These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Margin Trading Scam...

First post First post
Author
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#181 - 2013-07-24 06:03:04 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
I meant the scam doesn't add anything beneficial to the game... ...Except in this case the victim doesn't even get a warning box.


It apparently adds to the enjoyment of those that pull it off. Much as selling a 100m Firetail on contract adds to my enjoyment.

And they don't need a 'warning box.' The warning is right there in one or both market order windows that they need to interact with. Red text = bad. This item is XXX% above regional average. Smart people wonder why that is; fools part with their money, and then come crying here about it.
Jorden Ishonen
Doomheim
#182 - 2013-07-24 06:03:39 UTC
Zoe Ozran wrote:
Well, I learned something today. Had no idea this was a thing.


It's amazing what you can learn purely through research and observation. And a great deal of what you learn boils down to "People who don't research or observe are easy targets."
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#183 - 2013-07-24 12:46:43 UTC
Zoe Ozran wrote:
Well, I learned something today. Had no idea this was a thing.


This is why I read Crime and Punishment religiously. I like to keep abreast of the newest ways to part me from my space-money so I know what to watch out for.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#184 - 2013-07-24 13:06:21 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
Zoe Ozran wrote:
Well, I learned something today. Had no idea this was a thing.


This is why I read Crime and Punishment religiously. I like to keep abreast of the newest ways to part me from my space-money so I know what to watch out for.


Lies, you play EVE, and no EVE player gives a flip about the consequences of their actions or about taking responsibility for their gameplay experience by properly informing themselves BEFORE hand, what kind of dope are you smoking?

Also, it's it opposite day?? Where is my xanax?
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#185 - 2013-07-24 13:08:26 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

what kind of dope are you smoking?



The very best kind - the kind I scammed from someone else.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#186 - 2013-07-24 15:48:55 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

what kind of dope are you smoking?



The very best kind - the kind I scammed from someone else.


I'll give you some oregano for that powdered sugar you've got there.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
#187 - 2013-07-24 16:03:31 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
Poorly stated on my part, and eagerly taken out of context by you lot. P I meant the scam doesn't add anything beneficial to the game.


I would disagree. A lot of people enjoy scamming other players and it is beneficial to them. That it's not beneficial to everyone is no argument because same thing could be said about of lot of things that are regular part of the game.

Quote:
But the scam is kinda broken and has no warning.


Wrong. A warning pops up when you intend to buy or sell stuff way off the regional price average. Then ther's the item's market history which also serves as a warning.

Quote:
It just pisses off new players who have the silly idea that they can trust the market interface.


In that case they actualy benefit from the scam also because they learn some valuable lessons about Eve and its players.
Meunchyocan
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#188 - 2013-07-24 16:27:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Meunchyocan
I find a great deal of the ideas in this thread both amusing and disturbing at once.

"Eve is a game, it's not real"
I have news for you, Eve is a part of the universe. This is akin to saying that a conversation over the telephone is not communication because it wasn't done face-to-face. Side stepping the trolls and narrow-minded people who will argue it's all imaginary because their brain cells which contain the thoughts don't actually exist in an objective sense, we can conclude that it has an impact on THE universe. If there are additional parallel universes, perhaps someone might be exempt but I'll leave that to the quantum physicists to work out, and another topic.

"I love the mechanic because it punishes the stupid, careless and greedy"
I hardly even know where to begin as this shallow and partially thought-through sentiment has more holes than Swiss cheese. Having a user interface which is inconsistent linked to a skill which is poorly represented by name and has the potential to annoy anyone makes no sense to me. A person doesn't have to be greedy to be affected by this mechanic. What if I was a person trying to help others by selling items to their low buy price and the mechanism fails?

