These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

James 315 - An Apology and an Appeal

Author
Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
#441 - 2013-04-19 06:05:13 UTC
This is simply fantastic. You did a lot of reading and research! I think I agree with you. Most people who are called trolls in this game seem to just really understand it and love it and want to have wacky adventures by making their own fun. That is the best part of EVE. Just do it! See what feathers fly up in the air and how you can catch them and how many times you die before you drop them all.

The people who do interesting things are why the game is even worth playing! You can have fun dying in EVE when people like this are the ones killing you. c:

Ferox #1

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#442 - 2013-04-19 06:14:02 UTC
Another highsec failure. I look forward to the whine-thread when someone not in the "new order" bumps or ganks your world.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

dark heartt
#443 - 2013-04-19 06:19:06 UTC
Haha how did I miss this thread? It's solid gold! It's funny that James QUIT before he had a chance to do anything.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#444 - 2013-04-19 06:29:18 UTC
dark heartt wrote:
Haha how did I miss this thread? It's solid gold! It's funny that James QUIT before he had a chance to do anything.


His quiting showed his commitment IMHO
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Anunzi
Solace Corp
#445 - 2013-04-19 07:43:29 UTC



Vaeliel, I read all of your post, and I must say I agree with you whole heartedly.

As an ex Ultima player and more importantly (to me) an ex SWG player I understand exactly what you mean. I’ve seen first hand the death of great games because the loud mouthed whiners want the game to changed to their liking instead of adapting themselves to the dev’s vision of how the game should be.

I'm all for player/dev interaction, I'm a big supporter of the CSM, but I think that when it comes down to the core design philosophy of a game is, it’s a great mistake to try and change it.

EvE’s core design from day one has been “Space is dangerous”. That should stay that way, that feeling of “Here goes” every time we click undock should never leave us.

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

pussnheels
Viziam
#446 - 2013-04-19 08:30:24 UTC
dear OP
some points i like to clear out
First this is YOUR game and CCPs game not james his game , nor did james invented the wheel

Second James is not a Elite pvper , his only claim to fame that he advocates the massive griefing of players with the sole intention to force them out of the game

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Anunzi
Solace Corp
#447 - 2013-04-19 08:38:05 UTC
pussnheels wrote:


Second James is not a Elite pvper , his only claim to fame that he advocates the massive griefing of players with the sole intention to force them out of the game



I assume you can prove that?

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

mr ed thehouseofed
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#448 - 2013-04-19 10:28:47 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
Wall-o-text taken to a whole new level.
Did not read.

This will be a productive thread. Roll


oh goody. commercial break. brb coffee, smoke ,sex ,etc Lol

i want a eve pinball machine...  confirming  CCP Cognac is best cognac

Lady Areola Fappington
#449 - 2013-04-19 10:41:46 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
dear OP
some points i like to clear out
First this is YOUR game and CCPs game not james his game , nor did james invented the wheel

Second James is not a Elite pvper , his only claim to fame that he advocates the massive griefing of players with the sole intention to force them out of the game


So the dude who wants the most AFK and bot-aspirant portion of the playerbase to actually participate in this game is actually forcing these people out of the game that, originally, they basically weren't playing to start with.

Someone grab me a spinning top, this is Gankception!

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#450 - 2013-04-19 10:44:54 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:

...is actually forcing these people out of the game that, originally, they basically weren't playing to start with...

that's why no smart people will take you seriously

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Lady Areola Fappington
#451 - 2013-04-19 10:50:23 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:

...is actually forcing these people out of the game that, originally, they basically weren't playing to start with...

that's why no smart people will take you seriously


If you consider mashing a button every 15-30 minutes then tabbing back to netflix "playing EVE"....

Mine aligned (this includes moving at 75%), warp off when you see flashies jump in system, don't let anyone cuddle your barge. Presto, 99.999% ganks avoided.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
#452 - 2013-04-19 10:51:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Arancar Australis
Reading both sides of the supposed argument is amusing to say the least. One side has the viewpoint that their playing style should not be interfered with, while the other views this playing style as the downfall to eve and ultimately their preferred playing style.

