These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anti-Ganker Barge Fits.

First post
Author
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#201 - 2013-08-13 18:03:52 UTC
Sasha Rama wrote:
Personally I found your fits to be extremely helpful. Apparently some people don't understand what the word 'optional' means and didn't read anything you wrote.

The first 3 are the cheapest, and in my opinion, the most useful. The rest are a bit too expensive for my tastes, but then again, i'm not obsessed with over powering defenses as much as you are. Thank you for what you posted here and please ignore the trolls, they are everywhere.


lol... your giving Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha way too much credit. When he was running for CSM, he tried to make a name for himself by starting these anti-ganker barge fit threads. His original versions always had "Canyon" Medium Shield extenders (~20m), advocated t2 rigs, and claiming the best fit to be a pimped out 1b+ isk mackinaw. Frankly, he didn't seem to understand that eve is about balance, and he still doesn't seem to get it.

You need enough tank to deter, no more. A cheap-fit catalyst will deal ~500 dps. A t2 fit gank catalyst will output less than 700 dps. You need to survive 20s before concord arrives in a 0.5 system. Assuming three of them, you want more than 30k EHP minimum, but I usually suggest aiming for ~35k EHP before heat and fleet boosts (which will increase this to 40k+).

After that, you really want a survey scanner... as any miner will tell you it really helps optimizing your mining efficiency. You also want a laser upgrade or two if you can fit it.

The fit below has all of these things, 37k + EHP, A survey scanner, a decent mining yield:

[Mackinaw, Standard Ore]
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Mining Laser Upgrade II
Damage Control II

Medium F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Survey Scanner II

Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

Mining Drone I x5
Hornet EC-300 x5

I admire Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha tenacity in posting, but his advice falls short for a couple of reasons:

1.) He really doesn't seem to understand how resists work (i.e. what EHP means). EHP = HP / ( 1 - your resistance).

2.) He doesn't seem to understand the primary principles behind ganking:
  • Entertainment -- making peoples ships blow up satisfies a certian urge in people. These players look for player reactions, they look for explosions, and they look for easy targets. Putting a tank on your ship somewhat undermines them, as there are usually lots of other targets out there that don't bother tanking.

  • Profit -- this is ganking people with a bunch of cheap ships to collect the loot they drop. It is also done to freighters, industrials, mission ships, and anything that has a high Value to EHP ratio. To avoid these gankers, you reduce the profitability to gank you. It isn't just about maximizing your tank, it means you increase your tank without increasing the value of your ship. In other words, you don't put 100m+, 50m+, or even 20m+ modules on your ship.

  • Space Control -- ganking people is sometimes used to control space. You can never "tank" your ship to be gank proof, instead you simply make it more expensive for them to gank you. If they want the space bad enough, they will spend the isk & effort to remove you. You can either move away, give in to their extortion, or resist by making it too expensive to remove you. You really should work with others (like a jamming BB, remote reps, etc) to defeat these players.

  • In short, while you may find some of Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha posts helpful, please understand why he's getting so much resistance... It is because his posts are generally ignorant and arrogant, and the focus of his posts is off because of it.
    Sasha Rama
    Doomheim
    #202 - 2013-08-14 14:32:17 UTC
    I don't think he was given any credit. He actually held a public fleet in Nakugard for well over a year, every day, long before he ran for CSM and made a name for himself by helping hundreds of people. He didn't need this thread for that, I believe he created this thread simply to help people from being ganked, that much is obvious. I seem to be one of the only people in this thread without some form of mental dilapidation, because all of his barges actually are balanced, in the truest sense of the word. He simply left it open for people to choose from a long list of barges presented, however, I am aware that people like yourself obviously have very limited reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, so it is no suprise that they give themselves "too much credit" by signing on alts and liking their own posts until they have thousands of likes.


    The barges in this thread (and i've read the entire thing) are superior to everything else presented by anyone else. That is impossible to miss unless this thread simply was not read or not understood, in which case your opinion is invalid. Which it has been from the start since you said 'making suggestions' to people was 'horseshit'.

