These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hi/Low Fantasy vs. Sci-Fi

First post
Author
Mirajane Cromwell
#21 - 2013-02-11 15:51:31 UTC
ChromeStriker wrote:
Say NO to Orks in space!!!!!!!!!!!

"Oi! Space marine! I'm gonna crush your 'ead and put it on a spike!"

Orcs (or other fantasy elements) do fit scifi games if they're done correctly - WH40K is one good example. Blink
Tazer Ashpool
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-02-11 15:55:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Tazer Ashpool
Kitty Bear wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
Also, fantasy and sci-fi are not the same thing. Fantasy is about alternate worlds. Sci-Fi is about our world. See Star Wars vs Star Trek.


Fantasy is Fiction, because it's non factual.

Sigurd, Arthur, Hercules, Robin Hood are all examples of Fantasy based on legend and mythology.
They all represent ideals to strive for, Sigurd & Hercules are all about heroism and overcoming obstacles, and those 2 tales are seperated by about 3000 years. Arthur & Robin Hood represent tales of virtue, justice and equality seperated by a few hundred years.

Star Trek isn't so very different from the legends of Jason & the Argonauts
Star Wars isn't so very different from the Nibelungenlied

Klingon and Minbari & Elf and Orc are just 4 "non human" races, and Tolkien could have just as easily used Klingon as a descriptive term instead of Orc.



Everyone is same because everyone has to eat and sh**? regardless of fluff?

The fluff in SCI-FI is of couse fluff but it is inspired by our own world and ourselves blowing the boundaries of technology ............Fantasy is based on shooting lightning from your fingertips and slaying dragons and creating new worlds even if you find the "different species and new worlds/planets in SCI-FI it did not start out as that. At the outset SCI-FI was more "authentic "than Fantasy

OF course the two genres has intermingled and so on and so forth..


A rancor =/= a dragon even i the similarties in standing up against one (or a balrog) is very ehm striking.

A story is not so different from antother story...

Game mechanics IMO IS the game the other stuff is just a skin ,(in an avatar sense) the skin itself is mostly art and design but it is pretty much dead and shallow and fluff. and RP. But as every RP knows, rp without game mechanics , but fluff is just theater.
Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#23 - 2013-02-11 16:11:59 UTC
Tazer Ashpool wrote:


A rancor =/= a dragon even i the similarties in standing up against one (or a balrog) is very ehm striking.



No, a rancor is a rancor, the krayt dragon is a dragon. :)

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
#24 - 2013-02-11 16:51:15 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
how about both, with a bit of steampunk mixed?


Guild Wars 2 is a good instance about adding some SF to a fantasy game... They refuse to call it science and it is no science, but the Asura are almost scientists... and frankly, firearms and steam power are an interesting theme for a fantasy game.


TBH, my favorite homebrew D&D games were always the ones that took a mix of fantasy and early science. Think "Most of the world is still in the Renaissance though there are cultures that are definitely in an early industrial age". Magic existing in a campaign setting doesn't mean that basic science can't as well, if you can blend them nicely, all the better.

In closing, Tinkers FTW.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#25 - 2013-02-11 17:00:07 UTC
Science Fiction requires a real life logical explanation, or at least a currently theoretical one, for any of the concepts and actions that are presented.

Fantasy does have that requirement. No Real Life explanations required at all.

This is why "Star Wars" is Space Fantasy and not Science Fiction.

This is why "Game of Thrones" is Fantasy (impossible dragons and extremely variable season lengths but otherwise normal planetary environment).

This is why "Ringworld" is Science Fiction.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Diesel Phumes
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-02-11 17:04:10 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
WoW is not high fantasy.

"Nerd Spectrum" is a meaningless buzzword.

How can anything meaningful be added to this?


Get out much?
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#27 - 2013-02-11 17:58:10 UTC
Mirajane Cromwell wrote:
ChromeStriker wrote:
Say NO to Orks in space!!!!!!!!!!!

"Oi! Space marine! I'm gonna crush your 'ead and put it on a spike!"

Orcs (or other fantasy elements) do fit scifi games if they're done correctly - WH40K is one good example. Blink


I could also see Orcs being based off of reavers from Firefly. At least their barbaric traits and ship style.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Mire Stoude
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-02-11 18:02:03 UTC
Clearly CCP wants to add vampires and werewolves to Eve online eventually.
Ris Dnalor
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2013-02-11 18:14:19 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Since scifi is a subcategory of fantasy, no.
It would be pretty weird if the subset was larger than the superset. Blink



actually he's just talking about one subset being larger than another subset. have another cup of coffee :P

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961

EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody

  • Qolde
Markatta
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2013-02-11 18:17:57 UTC
If Blizzard had released the Starcraft RTS before Warcraft, the OP would probably be asking the inverse question.

Fantasy MMOs seem "successful" only by virtue of WoW's massive popularity - but I'd argue that its popularity is rooted more in a confluence of name recognition, marketing, technological developments, timing, and a healthy dose of luck than in any differences between fantasy and sci-fi.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#31 - 2013-02-11 18:19:27 UTC
Diesel Phumes wrote:
I, personally, love high-fantasy type MMOs above sci-fi type MMOs. If there was a game in existence, which was both a high-fantasy game and had the culture of Eve Online, I would probably be playing it instead.


