These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM 8 Candidate Sort Dragon

Author
Tertiacero
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#41 - 2013-02-22 17:28:36 UTC
Sort Dragon wrote:
I apologies for the mud slinging gone on in this thread I am not running as a pl candidate Sala Cameron is the PL candidate who if both of us are elected I would love to work with as he has similar thoughts as I do...

Unfortunately I cannot remove the pl fanboys from this thread. I do not believe only kills give a pilots worth so I have nothing to say to anything these people have to say logs or not...

Thank you to those who still support my campaign...


Yeah, at least you know Snot Shot still wants to suck your ****
MissBolyai
ElitistOps
Deepwater Hooligans
#42 - 2013-02-22 17:32:25 UTC
Sort Dragon wrote:
I apologies for the mud slinging gone on in this thread I am not running as a pl candidate Sala Cameron is the PL candidate who if both of us are elected I would love to work with as he has similar thoughts as I do...

Unfortunately I cannot remove the pl fanboys from this thread. I do not believe only kills give a pilots worth so I have nothing to say to anything these people have to say logs or not...

Thank you to those who still support my campaign...

Deep breaths. You're starting to lose your cool, and your thoughts are not being accurately conveyed. I'd happily debate with you in a calm manner why you think that your lack of participation in this game in any measurable way makes you qualified to represent the people that actually do log in and do more than send in their tech taxes, but you have failed to engage with me and now you're just backpedaling and trying to discredit my assertions (you're still losing on all fronts).

I'm glad to see that you are going to coattail on Sala's ideas. That's a wise decision as he has been more active on his titan than you have with all of your characters combined. And his in game experience has given him deep insight into improvements to this game that I feel warrant him representing those of us that actively enjoy eve.

Also, you are completely correct: kills do not give a pilot worth. Kills give a pilot experience, and experience breeds innovation. You have not played the game in a long, long time, and therefore, you do not have kills and you do not have relevant experience... which explains why you need to siphon ideas off of a more experienced, and vastly more qualified, Sala Cameron.

The only people that are supporting your campaign are sheep that follow some CEO or powerbloc that you've gotten in bed with (figuratively) and convinced that what you did back in 2007 mattered. The people that actively participate in this game are going to be judging the candidates on their merits.
Shadoo
North Eastern Swat
#43 - 2013-02-22 17:42:21 UTC
Just to clarify one point -- there has never been, nor will there ever be an "official Pandemic Legion" candidate for CSM.

Everyone stands on their own merits, and while Agmar's points about last 3 months of activity are probably valid -- I'm pretty sure everyone in EVE is smart enough to realize that there are issues worth representing which will benefit from experience gained over years of leading large fleets in 0.0 warfare. And that's experience Sort probably has over every other candidate this year.

While I'm personally supporting everyone, and no one -- I think it's appropriate to give everyone a chance to put their views forward in the context of their experience so far.
MissBolyai
ElitistOps
Deepwater Hooligans
#44 - 2013-02-22 18:06:20 UTC  |  Edited by: MissBolyai
Shadoo wrote:
Just to clarify one point -- there has never been, nor will there ever be an "official Pandemic Legion" candidate for CSM.

Everyone stands on their own merits, and while Agmar's points about last 3 months of activity are probably valid -- I'm pretty sure everyone in EVE is smart enough to realize that there are issues worth representing which will benefit from experience gained over years of leading large fleets in 0.0 warfare. And that's experience Sort probably has over every other candidate this year.

While I'm personally supporting everyone, and no one -- I think it's appropriate to give everyone a chance to put their views forward in the context of their experience so far.

I would contend that it's more than just 3 months of inactivity (more like 10). I don't count kills in a slowcat.

But you're right: large scale 0.0 warfare is important to be represented on the CSM, but sort hasn't actively participated in large scale 0.0 warfare in a long while. I'm looking forward to hearing him tell us what he thinks needs improved as he hasn't really played at all during either Inferno or Retribution. His ideas have a good chance of being suggestions to fix Crucible.
Phantra
Network Dynamics
#45 - 2013-02-22 19:39:29 UTC

I was under Sort Dragons horrible regime over in NC and bitched wildly when he was let into PL. Since then I was pleased to see he never gained the sort of position in PL that he had presided over in NC. From snooping in on TS channels to hear what people were saying about him to generic online misogyny disguised as bravado with the emphasis on impressing any female voice on teamspeak by posturing as some internet space lord alpha. The drama with Wicked Princess was beyond ridiculous and serves as an example. Sort, you're going to take that as a personal insult but that's generally the perception held by the people close to me in the game who experienced this.