    500 dps to 700 dps on a catalyst? Completely forgetting to factor in the resistances of said barges, it rapes damage on a catalyst. Since gankers formally use anti-matter or void, it destroys the damage they do to most of these barges by eliminating 80+% of the elemental damage done by them. But i'm sure you didn't mean to miscalculate and leave that fact out to mislead people. EHP matters very little as it does not factor possible damage done or training of the attacker into the equation.



    I for one do not want a survey scanner, I actually cut my lasers halfway through and am not concerned with time spared. As I afk most of the time, picking a fat rock and letting my lasers run. The fit you displayed is a modified version of what simo already presented in this thread, many, many, times over. Plagiarism is the height of stupidity, and since you do it shamelessly, you are a sad sack trying to, once again, give yourself too much credit by stealing out of someone elses think tank.



    Your admiration, would be like a boil inside the anus of a man who neither needs it, or wants his material stolen. You don't understand resistances or EHP (estimated hit points) which, once again, does not factor in any external factors like the damage done by the other incoming ship, implants, or the training of the other individual. It is actually flawed in that it can't possible know how much incoming damage would be present to make a guesstimation of the actually HP of the ship. Using that as a reference point is rediculous at best.



    He completely explained the principles behind ganking, as did many others, you simply read nothing, or could not read, and didn't take any time to think about what the thread was about. Furthermore, if he cared about other people being satisfied in blowing up someone elses work, I don't think he would have posted all of this, furthermore putting the tank on a ship is the furtherthest thing from undermining its defense, duh? You had best be trolling, because everything you just posted sounded like a two year old talking about daddy's poker night, maybe you should stay in your lane.



    I didn't just find his posts helpful, they were awesome to the many that he helped, especially in Nakugard during his stay. He got some much resistance because of self-liking forum trolls trying to make a name for themselves and get in good with unworthy organizations like goon, or just straight being a part of them.

    He was the furthest thing from ignorant or arrogant I have ever seen, as he let everyone choose from an entire list of barges he presented, argued no points, and as for arrogance... Arrogant people post with no justification, credibility, or improvement.



    You will not be responded to again, as I do now in retrospect know your trolling, no one is this ignorant. That was the most pitiful display of trying to discredit someone I have ever seen in a forum. I feel sorry for you.
    Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Doomheim
    #203 - 2013-08-14 14:50:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Quote:
    lol... your giving Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha way too much credit. When he was running for CSM, he tried to make a name for himself by starting these anti-ganker barge fit threads. His original versions always had "Canyon" Medium Shield extenders (~20m), advocated t2 rigs, and claiming the best fit to be a pimped out 1b+ isk mackinaw. Frankly, he didn't seem to understand that eve is about balance, and he still doesn't seem to get it.

    You need enough tank to deter, no more. A cheap-fit catalyst will deal ~500 dps. A t2 fit gank catalyst will output less than 700 dps. You need to survive 20s before concord arrives in a 0.5 system. Assuming three of them, you want more than 30k EHP minimum, but I usually suggest aiming for ~35k EHP before heat and fleet boosts (which will increase this to 40k+).

    1.) He really doesn't seem to understand how resists work (i.e. what EHP means). EHP = HP / ( 1 - your resistance).

    In short, while you may find some of Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha posts helpful, please understand why he's getting so much resistance... It is because his posts are generally ignorant and arrogant, and the focus of his posts is off because of it.


    Why so autism?
    Bugsy VanHalen
    Society of lost Souls
    #204 - 2013-08-14 15:12:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
    Sasha Rama wrote:
    I am aware that people like yourself obviously have very limited reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, so it is no suprise that they give themselves "too much credit" by signing on alts and liking their own posts until they have thousands of likes.


    LOL, a Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha alt, insulting other people for alt posting.
    This thread is now complete
    Lady Naween
    Ministry of War
    Amarr Empire
    #205 - 2013-08-14 16:18:30 UTC
    Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
    Sasha Rama wrote:
    I am aware that people like yourself obviously have very limited reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, so it is no suprise that they give themselves "too much credit" by signing on alts and liking their own posts until they have thousands of likes.


