These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE update content
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Rian Kurr
Doomheim
#61 - 2013-02-10 05:56:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Rian Kurr
Yes did write that originally then edited...
Eve ethos..
The game is what the players make it....
Someone wants to add more to the structured single player content...and then gets jumped all over...
Nice sandbox....lol.
How much of low/null is broken because of what the players have made of it...?
What do the non voting 350000 subscribers want in eve?
I vote but super block voting etc ....well its eve..
More single player content can be accommodated...I think the sandbox is big enough.
My point is that you need enough till new players find their way.....more single player content does not have to mean theme park...
SoOza N'GasZ
L F C
Ethereal Dawn
#62 - 2013-02-10 15:57:24 UTC  |  Edited by: SoOza N'GasZ
http://www.ggmania.com/?smsid=34550

Gabe Newell Doesn't Like Steam Greenlight - briefly
(hx) 06:49 AM EST - Feb,10 2013 - Post a comment
Gamasutra is reporting that Gabe Newell is not happy with Steam Greenlight:

"Right now we have inside of Steam we have a dictatorship.

"It's probably bad for the Steam community, in the long run, not to move to a different way of thinking about that. In other words, we should stop being a dictator and move towards much more participatory, peer-based methods of sanctioning player behavior.

"Greenlight is a bad example of an election process. We came to the conclusion pretty quickly that we could just do away with Greenlight

This is a good example for what is happening in a lot of very successfull companies at the moment leading to less and less quality for more money.

just saying .... smells like what almost happend at ccp.

;)

Legba