These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Night Beagle experiment

First post
Author
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#81 - 2013-02-24 12:19:33 UTC
QT McWhiskers wrote:
NATHAN!!!!! SHHHHH!!! Don't tell everyone! Keep it a secret so that others can have fun. :)


Oops sorry.

Although, to be honest, the information has already been out there for years. You can't force people to not be ignorant.

http://www.wormholes.info

QT McWhiskers
EdgeGamers
#82 - 2013-02-24 12:20:14 UTC
Nathan Jameson wrote:
QT McWhiskers wrote:
NATHAN!!!!! SHHHHH!!! Don't tell everyone! Keep it a secret so that others can have fun. :)


Oops sorry.

Although, to be honest, the information has already been out there for years. You can't force people to not be ignorant.


No but we can hope :)
Night Beagle
Beagle Inc
#83 - 2013-02-24 12:35:18 UTC
Once again information is power :) You have to love EVE :)

The world needs you to stop being boring!

J3rz11
Almost Dangerous
Wolves Amongst Strangers
#84 - 2013-02-24 15:01:40 UTC
Night Beagle wrote:

I'll let other people tell the more romanced story, but in fact we only speak about a theft done by using game mechanics. A good theft nevertheless, showing that a little improvement to POSes could go a long way to improve POS life.



finally the point has been seen - need better POS security! Vote for Ayeson and he'll annoy CCP til we get better POSs! Either that or will cause a chain of events that will destroy all WH space. One of the two at least, maybe even the 3rd option.

But yea - biggest issue was the way everything was setup, in the current state of POSs, you can limit what a theift as access to using the different levels of access (config starbase not being oen to give out.) If our spy didnt have that role, couldnt have unlocked The Slash's indy POS nor could he lock all 3 POSs to not allow corp access and to have a new password for HK to use the towers as a safe.

tl;dr: Ayeson - for change (to POSs)
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2013-02-24 15:02:10 UTC
Too pretentious, didn't read.
Night Beagle
Beagle Inc
#86 - 2013-02-24 20:03:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Night Beagle
Yes we need better POS mechanics but I wouldn't recommend voting for a guy who uses spies and lies to play the game.

For a regular corp ceo might be ok since it is allowed in game, but in choosing a CSM representative I would like to have somebody who does not resemble our politicians.
So, sorry, no Ayeson in CSM.

As you all insisted, let's look at what the candidates have been doing until now. In the past did they condoned lies? Revenge? Political games?

Choose somebody else, choose somebody who has whatever qualities you want, but does not has the flaws we seen, or be prepared to have the same type of behavior from your CSM representative.

The world needs you to stop being boring!

Carla Messer
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#87 - 2013-02-24 20:30:21 UTC
As I see things there really isn't a point in trolling anymore.

I will say this though.

When 20 of 40 people in a corporation have access to the starbase configuration role, and you have several billions of ISK up for grabs in a hole with a highsec static, what happened the other night was an inevitability. It just so happened it went to us (it couldn't have gone to a nicer group of people.Roll)

Smacking beagle down a peg or two was a nice bonus as he is a complete assclown, but I'm feeling for Rover. He's the tragic figure in all of this. He's a good guy and I'm sure he's feeling really guilty about this and feeling like he let his guys down. If he could afford to reimburse all his people for their loses I'm sure he would without a second thought, and I'm sure that's the kind of leader many of you would want to see as a CEO.

People are going to rag on you for giving roles like that to someone who was in corp for a month, but the reality is you have to pick who to trust in this game. A year ago I had 30 billion stolen from corp by a director who I had known and worked with for over 3 years. It is what it is. You can't build anything worth tearing down without giving someone, somewhere, the tools they need to do it. It's a risk you have to accept. I'm pretty certain none of the major wormhole corps or alliances have gone without their share of big thefts, they just weren't necessarily so publicly pointed out.

Part of why POS changes are receiving so much support from the wormhole community is because the security and privilege issues are confusing, overlap in funny ways, and in some cases are just plain silly. Wormhole corp theft became a sport years ago as a result, and is largely responsible for why there are so many empty wormholes, corps that are afraid to recruit opting instead to join alliances to bolster their numbers, and the increasing reliance of WH corps on nullsec to get their pvp. It's also part of the reason something like incursions can so easily steal large parts of the player base away if the rewards are even close to the ones we can get by opting for something riskier.

POSes and the knowledge of how to minimize risk of theft has become a high barrier to entry to wormhole space. Is that a good or a bad thing? As the other night showed, that depends on your point of view.

Carla Messer
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#88 - 2013-02-24 20:34:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Carla Messer
Night Beagle wrote:
Yes we need better POS mechanics but I wouldn't recommend voting for a guy who uses spies and lies to play the game.

For a regular corp ceo might be ok since it is allowed in game, but in choosing a CSM representative I would like to have somebody who does not resemble our politicians.
So, sorry, no Ayeson in CSM.

As you all insisted, let's look at what the candidates have been doing until now. In the past did they condoned lies? Revenge? Political games?

Choose somebody else, choose somebody who has whatever qualities you want, but does not has the flaws we seen, or be prepared to have the same type of behavior from your CSM representative.



Let's get one thing clear. Ayeson did not pull the trigger on this OP, Ayeson isn't the CEO, and Ayeson didn't call for spies to be sent into your corp. Ayeson is responsible for a great many things in corp and outside of it, and it wouldn't be what it is today without him, but we have many leaders and they all have their roles to play.

In short, Ayeson is a good guy. I however, am a complete bastard.
Ayeson
State War Academy
Caldari State
#89 - 2013-02-24 21:11:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Ayeson
Carla Messer wrote:

In short, Ayeson is a good guy. I however, am a complete bastard.


This is one of those times where I get to say, "not my department."
Night Beagle
Beagle Inc
#90 - 2013-02-24 21:27:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Night Beagle
@Carla Messer You are not. You seem to be a good diplomat, having a way with words. And EVE is meant to be played, is not WoW.

In fact you are all cool guys. Its a game and even if sometimes things get crazy in the end pixels will be pixels.
I do appreciate the tips, but I cannot speak for the corp (nor for Rover :) ). If you think you have something to discuss with him, it is your business. I'm just the resident pain in the ass if you want to play the roles game.

On the elections issue, I will keep my word and not run, present the paper for the community (you'll see, its not so bad :) ), and contribute with something in the future.

However, I'll pester the candidates, sometimes trolling, but mostly pointing out things. If the candidates can respond in a coherent way, than it is up to the community to decide. I'll just raise the issues :)

Have fun, and best of luck in the elections!

@ Ayeson: bad beagle, bad.

The world needs you to stop being boring!

Waldemar Pawlak
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2013-02-24 22:21:00 UTC
Night Beagle wrote:
@Carla Messer You are not.


You don't know him. He is. That's one of the reasons I want to fly with him. Lol

For recruitment:

1) Join our public channel: Hard Knocks 2) Follow the steps in MOTD of the channel. 3) Profit!

ash veratis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#92 - 2013-02-24 23:14:30 UTC
Waldemar Pawlak wrote:
Night Beagle wrote:
@Carla Messer You are not.


You don't know him. He is. That's one of the reasons I want to fly with him. Lol


QFT. I wouldn't be in HK if Carla was the nice guy you say he is.
Neal Sparks
The Tebo Corp
#93 - 2013-02-25 02:03:43 UTC
Carla Messer wrote:
.

I will say this though.

When 20 of 40 people in a corporation have access to the starbase configuration role, and you have several billions of ISK up for grabs in a hole with a highsec static, what happened the other night was an inevitability. It just so happened it went to us (it couldn't have gone to a nicer group of people.Roll)

Smacking beagle down a peg or two was a nice bonus as he is a complete assclown, but I'm feeling for Rover. He's the tragic figure in all of this. He's a good guy and I'm sure he's feeling really guilty about this and feeling like he let his guys down. If he could afford to reimburse all his people for their loses I'm sure he would without a second thought, and I'm sure that's the kind of leader many of you would want to see as a CEO.

People are going to rag on you for giving roles like that to someone who was in corp for a month, but the reality is you have to pick who to trust in this game. A year ago I had 30 billion stolen from corp by a director who I had known and worked with for over 3 years. It is what it is. You can't build anything worth tearing down without giving someone, somewhere, the tools they need to do it. It's a risk you have to accept. I'm pretty certain none of the major wormhole corps or alliances have gone without their share of big thefts, they just weren't necessarily so publicly pointed out.




This is probobly the smartist most fair an petty hate free statment I have read on this thread, I know rover is probobly emptying the corp wallet and his personal wallet in order to try an give a token payment to his corp mates , he may have his faults but loyalty to his corp isnt one of them.

dont forget what happened here when the big corps start to ***** that there arnt enough ppl in wh space , you just removed an entier corp and assets.

it dosnt seem right to say on one hand "we need to encourge more ppl in to wh space" then with the next breath be removing a corp that was trying to grow.
Night Beagle
Beagle Inc
#94 - 2013-02-25 08:55:08 UTC
@HK Do not mistake my statement as saying you are kind and gentle people. You are good at what you do, but that doesn't make me to personally like you or your methods :) Just respect among wh people. Hmmm I'm temporary no longer in a WH...who should I thank for...

@Neal Sparks Yes, kicking out people who put up fights and bring content to WH is not the best way to bring fun to WHs. Kicking ass...well that's what we play for.

Fk. This thread has outlived its purpose.

I am waiting just for the promised HK clip...

The world needs you to stop being boring!

QT McWhiskers
EdgeGamers
#95 - 2013-02-25 10:03:04 UTC
Neal Sparks wrote:

This is probobly the smartist most fair an petty hate free statment I have read on this thread, I know rover is probobly emptying the corp wallet and his personal wallet in order to try an give a token payment to his corp mates , he may have his faults but loyalty to his corp isnt one of them.

dont forget what happened here when the big corps start to ***** that there arnt enough ppl in wh space , you just removed an entier corp and assets.

it dosnt seem right to say on one hand "we need to encourge more ppl in to wh space" then with the next breath be removing a corp that was trying to grow.



To be quite honest the "power players," or the ones who would like to see more people in WHs, care more about c5s and c6s than c4-c1. While all WH pvp is fun, the majority of lower class WH residents usually dont come out to play. There are a few exceptions now and then, but the great majority of people in lower class holes tend to pos or safe up the instant probes go on D-scan and never come out.

Carla put is best. There isn't a single entity out there that hasnt had a major theft or some kind of theft or spy work done on them. We can put forward the best security, produce the best people, bring some of the best PVP, but at the end of the day if someone decides they want to **** you, they are going to **** you.
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#96 - 2013-02-25 11:21:01 UTC
Night Beagle wrote:
Yes we need better POS mechanics but I wouldn't recommend voting for a guy who uses spies and lies to play the game.

For a regular corp ceo might be ok since it is allowed in game, but in choosing a CSM representative I would like to have somebody who does not resemble our politicians.
So, sorry, no Ayeson in CSM.



Quite the opposite actually. I would be more inclined to vote for someone that understands ALL the aspects of Eve. Some of those aspects being spying,treachery, and general douchebaggery are all promoted and encouraged. This is one of the best examples of "dont hate the player, hate the game" I've seen in a while.

No trolling please

chris elliot
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#97 - 2013-02-25 11:58:39 UTC
Carla Messer wrote:
, and the increasing reliance of WH corps on nullsec to get their pvp.




I personally blame the walls of OP that are t3's, archons, bhaalgorns and blap dreads for that.

As it stands most people that roam null would much rather go p!ss in a bunch of null bears cheerios than bang their heads against a wall of OP t3's. (I know I said this somewhere else here but I love repeating myself)

Thieves just make it harder for more people to get in on the fun. And by fun I don't mean boring t3 balls. Garbage programing and antiquated code is just typical CCP.
Sorany
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#98 - 2013-02-25 12:45:00 UTC
Neal Sparks wrote:
Carla Messer wrote:
.

I will say this though.

When 20 of 40 people in a corporation have access to the starbase configuration role, and you have several billions of ISK up for grabs in a hole with a highsec static, what happened the other night was an inevitability. It just so happened it went to us (it couldn't have gone to a nicer group of people.Roll)

Smacking beagle down a peg or two was a nice bonus as he is a complete assclown, but I'm feeling for Rover. He's the tragic figure in all of this. He's a good guy and I'm sure he's feeling really guilty about this and feeling like he let his guys down. If he could afford to reimburse all his people for their loses I'm sure he would without a second thought, and I'm sure that's the kind of leader many of you would want to see as a CEO.

People are going to rag on you for giving roles like that to someone who was in corp for a month, but the reality is you have to pick who to trust in this game. A year ago I had 30 billion stolen from corp by a director who I had known and worked with for over 3 years. It is what it is. You can't build anything worth tearing down without giving someone, somewhere, the tools they need to do it. It's a risk you have to accept. I'm pretty certain none of the major wormhole corps or alliances have gone without their share of big thefts, they just weren't necessarily so publicly pointed out.




dont forget what happened here when the big corps start to ***** that there arnt enough ppl in wh space , you just removed an entier corp and assets.

it dosnt seem right to say on one hand "we need to encourge more ppl in to wh space" then with the next breath be removing a corp that was trying to grow.


look, the whole non-eviction of people who put up fights and all only applies to like entities.

Let's be honest here, Hard Knocks K162s into Insidious Design, what are they going to do? They are just going to stare us down from their shields and wait for us to get bored (which won't take long).

There is absolutely no way Insidious stands a chance at a throwdown, none. Same could be said for most corps living in the C4 and below.

This wasn't an issue of bringing fights, Insidious would have been incapable of bringing a fight to us as the balance currently stands. It just so happens that we played the long con this time around and it paid off.
Night Beagle
Beagle Inc
#99 - 2013-02-25 13:47:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Night Beagle
@Sorany
I will not claim that INSID had a standing chance of fighting an eviction, however our kb shows that in that last month we have put up a fight to whoever we met. So please do not claim that we didn't want to fight. In fact I lost more isk in PVP than in the heist (due to me being paranoid and logging off the goodies).

What is done is done (HK will not give back anything ;) ), and the discussion is moving up towards providing good fights in WHs and especially lower level Cs.

I have pointed out, in other circumstances, to the fact that the forums are not including the most part of WH (and general) community. Here we are mostly corps that PVP in WH, but the shear number of occupied holes show that extensive PVE is being done by other parties. We are providing content for ourselves when we meet, and rarely interact with the others that pos up at first sight.
Maybe we could think at something to change this.





Later edit: When I say do something I do not mean kill and evict everybody. Bring them into the community, teach them new ways ... be creative.

The world needs you to stop being boring!

Carla Messer
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#100 - 2013-02-25 14:15:00 UTC
Don't try to justify or moralize or philosophize what happened.

There is a very rational explanation for why the actions were taken.

Who in this game is gonna have an opportunity to take 60+ billion and then not do it because that group might provide pvp once every blue moon you roll into them? Many a corp and alliance have been evicted for far less. No further explanation necessary.