These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

ISBoxer Banhammered!?!?

First post First post
Author
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#21 - 2013-03-15 11:11:36 UTC
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.
Djana Libra
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#22 - 2013-03-15 11:20:01 UTC
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.


They could banhammer it at any time pointing to the EULA, chapter 6 paragraph 3.
Programs like ISBoxer are a violation of it.

So far they have just not taken any action against it.
Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
#23 - 2013-03-15 11:22:30 UTC
Jason Xado wrote:
I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.


I like that attitude, just don't come here when the ban hammer suddenly knocks you out of EVE.

Ever heard of 'better safe then sorry'?
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#24 - 2013-03-15 11:22:33 UTC
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.

Have they ever explicitly stated that it is within the rules and EULA?
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#25 - 2013-03-15 11:27:27 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.

Have they ever explicitly stated that it is within the rules and EULA?


Yes, they have said as long as you are at the keyboard controlling the clients, even if you are using program like synergy to broadcast to multiple computers, that this is not botting(and it isn't) and is not a banable offense. There was a guy who taped together a bunch of mice and keyboards to prove that he could just do that to control multiple clients at once, but that it is obviously quite silly not to use a program that does the same thing more effectively, and ccp agreed at the time and allowed synergy and isboxer etc.
Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
#26 - 2013-03-15 11:27:55 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Apparently CCP is no longer tolerating use of the multi-boxing software known as ISBoxer, or any other for that matter. I learned yesterday that accounts which were using it are being banned and was pretty concerned since I had just purchased the software about 2 weeks ago and rather enjoyed it. More disturbing was that I had to learn this from a friend...I had no idea that they had stopped allowing it at all since there were no notifications of this policy change that I know of. Anyways, I don't have a ton of accounts like some do, but even I will be shutting down at least one of them, possibly two. It just seems odd for a company that encourages multiboxing with Power of Two promotions to then outlaw the use of programs that make running these extra accounts so much less cumbersome.

CCP if you are going to have a policy change like this you should at least let people know with some kind of obvious warning, so that we don't get banned for using a program that was acceptable in the past!


You say that as if multi-boxing being banned is a bad thing, hell, even Blizzard have just stopped it working in WoW.

Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them.

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#27 - 2013-03-15 11:32:59 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.

Have they ever explicitly stated that it is within the rules and EULA?


Yes, they have said as long as you are at the keyboard controlling the clients, even if you are using program like synergy to broadcast to multiple computers, that this is not botting(and it isn't) and is not a banable offense. There was a guy who taped together a bunch of mice and keyboards to prove that he could just do that to control multiple clients at once, but that it is obviously quite silly not to use a program that does the same thing more effectively, and ccp agreed at the time and allowed synergy and isboxer etc.

So it is not a grey area and people will not suddenly get banned for it without an official statement (i.e. devblog) beforehand.

I'd say this concludes the /thread.
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#28 - 2013-03-15 11:33:43 UTC
Domina Trix wrote:
thebarry wrote:
Apparently CCP is no longer tolerating use of the multi-boxing software known as ISBoxer, or any other for that matter. I learned yesterday that accounts which were using it are being banned and was pretty concerned since I had just purchased the software about 2 weeks ago and rather enjoyed it. More disturbing was that I had to learn this from a friend...I had no idea that they had stopped allowing it at all since there were no notifications of this policy change that I know of. Anyways, I don't have a ton of accounts like some do, but even I will be shutting down at least one of them, possibly two. It just seems odd for a company that encourages multiboxing with Power of Two promotions to then outlaw the use of programs that make running these extra accounts so much less cumbersome.

CCP if you are going to have a policy change like this you should at least let people know with some kind of obvious warning, so that we don't get banned for using a program that was acceptable in the past!


You say that as if multi-boxing being banned is a bad thing, hell, even Blizzard have just stopped it working in WoW.


Do you think multiboxing being banned would be a good thing? I know very few people who have been playing this game for a long time who do not have at least two accounts...
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#29 - 2013-03-15 11:36:09 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
thebarry wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.

Have they ever explicitly stated that it is within the rules and EULA?


