These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Battlecruiser prices question

Author
Katica Zasve
Destructive Brothers
Fraternity.
#1 - 2013-03-05 11:18:54 UTC
I have noticed that sell prices of Prophecy and Cyclone are significantly lower then their build cost.
For example when I calculate Prophecy costs approx. 50m to build, and Cyclone 48m.
On the market they sell for 41,6m and 37m.

What is the catch I do not understand, are they in so low demand?

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
#2 - 2013-03-05 11:23:09 UTC
Hi Katica.

Please read this thread thoroughly, should answer all your questions, TL:DR saturation.

iCandy  - I have accidently swallowed some Scrabble tiles, my next shit could spell disaster!

Saveritrader
Sav Trading
#3 - 2013-03-05 11:23:17 UTC
It's because CCP has only just increased the build costs for the BC's. There are thousands, if not tens of thousands, built in advance of this change. So people are currently dumping them at lower prices, because for them it's still massive profit.
Katica Zasve
Destructive Brothers
Fraternity.
#4 - 2013-03-05 11:31:01 UTC
Thank you for the explanataion, but now I'm still confused lol.

Is this not perfect investment opportunity, like to buy now and re-sell later?
And if it is, how come this ships are not bought already by some big players, its like 10m profit per unit?
Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
#5 - 2013-03-05 11:34:57 UTC
http://i.imgur.com/m1XDUpa.jpg

iCandy  - I have accidently swallowed some Scrabble tiles, my next shit could spell disaster!

Saveritrader
Sav Trading
#6 - 2013-03-05 12:20:35 UTC
You'd need to be a multitrillionaire to buy up the whole market, and push prices towards the actual build value. It's simply undoable, as well as take a LONG time to liquidate again.


+ What candy says.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#7 - 2013-03-05 13:23:48 UTC
Katica Zasve wrote:
Is this not perfect investment opportunity, like to buy now and re-sell later?

It is an investment opportunity, just not a very good one when you compare it to the same opportunity before the patch.

Katica Zasve wrote:
And if it is, how come this ships are not bought already by some big players, its like 10m profit per unit?

Some people have been buying them and some people continue to buy them.

Many of the "big players" have already put their money in to this and are now looking forward to taking it out again when the price reaches their exit point.

It can be tricky to invest the same money twice on the same item, although some are doing that too. Some are even investing it for the third or fourth time over on this.

But aside from the point that the best time to invest in this has probably passed, there are two other good reasons not to invest in it. Firstly, the profit you will make over time could be very slight, because it may take a long time for the prices on these ships to rise significantly. Secondly, there are better things to invest in now.
Katica Zasve
Destructive Brothers
Fraternity.
#8 - 2013-03-05 14:25:35 UTC
Thank you everyone for enlightening me, you are awesome!

I have few thoughts about this, still.

So lot of people has invested already, including big players.
Big players are big.
Because they are big, they are influential.
Since they are influential, can they not engineer more demand?

For example, Brutixes are used to suicide gank (although did I hear that this is not so viable anymore?), if they organize some ganking contest, people would buy Brutix.

Prophecy looks like fleet ship, and some people call Cyclone as "new Drake", so while ships are still cheap can they not make their alliances use them in fights? "Whelpclones" comes to mind, etc.

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#9 - 2013-03-05 14:33:15 UTC
Katica Zasve wrote:
For example, Brutixes are used to suicide gank (although did I hear that this is not so viable anymore?), if they organize some ganking contest, people would buy Brutix.

Prophecy looks like fleet ship, and some people call Cyclone as "new Drake", so while ships are still cheap can they not make their alliances use them in fights? "Whelpclones" comes to mind, etc.

Yes, this also started some time ago.
Saveritrader
Sav Trading
#10 - 2013-03-05 14:41:26 UTC
Katica Zasve wrote:
Thank you everyone for enlightening me, you are awesome!

I have few thoughts about this, still.

So lot of people has invested already, including big players.
Big players are big.
Because they are big, they are influential.
Since they are influential, can they not engineer more demand?

For example, Brutixes are used to suicide gank (although did I hear that this is not so viable anymore?), if they organize some ganking contest, people would buy Brutix.

Prophecy looks like fleet ship, and some people call Cyclone as "new Drake", so while ships are still cheap can they not make their alliances use them in fights? "Whelpclones" comes to mind, etc.



Even if so, big alliances like goonswarm have stocks that could last them for atleast a year if they would mostly field BC's, so really it's just too late to really make a difference. Like bobby said, there are much better investment opportunities at hand right now.
Katica Zasve
Destructive Brothers
Fraternity.
#11 - 2013-03-05 15:01:31 UTC
>Even if so, big alliances like goonswarm have stocks that could last them for atleast a year if they would mostly field BC's, so >really it's just too late to really make a difference. Like bobby said, there are much better investment opportunities at hand right >now.