"Working as intended!"
Following the line of thinking behind why displayed buy orders may or may not work all of these would be excellent additions to the game: Allow people to manufacture ship modules which optionally function 50% of the time and are indistinguishable to anyone but the manufacturer while simultaneously ensuring no one knows who is selling them. The modules should look exactly like normal ship modules and conceal who created or sold them. Introduce a new line of ship modules where some of them list an attribute such as "increases ship maximum velocity by 5%" and make a couple variations on the item where in one case it increases velocity by 5% and the other it decreases velocity by 10%. This will make the game more fun because we'll be 'rollin the dice having a blast more as we learn how information which appears to be straight-forward can be incorrect. We should have buttons in the game which when pressed have a 35% chance of performing the action shown otherwise they activate another random module. A new skill should be introduced called Expert Communications which when trained allows you to farm pigs. How about if Eve just formats your hard-drive when you think you're actually going to be closing a window.. hah-sucker, got you - chalk it up and LTP better luck 'rollin them dice next time.

"It's all a part of the learning process of Eve"
Hey buddy, just buy both modules showing 5% velocity increase so you can determine which one actually doesn't slow you down. I did it and so you should too, it's grrrrrrrrrreat!

"Everything would be okay if you had just researched ahead of time"
Okay, so what if I create 100,000,000 alts and decide I'm going to place bogus buy orders all across the galaxy with no funds backing any of them. Maybe you don't even want to make a fast buck - you simply want to create your own buy orders to be something like, a space-trader, in a space game or god forbid to actually just use the items like a real sinner. Oh... wait... well, the first thing you should do then is uhhhh ignore every single buy order you see when determining what value you'd like to place your own buy order at because 99.999% of them can be bogus. Secondly, make sure you're in simple mode 99.999% of the time so you don't lose ISK, you fool!! Research that.

"It's so cool we can scam people, nooooo don't take our ability to scam people away"
In the big picture you cannot have light without dark. Nothing would exist without contrast and evolution requires conflict. I'll accept scammers should exist but on a more personal note I think scammers are short-sighted lamers. Biomass all you like, I won't trust someone who just rerolled as easily as someone who has earned trust over time. Slow and steady wins the race. Dishonesty and fast money runs out of gas quickly and karma is a *****. If you haven't figured these things out yet, your loss. I find it interesting that because Eve presents tempting opportunities for people to play like scum that many act as if it were in the player handbook that you must act like scum. For people like this, you won't get any of my tears - only pity. For people being constantly trolled by the emotionally disturbed, like-my-posts, always-got-a-counter-reply, pompous preening potpourri of poopery popularity contestants (off the tip of my head), you have my sympathies.

Don't take this the wrong way, I think Eve is a great game. I just think the inconsistency in this particular element which is largely centered around the otherwise logical and intuitive user interface amounts to nothing more than poor design. I was never scammed by this mechanic and I still think it sucks. It degrades my desire to participate in trading since I see the problem it could present. It is the potential I see in this game which evokes my response.
Jorden Ishonen
Doomheim
#189 - 2013-07-24 17:11:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorden Ishonen
Meunchyocan wrote:
I find a great deal of the ideas in this thread both amusing and disturbing at once.


Mmmmm, love that opening. It guarantees quality amusement to come.

1. If someone beat you at poker, would you call them a sociopath because they bluffed you? Threaten them with physical harm because they lied to you in a game? Hell, you could end up losing REAL LIFE money in poker. Some games incorporate lying and deception as part of the game, and EVE is one of them. If you're not comfortable with that, why are you playing?

2. A person has to be either greedy or stupid (usually both) to fall for this scam. Greedy if they KNOW that the order they are trying to fill is far, far in their favor, and are trying to take advantage of what they see as a mistake or desperation from another player. Stupid if they don't pay attention to the actual prices of goods and keep aware of potential market scams. And the buy price low, because then it would be an ineffectual scam. You're selling goods at a high price, then issuing a buy order nearby for an even higher price. At no point is there room for anyone to go "Hey, I should really help this guy out." The only people negatively effected by the scam are people who buy the inflated goods, which goes back to stupidity and greed.

3. I tried to make sense of this, I really did. It seems to boil down to "Waaaah, orders cancel if the buyer can't supply the money!" Which is surprising...how?

4. Well, I suppose I'm not surprised that you don't like learning.

5. Speaking of learning, go learn how Margin Trading and escrow works before you spout drivel.

6. Given that most scammers are alts, while the mains go about their more above-the-board business, I don't really think they care. And here's a friendly tip: you already gave them your tears. Your post is pretty much one big bag of salty Grade A goodness.

I think what it really boils down to is people refusing to accept that game mechanics are not 100% accurate 100% of the time. It's the same reason you see all those AFK cloaker threads, people just can't get over that they might have to apply their own intelligence to interpret what they see as opposed to have the game just spoonfeed it to them.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#190 - 2013-07-24 17:23:42 UTC
Meunchyocan wrote:
"Eve is a game, it's not real"
I have news for you, Eve is a part of the universe. This is akin to saying that a conversation over the telephone is not communication because it wasn't done face-to-face.
No, it's like saying that regicide is not only legal, but desirable, and ultimately the goal of chess. In other words, what goes on in the game has no particular bearing on what goes on outside it. Look up the concept of the “magic circle”.

Quote:
"I love the mechanic because it punishes the stupid, careless and greedy"
I hardly even know where to begin as this shallow and partially thought-through sentiment has more holes than Swiss cheese. Having a user interface which is inconsistent linked to a skill which is poorly represented by name and has the potential to annoy anyone makes no sense to me.
It's not inconsistent and the behaviour is not linked to a skill. People buying overpriced items punishes the stupid, careless, and greedy since they have all failed to use this rather simple interface (to say nothing about the vast information sources linked to and derived from it) to figure out what the stuff they're buying is actually worth. This is a trivial task and you have to do a lot wrong to fail at it… but you can skip it if you feel like being uninformed for some reason.

Quote:
"Working as intended!"
Following the line of thinking
…if the devs say it's working as intended, it is. That's really all there is. It's also no different from any of the myriad of other reasons why a buy order might no longer be valid by the time you try it — after all, it's an offer, not a promise. This interesting fact makes your example pretty much entirely misapplied since it relies on a fundamentally incorrect assumption.

Quote:
"It's all a part of the learning process of Eve"
Hey buddy, just buy both modules showing 5% velocity increase so you can determine which one actually doesn't slow you down.
No, it doesn't work that way. After all, there is no gambling or randomness involved.

Quote:
"Everything would be okay if you had just researched ahead of time"
Okay, so what if I create 100,000,000 alts and decide I'm going to place bogus buy orders all across the galaxy with no funds backing any of them.
…then you've just wasted trillions of ISK on market orders that will all fail, after which the market returns to normal.

Again, doing your research and finding out the real value of an item is trivial and irrationally absurd suggestions about what one might possibly do with infinite (real) money doesn't change this. No scammer will every waste the vast sums required for the kind of market manipulation you're suggesting — it simply doesn't pay off. For much the same reason, this whole notion that they keep biomassing their characters is nonsensical. Why on earth would they throw away good ISK and time doing that when it doesn't make the slightest bit of difference as far as being able to perpetrate this (or really any) kind of scam?

This particular element of the game is centred around people not doing their research and not understanding the fact that the players control the market. Period. It has nothing to do with the interface or any kind of inconsistency. They falsely believe that a buy order is a guarantee (when it can be gone at any point for any reason); they falsely believe that the highest (as in: way inflated) price is the actual value; they falsely believe that the reason the order is still on the market is because they're smarter than everyone else (when everyone else have actually already spotted the trap). The problem the skill and the scam presents is zero.
Meunchyocan
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#191 - 2013-07-24 17:52:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Meunchyocan
Jorden Ishonen wrote:
Meunchyocan wrote:
I find a great deal of the ideas in this thread both amusing and disturbing at once.


Mmmmm, love that opening. It guarantees quality amusement to come.

1. If someone beat you at poker, would you call them a sociopath because they bluffed you? Threaten them with physical harm because they lied to you in a game? Hell, you could end up losing REAL LIFE money in poker. Some games incorporate lying and deception as part of the game, and EVE is one of them. If you're not comfortable with that, why are you playing?