World of Darkness. It will happen eventually, but I wouldn't hold your breath. Not unless you can hold your breath for more than a year without dying, then you can hold your breath if you like.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#32 - 2013-02-11 18:23:45 UTC
Diesel Phumes wrote:
Do sword-and-board MMOs have t....


Lost interest right about there.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-02-11 18:40:56 UTC
Mire Stoude wrote:
Clearly CCP wants to add vampires and werewolves to Eve online eventually.


I think there's already plenty of folks with pale skin and excessive facial hair in this game.
Warpshade
Warped Industries
#34 - 2013-02-11 18:43:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Warpshade
Imo Sci-FI vs Fantasy is not much of a factor when you look at the past of the industry. Back in 2004 SWG was the highest subscribed MMO with about 400,000 subs peak roughly. When WoW came along, imo it was a very important time in the Industry, It was Sandbox vs Themepark.

SoE could of worked and improved on their sandbox, but as we all know they saw the quick success of WoW and tried to imitate Blizzards formula, forgetting their current customer base, and favoured the pursuit of new customers. You cannot beat WoW, at being WoW! If SoE had stuck to their guns and worked on keeping true to their own Sandbox formula, plus some other shenanigans within SoE; like keeping hold of Raph Koster, I think we could of seen a totally different set of MMO events than what we have had.

WoW had a long time with little competition, to polish and polish their product, all newer MMO's Sci-Fi and Fantasy, pretty much fell on their faces due to the fact, most companies were under the heavy burden of men in suits making the calls; WoW makes Cash, ergo make a WoW clone.

Also most games being rushed and being as complex as MMO's are to make, they were buggy as hell, folk don't like bugs! The common fallacy put forward is; "but WoW has had X amount of years to get that good!!!!", Well so what, you don't compare the history of what a product was like, you compare your product to what the competition currently has. If I started a Car company and wanted to compete against Ford and I started selling a 4 wheel vehicle using a steam engine (well you get the idea) simular to those back in 1806, but charge the same price, then screamed "but Ford has had decades to design theirs!", it just wouldn't wash, and evidently it hasn't washed with the MMO base.

Just look at new games like Minecraft and DayZ, ok they aren't MMO's, but they're Sandboxes and they have become massively popular, for many of the mainstream MMO folk, it's like they just discovered the creation of the first Sandbox.

So to answer your question without a doubt a Sci-Fi MMO could dominate the industry, be it Eve (some day) or another game. Could be Sandbox or Themepark, or hell some totally new format out of my comprehension. Just aslong as it's a quality product that fills the criteria to keep folk entertained.

WoW won its right to capture its portion of the market, but for WoW in my mind, it really was a matter being in the right place, with the right elements that were required at the time, and Blizzard invested in its fan base; Blizzard during the WoW beta, pretty much targeted and scouted leaders of known guilds, and invited them to the beta. Capture the mind of a leader, and they naturally are going to have some kind of charisma or power to interest his members to follow.

All in all, I don't know the hard numbers on which has the highest interest; Sci-Fi, Fantasy or fans that like both genres, but when it comes to the MMO industry, I really think it comes down the products we have been offered and not so much about the genre.

p.s. However I am greatly appreciative that CCP has made the quality product that is Eve and is fun to play!

tl;dr I think the history of MMO's effected the popularity, more so than genres.
Dheeradj Nurgle
Hoover Inc.
Snuffed Out
#35 - 2013-02-11 18:48:06 UTC
ChromeStriker wrote:
Say NO to Orks in space!!!!!!!!!!!



Never enuff DAKKA!
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2013-02-11 19:14:38 UTC
Dheeradj Nurgle wrote:
ChromeStriker wrote:
Say NO to Orks in space!!!!!!!!!!!



Never enuff DAKKA!

ALWAYS MOAR DAKKA!

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Felicity Love
Doomheim
#37 - 2013-02-11 19:33:52 UTC
Diesel Phumes wrote:


The big one: Could a game like Eve Online ever receive more subscriptions than a game like WoW? Could a sci-fi MMO ever dominate the industry?



Very much doubt it.... WoW uses dozens and dozens of distinct servers. Some are dedicated to PVE, some PVP and others are dedicated to geographic regions (for whatever technical and/or customer-driven reasons). To the best of my knowledge, EVE prides itself on using the "one server, one world" approach.

To get anywhere even close to WOW's sub levels CCP's whole corporate "game plan" might need an overhaul.


"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#38 - 2013-02-11 19:40:20 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Since scifi is a subcategory of fantasy...


NO!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Diesel Phumes
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#39 - 2013-02-11 19:45:31 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Diesel Phumes wrote:
Do sword-and-board MMOs have t....


Lost interest right about there.


That's alright little man, you stay in your little world.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#40 - 2013-02-11 20:03:52 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Since scifi is a subcategory of fantasy...


NO!



YES!

Even the most 'realistically justified' SF is considered to be of the fantastical.

There is over 50 years of critical thinking and analysis to back this up.

See Brian W Aldiss' "Trillion Year Spree: A History of Science Fiction". http://www.amazon.com/Trillion-Year-Spree-History-Science/dp/0689118392

My other favorite parallel along these lines is that regular Cinema is actually a subset of Animation.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882