These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Change Incursion Mechanics

Author
Snatch Pinion
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2013-03-13 16:40:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Snatch Pinion
.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#22 - 2013-03-13 17:14:06 UTC
Verity Sovereign wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
correct me if I'm wrong (likely am) -- but the "majority" of the incursion runners are corps/alliances these days, right (or at least that's how it sounds with this ISN/DIN/etc talk).

so ... um ... with that in mind ... can't you just dec the guys you don't like?


No, they are chat channels/ out of game groups, they're all different corps/alliances.
Otherwise, wardecs would have been used long ago



ah, that clarifies things then ...

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Snatch Pinion
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2013-03-13 17:23:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Snatch Pinion
.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#24 - 2013-03-13 17:57:03 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Verity Sovereign wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
correct me if I'm wrong (likely am) -- but the "majority" of the incursion runners are corps/alliances these days, right (or at least that's how it sounds with this ISN/DIN/etc talk).

so ... um ... with that in mind ... can't you just dec the guys you don't like?


No, they are chat channels/ out of game groups, they're all different corps/alliances.
Otherwise, wardecs would have been used long ago


^^ basically HI SEC wardecc'ing mechanics are a bane to all HI SEC incursion runners that want to band into a single group.Too easy to be war decc'd by 2-3 man griefing corps or even by corps that war decc then abbandon the corp in entirely( IMHO all defuct empty corp war dec's should be declared null & void &the side still with members be declared the winner).

One of the reason why HI SEC doen't have a CSM rep is because the game mechanics discourage HI SEC from banding all together in big coalitions like NULL does because game mechanics encourage them out there for safety in numbers.
In HI SEC a big alliance is just a big target in NULL its safety in numbers.
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2013-03-13 18:03:43 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
besides the harrassement i just petitioned against goldiiee.
its not my personal war.

even i cant multibox 100 pilots.
so there must be a reason why over 100 pilots are willingly to sacrifice their payout to make absolutley sure that ISN wont get a single isk.

again. its US. not my person alone.


Except that despite your blob, the ISN fleet made 155 mill each...

I do wonder how you are able to get 100 people to join your fleet, but I know you're fond of spreading lies.

For a while you insisted (I suspect you still do) that DIN would beat ISN if it weren't for ISN running heavy on grid... basically saying that ISN blobs you...
Then you also proudly point to your ability to blob with more numbers than ISN, contradicting your earlier premise.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#26 - 2013-03-13 18:08:08 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Noble Ranger wrote:

Also on behalf of the angry German, i apologize, please bear with him, he has a personal obsessive grudge with us in ISN, and he seems to desperately need to spread his grudge to everyone doing incursions,


I sort of see it as funny/ironic you painting him as an "angry German" when its your ISN cohort in chief thats getting snipped & censored for what appears to be rants/personal attacks in the thread Lol:



Goldiiee wrote:

*snipped* Your actions affected everyone, and this is your legacy, you have managed to remove Incursions from high sec entirely, congrats. ISN response to your Blob tactic is the logical progression and escalation of your personal war.

You bring Blob, ISN pops mom, next move is yours :)

*snipped personal attacks* - CCP Eterne



OK ok I see passions are high on this subject for everyone. Sort of reminds me of when efing Ammzi pulled his BS claiming his alts were not helping skunkworks & working with brick & Ripard Teg wrote an article about Incursioners shooting themselves in the foot or pulling the Blazing Saddles scene where the sherrif puts a gun to his head saying every1 freeze or the negro gets it Lol
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2013-03-13 18:09:07 UTC
Noble Ranger wrote:
"#1 is implemented. In this case, no more wait lists for engaging in group PvE content.."

We in ISN sort of "invented" using a waiting list, I'm not here to take credit for that, i would just say, no one is forcing anyone to sit on a waiting list, or make one, it is simply more efficient to maintain a fleet with one,


Well, the mechanics, which I assume were made to prevent blobbing, strongly point to the direction of a wait list/cap on fleet sizes.

As soon as you go 1 on grid over the soft cap, the total payout (individual payout * # of individuals) goes down.
Contests aside, nobody would blob like DIN does, because the mechanics promote keeping the fleet below a certain size, which promotes wait lists if you have enough for 1 fleet, but not enough for 2.

I simply propose making the total payout a fixed amount.


The 2nd proposal is to discourage blobbing to win contests, but then it also removes the purpose of contests completely.

How about a compromise.... 50% of the total goes to the winning fleet, the remaining 50% is split according to damage dealt.