    LOL, a Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha alt, insulting other people for alt posting.
    This thread is now complete


    ^^ that so many times that.
    Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
    Vigilante Carebears
    #206 - 2013-08-14 17:31:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
    Edited.
    Commodore Quaritch
    Doomheim
    #207 - 2013-08-14 17:37:21 UTC
    this thread should now be locked.

    It no longer holds relavent conversation or contributions.
    Sasha Rama
    Doomheim
    #208 - 2013-08-14 18:40:07 UTC
    Commodore Quaritch wrote:
    this thread should now be locked.

    It no longer holds relavent conversation or contributions.


    Alt of Gizzum, Bugsy, or Lady Newbqueen?
    Gizznitt Malikite
    Agony Unleashed
    Agony Empire
    #209 - 2013-08-14 19:18:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
    Sasha, Sasha, Sasha....

    I've always liked that name. I originally started responding to your post piece by piece, sometimes with the same rudeness of your original post. I even thought you were really Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha just posting on an alt. Then I came upon this gem:

    Sasha Rama wrote:

    You don't understand resistances or EHP (estimated hit points) which, once again, does not factor in any external factors like the damage done by the other incoming ship, implants, or the training of the other individual. It is actually flawed in that it can't possible know how much incoming damage would be present to make a guesstimation of the actually HP of the ship. Using that as a reference point is rediculous at best.


    Let me explain something to you, and I hope you read this because I'm doing it for your benefit, and anyone else that misinterpreted what EHP means.

    EHP does NOT mean ESTIMATED hit points, it means EFFECTIVE hit points.

    And it absolutely factors in implants, trained skills, modules, rigs, and most importantly, ship resistances.

    You, and Simo-Hayha, understands that resistances, at its core is damage reduction: If a catalyst dishes out 1000 dps, and the target has 85% resists in kinetic and thermic so it only takes 150 HP damage.
    Mathematically "HP Damage received = ( 1 - R ) * Incoming Damage", where R is your resistance to that damage.

    To make comparing dps and tank though, tools like EFT, Pyfa, and the like use Effective Hit Points. Effective hit points simply includes the "(1 - R)" factor with the HP, to represent the total tanking ability against a specific damage type.
    Mathematically EHP = HP / ( 1 - R ).

    Why do they do this?
    It makes it so you can directly look at the damage output, of say a catalyst, and quickly see how long it will kill a mackinaw. If a catalyst output 1000 dps, and you had a 30,000 EHP tank, it would take 30 seconds to destroy you.

    Now, there is some "extra math" since damage comes in four flavors, and you have four flavors of resistances. This is handled in EFT by averaging your resists, which isn't accurate for every situation but instead gives you a solid "this is what my tank is roughly scenario". Luckily, EFT allows you to create & define custom damage profiles to check your tank specifically against Angel rats, or Serpentis rats, or even blasters.

    This is why I replied, "Horseshit" to the notion most of his mackinaws can survive a simultaneous attack from 8x catalysts in a 0.5 system.

    See, I wrote an article on tanking hulks to survive hulkageddon suicide attacks several years ago. The guide explained ewar, remote reps, and the importance of resistances, and more (although the guide is way old now, as it was from before mining barges were rebalanced, from back in the day when the only way you could get 30k EHP on an exhumer was max-tanking a hulk). Tanking your Hulk

    I took a bunch of time, tested concord response times, tested mechanics on sisi & TQ, and actually did some research. This is also why I like the 35k EHP mark, because my tests showed that was a pretty solid tank, after which I could devote modules to mining upgrades and mining efficiency (survey scanners).
    Bugsy VanHalen
    Society of lost Souls
    #210 - 2013-08-14 19:34:25 UTC
    Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha wrote:
    Alts alt posting about alts alt posting while mains post about alts bumping threads to call out alts with their alts while other peoples alts defend mains.

    I don't even have to bump my own thread anymore. I love it.

