Jita Park Speakers Corner

campaign page : http://volt.vc/core/
interview: http://crossingzebras.com/2013/03/28/csm8-election-interviews-corebloodbrothers/
vote selection tools: http://crowdcortex.net/votOmat
vote selection tools: http://match.eve-csm.com/
voting list i endorse:

1. corebloodbrothers
2. ali aras (fellow providence candidate)
3. trebor Daehdoow (known hardworking csm vet)
4. nathan jameson (known WH-er)
5. jester/ripard teg (name speaks for itself)
6. psychotic monk (known candidate)
7. korvin (former CSM, little things pusher)
8. mangala solaris (RVB)
9. james arget (WH)
10. mike azariah (high sec)
11. chitsa jason (WH)
12. malcanis (all round eve player)
13. steve ronuken (all round, indy)
14 roc wieler

Let me first introduce myself: Corebloodbrothers, FC for Volt alliance & providence residents, proud Provi-Bloc member, and long time eve player with 3 accounts, for market stuff, scout, spy, titan, and so on. In real life I am Dutch, 41 years of age and proud father of 4 daughters. I work as an IT manager in a callcentre with 50 agents, and in eve I am a god when the kids sleep.

Eve is my passion. I have 3900 kills atm, and still enjoy PVP big time. I am a big fan of wormhole roams, new cruiser doctrines, and the paper/rock/scissors mechanisms that EVE present us. I do not agree EVE is broken and 500,000 players prove differently every day. There is room for major improvement and enhancement of the game fun for sure, eve should be evolving with us. A CSM candidate should bring that across; CSM should keep CCP at their toes giving it all they got and make sure their activities match the players demand as a whole. CCP's resources should be divided based on player activity or their activity wishes. If 10 % of eve loves mining, then that should receive a equal part.

As a roamer and provi member personally I would love to see isk gathering based on local activity as most CSM candidates promote these days. Everyone wants action, change is good, it forces you to adapt and opens up new opportunities. Change PoS moon mining into moon activity like in belts, I am sure CCP has ideas that way as they mentioned in old dev blogs. CSM should not want to try to implement their own ideas and stand in CCP shoes. They should push forward the player wishes and demand that change, no matter what the actual outcome for their individual agendas will be. CSM should handle player interests and even control CCP in their integrity. Personally I think a player council is unique and also a way of promoting EVE. I think that is a secondary responsibility, while still being as demanding and critical as you can be. Remember that your worst adversaries can be your biggest promoters on a higher level.

There used to be projects for little things. I did a survey last year when I ran for CSM first time as an independent candidate and made a long list of people's small wishes and demands. I still miss an 'alliance fittings' section on top of the corp's; how easy would that make your life? People mention cyno jamming ships, big implications, but hell, small scale roaming in null would pick up controversy for sure, but lets not steer away from controversy. Some people say everything is broken in eve. You can also say people enjoy eve so much that they care on the level where they want to improve it all. I am a big advocate of a positive approach where you can demand the world. CSM does not work for CCP, it should work for its player base and reflect that, whether you’re an indy man, a wormholer, a pos owner, faction warefare; you name it. We share that goal with CCP and the employees who make their rl isk there to pay their morgages and kids. We all want the best for eve from different angles of interest, but we share that common ground. Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. Let’s collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks.

What you can expect from me is to represent your interests, be open, and be a player demanding the best out of CCP for us. I will make the gap between player and developer smaller, representing all the best, funniest and craziest parts of the playerbase which you all love when you log on. This is what I love to do for you with the same passion as I have enjoyed eve over the years and which make me login anytime.

Don't hesitate too contact me ingame.

greetz
core

You have my vote!

Got my vote!

+1

Another everything for everyone, no content candidate.


I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks".

Good question, i believe i can represent a part of null and show in general the sense that all shoudl be heard, whever the candidate plays dominately, my hope is highsec woudl push forward with a candidate as well ofc

No u look per item categorie, so u vote on high sec items, zero, faction, and wihtin each type u allocate resources

+1

How is it balanced that 20 miners get the limited CCP resources focused on their wishes instead of the wishes of 20000 paying customers who happen to be in a bloc?

+1 vote from me !!