These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - http://bit.ly/vote-trebor

First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#81 - 2013-02-24 20:13:02 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
I draw a different moral from Trebor's Churchill anecdote, specifically: once you've shown that you're ready to sell out what you believe in, then there's nothing to stop people from dragging the price down as far as they like.
Trebor's entire campaign is about selling out. And he's trying to convince as many as he can to sell out with him. "Look what I can promise you if you sell out! More devs! Faster [your area of space] development!"


Idealists alone never get a deal. Pragmatists alone don't get anything but a deal. You need both to get the best result. I'm still looking forward very much to working with Trebor, because he'll be able to help me get better results than I would without him, as he's no doubt looking forward to working with me, because he'll be able to use me as bargaining weight to get those deals dealt.

If he gets more out of the arrangement than I do, then it sucks to be me.

We'll see Pirate

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2013-02-24 20:25:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Malcanis wrote:
I'm well aware that deal making and compromise is a part of the process.
I'm pretty sure that's not what the CSM is about. It's not horse trading.

CCP tells the CSM what it is going to do. If the CSM sees any particular "bad ideas" in the bunch, then your job is to convince CCP why it's a bad idea and why they should not continue down a particular road. Maybe some middle road can be reached, but you don't have to give something up in lowsec to adjust some piece of development in nullsec.

It's not about deal making: "CCP dudes, if you give some ground with this super-cap thing, you know don't nerf the Titan bridge range, then I promise to go easy on you with that highsec consensual wardec thing." I'm pretty sure that's exactly not how the CSM/CCP relationship works.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#83 - 2013-02-24 20:36:35 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
I'm well aware that deal making and compromise is a part of the process. That's why you'll be glad to have my idealism to increase your bargaining leverage, and I'll be glad to have the use of your pragmatism to get me the best deal and the fewest turds in the sand

Good to see that the candidates are confident, at least.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#84 - 2013-02-24 20:42:51 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
I'm well aware that deal making and compromise is a part of the process.
I'm pretty sure that's not what the CSM is about. It's not horse trading.

CCP tells the CSM what it is going to do. If the CSM sees any particular "bad ideas" in the bunch, then your job is to convince CCP why it's a bad idea and why they should not continue down a particular road. Maybe some middle road can be reached, but you don't have to give something up in lowsec to adjust some piece of development in nullsec.

It's not about deal making: "CCP dudes, if you give some ground with this super-cap thing, you know don't nerf the Titan bridge range, then I promise to go easy on you with that highsec consensual wardec thing." I'm pretty sure that's exactly not how the CSM/CCP relationship works.


I look forward to giving you more data upon which to base your assumptions. Who said anything about CCP?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2013-02-24 23:39:49 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
If he gets more out of the arrangement than I do, then it sucks to be me.

The whole point is that both of us get more out of the arrangement than we could achieve separately.

Now I'd like to get back on track and answer someone else's question. Wescro has been waiting patiently with his hand up for several pages...

Wescro wrote:
Thanks for the answer Trebor. I vaguely remember The Mittani claiming at Fanfest 2012 that pod killmails showing implants was somehow born out of the CSMs recommendation for it on the Skype channel, so I was under the impression that there would be some things that get passed through on the insistence of CSM.

Yes, stuff like that happens. That kind of thing flows out of the normal everyday conversations we have. We mention something, or a dev does, and there's a conversation, and maybe a Scrum story gets added or tweaked. But the hard work is done by the devs, and the credit belongs to them.

Quote:
Could you perhaps share with us, unachievable through CSM as it may seem, your grand vision of where EVE should head next?

What would I love to see?

New regions of space (or subsets of existing space) with different rules. WH space is the best example of this, but I think CCP could get even more radical. I'd love to have areas of the game that are like the Mutara Nebula in The Wrath of Khan, but that's just an example; there are tons of things that could be done.

Nullsec needs some serious love, both from the standpoint of sov and farms-and-field stuff. Same goes for industry.. and POSes.. and a ton of other things.