    LOL,
    That makes more sense than anything else you have said in this entire thread.
    Bugsy VanHalen
    Society of lost Souls
    #211 - 2013-08-14 20:02:06 UTC
    As far as ehp goes, the in game ship fitting tool gives you your EHP based on your lowest resist. Resists are factored in, but if you have say 60% resists against EM and 80% against kenetic and themal, the tool shows your ehp as about 20,000, that does not mean you have 20,000 hp with an additional 80% resists to kenetic and thermal. It means you have 20,000 effective hitpoints against your lowest resist, i.e. the 60% EM. EHP against kenetic and themal will be closer to 30,000. But resists do not change the total hp of your shield or armor, just how much damage is absorbed by them.

    For example a ship with 1,000 hp of shields with 80% resists, that 1000 hp will take 5000 points of incoming damage to destroy, due to the 80% resists. it resists 80% of the incoming damage, so only 20% of the incoming damage is applied to the shields. This ship would have a shield ehp of 5000.

    Your ehp already has the resists factored in. It does not change your actual hitpoints, but reflects the amount of damage you can take after resists are factored in.

    What this means is a ship with 200,000 ehp can be killed by about 8 Talos in under 30 seconds. The 8 Talos will cost about 800,000,000 isk. But the 200,000 ehp mining ship will cost about 50,000,000,000 isk. so that means the mining ship will pad the ganker corps kill board by 49,200,000,000 isk. Considering loot drops are rarely less than 20% of the value of the ship, often closer to 50%. that would leave a profit of 9,840,000,000 isk or 1,230,000,000isk per Talos pilot at only a 20% drop. Over 1 billion isk, per profit, per Talos pilot, after the loss of there own ship is paid for. over 1 billion isk for a 30 second kill. Ganking for profit is near dead, at least where mining ships are concerned, but if miners follow this idiots advice it will return very quickly. Hell I will give up indy and go out ganking if miners start officer fitting their Macks.

    If you think I am wrong Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha, then tell me where you mine, and I will come and show you how worthless your faction and officer tanks really are. Fitting a mining ship for tank is a smart thing to do, but never use anything better than T2 equipment. anything more makes you a profitable gank target, reducing your chance of survival, rather than increasing it.
    Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
    Vigilante Carebears
    #212 - 2013-08-14 20:58:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
    Edited.
    Commodore Quaritch
    Doomheim
    #213 - 2013-08-14 21:01:15 UTC
    Quote:
    LoL. Your too weak.


    I'm not and when I find you, i'm going to bring you down barge by barge until I get your Orca. You WILL stay docked up or your going to lose everything. Expect me.
    Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Doomheim
    #214 - 2013-08-15 00:39:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Quote:
    What this means is a ship with 200,000 ehp can be killed by about 8 Talos in under 30 seconds. The 8 Talos will cost about 800,000,000 isk. But the 200,000 ehp mining ship will cost about 50,000,000,000 isk. so that means the mining ship will pad the ganker corps kill board by 49,200,000,000 isk. Considering loot drops are rarely less than 20% of the value of the ship, often closer to 50%. that would leave a profit of 9,840,000,000 isk or 1,230,000,000isk per Talos pilot at only a 20% drop. Over 1 billion isk, per profit, per Talos pilot, after the loss of there own ship is paid for. over 1 billion isk for a 30 second kill. Ganking for profit is near dead, at least where mining ships are concerned, but if miners follow this idiots advice it will return very quickly. Hell I will give up indy and go out ganking if miners start officer fitting their Macks.


    Even in a 0.5, gankers only have 15 seconds to pull off a gank and correct me if i'm wrong but there literally aren't any industrial ships in the entire game, to include a Rorqual (even fully fitted) that cost 50 billion isk. Considering your estimations for 8 Talos' base price would be roughly between 700 to 800 million, for the ships alone, not to mention the gear and riggings, I find it difficult to believe any gankers would go that far, even for an Orca or freighter, and especially not for barges. If gankers followed your advice, they would be the idiots, broke ones at that, and even then, some of these barges with the proper logistics such as shield transporters on the orca(s), medium shield maintenance bots, and a logistics ship like a Scythe, it may take just what you mentioned to kill 1 of them, and you better pray they aren't in tanked a Mackinaw.

