2013-04-01 22:15:12 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


let alone the fact that neither Trebor nor his followers have any idea why he is actually running for the CSM this year other than for the fact he will be the only CSM 7 member likely to be elected.


The CSM is too smart that is why.

They all want to run off and play games while Trebor does the work to hold things together.

Isn't that pretty much the dream of every game player. Have someone who will hold things together and do the work, so you can run off and play.

They all want to believe in the CSM dream, and have the same experience, so they will vote for trebor.

If I had half a mind, I would vote for him as well. With Trebor in the office, I can AFK mine ice to my hearts content, knowing the game will take care of itself.

Yeah and if your lucky his concept of non consensual pvp will come to being and then you don't have to worry about war decs or ganking


Eh, my retriever fears no one.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#57 - 2013-04-01 22:23:14 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

I can see a place for a smaller easy to move base, kind of what I was hoping starbases and POS would become under a modular system, where you can just take some small parts to begin with.


Mind clarifying the modular POS and what it would be like?

I mostly see different kinds of POS that could be manufactured and used, kind of like ships and the roles they have.

How would a modular POS be different. Or is that more of a Strategic cruiser design rather then different ships with different roles?

the modular idea was to split up the current POS system and then make one that fits together like lego

So you start with a basic and then add storage space then a larger reactor and then maybe some guns and you just keep building adding more CPU and power grid as you go. So that way you can have a small little pos or something the size of a city, and of course the bigger it is the more it costs.

Then CCP was talking about the ability for it to jump and cloak.


That is not too bad. Kind of like build your own ship type thing.

Makes it hard to decide what I would like most.

I remember the jump and cloak idea.

Still seems like a big idea though, wonder when it will become feasible or so.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#58 - 2013-04-01 22:27:24 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Succendus Tegimens wrote:
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?

Hours of practice,


You sound an awful lot like Trebor with that reply. Doing hard work to move ahead. I am amaze you troll him so much.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Frying Doom
#59 - 2013-04-01 22:35:50 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Succendus Tegimens wrote:
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?

Hours of practice,


You sound an awful lot like Trebor with that reply. Doing hard work to move ahead. I am amaze you troll him so much.

Well with him doing 15-20 hours a week, on the CSM it is kind of amazing that he has failed in his roles as secretary and then this year as vice-chairman\

I mean thats 780 - 1040 hours, to fail to communicate with the player base or manage to update the "What is the CSM" page.

That is pretty incredible if you think about it.

But then again he did manage to hand CSM 8 to Null sec and remove the voting power of every person in EvE, so I suppose he does have something to show for all his hours of work.

As to my hours of practice, I must spend at least 3 hours a year practicing Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#60 - 2013-04-01 22:42:56 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Succendus Tegimens wrote:
Did you two become bad posters through constant practice, or do you have a natural talent for awful posts?

Hours of practice,


You sound an awful lot like Trebor with that reply. Doing hard work to move ahead. I am amaze you troll him so much.

Well with him doing 15-20 hours a week, on the CSM it is kind of amazing that he has failed in his roles as secretary and then this year as vice-chairman\

I mean thats 780 - 1040 hours, to fail to communicate with the player base or manage to update the "What is the CSM" page.

That is pretty incredible if you think about it.

But then again he did manage to hand CSM 8 to Null sec and remove the voting power of every person in EvE, so I suppose he does have something to show for all his hours of work.

As to my hours of practice, I must spend at least 3 hours a year practicing Lol



Eh, at least if null seccers do win. Trebor will be in the midst and heart of it all, sadly on a day to day basis sometimes. He has my sympathies.

I do imagine, if that does happen, this will be his year to make ya happy, Frying Doom. He will probably escape to update the wiki and stuff like that, rather then communicate with his fellow members.

Hopefully more current CSM come to our thread to troll us. We are gonna have to toughen up more to deal with the next CSM. Can't allow ourselves to grow fat from owning a thread all to ourselves.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne