These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

They just had to pick my home system for this noise.

Author
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#41 - 2013-02-25 11:55:01 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
Hello Provist. I hope you enjoyed the show; a symptom of the condition your people saw fit to inflict on us.


Drink less quafe-aid, read more history.

Peaceful and freedom loving my ass.

"It all started when a Gallente exploration ship happened upon one of the hidden Caldari colonies. When the Federation Senate learned of this they demanded a full-scale investigation into the matter and that all hidden Caldari colonies should immediately been put under Federation authority."

You started the whole conflict with the Caldari ... and now you're blaming them for winning. Boo hoo.

"Those within the Federation believing that peace talks should be initiated instead of an invasion didn’t dare speak up for fear of being branded cowards or, worse, traitors; the Gallente war machine grinded into gear."

Amazing how little has changed even after two centuries. Oh wait, I guess something have changed... they no longer get "branded cowards" ... now they just ... "disappear."



Your ignorance - legitimate or feigned - is very entertaining.

First of all... The various Caldari nations and corporations on Caldari prime founded the Federation along with all the other original founding-nations. All colonies and habitats started by any of these founder-nations were registered and brought under the aegis of the Federation upon creation.

Everyone except a good number of colonies later started by the Caldari mega-corporations - apparently they were special and could break this accord as they saw fit - and then profit freely from undocumented settlements under no legislation or tax or anything, really. But, being Caldari, this was entirely fair, was it not? The eventual discovery of these unregistered colonies caused an uproar, and instead of seeing these colonies be registered and brought under the Federation's aegis the Caldari megas decided to aim for separation from the Union they themselves helped create, instead of abiding by laws everyone else followed. Apparently they were to special to bother following those either, especially not when their power and profit-margins were in danger. Add in a large, unhealthy dose of Gallente ultra-nationalism, a tense political and social situation and a rapidly destabilizing situation on Caldari Prime and then some Caldari ultra-nationals acting as terrorists, and you had yourself the start of a nasty, 100 year long war...

...a war that, secondly, many Caldari will consider to have been lost to them with the annexation of their Homeworld. It was a war they started, and one that ended in a draw, by the way. As Katran Luftschreck would say: Boo hoo, ho ho ho, to bad.

That war ended a good while ago by the way, and is pretty grim history by now, my comment that you quoted was in regards to the recent war started not to long ago. By a Caldari State invading us because they preferred to have a war. How nice to see history repeat itself, except this time they can't blame a genocidal terrorist group with a hard-on for mass-drownings.

Thirdly, your people are the last who should open their mouths about people disappearing, and especially not in any kind of defense of the State, a State that has seen fit to, among other things, poison our children by selling them a "delicacy" that is in fact refined excrements, expel hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people from their glorious State for having the wrong genetics - and rob them of everything but the clothes on their back while they were at it - or out-right kidnapping men, women and children from the very transports leaving their space. They wanted them out of the State, but not all were allowed to even leave - as they were ordered. Fancy that. Years later, have we heard what happened to all those people? Not really. I guess we can all guess their condition at this point however.

Oh and, fourth - it appears my grasp of history is far tighter than yours. Try again, pilot.
IDENTITY REDACTED
Doomheim
#42 - 2013-02-25 12:55:33 UTC
You know BloodBird, your starting to sound like more of an ultra-nationalist then most Provists I know. That's saying something as I've worked with Diana Kim.

That being said once upon a time Mixed Metaphor stood for peace between the Federation and the State, I guess that idea went down the drain. It almost reminds me of a certain Admiral.....Noir?
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#43 - 2013-02-25 14:53:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Khross
Sigh. Here we go again.

BloodBird wrote:


First of all... The various Caldari nations and corporations on Caldari prime founded the Federation along with all the other original founding-nations. All colonies and habitats started by any of these founder-nations were registered and brought under the aegis of the Federation upon creation.