But the problem is one of resources. CCP simply doesn't have the resources to do all these things quickly. Their new development system is a good start, but it will take years to get through the to-do list at current levels of staffing.

So this means that if we want stuff to be done faster, we need more devs. And the best way to do that is to get subscription numbers up. More income => CCP can afford more devs.

There are basically three things that can be done to achieve this:

1) Get more people to try EVE. You can do this by creating cool new content (attracting more of the current demographic) or by creating new niches for players with playstyles that EVE currently doesn't support. This latter aspect is one reason why I have pushed CCP hard to look at the actual numbers regarding stuff like Wardecs and Hisec risk/reward -- if a place can be made for players who currently avoid EVE because of certain aspects of the game, without significant effects for the current community, then that's something that needs to be looked at very, very seriously.

Purists hate this position, but IMHO they are cutting off their noses to spite their faces.

2) Convert more trials into subscriptions. EVE is notoriously noob-unfriendly, and I think a lot more needs to be done here. This means a better tutorial, making mentoring a profitable in-game profession (something I really would like to see), and finding ways to hook new players into social groups as soon as possible.

3) Keep people subscribed for longer. CCP's on track here. The last two expansions have been full of fixes that improve the game for existing players. Maybe not fixing sucking chest wounds, but stitching up the scalp lacerations. That needs to continue.

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#86 - 2013-02-25 04:30:13 UTC
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
That wasn't the context you provided though: it was doing something you'd find morally repugnant for a sufficient incentive, not having your belief in whether it was repugnant changed. Once you've shown youre willing to do it at all, then what leverage do you have to keep the price high?

I think that you are reading more into the anecdote than I intended. The morally pure sandbox position would be that all areas of space should be unrestricted, but we have decided (for obvious reasons) to sully ourselves by having different regions of risk/reward in the game. As such, the argument is over the details of those tradeoffs.

I confess amusement when people trot out the "keep the sandbox clean" argument. The truth is that the sandbox is full of turds -- it has to be in order for EVE to be a functional game. What we can do is discuss the size, shape, number and artistic arrangement of the turds. Twisted


What about anime?

Would you be supporter of a watered down anime series, that would most likely also be very popular, and make lots of new money, and give resources to anime studios?

You did say EVE has turds, but so does anime. I for one, would never think of myself being able to determine the size, shape, number and arrangement of the anime turds. They are way too far weird, and live in a separate dimension. ( Or in other words, we are gonna shave the goon's kneckbeards, and also, give them rules, to how long and how kneckly their beards can be.) (Another impossible task most likely)

I did feel you had a knack for increasing resources, as well as them still being stable or usable. But it would be hard to convince me to take it for granted though.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#87 - 2013-02-25 11:54:01 UTC
rodyas wrote:
What about anime?

I see you've taken Malc's correspondence course in analogy stretching. In all honesty, there has to be a balance between artistic and commercial sensibilities; if you walk the line correctly, you produce something that is esthetically satisfying and lets you keep paying the rent. Again, there are already rules in the game, the arguments are (a) whether or not something could be changed to achieve some goal (artistic, commercial, or both), and (b) whether it is a good use of resources given all the other things you could do.

Different people will of course have different opinions about this -- which is fine. My goal as a CSM member is not to tell CCP what to do (well, not any more than any other EVE player), but to make sure they consider all the options before making their decision.

rodyas wrote:
Would you be supporter of a watered down anime series, that would most likely also be very popular, and make lots of new money, and give resources to anime studios?

That's already been tried. It's called My Little Pony. Twisted

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#88 - 2013-02-25 17:08:31 UTC
rodyas wrote:

What about anime?

Would you be supporter of a watered down anime series, that would most likely also be very popular, and make lots of new money, and give resources to anime studios?


You think you're being facetious, but this is in fact how a lot of publishing works: Every successful, established publisher has a stable of bestsellers whose money underwrites smaller, riskier and more personal publications. Most of the creators who write the smaller, riskier works have the grace and the class to acknowledge that the bestsellers make their careers possible.

