These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Botters Get Hazed

First post First post
Author
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#61 - 2013-03-08 07:11:45 UTC
Good good.

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Kerdrak
Querry Moon
#62 - 2013-03-08 07:39:23 UTC
Excellent. This is one of the best things honest players can hear.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#63 - 2013-03-08 07:43:00 UTC
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
So it scans your computer for bots? Like does it check your hard drive or just the client's integrity when running? Reason I ask is cause I do enjoy privacy. I wont' download origin and I'd hate for Eve to become Origin


A lot of online games already do this anyway. The only people that have anything to fear from it are botters. Stop botting.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#64 - 2013-03-08 07:45:44 UTC
Dark Reignz wrote:
I dont need to read forums or w/e where casual botters go nuts. Here's my post in layman's terms

Player A create 2 accounts to bot (maybe not to rmt, maybe just for casual income while being lazy)

Player B creates 20 accounts to bot (or enough to fill a corp!)

Player A is the one going to be banned every time because he represents a tiny fraction of revenue and is a negligible loss, where as Player B generates a considerable amount of revenue for the game company and is thus an asset and not something you take action against unless you are 200% committed to Botting and RMT removal at any cost.

I'm yet to see any game company that is 200% committed to removing ALL botters (or rmters in general).



You can keep clinging on to that thought if it makes you feel better, even though it's false.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Prince Kobol
#65 - 2013-03-08 08:05:23 UTC
I will happily admit that I often read many of the forums that botters frequent in hope that one day it will be full of outrage and anger when CCP target their bot.

Well I have been a very happy boy of late :)

Reading the forums of people who use a Reg Guard has been truly epic.

What makes me laugh more then anything is when people turn into Internet Lawyers and starting spouting crap like "I will sue CCP if they change any file on my PC.. rage rage rage"

He is a little something for all those people who are involved in RMT and are earning real life money from it.

Considering I have seen Titans selling for over $2500 a pop, there are people making a lot of rl money from Eve.

Whilst I doubt that CCP can do anything legally to you if you are caught, what they can do is pass over your personal details to your government tax department.. i.e HMRC for those who live in the UK, IRS for those who live in the US and inform them that you are earning extra income which you have most likely not declared

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#66 - 2013-03-08 08:43:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Prince Kobol wrote:
Whilst I doubt that CCP can do anything legally to you if you are caught, what they can do is pass over your personal details to your government tax department.. i.e HMRC for those who live in the UK, IRS for those who live in the US and inform them that you are earning extra income which you have most likely not declared

I doubt it - CCP cannot show that any money changed hands (unless they themselves have bought the ISK from you).

All CCP sees is "Guy A gave Guy B access to some in-game assets for no obvious reason" and from that they infer that money changed hands to balance the transaction.

That standard of proof is of course more than enough to ban you from EVE (in the ToS CCP reserves the right to ban you for whatever reason they wish to) but I doubt it would be enough for a tax investigation.

"Guy A gave Guy B access to some digital assets (that remained in our possession and our property all along).

We think access to these assets is valuable because people are willing to pay for it.

Gambling regulations? first time I hear about this Somer Blink thing....

Yes, EVE players transfer (access to) assets all the time but we we think this case is special based on our proprietary analysis of his behavioral patterns.

No, we don't have any strong indication that money or other RL assets changed hands.

No, his RL data was not verified when he created an account with us."


If I worked for a tax collection agency I'd file that tip right into the paperbin.... Roll

Admittedly a neat idea but it just doesn't seem very practical to me.

.

Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries
Forgers United
#67 - 2013-03-08 08:52:52 UTC
Sweet, I like this information.Smile
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#68 - 2013-03-08 09:05:42 UTC
Keep it up CCP!

Aside from hurting RMT, banning bots is something that many of us players care about and like to see Smile
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2013-03-08 09:07:00 UTC
Mara Tessidar wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


News like this is something we can all celebrate.


If it's such good news, then there will be an official CCP source you can cite instead of the head of goon propaganda.





You are an idiot if you think CCP will ever tell you that they've started doing what the article claims they have.

next time spend a minute before you post something. you make yourself look bad Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Othran
Route One
#70 - 2013-03-08 09:07:35 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:

All CCP sees is "Guy A gave Guy B access to some in-game assets for no obvious reason" and from that they infer that money changed hands to balance the transaction.

That standard of proof is of course more than enough to ban you from EVE (in the ToS CCP reserves the right to ban you for whatever reason they wish to) but I doubt it would be enough for a tax investigation.


It'll be more than enough for Revenue & Customs in the UK - these days they act on anonymous tipoffs involving as little as £250 of undeclared income.
Dark Reignz
Four-Q
#71 - 2013-03-08 09:18:12 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Eterne
Seems like they got your number pretty quick sreegs. Only RG officially declared as "Detected" and now all the bot devs are rushing round to program new features to counter you.

*snipped links to botting forums. While we appreciate the sentiment, we can't allow this* - CCP Eterne

Reading some of this **** makes me glad I'm not doing Sreegs job. And here's me whining about banning all the fckers Shocked

Troll Mode - ON

Dheeradj Nurgle
Hoover Inc.
Snuffed Out
#72 - 2013-03-08 09:40:08 UTC
I approve of this product and/or service.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#73 - 2013-03-08 11:05:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
(excuse my utter ignorance about how bot engines work)

That's great news but...