Yes one of the primary features of Eve is PVP, whether it be player vs player, market driven, industry driven..and yes mining driven.

This game was designed to appeal to a wide range of people who wish to play the game as they see fit. It allows people to disagree on what the "best" playing style is and allows them to show why they believe their style is the best for Eve. But the playing style is opinion based and not an absolute truth.

Eve is about allowing you to explore the game in a way that you see fit, to acheive the potential you want in this game. Will others dislike and not agree with your style? Yes of course they will and it will be shown via action or word. But the openess of the sandbox allows this to occur.

Hi Sec has enough risk for both sides of this arguement. Miners have the risk of being ganked at anytime and at the whim of anyone. Gankers have to take into consideration that their risk is to be concorded...but the law has never stopped those who truly wish to follow their impulses. And whining about how miners have been buffed so i cannot use one frigate to blow up an unarmed target, is not a valid argument.Go and get more firepower and accept the risk of you losing something valuable...is not one of the great sayings in this game "Do not fly what you cannot afford to lose"

People should be worried more about how the game is proceeding, the content that is being delivered so that we are not losing players due to boredom or that the game (yes keyword) has become a grind. And no, Hi sec miners are not affecting the way the game is proceeding or how someone else wishes to play the game. We all play this game to enjoy its many facets and the possibilities we wish to follow.

(And yes my Miner main does not care if it is bumped or ganked...it accepts the risk for this to happen as being part of this fun game).
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#453 - 2013-04-19 11:15:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Barrogh Habalu
I only wonder if "knights" ever think that they are actually defending one of the worst EVE mech survived to these days that is mining in its current form instead of allowing things to become outrageous enough so that CCP finally fix something they've promised to fix like 5 years ago.

James at least have an excuse of getting ISK from this mess through donations, shares and racket, but you?..
Lady Areola Fappington
#454 - 2013-04-19 12:35:36 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
I only wonder if "knights" ever think that they are actually defending one of the worst EVE mech survived to these days that is mining in its current form instead of allowing things to become outrageous enough so that CCP finally fix something they've promised to fix like 5 years ago.

James at least have an excuse of getting ISK from this mess through donations, shares and racket, but you?..




Some people ask why we gank. My question in return, is why not? If it makes me happy, I'm going to do it in EVE. If my pursuit in happiness makes someone unhappy, too bad. This is EVE. One of the core concepts is that someone can ruin your day anytime, anywhere.

I personally think staged 1v1 ~gudfites~ are silly in a world like EVE, but..some folks like it. Diffr'nt strokes.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#455 - 2013-04-19 12:42:50 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
dear OP
some points i like to clear out
First this is YOUR game and CCPs game not james his game , nor did james invented the wheel

Second James is not a Elite pvper , his only claim to fame that he advocates the massive griefing of players with the sole intention to force them out of the game


How can it be "his game" and "not james"? Don't you see the hypocrisy and stupidity of such a statement?

What james and the new order do is not griefing, calm down dear, and the goal isn't to force players out of the game, james and the new order play the game in a way that they enjoy. If you can't handle someone else existing in the sandbox that is not their problem
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#456 - 2013-04-19 12:44:19 UTC
james 315 speaks...entire eve online community listens
has he won the game? Shocked
Tara Read
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#457 - 2013-04-19 16:17:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Tara Read
I have personally long feared this trending shift in the way Eve itself has changed over the years from a game of unforgiving harshness to one of laxed mechanics favoring the majority. Simply put, the Eve I knew has long since been dead. Its been replaced by Rmt's, bots, afk comotose mutiboxers whose collective vested interst in anything interactive seems almost non existent.

Eve has become LAZY. Its become those sitting at the top of their blue doughnut skimming off of such unfathomable advantage that it has turned to real world profit while we suffer as the sandbox we've come to know and love is slowly chipped away.
It has turned into players becoming as introverted as possible seeking only selfish wealth and complaining when their isk printer stops at the hands of a ganker.

These people have NO vested interest in the health of a game that has garnered a reputation of being one of if not the harshest yet most freedom giving games to date. The imagination was the limit with Eve. There were a plethora of avenues one player could
Take if only they strayed beyond the borders of controlled space into the vast unknown. Now we see this gameplay frowned upon. We see the lazy and stagnant complain about the sandbox forcing them to engage, we see the same tired power blocks holding the ear of devs and others in rigged "elections" in which these proverbial czars of our sandbox hold sway to shape and mold not for the benefit or enjoyment of more enriching gameplay, but to hold tight to their power and influence in a universe gone soft.

Alot has changed when I stared in 2004 but I can tell you most of it has not been for the better. I fear the game ive come to know and love is changing. Its changing into the very thing eve players mocked its turning into the very thing we turned our nose up to!

We were explorers, conqurers, our destiny was among the stars! Not in some purple gear encrusted cartoon that held no real challenge to us. I remember still this quote from an expansion trailer

"Your destiny is yours to define. Be bold pilot."

Bold. Its as if the echoes of what made this game great are begging to be heard from the shadows. But will we listen? Or in say the next decade will Eve become even more marginalzied and divided. Will It turn into "realms" like Ultima?

Ill already tell you. With the large coalitions not wishing true combat and only wealth it already has. When players seek the comfort of pixilated rocks and not each other it already has. When staged "fights" are used to save face and keep the ignorant and the meatsshields in check it already has.

So go on. Ignore the problems. And one day you'll be trading pets in station and lamenting at what was once Eve.
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#458 - 2013-04-22 00:39:46 UTC
Tara Read wrote:
I have personally long feared this trending shift in the way Eve itself has changed over the years from a game of unforgiving harshness to one of laxed mechanics favoring the majority. Simply put, the Eve I knew has long since been dead. Its been replaced by Rmt's, bots, afk comotose mutiboxers whose collective vested interst in anything interactive seems almost non existent.

Eve has become LAZY. Its become those sitting at the top of their blue doughnut skimming off of such unfathomable advantage that it has turned to real world profit while we suffer as the sandbox we've come to know and love is slowly chipped away.
It has turned into players becoming as introverted as possible seeking only selfish wealth and complaining when their isk printer stops at the hands of a ganker.

These people have NO vested interest in the health of a game that has garnered a reputation of being one of if not the harshest yet most freedom giving games to date. The imagination was the limit with Eve. There were a plethora of avenues one player could
Take if only they strayed beyond the borders of controlled space into the vast unknown. Now we see this gameplay frowned upon. We see the lazy and stagnant complain about the sandbox forcing them to engage, we see the same tired power blocks holding the ear of devs and others in rigged "elections" in which these proverbial czars of our sandbox hold sway to shape and mold not for the benefit or enjoyment of more enriching gameplay, but to hold tight to their power and influence in a universe gone soft.

Alot has changed when I stared in 2004 but I can tell you most of it has not been for the better. I fear the game ive come to know and love is changing. Its changing into the very thing eve players mocked its turning into the very thing we turned our nose up to!

We were explorers, conqurers, our destiny was among the stars! Not in some purple gear encrusted cartoon that held no real challenge to us. I remember still this quote from an expansion trailer

"Your destiny is yours to define. Be bold pilot."

Bold. Its as if the echoes of what made this game great are begging to be heard from the shadows. But will we listen? Or in say the next decade will Eve become even more marginalzied and divided. Will It turn into "realms" like Ultima?

Ill already tell you. With the large coalitions not wishing true combat and only wealth it already has. When players seek the comfort of pixilated rocks and not each other it already has. When staged "fights" are used to save face and keep the ignorant and the meatsshields in check it already has.

So go on. Ignore the problems. And one day you'll be trading pets in station and lamenting at what was once Eve.


well said.
Anunzi
Solace Corp
#459 - 2013-04-22 10:32:49 UTC
Tara Read wrote:


* Glorious, glorious words *




If only i could click like more than once.

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

WTFAMILOOKINGAT
Horizon Research Group
#460 - 2013-04-22 10:39:26 UTC
Tara Read wrote:
good stuff



Wish I could convey my points this well.