These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Visions for hisec changes.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ristlin Wakefield
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2013-03-04 19:45:27 UTC
Kane Alvo wrote:
Psychotic Monk wrote:
That's not isk that he's somehow acquired, that's isk that he's destroyed. And Cannibal Kane is hardly a typical example anything. He's on a very short list of the best in the business.


Like I said, I chose the most prominent example I could think of.

If you look at the killboards of many hisec PvP corps and alliances, they all have similar results. Causing heavy casualties while experiencing few of their own. It's no secret that lulz are a major part of the hisec PvP business. But there's also real ISK making potential there in the form of loot drops and salvage from those juicy carebear mission ships, freighters, and mining barges.



Cane declares war on his targets. They can easily avoid death by not undocking or leaving the Corp. If they have losses, its because they chose to have losses. It's that simple.

I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license.
Kane Alvo
Doomheim
#22 - 2013-03-04 23:17:25 UTC
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:
Cane declares war on his targets. They can easily avoid death by not undocking or leaving the Corp. If they have losses, its because they chose to have losses. It's that simple.


Really? Thank you for that wonderfully insightful post. Taken completely out of context and has nothing to do with the discussion, but wonderfully insightful nonetheless.

Roll

Caldari Militia  ☜★☞ Psychotic Monk for CSM8

Jacid
Corvix.
Greater Domain Cooperative
#23 - 2013-03-05 00:54:23 UTC
I like the idea it would make high sec much more fluid. I would say keep it to .1 to .7 systems You wouldn't have to include FW mechanics you could just use the existing mission mechanics to determine the military index so all .1 to .4 systems would have level 4 agents. Once the index was push up to .5 or greater you could include a delayed effect where after a few weeks the lvl4 or lvl5s the agent runs out of missions. Mining would run the same way where a .1 system that was taken to .5 would have .1 rocks for a few weeks but after a time you would lose those rocks and end up with just high sec ores... So in effect the military index of a particular system would over the course of time from more secure to less secure down to a low of .1 and the more you shoot NPC rats the higher the index the higher the security. Mining index would move over time to whatever security the system was and would further be reduced by mining in it.

Interesting idea.

not sure why this post is in C&P though
Froggy Storm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2013-03-05 05:57:56 UTC
I chose C&P specifically for the underworld input. My "idea" wasn't the focus of the post. It was strictly an anecdotal musing of somekind to give an example for possible change. Mostly I was hoping for (and got) discussion in the question of when is safer too safe. As well as what are the (perceived) fears out there beyond those stated bt J_315 and his missionaries.

And for 100% honesty I was somewhat hoping that there might be some tears to harvest as well from either side's zealots. Twisted
culo duro
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-03-05 07:28:34 UTC
Froggy Storm wrote:

And for 100% honesty I was somewhat hoping that there might be some tears to harvest as well from either side's zealots. Twisted


I'm going to quit eve if CCP INTRODUCES MORE CAREBEAR STUFF!
Enough tears? no? *sadface*

But in all honesty if you came to C&P for tears you might wanna read the Pirate Forum Thread.

I've starting blogging http://www.epvpc.blogspot.com 
Ristlin Wakefield
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2013-03-05 15:26:34 UTC
Kane Alvo wrote:
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:
Cane declares war on his targets. They can easily avoid death by not undocking or leaving the Corp. If they have losses, its because they chose to have losses. It's that simple.


Really? Thank you for that wonderfully insightful post. Taken completely out of context and has nothing to do with the discussion, but wonderfully insightful nonetheless.

Roll


No problem, I've got to fill my troll quota somehow -- might as well choose someone who will recognize my hard work.

I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license.
Previous page12