2. A person has to be either greedy or stupid (usually both) to fall for this scam. Greedy if they KNOW that the order they are trying to fill is far, far in their favor, and are trying to take advantage of what they see as a mistake or desperation from another player. Stupid if they don't pay attention to the actual prices of goods and keep aware of potential market scams. And the buy price low, because then it would be an ineffectual scam. You're selling goods at a high price, then issuing a buy order nearby for an even higher price. At no point is there room for anyone to go "Hey, I should really help this guy out." The only people negatively effected by the scam are people who buy the inflated goods, which goes back to stupidity and greed.

3. I tried to make sense of this, I really did. It seems to boil down to "Waaaah, orders cancel if the buyer can't supply the money!" Which is surprising...how?

4. Well, I suppose I'm not surprised that you don't like learning.

5. Speaking of learning, go learn how Margin Trading and escrow works before you spout drivel.

6. Given that most scammers are alts, while the mains go about their more above-the-board business, I don't really think they care. And here's a friendly tip: you already gave them your tears. Your post is pretty much one big bag of salty Grade A goodness.

I think what it really boils down to is people refusing to accept that game mechanics are not 100% accurate 100% of the time. It's the same reason you see all those AFK cloaker threads, people just can't get over that they might have to apply their own intelligence to interpret what they see as opposed to have the game just spoonfeed it to them.



LOL, what?!?!
Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#192 - 2013-07-24 22:15:40 UTC
LOL so every part of my post was addressed... EXCEPT for the part that actually asked a question.
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
The scam is rather similar to the old Lofty trick, it uses hidden game mechanics in order to be implemented. Except in this case the victim doesn't even get a warning box. If CCP felt the Lofty needed to be fixed, why doesn't this?

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#193 - 2013-07-25 00:18:14 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
LOL so every part of my post was addressed... EXCEPT for the part that actually asked a question.
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
The scam is rather similar to the old Lofty trick, it uses hidden game mechanics in order to be implemented. Except in this case the victim doesn't even get a warning box. If CCP felt the Lofty needed to be fixed, why doesn't this?



The scam is getting you to buy an overpriced item. The method for checking the true value of the item is quite literally 1 mouseclick away.
The scam is ultimately based on enticing someone to attempt market PvP in the same way a bait Maller is enticing someone to attempt pew-pew PvP.


The lofty trick was based on buggy mechanics that allowed you to bypass the normal procedures for making someone a target for legal aggression. There are no buggy mechanics being used to bypass anything in a margin trading scam, just obvious bait and a hook.


And, of course, the ultimate answer: CCP felt the Lofty trick was broken and needed to be fixed, and CCP feels that the Margin Trading skill is not broken and thus does not need fixing.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#194 - 2013-07-25 01:34:30 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
LOL so every part of my post was addressed... EXCEPT for the part that actually asked a question.
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
The scam is rather similar to the old Lofty trick, it uses hidden game mechanics in order to be implemented. Except in this case the victim doesn't even get a warning box. If CCP felt the Lofty needed to be fixed, why doesn't this?



It was addressed at least twice. There's a big bunch of red text included in the market order confirmation screen that tells you that the price you are buying/selling for is well out of whack compared to regional average. That constitutes a warning.

How many times has your short attention span gotten you scammed?
Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#195 - 2013-07-25 03:39:07 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
The lofty trick was based on buggy mechanics that allowed you to bypass the normal procedures for making someone a target for legal aggression. There are no buggy mechanics being used to bypass anything in a margin trading scam, just obvious bait and a hook.
People buying overpriced crap is their choice alone. I have zero problem at all with that part of the scam. However, a game mechanic that bypasses "normal procedures" of the market simply because somebody trained a skill, and then hides the fact that it has done so with no warning to other players, is a buggy mechanic. Sure it's bait and hook, but the hook is invisible. The Maller always has a warning that a hook exists - warning flag when jumping into low/null, warning when undocking with aggro flag, warning when wardecced, etc. But there is never a warning that a buy order can fail.