Yes, they have said as long as you are at the keyboard controlling the clients, even if you are using program like synergy to broadcast to multiple computers, that this is not botting(and it isn't) and is not a banable offense. There was a guy who taped together a bunch of mice and keyboards to prove that he could just do that to control multiple clients at once, but that it is obviously quite silly not to use a program that does the same thing more effectively, and ccp agreed at the time and allowed synergy and isboxer etc.

So it is not a grey area and people will not suddenly get banned for it without an official statement (i.e. devblog) beforehand.

I'd say this concludes the /thread.


That's what they have said in the past, that is not what I am hearing now, and they have modified the original post where they said it was OK...
Rengerel en Distel
#30 - 2013-03-15 11:39:34 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Domina Trix wrote:
thebarry wrote:
Apparently CCP is no longer tolerating use of the multi-boxing software known as ISBoxer, or any other for that matter. I learned yesterday that accounts which were using it are being banned and was pretty concerned since I had just purchased the software about 2 weeks ago and rather enjoyed it. More disturbing was that I had to learn this from a friend...I had no idea that they had stopped allowing it at all since there were no notifications of this policy change that I know of. Anyways, I don't have a ton of accounts like some do, but even I will be shutting down at least one of them, possibly two. It just seems odd for a company that encourages multiboxing with Power of Two promotions to then outlaw the use of programs that make running these extra accounts so much less cumbersome.

CCP if you are going to have a policy change like this you should at least let people know with some kind of obvious warning, so that we don't get banned for using a program that was acceptable in the past!


You say that as if multi-boxing being banned is a bad thing, hell, even Blizzard have just stopped it working in WoW.


Do you think multiboxing being banned would be a good thing? I know very few people who have been playing this game for a long time who do not have at least two accounts...


There is quite a bit of difference between multi-boxing and having multiple accounts. That said, i think one of your first responses was the correct one, that you'll only get banned if you have the bot extension from ISBoxer.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
#31 - 2013-03-15 11:51:35 UTC
thebarry wrote:


Do you think multiboxing being banned would be a good thing? I know very few people who have been playing this game for a long time who do not have at least two accounts...


Do you think one player multiboxing an orca and a handful of mining barges and doing what is intended to be a corporate activity in a multiplayer game is a good thing?

FYI more than one account =/= multiboxing.

Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them.

thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#32 - 2013-03-15 11:56:55 UTC
Domina Trix wrote:
thebarry wrote:


Do you think multiboxing being banned would be a good thing? I know very few people who have been playing this game for a long time who do not have at least two accounts...


Do you think one player multiboxing an orca and a handful of mining barges and doing what is intended to be a corporate activity in a multiplayer game is a good thing?

FYI more than one account =/= multiboxing.


I think that's fine...perhaps you aren't aware that many ppl will pvp with their friends in low/null but carebear by themselves in high sec with alts for the isk they need to pvp.
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#33 - 2013-03-15 12:02:16 UTC
Tom Gerard wrote:
ISBoxer is the only way market prices are as low as they are, if they ban it the 23/7 ACTIVE players will depart.

Prices will go up, all will be tears. Cry

Macroing is not a black or white issue, hurting Macros hurts everyone.


Confirmed botter.

Not today spaghetti.

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#34 - 2013-03-15 12:06:04 UTC
Hi Guys,

I've trimmed this thread slightly.

As CCP Eterne has stated, they are still discussing this internally and that your feedback is appreciated; so please leave feedback and not turn this into another big argument about whether or not its right or wrong.

This has consistently led to arguments and trolling.

Now's your time to make your points constructively, so please do so without resorting to attacking each other about it!

Thanks.

[b]ISD Suvetar Captain/Commando Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]

Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
#35 - 2013-03-15 12:07:06 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Domina Trix wrote:
thebarry wrote:


Do you think multiboxing being banned would be a good thing? I know very few people who have been playing this game for a long time who do not have at least two accounts...


Do you think one player multiboxing an orca and a handful of mining barges and doing what is intended to be a corporate activity in a multiplayer game is a good thing?

FYI more than one account =/= multiboxing.


I think that's fine...perhaps you aren't aware that many ppl will pvp with their friends in low/null but carebear by themselves in high sec with alts for the isk they need to pvp.