This is a good jumping-off point to ask some other very basic questions. For instance, if it is unacceptable that EVE compromise on its wild roots in order to increase its player base, then there are two alternatives: You can either champion their efforts toward a bestseller that is not EVE, or you can concede that CCP will remain roughly the same size, growing reliably but slowly, and they will continue to nibble at their huge to-do list at more or less their current rate. In the latter case, no matter how loudly you clamor for fixes to nullsec and to POSes, you will get them when you get them, however many years that requires.

The question is not whether there are tradeoffs. There are. The question is, which ones are acceptable to you?

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2013-02-25 18:10:06 UTC
Dersen Lowery wrote:
Malcanis, Ripard Teg, and Trebor Daehdoow for CSM 8

(I have three accounts, so why not?)

I agree with your sentiments, but we have to have a little chat about your priorities... Twisted

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#90 - 2013-02-25 20:39:05 UTC
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
Dersen Lowery wrote:
Malcanis, Ripard Teg, and Trebor Daehdoow for CSM 8

(I have three accounts, so why not?)

I agree with your sentiments, but we have to have a little chat about your priorities... Twisted


Whose priorities? I listed you guys in the order your hats landed in the ring.

Chat away. ;-)

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#91 - 2013-02-25 20:41:22 UTC
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
Dersen Lowery wrote:
Malcanis, Ripard Teg, and Trebor Daehdoow for CSM 8

(I have three accounts, so why not?)

I agree with your sentiments, but we have to have a little chat about your priorities... Twisted


Alphabetical is as good an order as any!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2013-02-25 21:29:07 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Alphabetical is as good an order as any!

Age before beauty!

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#93 - 2013-02-25 21:39:16 UTC
Pearls before swine.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#94 - 2013-02-25 22:22:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Trebor Daehdoow
Malcanis wrote:
Pearls before swine.

You can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think.

And I wonder what Poetic will make of your admission that you're a cross-dresser.

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#95 - 2013-02-25 23:24:31 UTC
I note your careful use of terms, that is, "will make of" rather than "will think of".

Twisted

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2013-02-26 00:47:02 UTC
mynnna wrote:
I note your careful use of terms, that is, "will make of" rather than "will think of".

mynnna, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Twisted

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#97 - 2013-02-26 01:22:27 UTC
rodyas wrote:
You do make its confusing to know what the growth track is really, Trebor. I agree the ultra safe place isn't really that bad of an idea, but it does seem there are other places to see growth depending on the perspective, and I wouldn't even know what would be the best one, besides becoming WoW or something.

I rather doubt EVE will move far in the direction of WoW. I do think a small kiddy-pool is worth researching, but for now it's just an idea worth thinking about. The actual problem is giving people who are used to themepark games a gentler introduction to the sandbox, and providing more opportunities to get them hooked into the social fabric (because that's a big "stickyness" factor). I'd love to see discussion of multiple different ways to work on that.

Quote:
Which is why they are worried about an ultra safe area, CCP won't be able to touch the players there if they become unfit and lazy and also players won't be able to grab them for being lazy.

If they're staying in the kiddy pool, paying their subscriptions, and are lower-maintenance than other players, then they are subsidizing the sandbox and not getting in the way of the big kids. They're renters.

Quote:
So I wonder what you think of them Trebor, do they want an easy game, or are they unfit and lazy? Or do they just genuinely want an area to themselves, and promise to move or or make something of themselves afterwards?

I think new players that match current EVE demographics will want to play in the sandbox and would leave a kiddy pool pretty quickly, especially if the risk-reward was properly set (easy to say, hard to do, though). The really interesting question is whether or not it would allow CCP to tap into a whole different demographic that currently runs away screaming at the very thought of downloading the client.

Quote:
Trebor, you and I could make a good troll tag team, trying to make EVE safer.

I limit myself to the occasional sarcastic counter-troll. Firing the first shot is not the way I do business.

