These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

On Dust514 and why it will save Eve (and therefore CCP)

First post
Author
Mal Mandrake
Space Goat Likes it Rough
#1 - 2011-10-16 00:36:28 UTC
I believe CCP has an excellent plan for the future of Eve in conjunction with Dust 514.

Dust 514 will be a first-person shooter for the PS3. It is essentially a game about mercenaries. We as Eve players will be able to create contracts with Dust players to either a.) attack planet installations, or b.) defend planet installation (There may be other uses, but this is as far as I have gone so far.)

What installations are we talking about? Well PI of course.

That is right, in the near future you will have to pay to keep your cozy planets secure.

Now here is an interesting point, sort of a big picture look at how this works.

A lot of people have asked why PI is so easy, safe, overpowered. CCP has made it this way to encourage a rapid growth of PI installation across the galaxy. Whenever we set up a new planet with PI we are essentially creating another "level" for Dust players to play on.

Think about how many planets with PI are spread throughout the galaxy right now? Through our efforts we will have created an endless amount of levels for Dust players to fight on.

Now for how this saves Eve.

Each and every Dust purchase becomes a GIANT advertisement for Eve online.

At least a portion of Dust players will become curious about this mysterious Eve game for the computer. Some players may find that they want to try giving the orders instead of taking them. This will cause an influx of new players to Eve. Conversely there will be an influx of Eve players going to Dust. Muahahaha on CCP's part. Genius!

I am guessing that corporations between Dust and Eve will be linked (as in the same corp) which would mean you can fatten your Eve wallet by doing some assault missions in Dust. (This is an excellent opportunity to use your children as ISK farmers)

Dust will also provide an excellent ISK sink in keeping colonies alive. I imagine this will also translate into higher prices for PI materials. (Good for me as a PI industrialist)

-Mal Mandrake






ACE McFACE
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2011-10-16 00:38:56 UTC
It'll also help CCP make more money which it can spend on EVE or DUST, or that Vampire thing but meehehehsadefgdcsm

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.

Joseph Dreadloch
Dread Space Inc.
#3 - 2011-10-16 00:44:32 UTC
DUST 514 is going to sink CCP, it will not compete in the world of console shooters. It will have a population of a couple thousand players who happen to be EVE players who own a PS3.

What happens to DUST 514 and EVE a year after its launch, when BF5 and CoD13 launch?
Nel Gardier
Time Sync
#4 - 2011-10-16 00:47:14 UTC
Pass those drugs on over OP.
T'Laar Bok
#5 - 2011-10-16 00:48:04 UTC
Mal Mandrake wrote:
Dust 514 will be a first-person shooter for the PS3.


If CCP think they can compete with all the others out there with their years and years of experience at FPS with just the added gimmick of being somewhat interactive with the EVE universe then they are playing with their giggly bits.

I cannot see it being anything other than a failure.

Amphetimines are your friend.

http://eveboard.com/pilot/T'Laar_Bok

Mal Mandrake
Space Goat Likes it Rough
#6 - 2011-10-16 00:48:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Mal Mandrake
Joseph Dreadloch wrote:
DUST 514 is going to sink CCP, it will not compete in the world of console shooters. It will have a population of a couple thousand players who happen to be EVE players who own a PS3.

What happens to DUST 514 and EVE a year after its launch, when BF5 and CoD13 launch?


Naysayer!

The FPS world is currently saturated with current warfare games, (Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc) There is really only a few sci-fi multiplayer FPS's out there. Halo springs to mind, but their last game for that is a few years old now.

As an FPS player myself, I look forward to having an near endless amount of maps/missions to take on.

What you say may end up being true, but I believe the current FPS landscape will eat a game like Dust up.
Joseph Dreadloch
Dread Space Inc.
#7 - 2011-10-16 00:57:28 UTC
Mal Mandrake wrote:
Naysayer!

The FPS world is currently saturated with current warfare games, (Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc) There is really only a few sci-fi multiplayer FPS's out there. Halo springs to mind, but their last game for that is a few years old now.

As an FPS player myself, I look forward to having an near endless amount of maps/missions to take on.

What you say may end up being true, but I believe the current FPS landscape will eat a game like Dust up.




Console FPS players are generally ADHD stricken teenagers, or adults looking for some drop in - drop out fun. The complexity of a persistent MMO-style FPS will be completely lost on the console crowd and has only even been moderately successful with the PC crowd.

