These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A disturbing trend

Author
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2013-03-04 19:36:33 UTC
Darius, I'd strongly advise you not to pay all that much attention to Louvaki. His opinions tend to be of very little merit, he's an unashamed Empire apologist and his only accomplishment of note thus far was assisting in the murder of Kaalakiota civilians.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#42 - 2013-03-04 19:41:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
[REDACTED FOR BEING OFF TOPIC - SML]

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2013-03-04 19:43:11 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:
As always, its a pleasure Andreus. Now as for assisting in the murder of Kaalakiota civilians, I guess if throwing my ship in the way of Home Guard forces while providing cover for said civilians to try and escape then I guess, in a completely nonsensical way, you could say that.

Then why did you sic your drones on one of the freighters?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2013-03-04 20:12:15 UTC
Ah, so you're not psychotic, you're just incompetent.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

DeadRow
Blue Canary
Watch This
#45 - 2013-03-04 20:18:25 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Ah, so you're not psychotic, you're just incompetent.


I think I'll just use a quote from Starfire:

Ava Starfire wrote:
Pot, ring ring, it's the kettle.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#46 - 2013-03-04 20:18:56 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Suvetar
Darius: Forgive me if I came off cross, this remains a sensitive subject with me, I'm not looking to start a fight but rather encourage a different approach to freedom fighters. A number of innocent have died during these raids, people who havn't done anything to deserve another person deciding their fate, and it only serves to strengthen slavery's resolve rather than weaken it.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#47 - 2013-03-04 20:22:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
The first slaves were taken over seven centuries ago. No matari living in the Republic bears any relationship still living in the Empire or Mandate unless they can trace back their lineage over fifteen generations and claim that one ancestor was somehow enslaved and yet somehow the other was not. Anyone who says they can do that is lying.


We're all Minmatar, like it or not. That's all the relationship that the Republic needs. You and I are still Minmatar, regardless of what culture we were born in, raised with, and support. Something you seemed to recognize when you decided to side with the Nefantar in the Republic several weeks ago. Awfully hypocritical, miss Luftshreck.

Quote:
In fact, these "bloodlines" matter more than a person's own desires or loyalties, because if you happen to have a drop of matari blood in you then as far as the Republic is concerned you're their property and they have the right to come to whatever planet you happen to be living on, kidnap you, and drag you back to the Republic and be made to serve their government.


You don't make any case for yourself, for the Mandate, or for the Empire, miss Luftshreck. What are you trying to say here? Do you not recognize that your statements here must also, by nature, refer to the Empire as well, and that you likewise consider the Empire evil? You can't simply reverse situations, miss Luftshreck, without acknowledging that you are speaking of the Empire as well.

This is the problem with those born in freedom in the Mandate. You all take your culture, your faith, all these things you have for granted. You never had to toil as those of us in the Empire proper did. If you did, perhaps you would understand that freedom is something that must be earned. Perhaps you were kidnapped by the Republic, but I highly doubt you endured anywhere near what those of us who actually wore Glaive-collars did. Ever been injected with the Glaive's sixth toxin, miss Luftshreck, and then struck by a shockwhip while your nerves are hypersensitive? Ever been thrown in a Penitent's Box, left alone for days to think about what you've done, while still bleeding and in agony? Whatever you experienced in the Republic pales to what those of us who actually endured slavery went through. Instead of, excuse me, whining endlessly about your kidnapping, you should see it as a test of your faith. Because that is what captivity and servitude is, truly--a test of faith. Pain purifies the soul.

Quote:
But the important thing isn't freedom, it's resources. Human resources. Removing labor from the Empire's pool and adding it to the Republic's so they can have more soldiers, more workers, more labor for the effort of their eternal war against all things not-tribal and all people non-matari.

Revenge, freedom and liberation are just meaningless buzzwords to hide the truth: Bloodlust. A common enemy is the only thing that can unite the tribes and keep them from reverting back to fighting each other as they did in ages past.

Revenge, freedom and liberation are the excuses. War itself is the reason.


You have a rather simplistic view of the Republic, miss Luftshreck. Are they a rather violent culture that often prove themselves through conflict? A culture that prides itself in challenging authority? Yes. But their goals, however misguided they may be, are understandable. It is very difficult for those outside the faith to see the Reclaiming, and therefore the Empire, as anything but evil.

You need to look in a mirror, as miss Starfire said. Because you are acting exactly like them--just in reverse. If anything, you are even worse, because at least most in the Republic are hostile against the Empire out of concern with the well-being of those who have no relation to their own lives, while you follow a path of vengeance for no reason other than what happened to you and you alone.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2013-03-04 20:23:09 UTC
DeadRow wrote:
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Ah, so you're not psychotic, you're just incompetent.


I think I'll just use a quote from Starfire:

Ava Starfire wrote:
Pot, ring ring, it's the kettle.

You know, technically, given that our jobs both involve killing things, in the month of February, I've killed more ships and done more ISK in damage than you did. If I'm incompetent, where does that leave you?

Simon Louvaki wrote:
To be honest, I think I was wearing some of those big rimmed glass's like yours that day. Really its no surprise I wasn't able to see past my own nose...

I can see past my own nose just fine in these things. If you can't, maybe you need your eyes checked.

While you're at it, given the general quality of your opinions (i.e. univerally poor and incorrect), maybe you need to get your head checked.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#49 - 2013-03-04 20:23:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Mister Ixiris, mister Louvaki, don't you two have another thread to discuss Caldari-Gallente issues?
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#50 - 2013-03-04 20:27:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
Samira Kernher wrote:
Mister Ixiris, mister Louvaki, don't you two have another thread to discuss Caldari-Gallente issues?


Very correct Ms. Kernher, I didn't come here to discuss Gallnete-Caldari politics.

[REDACTED FOR BEING OFF TOPIC - SML]

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

DeadRow
Blue Canary
Watch This
#51 - 2013-03-04 20:29:07 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
You know, technically, given that our jobs both involve killing things, in the month of February, I've killed more ships and done more ISK in damage than you did. If I'm incompetent, where does that leave you?
.


Inactive and despite us being 112 kills apart, in ISK damage we are only 20million apart. Blink
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2013-03-04 20:32:46 UTC
DeadRow wrote:
Inactive and despite us being 112 kills apart, in ISK damage we are only 20million apart. Blink

It isn't my fault if the Caldari militia aren't brave or competent enough to field ships that cost actual money.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Darius Shakor
Second Shakor Clan
#53 - 2013-03-04 20:37:35 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:

EDIT: @ Darius: Forgive me if I came off cross, this remains a sensitive subject with me, I'm not looking to start a fight but rather encourage a different approach to freedom fighters. A number of innocent have died during these raids, people who havn't done anything to deserve another person deciding their fate, and it only serves to strengthen slavery's resolve rather than weaken it.


Not sure an apology is needed when opinions are voiced, but, fair enough. Yes it is a touchy subject. One that I have spent 10 years in space learning the hard way.

I once felt other and more moderate means would work, as well. The fact of the matter is they never did. So I changed up my ideas and, back in early YC 106, split the hull of an Amarrian ship to free those within. Eighteen slaves died, out of around four hundred. Not something I forget easy, even now. But something I have learned to make peace with.

Darius Shakor - Kacha

Vandeamon Writing Project - EVE Works

Nick Shale
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#54 - 2013-03-04 21:21:51 UTC
What makes slavery wrong and why it's so offensive that merits the taking of lives? People are often rightly horrified about some of the practices of slavery that the universe has seen. What's horrific about those cases is not the slavery itself, though it’s other factors.

What's more accurate, I would say, is that there's a scale from those most enslaved to those least enslaved, and each case of enslavement is thus a matter of degree. I'm a slave to my employers. They don't have as much control over me as amarian holders, but they have enough control over me that it's not entirely inaccurate to describe me as a waged slave working under their authority and serving their needs. In exchange, they give me some ISK. Amarian slaves didn't get ISK in exchange, but they did get education, food and shelter out of the deal. The difference between them and me is really only a matter of degree. It's a great degree of difference, but there's a whole continuum between the two cases. I'm beholden to my employers for specific things, and I have no freedom to violate the contracts I've signed with them. We also have CONCORD that gives us rules of conduct. Under a monarchy or in a totalitarian regime, this is stronger. The government truly is a sort of lord and master. A citizen under that government is a sort of slave. This is all too clear with serfdom. It's only a matter of degree that less constricting systems are different.

Now given that slavery is something that can be administered to different degrees, since it's really just the amount of control someone has over someone else and the amount of autonomy that second person therefore lacks, it shouldn't be so hard to see why I think slavery isn't in principle wrong. Whether it's wrong depends on what other features you tack on to the control over someone who therefore has a lack of autonomy.

However one of the worst aspects of one of the worst kinds of slavery ever was the racially-based element in amarian slavery. The thought that a whole race of people is somehow deserving of servitude while no one else is or that a whole race of people has a right to enslave anyone they want out of another whole race is pretty disgusting and morally bankrupt.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2013-03-04 22:29:35 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:


This is the problem with those born in freedom in the Mandate. You all take your culture, your faith, all these things you have for granted. You never had to toil as those of us in the Empire proper did. If you did, perhaps you would understand that freedom is something that must be earned. Perhaps you were kidnapped by the Republic, but I highly doubt you endured anywhere near what those of us who actually wore Glaive-collars did. Ever been injected with the Glaive's sixth toxin, miss Luftshreck, and then struck by a shockwhip while your nerves are hypersensitive? Ever been thrown in the Penitent's Box, left alone for days to think about what you've done, while still bleeding and in agony? Whatever you experienced in the Republic pales to what those of us who actually endured slavery went through. Instead of, excuse me, whining endlessly about your kidnapping, you should see it as a test of your faith. Because that is what captivity and servitude is, truly--a test of faith. Pain purifies the soul..


Well... Thank you.
Arnulf Ogunkoya
Clan Ogunkoya
Electus Matari
#56 - 2013-03-05 00:27:29 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:
Darius Shakor wrote:


Pay to free 1000 slaves and you free 1000 slaves, another 1000 enter the system behind them to fill the gap. Funded by you. Free them by destroying that transport ship and the slavers need a new ship, at their expense.

The violence is required to prevent perpetuation of this trade.


You do realize that the taking of slaves has been recanted by both the Empire and forbidden by CONCORD right? The only way new slaves come about is if their born. When you destroy a transport your destroying a commerce vessel.

Your killing the pilot, the technicians, the janitors, the cooks, the general crew who had nothing to do with slavery and never could own slaves, not a slaver. These are just people simply trying to make a living on the space lanes. As long as you continue a crusade of violence slavery will never end.


Mr Louvaki, you are mistaken. I have intercepted slave raiding groups repeatedly whilst working for Republican and Federal agents. Also whilst working for the Sisters of EVE.

Invariably the first ships I will encounter are Caldari. Once I fight past them I come across Imperial ships guarding deadspace holding areas. Both groups tend to leave navy ID as part of the wreckage. If you so desire I can provide samples of both types.

Now I will concede that these may be rogue elements. But what I think is happening is someone is employing state citizens in a mercenary capacity to capture slaves. Then the Imperials doing business with them can honestly claim that they didn't raid for slaves themselves and have not broken any laws. Maybe this is enough of a technicality to satisfy the legal systems of both nations? Certainly the bulk of my standings issues with the Empire is the result of this type of work. Now if I was just shooting renegades, why would either navy have a problem with it?

Regards, Arnulf Ogunkoya.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#57 - 2013-03-05 01:38:52 UTC
A most disturbing find Mr. Ogunkoya. Especially so in regards to the possibility of legal State forces being involved in such raids. Consider me mistook until proof surfaces to the contrary.

I wish you luck in stopping further raids.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#58 - 2013-03-05 01:39:23 UTC
I never thought I'd say this about a member of PIE, but...

Beautifully stated, Samira.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#59 - 2013-03-05 02:28:42 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
You are the one who's mistaken. Your ancestors invaded the sovereign nations of the Minmatar Empire and the Jovian Directorate. Just because your empire didn't choose to recognize them as sovereign entities didn't make them any less so.


Hm, no, you should check your political science lessons, as you're mixing two different things here, which lead you to wrong conclusions.

A State is a political entity: has institutions, government, laws, etc. I could go into a longer definition, but I don't think it's necessary. They are the ones that are sovereign. And the Minmatarr State ceased to exist the moment we conquered it and it's institutions were abolished. Thus, your citizens became our citizens, as citizens is a title that is granted by the State, it's a political/institutional element which depends on the laws of that State. Well, actually, your citizens became our slaves.

A Nation is a collection of feelings, identity, traditions and elements usually bound to a specific place, which a community of persons share. Once again, definition could be longer and more precise, but I don't think it's necessary. The Minmatarr Nation existed before the amarrians came, and existed during slavery and existed after your independence. But Nations have no institutions, and are not sovereign, thus hold no citizens, they have Nation members: people who identify with that Nation.

Thus, while your Nation was perpetuated in time, your State dissapeared during centuries. I hope that clears up your mistakes a bit.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#60 - 2013-03-05 02:45:11 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
While you're at it, given the general quality of your opinions (i.e. univerally poor and incorrect), maybe you need to get your head checked.


I apologize for interjecting, and will make no comment on the topic of this discussion. The comment above caught my attention and I am compelled to reply. Mister Ixiris, this comment is not against you specifically; you are an upstanding gentleman and I hope that you do not take my statement to be personal.

I think that all of us Capsuleers would be well-served by a few daily moments of contemplation on the wisdom our enemies expound. Others hold reasons that differ from ours, and we often underestimate the value of their reasoning.

Wisdom hides in funny places.