You'll find that history is quite clear about the fact that the Caldari only helped in the founding of the Federation because circumstances demanded it. You'll also find that this was greatly to the benefit of the Gallente, not the Caldari.

BloodBird wrote:
Everyone except a good number of colonies later started by the Caldari mega-corporations - apparently they were special and could break this accord as they saw fit - and then profit freely from undocumented settlements under no legislation or tax or anything, really. But, being Caldari, this was entirely fair, was it not?


Ah, now who's feigning ignorance? In case you've forgotten the "hidden colonies" being referenced here were placed outside of Federal space because the Federation had been steadily decreasing Caldari "freedoms" and representation in the government.

"It is rather strange that the good of the many seems to constantly coincide with whatever policies weaken the Caldari, the Intaki, and the Mannar and keep them under the heel of the Gallente."

- Caldari Senator Kiriusu Otenga, Senate session 23154/T3782. CE 23154.11.21


If you're going to use history as a weapon, at least use it accurately.


  • The Gallente benefited more by the Federal expansion and progression than the Caldari
  • When the Federation was formed, the Caldari were forced to join by circumstance more than desire

  • "Slowly but surely we are betraying the legacy left to us, the children of the Raata. The light of the Caldari spirit grows ever darker under the encroaching shadow of our would-be masters. Our very identity as a people is being subsumed by the Federation and we must act to preserve it."

    - Excerpt from a National Address, delivered by Kalaakiota CEO Matias Sobaseki. CE 23154.6.26


  • The First Gallente-Caldari War started because the Caldari seceded from the Federation, the Caldari blockaded all stargates that were built by the Caldari megacorporations
  • The Federation entered into a delegation to try and find a way to pursue a peaceful resolution
  • An extremist, terrorist group then bombed Nouvelle Rouvenoir, claiming more than half a million lives
  • In retaliation, the Federation began a sustained, orbital bombardment of Caldari Prime
  • Outnumbered, the Caldari engaged in a month-long guerilla campaign to distract the Federal Navy long enough to evacuate Caldari Prime
  • Bitterness over the loss of Caldari Prime fueled the war for another 80 years and continued to be a wedge between peace


BloodBird wrote:
That war ended a good while ago by the way, and is pretty grim history by now, my comment that you quoted was in regards to the recent war started not to long ago. By a Caldari State invading us because they preferred to have a war. How nice to see history repeat itself, except this time they can't blame a genocidal terrorist group with a hard-on for mass-drownings.


Wrong. Again. The war was started by a series of events capitalized upon by one man: Tibus Heth. After the Malkalen Disaster, Heth announced he was taking over Kaalakiota Corporation after its CEO resigned, he then issued a nationwide quarantine of Gallente - which you reference (albeit out of context). Using political clout and the recent events, Heth maneuvered himself into power by convincing the Megacorporations to grant strategic control over their production and military lines to Heth in the wake of what would likely become another war with the Gallente. (Ishukone wished to be excluded but the vaccum of leadership left by the Malkalen Incident forced it to comply). With this power at his disposal, Heth then issued a military draft and, in tandem with the Minmatar Rebellion and the destruction of CONCORD's Yulai station, invaded Gallente sovereign space to recapture Caldari Prime, an event that received mixed sentiments from the Caldari Megacorporations.

All of that aside, we have all done things during times of frustration, hostility and emotional turmoil that history does not look kindly upon. The State, the Federation, the Empire and even the Republic have dark spots on our histories that we'd rather not recall. Pointing fingers at each other and justifying further dark spots is counter productive and foolhardy.

BloodBird wrote:
Oh and, fourth - it appears my grasp of history is far tighter than yours. Try again, pilot.


Not exactly. Your grasp of political handwaving and casting history in a light favorable to your argument is quite strong but that doesn't do you much credit. History is objective, not partial, use it objectively.

~Malcolm Khross

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#44 - 2013-02-25 17:05:22 UTC
IDENTITY REDACTED wrote:
You know BloodBird, your starting to sound like more of an ultra-nationalist then most Provists I know. That's saying something as I've worked with Diana Kim.

That being said once upon a time Mixed Metaphor stood for peace between the Federation and the State, I guess that idea went down the drain. It almost reminds me of a certain Admiral.....Noir?


...Pilot Shadow? No, that's not right.

I think you will find that simply because I argue against people who like to cast the Union in a bad light, this does not make me an ultra-nationalist. Feel free to assume whatever you wish, however.

MXD's policy may or may not have changed - you will have to ask my CEO for that kind of statement. I would however like to remind you that corporate policy and my opinion do not have to be indicative of each other, and that my conversing in here, does not mean I no not favor peace, or that the corporate aims of MXD is not a peace-agreement. My conversing in here and MXD's current enrollment in the FEDEF means exactly that - we are enrolled and fight on the Federation's behalf.

You will have to excuse me if defending the Federated Union physically or verbally offends you - I am not apologizing.
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#45 - 2013-02-25 18:42:24 UTC
"Sigh. Here we go again."

Indeed pilot Khross. This is how I feel every single time someone makes out-right false statements regarding my homeland - dissapointed. You will find however that neither mine, nor your statements are false in this matter, and that in responce to pilot Luftschreck's one-sided and highly biased claims I re-buffed her claims with knows facts.

Unfortunately I was not completely politically correct by spending hours embellishing on the details about all factors involved, I did not feel the need to do so - it was not relevant to my counter-arguments. If it makes you more comfortable with my statements however, I will point out the accuracy of my own and your claims here.

Malcolm Khross wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
First of all... The various Caldari nations and corporations on Caldari prime founded the Federation along with all the other original founding-nations. All colonies and habitats started by any of these founder-nations were registered and brought under the aegis of the Federation upon creation.


You'll find that history is quite clear about the fact that the Caldari only helped in the founding of the Federation because circumstances demanded it. You'll also find that this was greatly to the benefit of the Gallente, not the Caldari.


You are right, the early Federation was politically slanted in favor of the Gallente Prime nations and membership in the Union for others were not equal as a result of this. And this does not invalidate my claims - the Federation WAS founded jointly with the Caldari from the beginning, regardless of circumstances. The Caldari megas violated agreements they had made. This is still a fact, regardless of their reasons for doing so.

Malcolm Khross wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
Everyone except a good number of colonies later started by the Caldari mega-corporations - apparently they were special and could break this accord as they saw fit - and then profit freely from undocumented settlements under no legislation or tax or anything, really. But, being Caldari, this was entirely fair, was it not?


Ah, now who's feigning ignorance? In case you've forgotten the "hidden colonies" being referenced here were placed outside of Federal space because the Federation had been steadily decreasing Caldari "freedoms" and representation in the government.


I do not recall exactly when these colonies were first settled, so I do not know if they were around before the Union's founding. Regardless, the fact I pointed out remains, yet again - these colonies did not fall under Federation oversight and as such the Caldari megas benefited greatly from having no oversight, control or tax on their assets of any kind.

They lied. They concealed the truth. And in their opinion they were justified in doing so. But they still did. Neither of our statements are innaccurate.

Malcolm Khross wrote:


  • The First Gallente-Caldari War started because the Caldari seceded from the Federation, the Caldari blockaded all stargates that were built by the Caldari megacorporations
  • The Federation entered into a delegation to try and find a way to pursue a peaceful resolution
  • An extremist, terrorist group then bombed Nouvelle Rouvenoir, claiming more than half a million lives
  • In retaliation, the Federation began a sustained, orbital bombardment of Caldari Prime
  • Outnumbered, the Caldari engaged in a month-long guerilla campaign to distract the Federal Navy long enough to evacuate Caldari Prime
  • Bitterness over the loss of Caldari Prime fueled the war for another 80 years and continued to be a wedge between peace
  • [/list]


    The first war started at point 3 - there were no live war and no shots had been fired outside of civil unrest and localized conflict on Caldari Prime, among the various ethnic groups on the planet. The newly-formed State and the Federation they had seceded from, had not officially fought each other until after the people of Nouvelle Rouvenoir died. This event brough the Federation into deep turmoil, enabled the New Year Coup, and allowed the U-nats into power, silencing all pro-peaceful-resolution voices. The U-nats then launched the one-day bombardment of Caldari Prime, killing hundreds of thousands, and anyone in the Union disgusted with this who treatened to seceded in turn if these actions did not stop, were soon forced to comply.

    Side-note: I find it interesting to note how the Caldari mega's secession after annexing Caldari Prime from their various native Nations nearly destroyed the Federation in it's infancy, and today the actions of the State once again influence the Federation's darkest aspects. It sadly ironic how your State is the bane of our way of life in so many ways, but I think this is a topic for another day.
    BloodBird
    The Crucible.
    #46 - 2013-02-25 18:42:52 UTC  |  Edited by: BloodBird
    Malcolm Khross wrote:
    BloodBird wrote:
    That war ended a good while ago by the way, and is pretty grim history by now, my comment that you quoted was in regards to the recent war started not to long ago. By a Caldari State invading us because they preferred to have a war. How nice to see history repeat itself, except this time they can't blame a genocidal terrorist group with a hard-on for mass-drownings.


    Wrong. Again. The war was started by a series of events capitalized upon by one man: Tibus Heth. After the Malkalen Disaster, Heth announced he was taking over Kaalakiota Corporation after its CEO resigned, he then issued a nationwide quarantine of Gallente - which you reference (albeit out of context). Using political clout and the recent events, Heth maneuvered himself into power by convincing the Megacorporations to grant strategic control over their production and military lines to Heth in the wake of what would likely become another war with the Gallente. (Ishukone wished to be excluded but the vaccum of leadership left by the Malkalen Incident forced it to comply). With this power at his disposal, Heth then issued a military draft and, in tandem with the Minmatar Rebellion and the destruction of CONCORD's Yulai station, invaded Gallente sovereign space to recapture Caldari Prime, an event that received mixed sentiments from the Caldari Megacorporations.


    In other words, the State, now under the leadership of Tibus Heth, preffered war and invaded us when they could do so with no CONCORD enforced reprisal. The Malkalen event and everything that followed made good justifications, but again it was the State who saw fit to violate standing agreements they had made with CONCORD, and once again violating agreements with the Federation. Clearly the State's word means nothing at all to them when convenient.

    The Federation's leadership did not declare war themselves, they were de-facto at war when the State invaded. The official counter-declaration of war came after the conquest of Caldari Prime by the State was complete, and the official CONCORD agreed upon war came into effect.

    Malcolm Khross wrote:
    All of that aside, we have all done things during times of frustration, hostility and emotional turmoil that history does not look kindly upon. The State, the Federation, the Empire and even the Republic have dark spots on our histories that we'd rather not recall. Pointing fingers at each other and justifying further dark spots is counter productive and foolhardy.


    All true, but this is irrelevant to my points aimed at pilot Luftschreck's claims. For the record I am not interested in forgetting any events transpiering through history because this prevents us from learning from them.

    Malcolm Khross wrote:
    BloodBird wrote:
    Oh and, fourth - it appears my grasp of history is far tighter than yours. Try again, pilot.


    Not exactly. Your grasp of political handwaving and casting history in a light favorable to your argument is quite strong but that doesn't do you much credit. History is objective, not partial, use it objectively.


    My grasp of history is sound. It appears however that I will have to go into higher detail in the future so as not to offend or appear to be acting on favoritism in ligth of historically known facts.
    Scherezad
    Revenent Defence Corperation
    Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
    #47 - 2013-02-25 18:52:24 UTC
    BloodBird wrote:
    Clearly the State's word means nothing at all to them when convenient.