Also I don't own a PS3 but just offhand Resistance and Killzone are PS3 exclusive sci-fi shooters, not to mention Planetside 2 in developement...
Boseo
Azure Horizon
#8 - 2011-10-16 01:03:19 UTC
Mal Mandrake wrote:

Naysayer!

The FPS world is currently saturated with current warfare games, (Call of Duty, Battlefield, etc) There is really only a few sci-fi multiplayer FPS's out there. Halo springs to mind, but their last game for that is a few years old now.

As an FPS player myself, I look forward to having an near endless amount of maps/missions to take on.

What you say may end up being true, but I believe the current FPS landscape will eat a game like Dust up.


I totally agree, they all follow the same formula. Was talking to a few friends or mine who are big console gamers, and one of the things they complain about is how the games get boring and repetitive, all because there is no reason for them to be fighting over a flag any more, which is why they then move on to the newer game when it comes out, so they have something different to do.

I mentioned Dust 514 ad one of them said they were keeping an eye out for it (they never heard of or played eve, and did not know I played it) due to the fact they felt that they would finally have a little more depth to the reason why they were fighting over something.

so yea I don't see why so many people seem to think this is destined to fail, as its different enough that it may work well and be popular. But hay we don't know until its out.

P.S. Look on the PS3 network site thing, every time something about Dust is mentioned it gets lots of people seemingly excited and asking questions. so it looks popular. Also CCP, if they had any brains would have done market research to check there was a market.

Sorry but file “forumsig.GIF” is currently unavailable please come back later…… like in a year or so.

Steveir
Hagukure
#9 - 2011-10-16 01:14:49 UTC
Well the tie in deal with Sony could prove to be a clever plan. Sony could promote this as The Game to play.
While I agree that the FPS are normally drop in, drop out, the very fact that this is persistent could attract considerable interest.
I would love the option of flying a Battleship (fitted for orbital bombardment) to a planet to "help" out. That could raise considerable interest in lo-sec.
..and how about t2 Planetary interaction. Colonies, expensive installations that yield considerable passive tax isk, but are subject to hostile takeovers by Dust players; again would tie the games together well.
Personally I am very optimistic at the possibilities here; but we shall have to wait and see if CCP delivers :)
Mal Mandrake
Space Goat Likes it Rough
#10 - 2011-10-16 01:19:22 UTC
Steveir wrote:
Well the tie in deal with Sony could prove to be a clever plan. Sony could promote this as The Game to play.
While I agree that the FPS are normally drop in, drop out, the very fact that this is persistent could attract considerable interest.
I would love the option of flying a Battleship (fitted for orbital bombardment) to a planet to "help" out. That could raise considerable interest in lo-sec.
..and how about t2 Planetary interaction. Colonies, expensive installations that yield considerable passive tax isk, but are subject to hostile takeovers by Dust players; again would tie the games together well.
Personally I am very optimistic at the possibilities here; but we shall have to wait and see if CCP delivers :)


Agreed, biggest hitch is seeing if CCP delivers. (I am hopeful on this one)
Joseph Dreadloch
Dread Space Inc.
#11 - 2011-10-16 01:24:56 UTC
Steveir wrote:
Well the tie in deal with Sony could prove to be a clever plan. Sony could promote this as The Game to play.


Sony is developing Planetside 2, a direct competitor to DUST514.
BLACK-STAR
#12 - 2011-10-16 01:30:12 UTC
Wow. why I'm replying... cause bad threads like this should stop.


This doesn't save EVE, this is just another bad post. DUST no way saves EVE, the question you're asking yourself is if DUST is ready for EVE.


DUST to survive longer than 6-12 months via console? lols

We all know CCP is too slow to deliver feasible content in a short amount of time, what's wrong with your head if you think CCP is committed to a constant explosion of new content simultaneously to EVE and DUST and keep both boats afloat? They can't. And console players' have a way shorter attention span compared to PC EVE community.


You are literally looking at a disaster. And you seem to be sitting on a horizontal stick on your chair.
Adunh Slavy
#13 - 2011-10-16 01:34:16 UTC
If Dust is at least as good an FPS as the others, then it has something they do not, a persistent, and dynamic world where their actions have meaning beyond some kill board or ranking system. Dust will of course compete for the trigger happy dopamine crowd, but its core target audience are those who want play have more meaning and value in the experience.

In the real world, in combat, you care more about your buddies, you really don't give a crap about the larger political issues, something about not being able to respawn in real life plays a part here. But in an FPS, a game, where you can respawn forever, something else needs to matter beyond just your buddies. Something to loose makes the experience better for some. For those that want this, and are FPS dopamine addicts, Dust will fill that need.