All that's need is a simple checkbox on the buyer's interface "Do you want this buy order to be a Margin Trade?" and then flag the Buy with an innocuous white bullet that gives info on what a Margin Trade is when moused over. Sufficient warning. Done. Greedy idiots that don't bother to fully read the market interface will still fall for it. But at least the warning was there before they leaped in.

Domanique Altares wrote:
How many times has your short attention span gotten you scammed?
Amazingly never in the many years I've played this game. How about you?
Meunchyocan
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#196 - 2013-07-25 04:03:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Meunchyocan
My first point was that events in Eve can and do have impact in the so-called "real world" as everything is in the "real world" eventually. At this time in my post I made no mention of whether I was personally a saint or a demon. The sense of immersion itself does not change the nature of the universe. If a person reads a fiction novel that makes them cry, they are still missing the physical tears.

Failed reading comprehension replies:
* Assumption I would hate someone who bluffed me in poker.
* Questioning whether I might physically threaten someone over a game of poker.
* Assumption I am personally uncomfortable playing a game where people lie.
* Stating that regicide is not only legal but desirable and ultimately like chess.
* Stating what goes on inside a game has no impact on what goes on outside it because of the "magic circle"
* Telling me I should read a game development term which I was familiar to begin with and does not refute what I said.

My second point was that a system of unreliable buy orders being displayed can impact a player regardless of whether they are careless or greedy. The single example presented of the person who wants to play the game by selling items cheaply to people is ignored. Apparently the response is addressing whether or not the buy orders can be relied upon or not, and not even if this is a good game design element. Suddenly they are "not inconsistent" and the behavior I was discussing is not linked to a skill, such as Margin Trading (which enables buy orders to fail only after an attempt to transact is made.)

Irrelevant replies topped off with assumptions:
* "A person has to be either greedy or stupid to fall for this scam" - what if I enjoy getting scammed?
* "It's not inconsistent and the behaviour is not linked to a skill." - it must be true behaviour, if you say so.
* "People buying overpriced items punishes the stupid, careless, and greedy" - what if I enjoy buying overpriced items?
* researching item prices: "This is a trivial task and you have to do a lot wrong to fail at it… but you can skip it if you feel like being uninformed for some reason." - please direct me to the web site which shows me which buy orders are covered with funds and which are not.

My third point asserts that buy orders which can fail with no indication which are valid and which are not is a bad game design element.

Replies:
* "I tried to make sense of this, I really did. It seems to boil down to "Waaaah, orders cancel if the buyer can't supply the money!" Which is surprising...how?" - I'm surprised you cannot comprehend. The impact can be further reaching than Waaaaah I clicked a button and it didn't work but since you're already having difficulty understanding I won't try to explain further.
* …if the devs say it's working as intended, it is." - where did I say the devs did not create it to function as it does?
* "That's really all there is." - but what is your point? Are you suggesting if Eve were to crash on startup because the devs were responsible, that's all there really is..awesome you must be some fan girl, can I sell you something?
* "it's an offer, not a promise." - Nowhere did I say as it currently stands that it's a guaranteed promise. Sure it's unreliable information... that's what I said before you defended with "It's not inconsistent".

My fourth point demonstrates how while it's a learning process, to learn which buy orders function and which do not requires attempting to use them.

Replies:
* "Well, I suppose I'm not surprised that you don't like learning." - O.K. buddy right on topic! Nice personal attack based on little to no knowledge about me.
* "No, it doesn't work that way. After all, there is no gambling or randomness involved." - Please demonstrate your perfect ability to tell me which buy orders will work and not work in a station 100% of the time provided that you did not create all of them.

My fifth point shows the potential the buy orders can have if used as any sort of metric. Since so far it's only been displayed in the context of a fairly obvious scam I gave examples how it could be further utilized with far-reaching implications.