    50 billion isk ship? What is he mining in a Titan?

    I use one of his recomendations, but with what ye' ole admiral listed, it isen't required that I do of course, It is just efficient.

    Personally, I prefer this Mackinaw:

    High Power
    2x Ice harvesters

    Medium Power
    1x Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
    1x Basic/Supplemental Thermic Dissipation Amplifier
    1x Medium 'Canyon' Shield Extender
    1x Kinetic Deflection Amplifier I

    Low Power
    2x Reinforced Bulkheads
    1x Damage Control II

    Rig Slot
    2x Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
    Ersahi Kir
    Brutor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #215 - 2013-08-15 01:23:24 UTC
    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:
    Quote:
    What this means is a ship with 200,000 ehp can be killed by about 8 Talos in under 30 seconds. The 8 Talos will cost about 800,000,000 isk. But the 200,000 ehp mining ship will cost about 50,000,000,000 isk. so that means the mining ship will pad the ganker corps kill board by 49,200,000,000 isk. Considering loot drops are rarely less than 20% of the value of the ship, often closer to 50%. that would leave a profit of 9,840,000,000 isk or 1,230,000,000isk per Talos pilot at only a 20% drop. Over 1 billion isk, per profit, per Talos pilot, after the loss of there own ship is paid for. over 1 billion isk for a 30 second kill. Ganking for profit is near dead, at least where mining ships are concerned, but if miners follow this idiots advice it will return very quickly. Hell I will give up indy and go out ganking if miners start officer fitting their Macks.


    Even in a 0.5, gankers only have 15 seconds to pull off a gank and correct me if i'm wrong but there literally aren't any industrial ships in the entire game, to include a Rorqual (even fully fitted) that cost 50 billion isk. Considering your estimations for 8 Talos' base price would be roughly between 700 to 800 million, for the ships alone, not to mention the gear and riggings, I find it difficult to believe any gankers would go that far, even for an Orca or freighter, and especially not for barges. If gankers followed your advice, they would be the idiots, broke ones at that, and even then, some of these barges with the proper logistics such as shield transporters on the orca(s), medium shield maintenance bots, and a logistics ship like a Scythe, it may take just what you mentioned to kill 1 of them, and you better pray they aren't in tanked a Mackinaw.

    50 billion isk ship? What is he mining in a Titan?I


    I think the reference here is the fit that had 2 Estamel's invulnerability fields on it. There's some disagreement about what the price is for that, but it ranges somewhere between 14b-21b. I said it was 25b a piece, but that number was from a few years ago where you couldn't list them on the market, but some people used the 25b number to come up with the 50b value of the ship (because it far outweighs the price of everything else put together).

    So yeah, just figure that the discussion got so ******** that people were talking about a mining barge with 2 Estamel's and a leviathan booster.
    Gizznitt Malikite
    Agony Unleashed
    Agony Empire
    #216 - 2013-08-15 03:36:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:


    A.) Even in a 0.5, gankers only have 15 seconds to pull off a gank

    Only slightly correct. In 0.5 s, you have 14 s to pull off the gank if concord has NOT been previously spawned in system. If concord has been spawned, they make a 6s warp (it is always 6s for them to warp). As such, a primed system (which gankers often do), they have 14+6 = 20 seconds to gank you.

    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:

    B.) Correct me if i'm wrong but there literally aren't any industrial ships in the entire game, to include a Rorqual (even fully fitted) that cost 50 billion isk.

    This is a story that is repeated every month, with dozens of players. Here is a taste of what has happend just in the last two weeks. These are all Highsec suicide gank Kills:
    11 b isk Anshar
    13.5 b isk Nightmare
    32b isk Abbadon
    23b isk Golem
    14b isk Charon
    10.5b isk Rhea

    None of these ships have any business being this blingy. If you put enough bling on your ship (and/or in your cargo), it will be ganked as soon as an opportunistic player finds out!

