These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

CCP please just change everything.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Gluthor
Aegis Reforged
Already Replaced.
#21 - 2013-02-22 10:53:01 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:

so now you are saying the hurricane was the only ship people ever flew in game? ok.....

and you think that all cars on earth should have very similar performance specifications in order to create diversity?

why do some people then buy an audi and others a vw with 50 Bhp less?

more diversity means things are more different.


The Hurricane and drake were by far the most popular two battlecrusiers,

and all cars in the same class do have similar performance

diversity means having a choice, under the old system the only choice was the hurricane or drake, there was little diversity !
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#22 - 2013-02-22 10:53:04 UTC
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


yes you are right and the list of outstanding ships has lessend a little... yet so is life.

Legba
Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
#23 - 2013-02-22 10:56:43 UTC
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


A bit of pain now while we adjust, but looks like a happier future for BC pilots
Kate stark
#24 - 2013-02-22 10:57:04 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


yes you are right and the list of outstanding ships has lessend a little... yet so is life.


by outstanding, you mean ships that really weren't balanced in any way shape or form? (that's rhetorical, by the way).

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#25 - 2013-02-22 10:57:44 UTC  |  Edited by: SoOza N'GasZ
Gluthor wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:

so now you are saying the hurricane was the only ship people ever flew in game? ok.....

and you think that all cars on earth should have very similar performance specifications in order to create diversity?

why do some people then buy an audi and others a vw with 50 Bhp less?

more diversity means things are more different.


The Hurricane and drake were by far the most popular two battlecrusiers,

and all cars in the same class do have similar performance

diversity means having a choice, under the old system the only choice was the hurricane or drake, there was little diversity !


hmmmmmmmmmm diversity actually if u look it up in a dictionary does in NO way mean having a choice.

now because i know how eve forum trolls work this almost useless sentence for the eve forum community: No im not against having a choice -.-

'The Hurricane and drake were by far the most popular two battlecrusiers,' i agree with you on this.

'and all cars in the same class do have similar performance' this is true to some extent but only i would say to 70% there are cars in the same class and price range that stand out drasticly. There is for example a Nissan skyline for about 80k us that has as much horespower and tourque as a lamborghini murcielago.

Legba
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#26 - 2013-02-22 10:58:46 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


yes you are right and the list of outstanding ships has lessend a little... yet so is life.


by outstanding, you mean ships that really weren't balanced in any way shape or form? (that's rhetorical, by the way).


by outstanding i mean standing out as in ... far better than the others Big smile you need to work on your vocabulary P

Legba
Kate stark
#27 - 2013-02-22 10:59:05 UTC
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


A bit of pain now while we adjust, but looks like a happier future for BC pilots


except for the OP, who's going to eternally mourn their i-win ship since it's now properly balanced and they might have to learn to pvp properly without relying on a ship that wasn't balanced.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#28 - 2013-02-22 10:59:08 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:


and you think that all cars on earth should have very similar performance specifications in order to create diversity?

why do some people then buy an audi and others a vw with 50 Bhp less?

more diversity means things are more different.


So Audi and VW cost the same?



.
Kate stark
#29 - 2013-02-22 11:00:22 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


yes you are right and the list of outstanding ships has lessend a little... yet so is life.


by outstanding, you mean ships that really weren't balanced in any way shape or form? (that's rhetorical, by the way).


by outstanding i mean standing out as in ... far better than the others Big smile you need to work on your vocabulary P


i know what outstanding means, it just wasn't the correct word for the sentence.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#30 - 2013-02-22 11:01:38 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:


my hands are as empty as the content of this thread.
on the bright side, at least the list of viable battlecruisers isn't as empty as it used to be.


yes you are right and the list of outstanding ships has lessend a little... yet so is life.


by outstanding, you mean ships that really weren't balanced in any way shape or form? (that's rhetorical, by the way).


by outstanding i mean standing out as in ... far better than the others Big smile you need to work on your vocabulary P


i know what outstanding means, it just wasn't the correct word for the sentence.


in my case?

Legba
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#31 - 2013-02-22 11:01:46 UTC
Don't play MMO's if you don't like changes. Roll

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#32 - 2013-02-22 11:02:31 UTC
Roime wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:


and you think that all cars on earth should have very similar performance specifications in order to create diversity?

why do some people then buy an audi and others a vw with 50 Bhp less?

more diversity means things are more different.


So Audi and VW cost the same?



some times yes and sometimes no... but they have different models of cars and those that are listed in the same class can have far different specs

Legba
Kate stark
#33 - 2013-02-22 11:04:00 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
in my case?


what about your case? is it brief? i like brief cases.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#34 - 2013-02-22 11:05:05 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
in my case?


what about your case? is it brief? i like brief cases.


where was outstanding the wrong word for a sentence

Legba
Leper ofBacon
HELP GRANDMA SMASH HER LEGS IN
#35 - 2013-02-22 11:08:38 UTC
What's the point in diversity if some things are just objectively better than others? If something is just good in every situation the others will just be relegated and you have no diversity. Either that or you have an imagined diversity where people who don't know any better are piloting the worse ships and are at a major disadvantage. There are plenty of differences between the BC's now which will alter ingame situations.

It's still good in comparison to other BC but it just has less of that 'universal utility' that made it so much better.
Kate stark
#36 - 2013-02-22 11:08:50 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
in my case?


what about your case? is it brief? i like brief cases.


where was outstanding the wrong word for a sentence


this might be GD, but you're not that stupid....

are you?

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#37 - 2013-02-22 11:10:40 UTC  |  Edited by: SoOza N'GasZ
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
in my case?


what about your case? is it brief? i like brief cases.


where was outstanding the wrong word for a sentence


this might be GD, but you're not that stupid....

are you?


i think i might be stupid ... what is a GD?

oh a general discussion... well i certainly think it is a pretty general discussion.

whats wrong with me being stupid are you gonna put me in a gas chamber?

Legba
Kate stark
#38 - 2013-02-22 11:16:25 UTC
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
are you gonna put me in a gas chamber?


no, but i'll let you use my shower.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#39 - 2013-02-22 11:19:21 UTC  |  Edited by: SoOza N'GasZ
Leper ofBacon wrote:
What's the point in diversity if some things are just objectively better than others? If something is just good in every situation the others will just be relegated and you have no diversity. Either that or you have an imagined diversity where people who don't know any better are piloting the worse ships and are at a major disadvantage. There are plenty of differences between the BC's now which will alter ingame situations.

It's still good in comparison to other BC but it just has less of that 'universal utility' that made it so much better.


I agree with you 100%

My only issue is I dont like ccp 'constantly' intervening with 'working' things because they kind of made eve what it was..... in a way if they want to be sincere in an artistic way then they have to respect an environments flaws as well as its strengths. This would need to be done in order to give eve credibility as a fictional but artisticly and immersively seen real world or universe. (in order to enjoy lord of the rings or alien, u have to believe its real for the duration of the film.

real world places also are not always perfectly balanced.

i agree this intervention makes sense yet it kinda makes eve a little less eve and a little more space simulation.

and i am sort of paying to play eve.... i mean.... it began as a place with hardly any rules... *small tear*

The point of diversity? to me it creates a greater sense of interest and variation.

Legba
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#40 - 2013-02-22 11:19:36 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
SoOza N'GasZ wrote:
are you gonna put me in a gas chamber?


no, but i'll let you use my shower.


thank you.

Legba
Previous page123Next page