... do programmers who have Python, LAMP and Visual Studio installed also risk being flagged by those detection routines?

Because I'd kinda hate to be banned because of my (now former) job.
Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#74 - 2013-03-08 11:12:42 UTC
Angelique Duchemin wrote:
Quote:
Team Security began, for what some bot developers believe is the first time, actually checking for botting and bot-enabling software running on a player’s computer.


I got a bit hung up on that part.


why get hung up about it ??
it's a measure put in place to make your gaming experience transparently improved.

Ive played FPS's for years, stuff like that isn't really news with those games
Punkbuster etc have been automating bot banning for a long time

tbh i think ccp should have implemented something like this from day 1.
Prince Kobol
#75 - 2013-03-08 11:15:51 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Whilst I doubt that CCP can do anything legally to you if you are caught, what they can do is pass over your personal details to your government tax department.. i.e HMRC for those who live in the UK, IRS for those who live in the US and inform them that you are earning extra income which you have most likely not declared

I doubt it - CCP cannot show that any money changed hands (unless they themselves have bought the ISK from you).

All CCP sees is "Guy A gave Guy B access to some in-game assets for no obvious reason" and from that they infer that money changed hands to balance the transaction.

That standard of proof is of course more than enough to ban you from EVE (in the ToS CCP reserves the right to ban you for whatever reason they wish to) but I doubt it would be enough for a tax investigation.

"Guy A gave Guy B access to some digital assets (that remained in our possession and our property all along).

We think access to these assets is valuable because people are willing to pay for it.

Gambling regulations? first time I hear about this Somer Blink thing....

Yes, EVE players transfer (access to) assets all the time but we we think this case is special based on our proprietary analysis of his behavioral patterns.

No, we don't have any strong indication that money or other RL assets changed hands.

No, his RL data was not verified when he created an account with us."


If I worked for a tax collection agency I'd file that tip right into the paperbin.... Roll

Admittedly a neat idea but it just doesn't seem very practical to me.


As another poster has already stated, in the UK you do not have to show any proof to the HMRC, all you have to do is fill out a very simple form on their website stating that you believe this person is not declaring an income and your reasons why.

So for example let say CCP contact HMRC stating that x person has been banned as they are involved in RMT.. i.e selling in game items for real life money then trust me, HMRC will investigate that person.

Once HMRC sniff there might be even a small outside chance that you have an undeclared income they will not stop until you show at the very least 12 months history off all your bank accounts and are able to account for all the money coming in.

A very good friend of mine was reported to HMRC for selling items on ebay and he was not declaring it as a income just over a year ago.

He had to prove to the HMRC that all the items he was selling were items that he had personally owned and that he was not buying and selling items at a profit via ebay.

Considering he had been selling items for quite a few years it took months to sort out and involved a lot of worrying as he was potentially facing a very big fine and tax bill.

As I have said, if the HMRC even get the slightest of hints they can screw somebody, they will take it.
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#76 - 2013-03-08 11:29:53 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
(excuse my utter ignorance about how bot engines work)

That's great news but...

... do programmers who have Python, LAMP and Visual Studio installed also risk being flagged by those detection routines?

Because I'd kinda hate to be banned because of my (now former) job.

Seriously doubt that they check what you have installed, rather to what is running and executing the client process, VS is fairly common especially with all other .net stuff and similar that windows throws in.

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#77 - 2013-03-08 11:30:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
(excuse my utter ignorance about how bot engines work)

That's great news but...

... do programmers who have Python, LAMP and Visual Studio installed also risk being flagged by those detection routines

it's impossible to say "there is no risk" when CCP can change their mind any time they want to but for now it doesn't seem likely at all.

According to a publicdemands post by civan (the Red Guard developer) CCP checks for the existence of a dll called "rgdll.dll". He doesn't say whether there are further checks to make sure that this rgdll.dll is actually Red Guard and that it is used to "protect" the EVE client, only that EVE tries to load it.
So it seems there might be a potential for false positives if you have a rgdll.dll somewhere in your library path (maybe it's the real red guard but you don't use it, or it's just some random library that you named rgdll.dll).

With rgds to dev tools I would definitely stay away from hooking up a debugger to the eve client - I can't recall anyone ever complaining that this gets you banned but then very few people have probably tried it and the silence may very well just be a lack of information.

I should probably delete my Questor folder (or at least the binaries) so as not to incur Sreegs' wrath by accident... but I can't imagine CCP banning people for the mere act of having common dev tools (such as Visual Studio) installed and so far no report mentions false positives of this sort.

.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#78 - 2013-03-08 11:31:37 UTC
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


News like this is something we can all celebrate.


If it's such good news, then there will be an official CCP source you can cite instead of the head of goon propaganda.



I find it interesting that Mittens knew all the details (exact software, bans, and etc.) in great detail.



I find it interesting that you (and so many others) can't read bylines.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#79 - 2013-03-08 11:43:01 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:


As I have said, if the HMRC even get the slightest of hints they can screw somebody, they will take it.


Unless of course the sums involved exceed a few tens of millions of pounds, then they'll offer to make an easy deal for a few percent of the sum owed.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Kane Alvo
Doomheim
#80 - 2013-03-08 11:43:51 UTC
Retribution 1.1.6...more effective than James316 and minerbumping since 2013.

Caldari Militia  ☜★☞ Psychotic Monk for CSM8