    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:

    C.) Considering your estimations for 8 Talos' base price would be roughly between 700 to 800 million, for the ships alone, not to mention the gear and riggings, I find it difficult to believe any gankers would go that far, even for an Orca or freighter, and especially not for barges.

    Half the killmails above are done with 8-12 BCs. Usually Arty Tornados, Blaster Talos, Blaster Brutix, or Pulse Oracles. Don't forget, the gankers generally scoop their own wrecks and recover ~50% of their own modules, as well as ~50% of their targets modules & cargo. It is profitable, or it wouldn't be repeated over and over and over.

    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:

    D.) If gankers followed your advice, they would be the idiots, broke ones at that, and even then, some of these barges with the proper logistics such as shield transporters on the orca(s), medium shield maintenance bots, and a logistics ship like a Scythe, it may take just what you mentioned to kill 1 of them, and you better pray they aren't in tanked a Mackinaw.

    Hardly... the gankers that pulled off the above ganks make plenty of profit to cover their ship losses while elegantly dining on tears.

    Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:

    E.) I use one of his recomendations, but with what ye' ole admiral listed, it isen't required that I do of course, It is just efficient.

    Personally, I prefer this Mackinaw:

    High Power
    2x Ice harvesters

    Medium Power
    1x Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
    1x Basic/Supplemental Thermic Dissipation Amplifier
    1x Medium 'Canyon' Shield Extender
    1x Kinetic Deflection Amplifier I

    Low Power
    2x Reinforced Bulkheads
    1x Damage Control II

    Rig Slot
    2x Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


    The basic/supplemental Thermic amp is ~40m isk.
    The Medium Canyon Shield Extender is ~30m isk

    Against Blasters, that fit has about 50k EHP. I'll stretch it to 60k to make this point:
    A cheap, meta 2 fit catalyst outputs 10k damage in 20 seconds. Six of them WILL destroy your ship unless you have remote reps or jams or something to save your ass. Do you know how much 6 meta 2 fit catalysts cost? Less than 25m isk.

    In other words, the fit above is profitable to gank.

    Compared to say, this fit, which still takes 4-5 catalysts to destroy, has a better yield, has a survey scanner, and has less than 15m in modules to loot.

    [Mackinaw, Standard Ice]
    Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
    Ice Harvester Upgrade II
    Damage Control II

    Medium Shield Extender II
    Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
    Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
    Survey Scanner II

    Ice Harvester II
    Ice Harvester II

    Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
    Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

    Look at this rationally, if Sino's ship and my ship are both ice mining next to each other, there isn't a ganker around that would attack my setup instead of his (unless I pissed them off). His fit essentially pays gankers to gank him, and that is something he simply doesn't comprehend.

    It sounds like Sino has good intentions. But he doesn't (or didn't until we just explained it to him) understand what effective hit points is, and how they factor in resistances. He hasn't done any "stated" research on ganking (like concord response times, potential damage output, etc). He advocates unnecessarily expensive and blingy setups, when cheap meta and/or t2 modules will suffice. His responses on the forums generally don't articulate his reasoning, and when he gets criticized because we don't understand where he's coming from, or when we blatantly state & show he is wrong, he writes flippant ad hominem responses rather than defend his position. This is why so many people jumped down his case over this thread (and the other threads, may they stay berried).
    RubyPorto
    RubysRhymes
    #217 - 2013-08-15 03:59:52 UTC
    I'm surprised I haven't seen this fit come up.

    EHP: Who cares
    Resists: Roll


    Just me and my pal webby aligning away at a blistering 11m/s:


    [Mackinaw, Web Tank]

    Ice Harvester Upgrade II
    Ice Harvester Upgrade II
    Ice Harvester Upgrade II

    'Langour' Drive Disruptor I
    'Langour' Drive Disruptor I
    'Langour' Drive Disruptor I
    'Langour' Drive Disruptor I

    Ice Harvester II
    Ice Harvester II

    Medium Processor Overclocking Unit I
    Medium Ice Harvester Accelerator I


    Genolution Core Augmentation CA-2 (Both implants can be dropped if you're doing Ore mining).
    Zainou 'Gypsy' Electronics EE-601

    "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

    Tauranon
    Weeesearch
    CAStabouts
    #218 - 2013-08-15 04:17:46 UTC
    oh nice, didn't think of that. at 11ms, you can do ore mining aligned no drama - just make a warp in point at one side of a belt, and a safe a few thousand km downrange with a frigate beforehand. if you mine in the same systems from week to week, you don't have to repeat that work.