Over the course of a year I've changed my mind somewhat, he has credibility in PL aside from being completely inactive, and whilst I do actually like Sort now, not just as a capsuleer, but as a decent guy to have a bit of a chat with.. and I enjoyed being on fleets that he's run in the past including 2 RA titan kills and several dumpsterings of AAA; I don't think in good conscience I could vote to give him a platform to represent my opinions, or risk allowing him to be in a position where he can freely behave like that again with PL associated with his name. I thought your interview on the zebra radio thing was decent.

I wont be voting for you, but I do think you've the credentials for the job.

Best of luck to you and all the other candidates.

Big smileSmileSadShockedWhat?CoolLolXPOopsCryEvilTwistedRollBlinkAttentionQuestionIdeaArrowStraightPirateUghBear
I've never really posted here before, having a go at using all the emoticons.
Endeavour Starfleet
#46 - 2013-02-27 07:32:00 UTC
Hello there!

I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)

POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?

Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)

Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?

The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.

The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.

Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.

Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.

Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.
Sort Dragon
Resilience.
The Initiative.
#47 - 2013-02-27 21:01:44 UTC
First off Thanks for the post and the questions, below I will do my best to answer your questions.

1) A) I do not 100% think Modular pos's are the answer to the problems at hand with starbases I think alot of people would like to think it the answer as ccp has suggested this and it really intrigued alot of people. To change anything with pos's means a complete overhaul of the game it would be the biggest change the game ever made even bigger then the sov work in dominion. I do not believe any game company should band-aid fix a problem in its game just to have to come back later and fix the issue again, I personally am happy to wait for ccp to come to the csm and the players with ideas they have and for us as csm to work with them on what could possible work and what we believe will not. I do not at all support ccp making a short hotfix to starbases no matter the change. If however they turn their focus completely to starbases I would do my best to work with them to fix the current problems in the mechanic.

2) A) Trying to change passive cloaking I do not support I believe its a valid tactic for a defender and some one attacking, trying to change it would be just making the game easier for a small group and right now I like the difficulty of the game is right where it needs to be in that area.

3) A) Ring mining is an interesting topic and I would love to see it in game however the time line for that I am sure is planned out and to make sure that it doesn't become such an influential money maker in 0.0 and low sec like moon mining did I am sure ccp want to take their time before introducing it. Moon mining personally for me I think is great it helps my corp make a fair amount of money and my alliance too. For the general game populace I do believe the distribution of wealth through moons and where they are located is broken and any way that ccp can improve this would be great.

4) A) The reason people are asking for a delayed local is because roaming in eve is unfortunately not as profitable as it was before for hunting people in different areas in the game, it is too easy for people to just safe up and wait for people to leave. I believe it could have its positives and negatives to it but no matter what they change with regards to local I am sure that is not the only problem with roaming out there.

5) A) Each of these topics you are asking about are not simple changes these are massive overhauls that take time. Missions in high sec have slowly gotten better over time some parts have not been changed and need working on. But it is still a simple fact that some one in empire can still make vast amounts of isk doing missions in high sec continuously for hours on end with little to no risk, so yes I believe missions do need a work on but I believe they should be made harder so people cannot so simply make huge amounts of isk for no risk.

6) A) Incursions like all other parts of the game that have been introduced in the past need there time in the sun. Each expansion ccp releases with new content or features needs its stress test and a chance for ccp to gather data on. I do not believe incursions have reached that point yet and need to be looked at yet in comparison to other parts of the game that have alot more problems with them and need closer attention first.

7) A) I think a logi only screen could be good sure but I think specially for pvp this would take the fun out of trying and training to be the best logi pilot you can. Being a logistic pilot and a good one at that puts you in a select group of people who keep people from dying in eve, some pilots like to fly with a simplified setup and some like flying with a big setup with lots of information coming in. I do not think you would be able to find a system or a logi screen that would work for all logi pilots in eve or even half the pilots in eve the thing that makes logi pilots special is they do it there way I think trying to give them a logi screen would take that away from them. However it may work and if ccp came with an idea I would sure look at it and from my experience flying logistics I would help them the best I could.

8) A) This is one thing I could defiantly get behind. If there is possibly a way to make this work even how you described it then yes I would defiantly want it to happen. Maybe something like how sentry carriers work where even though you aren't targeting your drones are assigned so they get you on kill mails, maybe they could make this work with whoever you rep you are linked to the killmails of those people who knows?

Remnant Madeveda
Apex Mining and Industry
Caldari Alliance
#48 - 2013-03-06 11:33:26 UTC
Bump for an amazing candidate.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2013-03-07 21:23:53 UTC
What is your stance on AFK skill training?
Sort Dragon
Resilience.
The Initiative.
#50 - 2013-03-08 05:30:03 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
What is your stance on AFK skill training?


AFK skill training is right where it should be. Back a few years back for people who didn't know it was possible to train while you were unsubbed so because of this you could easily plug in a giant skill and leave it for a couple months without paying for the account. this mechanic i did not at all think was fair. I do however think the skill system right now does not have that many faults within it at all compared to what it has had in the past.

I hope this answers your question.
Hellakhanasos
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2013-03-17 23:44:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Hellakhanasos
Let me ask you this are you going to be any different from the risk averse Führer's Mittens, Shadoo, or will you simpley slurp on there dingaling like every other puppet?

I.e. what ever horse turd excuse they want to make about Sov being THEE reason for why null sec is so stagnant and that no further large scale bloc wars are willing to be waged. Yes its a factor, but not THEE Reason for the dyer situation null sec has been in content wise/oppertunity wise, real objective wise for a fair while now.
Will you rise above this nonscence and act on the eve communitys behalf, influencing the game for the good of the many, rather than the current state of influencing, minipulating it so the rmt/botting fiasco can continue unharmed in peice.
Do you not think the good of many, to influence the game for its Primary purpose "FUN", should not be out weighed by the exploits/benifits of the few for their RL & ingame wallets?
That is currently what is happening, you being in a better position than many to confirm what every person with a brain knows.
* WHAT ARE YOU WILLING TO DO? If your not willing to act on the eve communities behalf then there would be no reason for you to join csm,would be a waste of your time,my time,everybodies time. . . except those chosen few if you like,If you are to act upon the imbalace then there is a reason for you to be there!
Sort Dragon
Resilience.
The Initiative.
#52 - 2013-03-19 11:49:19 UTC
Hellakhanasos wrote:
Let me ask you this are you going to be any different from the risk averse Führer's Mittens, Shadoo, or will you simpley slurp on there dingaling like every other puppet?

I.e. what ever horse turd excuse they want to make about Sov being THEE reason for why null sec is so stagnant and that no further large scale bloc wars are willing to be waged. Yes its a factor, but not THEE Reason for the dyer situation null sec has been in content wise/oppertunity wise, real objective wise for a fair while now.
Will you rise above this nonscence and act on the eve communitys behalf, influencing the game for the good of the many, rather than the current state of influencing, minipulating it so the rmt/botting fiasco can continue unharmed in peice.
Do you not think the good of many, to influence the game for its Primary purpose "FUN", should not be out weighed by the exploits/benifits of the few for their RL & ingame wallets?
That is currently what is happening, you being in a better position than many to confirm what every person with a brain knows.
* WHAT ARE YOU WILLING TO DO? If your not willing to act on the eve communities behalf then there would be no reason for you to join csm,would be a waste of your time,my time,everybodies time. . . except those chosen few if you like,If you are to act upon the imbalace then there is a reason for you to be there!


Hi there if you post these statements from your main in thorn (yes i know its you roboticus) I will happily answer them but answering points from an alt is not something I am willing to do.
Kael Katan
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#53 - 2013-03-19 15:24:46 UTC
Sort Dragon wrote:
Hellakhanasos wrote:
Let me ask you this are you going to be any different from the risk averse Führer's Mittens, Shadoo, or will you simpley slurp on there dingaling like every other puppet?

I.e. what ever horse turd excuse they want to make about Sov being THEE reason for why null sec is so stagnant and that no further large scale bloc wars are willing to be waged. Yes its a factor, but not THEE Reason for the dyer situation null sec has been in content wise/oppertunity wise, real objective wise for a fair while now.
Will you rise above this nonscence and act on the eve communitys behalf, influencing the game for the good of the many, rather than the current state of influencing, minipulating it so the rmt/botting fiasco can continue unharmed in peice.
Do you not think the good of many, to influence the game for its Primary purpose "FUN", should not be out weighed by the exploits/benifits of the few for their RL & ingame wallets?
That is currently what is happening, you being in a better position than many to confirm what every person with a brain knows.
* WHAT ARE YOU WILLING TO DO? If your not willing to act on the eve communities behalf then there would be no reason for you to join csm,would be a waste of your time,my time,everybodies time. . . except those chosen few if you like,If you are to act upon the imbalace then there is a reason for you to be there!


Hi there if you post these statements from your main in thorn (yes i know its you roboticus) I will happily answer them but answering points from an alt is not something I am willing to do.


Same question, valid question whom ever posts it, could be a one day alt and it would still have its validity to be answered, not going to run any candidate through the mud, but I think this is a genuine question about one of the biggest issues we currently have, and for me and I'm sure many alike will mean the difference of what could be achieved through you.
Richter Enderas
Kaesong Kosmonauts
#54 - 2013-03-20 05:00:38 UTC
sort's been playing for literally forever, and has a plethora of knowledge and first-hand experiences to draw from

he saw the rise and fall of BoB/IT, helped kill the NC and was one of the dudes who had a direct hand in sculpting the south in the post-AAA eve world

sort is p bullshit-free and would be a fine addition to CSM 8
Rosa Ferrara
Bundy Rum manufacturing
#55 - 2013-03-20 23:59:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Rosa Ferrara
Just what the CSM needs another GOON / PL stooge with pre-conceived agenda's for there alliance's
Baron Holbach
The Northerners
Pandemic Horde
#56 - 2013-03-21 15:19:53 UTC
bump for most awesome candidate in CSM 8


Sort Dragon wrote:

  • Titans:
  • I do hope that there is some way that between the players the csm and ccp we can find some way to find the happy medium for titans so they can get the use they need for the pilots who own them while at the same time not being completely game controlling that everyone wants them banished from the game.


    Do you have any ideas about this - what you, as possible future CSM, would like to offer CCP for how to make everyone happy about titans....
    Litt Up
    Litt Nothing and Nobody
    #57 - 2013-03-21 15:22:59 UTC
    Sort still hasn't answered validly any of the points brought up by his own alliance mates re: inactivity.

    A PL has-been becoming interested in the game at a time when you want something is a poor ploy that the eve community has been fooled by twice already (Seleene and Mazzillu). Thanks for your interest, and best of luck if you find enough plebeians that will vote for you, but you have not done anything in the past two years at your alliance's own admission.


    If this was 2008, I'm sure your case would be much more compelling. But, that was before Seleene and Mazzillu... and that was back when you played.
    Sort Dragon
    Resilience.
    The Initiative.
    #58 - 2013-03-21 17:41:18 UTC
    Baron Holbach wrote:
    bump for most awesome candidate in CSM 8


    Sort Dragon wrote:

  • Titans:
  • I do hope that there is some way that between the players the csm and ccp we can find some way to find the happy medium for titans so they can get the use they need for the pilots who own them while at the same time not being completely game controlling that everyone wants them banished from the game.


    Do you have any ideas about this - what you, as possible future CSM, would like to offer CCP for how to make everyone happy about titans....



    First of thanks Baron for the support.

    To answer your question titans are so hard to think about with regards to how I would change it I am not totally sure, me personally as a titan pilot I would like to be able to jump in and be able to have some kind of effect on a fight no matter if it is a sub cap fight or a capital engagement. How this could be I think is maybe give some of the gun damage back to the titan towards sub caps but maybe give them a siege module I am not completely sure. I just know right now flying a titan I feel quite redundant to be quite honest and I do not see any easy fix to make my titan or anyone's useful again.
    Johnny thorir
    Caldari Provisions
    Caldari State
    #59 - 2013-03-21 19:12:38 UTC
    Good man
    Litt Up
    Litt Nothing and Nobody
    #60 - 2013-03-22 16:33:51 UTC
    I find it interesting that you've not put any thought into how you would fix the most worthless ship in the game.

    Just kidding, it's not interesting... it's expected from you. Is this the kind of creativity we can expect from you?