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

Frying Doom
#98 - 2013-02-26 01:29:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
While I have come to believe you do have some good ideas. I must ask this.

Justify your electing of Seleene to Chairman. Given all the Yay CCP's we have heard in the last 12 months as well as the behind the scene talks that have handed the majority of CSM8 to Null sec blocks via the new voting system (Ok they may not get more than 7 but if they don't it means they are not trying and that says something in its self)

So simple question can you justify that vote?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#99 - 2013-02-26 01:42:28 UTC
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:


Quote:
Trebor, you and I could make a good troll tag team, trying to make EVE safer.

I limit myself to the occasional sarcastic counter-troll. Firing the first shot is not the way I do business.


Except for voter reform, but I kid.

Thanks for the replies. I thought they were really good.

I suppose if I had joined EVE without playing WoW so much, I would be a strong supporter of yours.

I mostly saw EVE as being really new to the MMO world really. I don't just mean the sandbox either. Most MMOs follow the role playing fantasy with swords and alchemy and whatnot game a whole lot, and it was very nice to find EVE after playing those games for so long and finding myself burned out.

Of course it is hard, to just wait around waiting for different players to be burned out, so they will pick EVE up. So I see why you want a better introduction and easier place for awhile to attract new players.

Also EVE is small in a way, so just gaining more players, seems like such a big bonus to everyone who plays.

EVE is a pretty hard place as well, and is probably worth debating whether that is important to hold onto, when faced with the improvements we could get. (CCP says, they like the way EVE is hard, from CCP Seagulls dev blog. So we shouldn't feel like we go to far as well with a discussion.)

As for the My Little Pony reply, That series was pretty popular for EVE players it seemed like, so maybe a newbie area would be popular amongst EVE players as well. ( I also meant more like Naruto but timesed by 20, as well as watered down.)

Also the Beatles and Depeche Mode started out being pop music, before taking more serious turns. So even if EVE did go to far of a sell out, could always go back.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2013-02-26 11:31:38 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Justify your electing of Seleene to Chairman. Given all the Yay CCP's we have heard in the last 12 months as well as the behind the scene talks that have handed the majority of CSM8 to Null sec blocks via the new voting system (Ok they may not get more than 7 but if they don't it means they are not trying and that says something in its self)

So simple question can you justify that vote?

I actually argued to CCP Xhagen that Two step should succeed to the chair because with Mittens resignation, he was the member elected with the highest number of votes at the time CSM8 was seated. I simply didn't want to have to decide between two gentlemen whom I greatly respect, each of whom had significant points in their favor.

But when I did have to vote, it was one of those 51/49 decisions. The factors that tipped it in Seleene's favor was that he had a very good relationship with certain people at CCP, and that batphone was going to be important. Also, Two step had proven he was a good writer and editor, so I felt he was better suited to the Secretary position (I asked for vice-chair to make sure Two step would get Secretary). Finally, I expected that he would run again, and would be the front-runner for CSM8 chair (which I expected would be determined by election).

I disagree with your assessment that CSM8 has been handed to Null on several levels.

First, they will get representation proportional to their share of the electorate; under the old system, they could choose to get more than that fair share by leveraging their information advantage (unfair) or take less than their fair share (lazy bastards) by focusing their vote on just a few candidates.

Second, CSM is not a legislature. 3 people saying the same thing are not more powerful than 1 person saying something different; what counts is the strength of the arguments, and in particular, CSM is most effective when it comes to a consensus ("we disagree about a lot of things, but this we agree upon"). So no group can "dominate" unless the other delegates allow it.

One hope I have for the new system is that it will encourage qualified people to run who would not otherwise do so, and give them a chance to get elected. What the CSM needs more than anything else is a higher percentage of people willing to put in serious effort. If "Nullsec" elects 8 people who are going to bust ass rather than sit on their asses, that's fine by me -- because the rest of the community will elect people like Ripard Teg, Malcanis, Marc Scaurus and so on. Which means we'd have at least 11 worker-bees, as compared to CSM7 where we had about 6.

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery