These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The new CSM voting system explained in a graph for HI secc candidates
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#1 - 2013-02-21 19:21:15 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/2011/eve-learning-curve.jpg

While I see that theoretically this system should help HI sec candidates I foresee such complexity will depress already dismal voter turnout from HI seccers. This will reinforce the commonly held idea CSM is a NULL sec thing IMHO
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-02-21 19:22:22 UTC
2/10

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]
Big Jim Slade
Kentucky Fried Nightmare
#3 - 2013-02-21 19:55:26 UTC
/trying to shoehorn ancient meme (which they only discovered last week) into something unrelated in premise and execution
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#4 - 2013-02-21 20:32:59 UTC
If you want Hiseccers to vote, take away all asteroids, missions and manufacturing in highsec until you get a 50%+ highsec voter turnout.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#5 - 2013-02-21 20:59:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Lapine Davion
I would like to take this opportunity to reintroduce everyone to an old idea. Downvoting posts.

Edit: Come visit my F&I Topic on the subject!

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]
Onomerous
Negative-Impact
Sedition.
#6 - 2013-02-21 21:00:10 UTC
0/10

Typical nerf hi-sec post...
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#7 - 2013-02-21 21:05:37 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Lapine Davion wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to reintroduce everyone to an old idea. Downvoting posts.

Edit: Come visit my F&I Topic on the subject!


I would also like to take this opportunity to reintroduce everyone to an old idea. Allowing the option of -1 votes in the CSM elections
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#8 - 2013-02-21 21:08:50 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Lapine Davion wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to reintroduce everyone to an old idea. Downvoting posts.

Edit: Come visit my F&I Topic on the subject!


I would also like to take this opportunity to reintroduce everyone to an old idea. Having -1 votes in the CSM elections


What does this even mean?

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]