Replies:
* "Speaking of learning, go learn how Margin Trading and escrow works before you spout drivel." - An assumption that I know nothing about margin trading is made and an order is issued to me.
* "…then you've just wasted trillions of ISK on market orders that will all fail, after which the market returns to normal." - If I were to do that, it would only be a waste if I considered doing it a waste. You also assume that it must end instead of being an ongoing-state for no apparent reason.
* "Again, doing your research and finding out the real value of an item is trivial" - There is no such thing as the real value of an item as the value of any item is relative to what a person is willing to pay for it, and one method for which this information is relayed is incidentally what I am discussing.
* "Why on earth would they throw away good ISK and time doing that when it doesn't make the slightest bit of difference" - Why would anyone do anything? Are you so ego-centric you believe everyone has your motives? How are you substantiating your claim that if someone were to do this it wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference?

Some more misc. interesting replies:
"Given that most scammers are alts" - Is this a given? Define an alt please. If I play 5 characters an exact equal amount of time and they each have the same skill points can you tell me which one is the alt? Can you please explain how the player is not scamming if they act nicely on one character and not on another?
Meunchyocan
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#197 - 2013-07-25 04:08:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Meunchyocan
Tippia wrote:
This particular element of the game is centred around people not doing their research and not understanding the fact that the players control the market. Period. It has nothing to do with the interface or any kind of inconsistency. They falsely believe that a buy order is a guarantee (when it can be gone at any point for any reason); they falsely believe that the highest (as in: way inflated) price is the actual value; they falsely believe that the reason the order is still on the market is because they're smarter than everyone else (when everyone else have actually already spotted the trap). The problem the skill and the scam presents is zero."


[X] I've researched the matter
[X] I understand the fact that players control the market
[X] I don't believe that a buy order is a guarantee
[X] I don't believe that the highest price displayed is the actual first working value
[X] I don't believe the order is still on the market because I'm smarter than everyone else
[X] I have a problem with the skill as it is. It detracts from my desire to play as a trader which I would like to do otherwise.

Why do I get the feeling that some of these defensive replies are for the purpose of either covering or kissing asses?

"The sky is blue."
now begin:
Jorden Ishonen
Doomheim
#198 - 2013-07-25 04:31:34 UTC
Meunchyocan wrote:

Irrelevant replies topped off with assumptions:
* "A person has to be either greedy or stupid to fall for this scam" - what if I enjoy getting scammed?


Damn, you got me to reply. 9/10 good sir, very subtle.
cyndrogen
The Greatest Corp in the Universe
#199 - 2013-07-25 04:57:50 UTC
Can you please tell us how much ISK you lost?

Every day in every way I improve my skills and get better.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#200 - 2013-07-25 05:15:19 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
People buying overpriced crap is their choice alone. I have zero problem at all with that part of the scam. However, a game mechanic that bypasses "normal procedures" of the market simply because somebody trained a skill, and then hides the fact that it has done so with no warning to other players, is a buggy mechanic. Sure it's bait and hook, but the hook is invisible. The Maller always has a warning that a hook exists - warning flag when jumping into low/null, warning when undocking with aggro flag, warning when wardecced, etc. But there is never a warning that a buy order can fail.


What normal procedure is bypassed? The normal amount of escrow for someone with their level of the margin skill is set aside every time an order is placed. EVE is an exception based skill system; you cannot do "X" without skill "Y." Everything you can do because of a skill is an exception to the normal that's (often) hidden to other players. In this case, it's hidden because the amount you put into escrow is entirely irrelevant.

Quote:
All that's need is a simple checkbox on the buyer's interface "Do you want this buy order to be a Margin Trade?" and then flag the Buy with an innocuous white bullet that gives info on what a Margin Trade is when moused over. Sufficient warning. Done. Greedy idiots that don't bother to fully read the market interface will still fall for it. But at least the warning was there before they leaped in.


An order failing cannot hurt you. You retain your stuff and are not charged any ISK for the sales attempt. Why should you be "warned" about something that cannot hurt you? Or, explain how you can be hurt by something that leaves you exactly as you were before attempting it and takes very little time (remember, if the hurt is caused by you carelessly buying something for too much, well, that's what hurt you, not your inability to turn around and sell it for even more).

Oh, and the market interface tells you how much something's worth. The only way you can be tricked into buying something that's way overpriced now is by failing to read the market interface.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon