These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EvE is weird: Topic - PIRATES

First post
Author
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#81 - 2013-02-24 17:32:00 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
Tippia wrote:
So why are you bringing up irrelevancies such as moral and the real world?

ask RubyPorto


Ok... why are you trying to link in game activities to the real world and trying to apply real world morality to them?

Ivy Romanova wrote:
The anonymity of EvE has this problem ...
Now only if ALL accounts are binding towards a credit card , and upon request of the corp and authorization of the account holder , the person's name would be visible to the CEO ....


Ivy Romanova wrote:
You know.... what one does when his true identity is anonymous reflects a lot on their true personality.
Do you believe in times of anarchy , one can do whatever he wants ,including pillaging , **** and extortion .... and the one with the biggest stick makes the rules?


Ivy Romanova wrote:

That anonymity and that severance from one's real life identity destroyed that system and those who are intrinsically predators on the weak but are held back by social pressure in real life unleashes their ugly face on the honorable and those trying to make a honest living.

THAT must change.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#82 - 2013-02-24 17:35:02 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
I WAS WRONG!
OK!?

I MADE A MISTAKE!
and I want to RIGHT WHAT HAS BEEN WRONG!


If shooting haulers is wrong (and you make no effort to limit your claim to HS):

Ivy Romanova wrote:
But seriously , what kind of satisfaction do they get from killing indies who can't shoot back??


Why didn't you let him go back to the gate in peace? You could have rectified your "mistake" at any point before the *BOOM.*

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#83 - 2013-02-24 17:42:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Tippia wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Welcome to EVE: Ganking your Hauler is the moral equivalent to taking a pawn in Chess.
You're seriously underestimating how devastating it is to lose a pawn in chess…


Your seriously underestimating how expensive the loot is from haulers meandering through lowsec. I killed an auto piloting hauler in lowsec. To you, that makes me a bad person. To me, that makes me 1b ISK richer.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Ivy Romanova
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#84 - 2013-02-24 17:51:41 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Ivy Romanova wrote:
I WAS WRONG!
OK!?

I MADE A MISTAKE!
and I want to RIGHT WHAT HAS BEEN WRONG!


If shooting haulers is wrong (and you make no effort to limit your claim to HS):

Ivy Romanova wrote:
But seriously , what kind of satisfaction do they get from killing indies who can't shoot back??


Why didn't you let him go back to the gate in peace? You could have rectified your "mistake" at any point before the *BOOM.*



Because I am not a FC , I'm just a nosy grunt.
I was in a 800 dps tachy oracle.
I fired 1 salvo and ceased immediately , others did not ,and I'm not going to shoot blues.
I tried reasoning with them and I failed.


I am limiting my claim to EMPIRE space.
Since that's the only place where such can be termed piracy

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ DAMN THIS    SIGNATURE    IS FANCY ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#85 - 2013-02-24 17:54:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
RubyPorto wrote:
Welcome to EVE: Ganking your Hauler is the moral equivalent to taking a pawn in Chess.


What? That takes the fun out of it.

No one actually loses much time and/or money playing chess (unless you are gambling).

I see ganking as taking away theorectical money from the oponnents.

For arguments sake lets just say Plex is around 500 million isk and that a Charon is 1.5 billion isk (which neither are not) and that in this example somone spent $45 (3 plex's) to buy that Charon. Even if they did not spend the money to the Plex they usually have put forth $45 worth of time and effort to purchase that ship (it takes $15 a month to play after all).

Now let's say that ship is moving down the pipe on autopilot and is empty, but for whatever reason they did this while at war and a bunch of war targets see the target on the gate (or maybe it was a bunch of person's who didn't mind eating the loss to kill it) and sadly the ship goes boom.

Thats $45 dollars of money they spent to buy plex down the drain.

Quite more than taking a pawn in chess. You just took theorectical money out of their pocket.

Now if that doesn't make you feel better about yourself, then I don't know what will.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Ivy Romanova
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#86 - 2013-02-24 17:54:43 UTC
If this were the real world.
After reading all the replies... I think all of us are secret sociopaths and psychopaths What?

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ DAMN THIS    SIGNATURE    IS FANCY ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#87 - 2013-02-24 17:54:54 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
My corp is relevant, how may I help?
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#88 - 2013-02-24 18:05:26 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
I am limiting my claim to EMPIRE space.
Since that's the only place where such can be termed piracy


Maila (0.4)
Name Maila Planets 7 Jumps 1h/24h 42 1009
Region The Forge Moons 12 Ship Kills 7 150
Constellation Ihatalo Belts/Icebelts 5 NPC Kills 44 376
Security Level 0.4 Security Class C1 Pod Kills 4 77
Faction Caldari State

So.... you're still a hypocrite even with your newly revised claim.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#89 - 2013-02-24 18:07:29 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Ivy Romanova wrote:
If this were the real world.
After reading all the replies... I think all of us are secret sociopaths and psychopaths What?


... except that this is not the real world. This is a game. You have yet to explain why you think in game actions carry any RL moral significance. Let alone why we should agree with that notion.

Were JFK and Henry Kissenger sociopaths and psychopaths because of their backstabbing and betrayal in their favorite board game: Diplomacy (a game that involves backstabbing and betrayal)?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#90 - 2013-02-24 18:17:17 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:

I WAS WRONG!
OK!?

I MADE A MISTAKE!
and I want to RIGHT WHAT HAS BEEN WRONG!



Shame on you, you ganked an obelisk, you make baby Jesus cry
Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#91 - 2013-02-24 19:26:39 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Eterne
Ivy Romanova wrote:
*snipped*
But seriously , what kind of satisfaction do they get from killing indies who can't shoot back??
And most importantly , BLUE ALTS!
What is happening in the mind of the indy shooters and AWOXERS???
Do you really have to ask this question?

Look, pirates and awoxers aren't some bizarre mental patient to study and observe. Their motivations are quite simple and understandable. You just choose to ignore it and instead go looking for alternative motivations.

Pirates do what they do because they're either defending their territory from intruders, they're looking for a fun fight (and yes, PvP is actually fun even against defenseless players), or they think they can make money. Simple huh? They're not psychotic nor deranged. They're not sad little people who have miserable RL situations. They simply like the playstyle that EvE Online has to offer.

Awoxers (and I fall into this category from time to time) do it for a multitude of reasons. They're either trying to profit from it, they're applying to a rival corp who requests it, or the corp treated that member badly and he wants revenge before he leaves. Those are usually the most common reasons. Again they're not deranged psychopaths or have bad things going on in their real lives. This is EvE and it is a cold harsh universe filled with betrayal and backstabbing.

It really is that simple. Your post shows a clear lack of denial to understand the simplicity of their motivations.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2013-02-24 19:38:41 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Ivy Romanova wrote:

Hauler ganking ...
Shooting at someone helpless.
I can hear your peniz deflating


*Who chooses to make themselves helpless. And a Pinata.

Important part, that.


You know.... what one does when his true identity is anonymous reflects a lot on their true personality.
Do you believe in times of anarchy , one can do whatever he wants ,including pillaging , **** and extortion .... and the one with the biggest stick makes the rules?


Yes, that is the very definition of anarchy.

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik

SB Rico
Sumo Wrestlers
#93 - 2013-02-24 20:39:19 UTC
It's a game I pay my money/plex for accounts so do you, I operate within the EULA so do you.

I f I shoot a hauler/BC/Rookie Ship/dreadnought etc. then it is simply part of the game.

Accountability starts and stops on tranquility at this time and expanding that to rl would be both wrong and illegal. Even if I was not a pirate I would oppose this and refuse to grant permission for some random person to access my personal details for any reason.

If you want to make a guy who shot your ship accountable form /join a gang and make them accountable on the server.

End of.

Scammers are currently selling killrights on this toon for up to 5mil, if you have paid for this service demand your money back at once.

Killing me should be for free.

CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#94 - 2013-02-25 09:17:45 UTC
I have cleaned up this thread of trolling, personal attacks, and inappropriate links.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#95 - 2013-02-25 10:30:09 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
But seriously , what kind of satisfaction do they get from killing indies who can't shoot back??


The satisfaction of relieving you from your goodies, getting the stuff you farmed for weeks in just a few minutes, and hopefully getting the message across you are not welcome to farm the fields we consider our home. Last time I checked my Mammoth still had a high slot. Indies can shoot back.

Ivy Romanova wrote:
And most importantly , BLUE ALTS!

Wut?

Ivy Romanova wrote:
What is happening in the mind of the indy shooters and AWOXERS???

Emergent gameplay and drama generation? More then in that of the average miner / mission runner, that's for sure! Big smile


Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#96 - 2013-02-25 11:00:35 UTC
CCP Eterne wrote:
I have cleaned up this thread of trolling, personal attacks, and inappropriate links.


You missed a link inside a quote.
Nova Satar
Pator Tech School
#97 - 2013-02-25 11:14:10 UTC
You're reading into this way too deeply. Pirates shoot haulers because they want "kills", simple as that.

They say they like "causing tears" and that they have some burning desire to destroy and ruin peoples days, but that's just talk. It's for the kills, it's for the killboard.

They want a kill, you are an easy one. Haul your stuff in a Battleship and some of the pussy ones will probably just leave you to it.
Jules Wynnfield
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#98 - 2013-02-25 11:18:22 UTC
CCP Eterne wrote:
I have cleaned up this thread of trolling, personal attacks, and inappropriate links.


You deleted a post of mine which was not intended as a troll.

But all the same thank you for taking the time to read the forums.

♫ When I think about you, I touch myself ♫ - Divinyls 1991

Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#99 - 2013-02-25 12:03:39 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
Not exactly.
What I am suggesting is accountability , the PERSON behind the toon should be responsible for the acts , precarious liability should be exercised .
THATS the only way order can be resumed .

An alternative would be to revamp the alt system , similar to the banking account .
You may have a saving account , a current account , a time deposit account, but in the end . Its down to the person behind it.
Can be an alias if you want.

Combat in low sec is NOT a problem, but dishonorable acts is.
EvE is a sandbox , so no mechanism should STOP you from doing such, but as it is a SANDBOX, the person should face the consequences


Honestly, that sounds like a very very horrible idea. EVE was made for this kind of stuff. It was made for piracy and scams and wars and gatecamps and all that other "evil" stuff.

Everyone is already accountable for what he does because You A) get killmails (so You won't forgett on whom to place Your bounties) and B) some Toons are actually locked out of high sec due to the hit on their sec status for all the atrocities they committed against other players and C) You can kill them back.

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

Dante Uisen
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#100 - 2013-02-25 12:23:58 UTC
Ivy Romanova wrote:
But seriously , what kind of satisfaction do they get from killing indies who can't shoot back??


You are asking the wrong question, the real question is:

Why the hell would someone undock, without being armed to the teeth?