Thus, a very close contest is approximately a 75/25 split.
Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#28 - 2013-03-13 18:12:44 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Noble Ranger wrote:

Also on behalf of the angry German, i apologize, please bear with him, he has a personal obsessive grudge with us in ISN, and he seems to desperately need to spread his grudge to everyone doing incursions,


I sort of see it as funny/ironic you painting him as an "angry German" when its your ISN cohort in chief thats getting snipped & censored for what appears to be rants/personal attacks in the thread Lol

I actully thought he was emulating a historic figure in role play. I had no idea he would take it personal. I again apologise for confusing his actions with his personality.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#29 - 2013-03-13 18:24:33 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
delete this silly list option in forms blah Straight
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#30 - 2013-03-13 18:26:12 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
DarthNefarius wrote:
Verity Sovereign wrote:
[quote=Noble Ranger]"#1 is implemented. In this case, no more wait lists for engaging in group PvE content.."

We in ISN sort of "invented" using a waiting list, I'm not here to take credit for that, i would just say, no one is forcing anyone to sit on a waiting list, or make one, it is simply more efficient to maintain a fleet with one,


Well, the mechanics, which I assume were made to prevent blobbing, strongly point to the direction of a wait list/cap on fleet sizes.

( snip a diving up of contest formula)



- lol I don't know about ISN inventing the WL... its sort of like how I'd say it was Lord Galtran inventing the blitz legion fleets
- not sure if it was invented to prevent blobbing... more like to control size ofleets w/o changing the acelleration gate mechanics ( sort ofthe same as blobbing control in many respects I suspect but that's only the over portion not considering theunder payout dropoff )
-how would your system handle 3+ fleets contesting asingle site? sorry but I think it gets too complicated
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Velicitia
XS Tech
#31 - 2013-03-13 18:36:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Velicitia
DarthNefarius wrote:
Verity Sovereign wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
correct me if I'm wrong (likely am) -- but the "majority" of the incursion runners are corps/alliances these days, right (or at least that's how it sounds with this ISN/DIN/etc talk).

so ... um ... with that in mind ... can't you just dec the guys you don't like?


No, they are chat channels/ out of game groups, they're all different corps/alliances.
Otherwise, wardecs would have been used long ago


^^ basically HI SEC wardecc'ing mechanics are a bane to all HI SEC incursion runners that want to band into a single group.Too easy to be war decc'd by 2-3 man griefing corps or even by corps that war decc then abbandon the corp in entirely( IMHO all defuct empty corp war dec's should be declared null & void &the side still with members be declared the winner).

One of the reason why HI SEC doen't have a CSM rep is because the game mechanics discourage HI SEC from banding all together in big coalitions like NULL does because game mechanics encourage them out there for safety in numbers.
In HI SEC a big alliance is just a big target in NULL its safety in numbers.



I don't follow. a 500-man alliance in empire has the same "safety in numbers" that a 500-man alliance in null has (well, actually a bit better because the other guy is guaranteed to not be bringing caps or supers).

Both of you get dec'd by a 10-man corp, both of you outnumber that corp by 50 to 1. Even if you're absolutely _terrible_ at PvP, those odds are extremely in your favor.

(but they just hide in station then, and play on an alt, and we don't have any!!!)
1. bullshit that you don't have alts (maybe not as skilled as you'd like, but you have alts)
2. if you think they're just AFKing, then have 2 or 3 guys watch the station ... rotate amongst at least 4-6 pilots (run mission or two, then trade off with someone on the station). The same applies for incursion sites... though you're probably rotating more pilots at a time.
3. If you want to mine, go a system or two off, have people watching the incoming gate(s) for WTs

this is what the nullsec guys have to do EVERY DAY. I'm sure you can do it for a week and not have significant adverse affects (beyond a few losses because of making bad decisions ... but making bad decisions is how we learn).

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-03-13 18:41:15 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
-how would your system handle 3+ fleets contesting asingle site? sorry but I think it gets too complicated


Very simple. THe game already keeps track of how much damage is done, that is how it determines who winds a contest. Just take those numbers, for each fleet take its number. divide by the total damge, multiply by payout
Dan-ielle
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-03-13 18:42:56 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
So first, it is OK if ISN follows weaker Fleets as TVP from site to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "game mechanic".
DIN and TVP teamed up, to counter it. By blobbing ISN and following from sit to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "griefing"
see the problem?

You cannot see the difference between an equal numbers group contesting sites in a fair manner to increase their isk gain, and following another group around with such an excessively large blob that nobody gets paid, exclusively in order to prevent them from making isk? I'll give you a hint, one of them is for extra profit, by virtue of just being better, the other is outright griefing.


Of course, there's no point in arguing with you, your vendetta against ISN has gone so far that to back down would be to somehow lose face.
turlough dominian
EVE University
Ivy League
#34 - 2013-03-13 18:54:27 UTC
Not sure if a change in how incurstions work is needed,

Probably best if the groups who may or may not be causeing the issue's come to some kind of mature arrangement that not only benifits them but also the rest of the isk makeing comunity or other option continue killing off the high sec incurstions so no one can do them
LeMorted'Authur
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2013-03-13 19:00:11 UTC  |  Edited by: LeMorted'Authur
Charadrass wrote:
Verity Sovereign wrote:

Most recently, ISN left an incursion where this massive payout-less blob was harassing them, and went to the other high sec incursion. DIN killed the mom and followed ISN to blob some more to shut ISN isk flow. ISN responded by killing the mom (where you can get payouts with larger numbers), resulting in no high sec incursions, so that DIN/TVP can't make ISK when ISN isn't on.

So first, it is OK if ISN follows weaker Fleets as TVP from site to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "game mechanic".
DIN and TVP teamed up, to counter it. By blobbing ISN and following from sit to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "griefing"
see the problem?
Second: DIN didnt killed the Mom, TDF did, because it was their mom to kill and it was on schedule, wait. it wasnt, we delayed it one day, to let ISN fly alone in the other Incursion. BTW: ISN is not able to blue that incursion out. without the help from another fleet.

Actually every Incursioncommunity Part of the agreement is fed up with ISN.

WE take action against that.
WE are not Charadrass nor DIN alone.
WE use game mechanics to prevent ISN payout everytime they show up.

WE wish you a nice day.

First off mechanics is fine and the issue is not contest but people in contested fleets not firing thier guns. I have found many not firing.

Now to focus on this anrgy german and TVP. This man is hiding before TVP when actually he runs 16 accounts in sites. I am not rich enough to have sixteen incursion toons let alone the real life money to run a computer network to run sixteen clients. What kind of isk does 16 clients make you and how can he relate to me who must be an uber noob and can only run one client in an incursion. I sometimes try to ice mine but often my ice miner is full and well has been siting there for a long time doing nothing. 16 man that is alot of isk and man he must be very rich to use so much real life money to try and control eve.

Ok here is my real concern. I have been flying incursions since incursion patch, when they were also at times live events. I flew a blackbird with logistics, I know it was a bad fit but we were trying tactics, it and the fleet died in flames within secs i think. Next secondly sucessfully run a drake and then I got shiny and ran with Skeet. TVP and TDF/Born-Ara were left to the HQ's AS's and it was unofficially agreed that HQ's be new player zone and most made their isk got shiny and move on to vg's.

So here is my issue with TVP and it comes after the nerf last summer. I was not able to fly in BTL or TVP although i did if i wanted on alts, because members of my alliance ganked Nomitech's tengu and got his pod as well. This happened because he and others scammed members of the incursion community out of a Revenant bpc saying he sold it to Goons for 4 bil and goodwill. Well this did not create goodwill and if Goons have goodwill then talk to a dipo so they can troll you. Someone offered a great contract and people in my alliance took it. So this led me to discover the armor community and knowing nothing about armor but having all cruisers at 5 and all reps at 5 and logi 5 somehow I was welcome as a reliable logi pilot, and found my way into Born-ara invite only channel very quickly. At this time founders of TVP and All the TDF leadership were all running in Born-Ara comms. TVP leadership were giving back to the incursion community and training armor FC's in how to run. At this time there was an agreement to run all MOM's as a big group. But several times TVP just popped the MOM even when the armor fleet they were to merge with had no idea and were halfway through a site when the MOM died. These directors of TVP who now are running it did not consider anyone other than themselves, even their founders halfway through a site.

So back to ISN after the nerf VG's Shield communities lost tons of fleets and most died right after the nerf, ISN also was mostly dead sometimes Noble after getting off work would run a vg fleet for a few hours and well my logi alt was there sometimes. So ISN being one of the few places even running sites (took several hours to even get an vg fleet together), they became the gathering place for shiny pilots and well AS's and HQ's at this time were safer and better isk than VG's. Noble having run AS's in hunters something channel back before ISN knew a little bit but knew alot of people were interested in doing them. After this starts the war, between TVP and ISN, and now one angry german with more isk and money than he needs.
TVP keep believing all MOM's were thier personal property and well every time ISN made a MOM fleet TVP banned all fleet members so these people had no place to go. Fueling ISN recuitment out of nescesity, their pilots had no place else to fly.

What these self serving Directors of TVP lack to see is ISN can't contest them as easily anymore. They have transformed thier community of new pilots into an effective fleet but they allow one overly rich angry german man to control the dialogue. I mean I suck at ice mining while i am in an incursion fleet but the leader of Din can multibox 16 toons. I wish I could just fly two boxes effectively in incursions; at least I would be eve rich :).

I use to send new pilots to TVP to learn and earn isk in incusions now I send them to LV6 and Born-Ara depending on their tank. Please lets, let Din and one super rich 16 box leader lose the control he is seeking.

Flying it like you stole it, because half of the others in eve have. 

Kodavor
Iz Doge Korp .
#36 - 2013-03-13 19:02:52 UTC
turlough dominian wrote:
Not sure if a change in how incurstions work is needed,

Probably best if the groups who may or may not be causeing the issue's come to some kind of mature arrangement that not only benifits them but also the rest of the isk making comunity or other option continue killing off the high sec incurstions so no one can do them


Oh we tried . We tried many times . Each time we were offered a ready agreement made by the other side that we need to " sign " or simply told that we have to stop flying the way we want to and have flown since day one . And because we flew that way certain category of pilots joined our ranks . So respectfully we were offered to abandon our gameplay and play their game .




Kodavor wrote:
If TVP and DIN leaders would be genuinely concerned about their ENTIRE community across all timezones ( because they run 24/7 ) then they would advise their EU timezone to improve and adjust for the times when ISN form for some hours of HQ's . What they do instead is provoke ISN to the extent of closing the last empire incursion resulting in No fleet for absolutely no one . And then you claim that is is for the benefit for the bigger community ? You have 90% of the incursion HQ time to yourselves and you STILL WANT THE LAST 10% . How greedy can you be ?

No matter what you say ... TVP has HQ fleets 24/7 . That is a fact . So why do you press for a complete monopoly ?
Well ... then don't spout random BS about your noble cause . Just say it out loud that you want it all .

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#37 - 2013-03-13 19:11:23 UTC
Kodavor wrote:
turlough dominian wrote:
Not sure if a change in how incurstions work is needed,

Probably best if the groups who may or may not be causeing the issue's come to some kind of mature arrangement that not only benifits them but also the rest of the isk making comunity or other option continue killing off the high sec incurstions so no one can do them


Oh we tried . We tried many times . Each time we were offered a ready agreement made by the other side that we need to " sign " or simply told that we have to stop flying the way we want to and have flown since day one .



ISN broke every agreement we tried to have with them. Your word in repect to agreements is lower then mud TBH
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Bozl1n
Shiva
Northern Coalition.
#38 - 2013-03-13 19:14:30 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:
Charadrass wrote:
besides the harrassement i just petitioned against goldiiee.
its not my personal war.

even i cant multibox 100 pilots.
so there must be a reason why over 100 pilots are willingly to sacrifice their payout to make absolutley sure that ISN wont get a single isk.

again. its US. not my person alone.

I apoligize if you took my statement as a personal attack, I assumed you were role playing and the similarities of Propaganda and Screaming from a soap box were in line with the persona I thought you were trying to emulate. Again I didn't not know this was your personality and I am extreemly sorry for my misjudging of your intent.


LMAO


Kodavor
Iz Doge Korp .
#39 - 2013-03-13 19:15:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Kodavor
DarthNefarius wrote:
Kodavor wrote:
turlough dominian wrote:
Not sure if a change in how incurstions work is needed,

Probably best if the groups who may or may not be causeing the issue's come to some kind of mature arrangement that not only benifits them but also the rest of the isk making comunity or other option continue killing off the high sec incurstions so no one can do them


Oh we tried . We tried many times . Each time we were offered a ready agreement made by the other side that we need to " sign " or simply told that we have to stop flying the way we want to and have flown since day one .



ISN broke every agreement we tried to have with them. Your word in repect to agreements is lower then mud TBH



Quote:
ISN broke every agreement we tried to have with them. Your word in repect to agreements is lower then mud TBH


You never had any standing agreement with ISN .You TRIED to have it . Since we never had any agreement with anyone we could not brake anything .
Bozl1n
Shiva
Northern Coalition.
#40 - 2013-03-13 19:39:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Bozl1n
DarthNefarius wrote:
Kodavor wrote:
turlough dominian wrote:
Not sure if a change in how incurstions work is needed,

Probably best if the groups who may or may not be causeing the issue's come to some kind of mature arrangement that not only benifits them but also the rest of the isk making comunity or other option continue killing off the high sec incurstions so no one can do them


Oh we tried . We tried many times . Each time we were offered a ready agreement made by the other side that we need to " sign " or simply told that we have to stop flying the way we want to and have flown since day one .



ISN broke every agreement we tried to have with them. Your word in repect to agreements is lower then mud TBH


I do not recall ISN ever making any agreement with anyone.

No wait we did once agree not to pop any moms for a 2 week period, which we stuck to.