Or they actually play with other players and generate their ISK in null/low while at the same time contributing to the economy there...yeah I know silly idea they would rather play a single player game up in hi-sec and complain that there are not enough people down in low/null and industry down there is fubar...

Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them.

Randi Fleetstalker
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2013-03-15 12:08:40 UTC
Greetings! Disclosure: I wrote ISBoxer.

Lelouch edited that post a month ago! People are just noticing now because CCP has started specifically targeting various bots with detection mechanisms. Some people who use bots also happen to use ISBoxer, and naturally anyone who is caught red handed with their cheating is going to try to pretend they were just using ISBoxer and no hacks.

If they meant to ban ISBoxer, then why would they not just say that in one of the many multiboxing threads since the edit? Probably because they are not specifically banning for ISBoxer. They are banning for bots; if you're worried about the changes, the solution is simple: STOP BOTTING/HACKING. (And that has nothing to do with ISBoxer...)

Another thing to remember is that back in 2008 or so with World of Warcraft, Blizzard started detecting and banning bots, similar to what CCP is currently doing. Through discussions with Blizzard at the time, they basically agreed that they could work on the bots without banning Inner Space, and they would much rather have multiboxers than botters -- wouldn't you? And, frankly, there's a lot more interest in multiboxing than botting, simply for the fact that people don't want their accounts banned.

Besides, people claiming to just be using ISBoxer when they're hacking/botting, are attacking ISBoxer. These are not my friends...
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#37 - 2013-03-15 12:12:36 UTC
Tom Gerard wrote:
ISBoxer is the only way market prices are as low as they are, if they ban it the 23/7 ACTIVE players will depart.
Good.

Quote:
Prices will go up, all will be tears. Cry remain the same, and actual people get to earn the ISK
Fixed. And good.

Quote:
Macroing is not a black or white issue, hurting Macros hurts everyone.
Incorrect in every way.
Macroing is a very simple issue: hurting macros hurts no-one and helps everyone.
Kyra Quinn
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2013-03-15 12:25:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyra Quinn
I don't have experience with it in this game (I've not seen someone doing it) but I HAVE seen it in other MMOs. Here's my newbie view on it:

If someone wants to run 17 accounts then by all means go ahead, as long as he controls those 17 accounts in person. The second you automate it (and ISBoxer does automate, it relays your input to other accounts) is where it's just wrong. It breaks immersion to see 6 Mages run around doing the exact same thing as if they were radio controlled, it looks wrong, it feels wrong and it is wrong. In an MMO it's kinda backwards to allow ways of playing that exclude the need for others and while that could also extend to using more than one account at least then the player has to divide his attention between them meaning there's a disadvantage to it.

A company that allows stuff like ISBoxer is effectively stating they're ok with lowering the quality of their game towards "real" players, just like botting in that respect.
Signal11th
#39 - 2013-03-15 12:28:48 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Tom Gerard wrote:
ISBoxer is the only way market prices are as low as they are, if they ban it the 23/7 ACTIVE players will depart.
Good.

Quote:
Prices will go up, all will be tears. Cry remain the same, and actual people get to earn the ISK
Fixed. And good.

Quote:
Macroing is not a black or white issue, hurting Macros hurts everyone.
Incorrect in every way.
Macroing is a very simple issue: hurting macros hurts no-one and helps everyone.



Jesus I actually agree, I need a lie down now..

If you want to run mutiple accounts you should just accept it will be a ball ache, if you dont want the ball-ache don't run mutiple accounts.

I run a few manually and it's a ball-ache but I accept that.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Colonel Xaven
Perkone
Caldari State
#40 - 2013-03-15 12:40:29 UTC
Jason Xado wrote:
This feels like rumour spreading.

Nothing CCP has said has indicated using ISBoxer to duplicate keystrokes to multiple clients is against the rules.

I will continue to use ISBoxer until such time as CCP says to stop.


You probably should read the EULA Section 6 A:


Quote:
2. You may not use your own or third-party software to modify any content appearing within the Game environment or change how the Game is played.

www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance

Previous page123Next page