I'm not saying CCP has a sure fire winner, but they are filling a gap in the market and in many ways, filling that gap first, and that is a considerable advantage.

If I have any complaint about it, it's not on PC.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Flamespar
WarRavens
#14 - 2011-10-16 01:42:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Flamespar
How dare someone say something positive about CCP or Dust514 on these forums.

Don't you know that these forums are only for baseless accusations, wild speculation, childish tantrums and endless anti-everything-CCP-does-that-isn't-FiS drivel.

Naughty, naughty OP
Mal Mandrake
Space Goat Likes it Rough
#15 - 2011-10-16 01:42:56 UTC
BLACK-STAR wrote:
Wow. why I'm replying... cause bad threads like this should stop.


This doesn't save EVE, this is just another bad post. DUST no way saves EVE, the question you're asking yourself is if DUST is ready for EVE.


DUST to survive longer than 6-12 months via console? lols

We all know CCP is too slow to deliver feasible content in a short amount of time, what's wrong with your head if you think CCP is committed to a constant explosion of new content simultaneously to EVE and DUST and keep both boats afloat? They can't. And console players' have a way shorter attention span compared to PC EVE community.


You are literally looking at a disaster. And you seem to be sitting on a horizontal stick on your chair.



Why do you gotta ruin a thread full of civil conversation?

It is possible to make a post with a dissenting opinion without being a jerk.

If you consider it a bad thread then move on.
Falin Whalen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2011-10-16 01:56:30 UTC
Joseph Dreadloch wrote:
Steveir wrote:
Well the tie in deal with Sony could prove to be a clever plan. Sony could promote this as The Game to play.


Sony is developing Planetside 2, a direct competitor to DUST514.


CCP may deliver, but they will be overshadowed by an established Planetside fan base, eager to try Planetside 2.

"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka 

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#17 - 2011-10-16 01:58:47 UTC
BLACK-STAR wrote:
We all know CCP is too slow to deliver feasible content in a short amount of time, what's wrong with your head if you think CCP is committed to a constant explosion of new content simultaneously to EVE and DUST and keep both boats afloat? They can't.

Isn't CCP Shanghai doing the Dust side of things?
Why can't they keep working on Dust?
BLACK-STAR
#18 - 2011-10-16 01:59:35 UTC  |  Edited by: BLACK-STAR
I'm truly the nicest guy you'll meet, but not a jerk. I'm telling you, that high horse you're on about EVE being saved is flat out wrong and ignorant.

I understand that you're trying to make a nice thread and high hopes but DUST is not a solution nor will it have significant impact to somehow solve EVE's problems on any front.

CCP's ultimate plan with DUST, if met with flat out failure, is to port it to PC platform. or abandon it entirely (probably not).



You're on a stretch right now and I thought I would step up and cash you the reality check, I think nothing about using soft words or trying to sound soft, I just speak my thought.


But seriously enjoy DUST if you're going to play it. I certainly hope CCP does a good job but as for preliminary info go on about it, and from what we learned this year and before that, CCP cannot deliver. And the FPS market is much harder to break through than they anticipated years ago.



edit:

non judgement wrote:
BLACK-STAR wrote:
We all know CCP is too slow to deliver feasible content in a short amount of time, what's wrong with your head if you think CCP is committed to a constant explosion of new content simultaneously to EVE and DUST and keep both boats afloat? They can't.

Isn't CCP Shanghai doing the Dust side of things?
Why can't they keep working on Dust?

Isn't CCP Shanghai another end department of CCP, which would have to first go through with homebase CCP to approve new DUST content then implement it space side? see how this works? Not going to work out well, the communication problems between the two bases isn't even considered by CCP. and we all know how CCP handles player feedback. Look where we are all ended up now... Not so good =S
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2011-10-16 04:27:22 UTC
Joseph Dreadloch wrote:
DUST 514 is going to sink CCP, it will not compete in the world of console shooters. It will have a population of a couple thousand players who happen to be EVE players who own a PS3.

What happens to DUST 514 and EVE a year after its launch, when BF5 and CoD13 launch?


u don't know that, BF2MC had a good fanbase on the original xbox for years... the only issue atm is PS3 is a bad market for shooters it already has lots of exclusives + shooters dont sell well on PS3.

anyways, if dust is a good shooter it will be a great success, we don't know how it will end up until a demo or the full game comes out.
Dbars Grinding
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-10-16 04:37:37 UTC
sure if it was for PC or xbox and not shtty ass ps3.

I have more space likes than you. 

123Next pageLast page