I see, thank you.
I have decided then to buy few of them now, 20-30, and wait for price to go up to re-sell. Price will go up inevitably, sooner or later, its below build price atm Big smile Might be really long time like you guys said, and I belive you, but I may use them meanwhile on my alt. Will not be big profit, but its reasonable buy, will save up to 20%.







Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#12 - 2013-03-05 15:03:56 UTC
Saveritrader wrote:
Even if so, big alliances like goonswarm have stocks that could last them for atleast a year if they would mostly field BC's, so really it's just too late to really make a difference.

You actually might be quite surprised how small (and in some cases non-existent) the ship stocks of some big alliances are. It depends quite a lot on the nature and organisation of their reimbursement programs as well as the foresight of their logistics, support and leadership personnel.

It is not uncommon for a fleet whelp to result in a specific ship hull being entirely stripped from the Jita marketplace. It is also not uncommon for an unexpected docterine choice for a specific operation to suddenly result in the same.
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#13 - 2013-03-05 15:35:09 UTC
Saveritrader wrote:
Even if so, big alliances like goonswarm have stocks that could last them for atleast a year if they would mostly field BC's.


hehn?

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Saveritrader
Sav Trading
#14 - 2013-03-05 15:38:17 UTC
Hm? I also mentioned 'could have'... I have no clue what their actual ship stocks could hold since I am a fairly lowballing player in the market, especially compared to some. Though the point remains, wether or not there might be long term profit in buying the market as it is now, it's simply not worth it to get in now.
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#15 - 2013-03-05 15:46:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Varius Xeral
No, the point doesn't remain because alliances generally don't have huge stockpiles of ships.

Most alliances outsource their supply to their own membership who use the market and contracts, with minimal direction or interference only during notable strategic shifts (deployments, main doctrine changes, etc).

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#16 - 2013-03-05 16:30:52 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
No, the point doesn't remain because alliances generally don't have huge stockpiles of ships.

Most alliances outsource their supply to their own membership who use the market and contracts, with minimal direction or interference only during notable strategic shifts (deployments, main doctrine changes, etc).

It varies widely from alliance to alliance and within each alliance as policies change.

I've seen alliances with hull-for-lossmail type reimbursement policies carry ridiculous stocks of ships. But I've not seen anything like that for a while. I think most alliances have learned that this approach to reimbursement gives poor results in exchange for excessive cost and effort. It has a severe negative effect on the mobility and adaptability of the alliance war machine.

I've also seen alliances carry no more than a couple of JFs and SMBs full of high priority reimbursement hulls (e.g. logistics, dictors, hictors, link vessels, bombers and cynoships). This was the policy in both alliances in which I held leadership positions.

I also know of at least one alliance that maintains a stock of several hundred capital hulls at the alliance level.

The thing about battlecruiser hulls is that they can be effectively acquired, produced or shipped with little effort, time or cost and by just about any competent alliance logistician. So there isn't really a good reason to stockpile them at the kind of scale that would have these kind of massive market effects. Capitals, pirate vessels and limited-issue ships are a different matter.





Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#17 - 2013-03-05 18:01:40 UTC
I won;t disgree with any of that. I was going to add a comment about capitals, particularly dreads, but it seemed superfluous to the point at hand.

Point is these speculated stockpiles of ships should not be a factor in the market for BCs.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Molic Blackbird
Orion Faction Industries
Orion Consortium
#18 - 2013-03-05 18:21:12 UTC
Katica Zasve wrote:
>
I have decided then to buy few of them now, 20-30, and wait for price to go up to re-sell. Price will go up inevitably, sooner or later,



Mineral prices could drop over the course of the next 6 months to a year eliminating any potential profit gain. Investing in ship hulls is by no means a sure thing.
Takeshi Takei
Quafe Wholesale Distributions Unlimited
#19 - 2013-03-05 19:03:26 UTC
What about buying the BC and then reprocessing the ship. The minerals might give you the higher value, would it not?
flakeys
Doomheim
#20 - 2013-03-05 19:07:18 UTC
Molic Blackbird wrote:
Katica Zasve wrote:
>
I have decided then to buy few of them now, 20-30, and wait for price to go up to re-sell. Price will go up inevitably, sooner or later,



Mineral prices could drop over the course of the next 6 months to a year eliminating any potential profit gain. Investing in ship hulls is by no means a sure thing.


True but we still have the bs changes coming in a few months so till after summer it should be 'reasonably safe' .Offcourse one never is 100% sure in eve Blink.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

12Next page