    Our word has never once changed throughout this prolonged engagement.

    Hakkin k'len. We Return.

    I deeply apologize for the confusion that the subtleties of our culture often cause. If it is any consolation, your culture holds for me just as many points of mystery. Let this shared mystery be an opportunity to learn and grow together.
    Malcolm Khross
    Doomheim
    #48 - 2013-02-25 18:54:20 UTC
    Well, I confess that I am surprised to see your response be as well reasoned as it is. It is quite possible I read nuance into your original statements that was not there, based on your assertions that the Megas "were too special to follow the laws" and other such allegations.

    My intention was to point out that your assertions were biased and not based on historical fact. While it is true that both of our overall points are accurate, let us instead stick to the facts without inserting our own bias into them and such side-tracks can be avoided.

    ~Malcolm Khross

    BloodBird
    The Crucible.
    #49 - 2013-02-27 04:31:22 UTC  |  Edited by: BloodBird
    Scherezad wrote:
    BloodBird wrote:
    Clearly the State's word means nothing at all to them when convenient.


    Our word has never once changed throughout this prolonged engagement.

    Hakkin k'len. We Return.

    I deeply apologize for the confusion that the subtleties of our culture often cause. If it is any consolation, your culture holds for me just as many points of mystery. Let this shared mystery be an opportunity to learn and grow together.


    You upheld this one promise, this one oath...

    ...by breaking how many other promises and oaths?

    The terrible take-away here is that the Caldari State is not worthy of any trust because you will violate any agreement the moment it does not benefit you, and that you feel fine making agreements that you have full intention of breaking at a later date.

    You promised you would be back. Reasonable enough. Did that promise have to entail violence? Did there have to be a whole new war waged for that promise to be held? Why did so many have to die, and so much be destroyed, subverted, or twisted to the near-unreqognizable, for you to fulfill that oath?

    Malcolm Khross wrote:
    Well, I confess that I am surprised to see your response be as well reasoned as it is. It is quite possible I read nuance into your original statements that was not there, based on your assertions that the Megas "were too special to follow the laws" and other such allegations.

    My intention was to point out that your assertions were biased and not based on historical fact. While it is true that both of our overall points are accurate, let us instead stick to the facts without inserting our own bias into them and such side-tracks can be avoided.


    I aim to be as accurate as able in my comments and arguments. I will apologize if proven wrong, I will not argue for something I know is not correct, and at the same time I can rarely stand to let clearly incorrect or out-right false claims remain unchallenged, I will try to correct mis-understandings when they occur. And I will never apologize for my opinions.

    If you argue or converse with me, keep this in mind.
    Pieter Tuulinen
    Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
    Khimi Harar
    #50 - 2013-02-27 06:58:00 UTC
    So, peaceful dialog was getting us our Homeworld back.... when?

    It wasn't. So we took the chance when we saw it - and that's something I'm not going to apologise for.

    For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

    Desiderya
    Blue Canary
    Watch This
    #51 - 2013-02-27 14:41:22 UTC
    One day of war achieved more than a hundred years of peaceful dialogue.

    Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

    Astera Zandraki
    Federal Navy Academy
    Gallente Federation
    #52 - 2013-02-27 15:08:48 UTC
    Desiderya wrote:
    One day of war achieved more than a hundred years of peaceful dialogue.


    Yep, the death of millions.
    Desiderya
    Blue Canary
    Watch This
    #53 - 2013-02-27 15:26:14 UTC
    Thank you for agreeing with my point.
    Personally I wouldn't count that as an achievement, but if you're that bitter, you're welcome.

    Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

    Scherezad
    Revenent Defence Corperation
    Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
    #54 - 2013-02-27 15:52:13 UTC
    Sir;

    I will do you the service of being more direct in my explanation. I apologize in advance, such directness is difficult.

    The source of our conflict, and the difficulty in its reconciliation, lies here:

    BloodBird wrote:
    You upheld this one promise, this one oath...

    ...by breaking how many other promises and oaths?

    The terrible take-away here is that the Caldari State is not worthy of any trust because you will violate any agreement the moment it does not benefit you, and that you feel fine making agreements that you have full intention of breaking at a later date.


    We are not liars, we are polite. Before you recoil, sir, please allow me to explain by way of analogy.

    Let us presume that a Galois gentleman is served a distasteful meal at a Galois restaurant of high quality and esteem. He believes that it was an intentional slight by the chef, who dislikes him. When the host returns to inquire about how he is enjoying his meal, the gentleman will explain that the meal is distasteful and will leave without eating - perhaps indeed without paying. He does these things in accordance with his sense of justice and the inviolable right of his person to choose his actions. The restaurant will make an immediate display of ensuring the customer is fully refunded for the meal and that the chef will be reprimanded.

    Let us presume that a Caldari lady is served a distasteful meal at a Caldari restaurant of high quality and esteem. She believes that it was an intentional slight by the chef, who dislikes her. When the host returns to inquire about how she is enjoying her meal, the lady willl explain that she is enjoying the meal very much, but the meal will be uneaten on her plate. She pays, thanks the host for his attentiveness and makes special note that the chef should be commended on a fine meal. She does these things in accordance with her sense of dignity and the inviolable rights of the others in the restaurant to enjoy a peaceful, gentle evening at dinner. The restaurant will then make a gift of the meal's expense to the lady at a later time, and the chef will be privately reprimanded.

    Both of these individuals explained to the restaurant their issues, and in both cases the end results were the same. The path they took to get there, however, was very different. Imagine the offense that would ensue should the Galois gentleman visit the Caldari establishment! Imagine the shame and anger of the Caldari lady visiting the Galois restaurant!

    I shall be blunt, sir, for your sake. You served us a distasteful meal those years ago, and we have waited a very long time indeed for its repayment.

    BloodBird wrote:
    You promised you would be back. Reasonable enough. Did that promise have to entail violence? Did there have to be a whole new war waged for that promise to be held? Why did so many have to die, and so much be destroyed, subverted, or twisted to the near-unreqognizable, for you to fulfill that oath?


    I should very much like to hear what other paths we could have taken, sir. You are a very intelligent man, and I am sure you can see through to the heart of the matter quickly.
    Natalcya Katla
    Astropolitan Front
    #55 - 2013-02-27 16:12:02 UTC
    Scherezad wrote:
    I should very much like to hear what other paths we could have taken, sir. You are a very intelligent man, and I am sure you can see through to the heart of the matter quickly.

    ...said the Caldari lady, in accordance with her sense of dignity.

    You're a clever one, Captain.
    Veikitamo Gesakaarin
    Doomheim
    #56 - 2013-02-27 16:39:05 UTC
    BloodBird wrote:

    You upheld this one promise, this one oath...

    ...by breaking how many other promises and oaths?

    The terrible take-away here is that the Caldari State is not worthy of any trust because you will violate any agreement the moment it does not benefit you, and that you feel fine making agreements that you have full intention of breaking at a later date.

    You promised you would be back. Reasonable enough. Did that promise have to entail violence? Did there have to be a whole new war waged for that promise to be held? Why did so many have to die, and so much be destroyed, subverted, or twisted to the near-unreqognizable, for you to fulfill that oath?


    What has always struck me as characteristically odd about Federalist apologists both past and present is the notion that interstellar agreements and political arrangements are promises or oaths that carry with them the romantic and flawed concept that they are obligations to be held to in perpetuity. Such complacent thinking will always lead to shock and surprise when others, who view interstellar agreements and political arrangements as nothing more than the codification of shared and mutual interests - whatever they may be - seek to change such agreements and arrangements when they are no longer held to be satisfactory or indeed inimical to ones own interests.