    Quick question, do both get into warp properly ?
    RubyPorto
    RubysRhymes
    #219 - 2013-08-15 05:28:19 UTC
    Tauranon wrote:
    oh nice, didn't think of that. at 11ms, you can do ore mining aligned no drama - just make a warp in point at one side of a belt, and a safe a few thousand km downrange with a frigate beforehand. if you mine in the same systems from week to week, you don't have to repeat that work.

    Quick question, do both get into warp properly ?



    Fleetwarp it. Everything aligned o7s on the same tick.

    "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

    Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Doomheim
    #220 - 2013-08-15 16:28:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Sosueme Hapytuedispt
    Quote:
    This is a story that is repeated every month, with dozens of players. Here is a taste of what has happend just in the last two weeks. These are all Highsec suicide gank Kills:
    11 b isk Anshar
    13.5 b isk Nightmare
    32b isk Abbadon
    23b isk Golem
    14b isk Charon
    27b isk Nomad
    10.5b isk Rhea
    13b isk Charon

    None of these ships have any business being this blingy. If you put enough bling on your ship (and/or in your cargo), it will be ganked as soon as an opportunistic player finds out!


    Yes, but half of these are combat ships. The industrial freighters on there contain cargo that is worth while, they have no fittings. So while that type of ganking happens, and it is interesting, it is completely irrelevant to the ships shown on simo's thread. He presented barges. I understand. But then again, no one has any buisness telling someone else how and what to fit on their ships, they can make recommendations but not tell them they should die if they don't. Plus, a few of those combat ships may have been wardecs, not ganks.

    Quote:
    Half the killmails above are done with 8-12 BCs. Usually Arty Tornados, Blaster Talos, Blaster Brutix, or Pulse Oracles. Don't forget, the gankers generally scoop their own wrecks and recover ~50% of their own modules, as well as ~50% of their targets modules & cargo. It is profitable, or it wouldn't be repeated over and over and over.


    Once again, the freighters were all cargo. Some of the fits in this thread would take not only a great deal of people, effort, money, and coordination, but if it was done correctly, it may not even work. I've had 7 catalysts attack my barge I showed in my last post and they didn't even penetrate the shields, however, I did have logistic drones and implants to augment my defenses.

    Quote:
    Hardly... the gankers that pulled off the above ganks make plenty of profit to cover their ship losses while elegantly dining on tears.


    From freighters.

    Quote:
    Against Blasters, that fit has about 50k EHP. I'll stretch it to 60k to make this point:
    A cheap, meta 2 fit catalyst outputs 10k damage in 20 seconds. Six of them WILL destroy your ship unless you have remote reps or jams or something to save your ass. Do you know how much 6 meta 2 fit catalysts cost? Less than 25m isk.

    In other words, the fit above is profitable to gank. Compared to say, this fit, which still takes 4-5 catalysts to destroy, has a better yield, has a survey scanner, and has less than 15m in modules to loot.


    Again, I was attacked by 7 T2 catalysts and it didn't penetrate my shields, it got it down to 11% shields, but then they would have had to deal with 3600 armor and 5600 hull with a great deal of resistance on both. I'm sorry, but what your saying just doesen't match what I have experienced first hand.

    Quote:
    Look at this rationally, if Sino's ship and my ship are both ice mining next to each other, there isn't a ganker around that would attack my setup instead of his (unless I pissed them off). His fit essentially pays gankers to gank him, and that is something he simply doesn't comprehend.


    It really depends on what fit your using, however, the first I used saved me hundreds of millions of isk, fended off 7 T2 catalysts, and I got to laugh in their faces while I docked up. I found it to be extremely satisfying and like the man said, quite the investment.