    Just as the Federation as an economic, political, and cultural entity proved to be inimical to the economic, political and cultural interests of the Caldari people through the use of oppressive laws and legislation designed to deny the rights, freedoms and independence of Caldari colonies and corporations once enjoyed prior to the formation of the Union required the use of violence in order to reject the political agreements of its charter when negotiations to exit from it peacefully failed; then so too was violence necessary in the return of Home to the Caldari people when the interstellar agreements of Iyen-Oursta and CONCORD proved insufficient with a Federation that even during a century of peace failed to compromise, failed to negotiate, and failed to reach accord with the Caldari State for a suitable solution to the issue.

    Home has its own significance for the Caldari people, but what Federal citizens such as yourself should see etched upon its soil is that the Caldari State will always fight to preserve its interests. With words where possible, but if arrogance prevents negotiation and compromise as has often occurred with the Federation then care be but recourse to violence and once such is decided upon and deemed necessary then no scraps of paper will prevent the spilling of blood to do with the sword what could not be accomplished with the pen.

    Kurilaivonen|Concern

    Lyn Farel
    Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
    Khimi Harar
    #57 - 2013-02-27 20:19:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
    Scherezad wrote:
    Sir;

    I will do you the service of being more direct in my explanation. I apologize in advance, such directness is difficult.

    The source of our conflict, and the difficulty in its reconciliation, lies here:

    BloodBird wrote:
    You upheld this one promise, this one oath...

    ...by breaking how many other promises and oaths?

    The terrible take-away here is that the Caldari State is not worthy of any trust because you will violate any agreement the moment it does not benefit you, and that you feel fine making agreements that you have full intention of breaking at a later date.


    We are not liars, we are polite. Before you recoil, sir, please allow me to explain by way of analogy.

    Let us presume that a Galois gentleman is served a distasteful meal at a Galois restaurant of high quality and esteem. He believes that it was an intentional slight by the chef, who dislikes him. When the host returns to inquire about how he is enjoying his meal, the gentleman will explain that the meal is distasteful and will leave without eating - perhaps indeed without paying. He does these things in accordance with his sense of justice and the inviolable right of his person to choose his actions. The restaurant will make an immediate display of ensuring the customer is fully refunded for the meal and that the chef will be reprimanded.

    Let us presume that a Caldari lady is served a distasteful meal at a Caldari restaurant of high quality and esteem. She believes that it was an intentional slight by the chef, who dislikes her. When the host returns to inquire about how she is enjoying her meal, the lady willl explain that she is enjoying the meal very much, but the meal will be uneaten on her plate. She pays, thanks the host for his attentiveness and makes special note that the chef should be commended on a fine meal. She does these things in accordance with her sense of dignity and the inviolable rights of the others in the restaurant to enjoy a peaceful, gentle evening at dinner. The restaurant will then make a gift of the meal's expense to the lady at a later time, and the chef will be privately reprimanded.

    Both of these individuals explained to the restaurant their issues, and in both cases the end results were the same. The path they took to get there, however, was very different. Imagine the offense that would ensue should the Galois gentleman visit the Caldari establishment! Imagine the shame and anger of the Caldari lady visiting the Galois restaurant!

    I shall be blunt, sir, for your sake. You served us a distasteful meal those years ago, and we have waited a very long time indeed for its repayment.


    And the Caldari eventually acted like the Galois in the Galois restaurant.
    Scherezad
    Revenent Defence Corperation
    Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
    #58 - 2013-02-27 22:26:53 UTC
    Lyn Farel wrote:
    And the Caldari eventually acted like the Galois in the Galois restaurant.


    There are limits to our willingness to wait, ma'am. I won't bore you with the subtleties of our culture in regards to this topic. Needless to say, we stood waiting at the mailbox long enough to feel justified.
    Previous page123