These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RMTing...

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#181 - 2013-02-06 22:48:04 UTC
Anndy wrote:

yes because getting massive numbers and throwing them all into a single system to create lag is hard, and you wonder why no 1 will play with you


~~goonie lagsploits~~

man hadn't heard that one in ages this brings me back

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.
Anndy
The Evocati
#182 - 2013-02-06 22:49:38 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet the area of space with the highest concentration of bots also contains two of the most popular mission systems

Have we got to the 'CCP are manipulating the figures and lying about the enthusiastic highsec missioners to cover up for the massive nullsec RMT botfarms' part of the delusion yet?


i seriously doubt it

BUT since you decided to bring it up i honestly wouldn't be to surprised, people accused ccp of helping bob for years too and bob said the same things your saying now but look what happened with that, we even got the CSM created in part because of the T20 thing and look who happens to control the CSM now
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#183 - 2013-02-06 22:50:02 UTC
Anndy wrote:
look who happens to control the CSM now


number of goons on the CSM:

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#184 - 2013-02-06 22:50:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
Weaselior wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:

Herp derp, planet Earth to Andski, come in, did i say anomalies.....?

Ratting as in belts, you know. Those belts that have NPC with higher bounties that the NPCs in missions. Those belts that have a chance to spawn some juicy things.

To the other goon above, I also explained my point of view but you clearly missed it, so I won't bother doing it again.

belt ratting is inferior to anomaly ratting in 0.0 and is also competing for limited resources

don't you ever get tired of being wrong


Ah yes, "competing". Clearly there are more empty systems in high than null and clearly a bot can't jump through gates to clear systems, its clearly stuck in that one system. There is also NO way a bot will alert the "player" that there is an officer spawn and there is absolutely NO way that said player can grab a good ship to kill those spawns.

I like how you left out that fact that belt ratting still earns more ISK than missions though. Cause, fark logic.

I am tired, so i bid you all good night :)
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#185 - 2013-02-06 22:50:52 UTC
Anndy wrote:


i seriously doubt it

look who happens to control the CSM now




I give up, who is that?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#186 - 2013-02-06 22:51:37 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Ah yes, "competing". Clearly there are more empty systems in high than null and clearly a bot can't jump through gates to clear systems, its clearly stuck in that one system. There is also NO way a bot will alert the "player" that there is an officer spawn and there is absolutely NO way that said player can grab a good ship to kill those spawns.


since when do you need an empty system in highsec to run missions

mission sites are spawned the moment you warp to agent bookmark, there's no competition over them, period

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Anndy
The Evocati
#187 - 2013-02-06 22:52:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Anndy wrote:


yes because getting massive numbers and throwing them all into a single system to create lag is hard, and you wonder why no 1 will play with you


TiDi stops that from happening and has done for a very long time.


you call November 29, 2011 a very long time?
CynoNet Two
GSF Logistics and Posting Reserves
Goonswarm Federation
#188 - 2013-02-06 22:55:41 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Anndy wrote:


look who happens to control the CSM now



I give up, who is that?


Apathy.

Anndy wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Anndy wrote:


yes because getting massive numbers and throwing them all into a single system to create lag is hard, and you wonder why no 1 will play with you


TiDi stops that from happening and has done for a very long time.


you call November 29, 2011 a very long time?


That's almost 10 dog years!

Also it's longer than you've been making good posts (you don't ever make good posts).
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#189 - 2013-02-06 22:56:23 UTC
Andski wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Ah yes, "competing". Clearly there are more empty systems in high than null and clearly a bot can't jump through gates to clear systems, its clearly stuck in that one system. There is also NO way a bot will alert the "player" that there is an officer spawn and there is absolutely NO way that said player can grab a good ship to kill those spawns.


since when do you need an empty system in highsec to run missions

mission sites are spawned the moment you warp to agent bookmark, there's no competition over them, period


I was so close to logging off and going to bed but you just HAD to post.
Right, stay with me dear Andski, when i am talking about empty systems I mean ratting.

The other goon said that ratting is inferior to anomalies.

BUT, you are still with me right ? BUT there are more empty systems in null that competition does not matter.

It would be funny to see someone run missions in null......it would also make no sense. Again, fark logic.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#190 - 2013-02-06 22:56:49 UTC
Anndy wrote:


you call November 29, 2011 a very long time?


Its 2013.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#191 - 2013-02-06 22:57:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
BUT, you are still with me right ? BUT there are more empty systems in null that competition does not matter.


those systems are empty because they're worthless to rat in, you see

worthless to the point that hisec mission running is literally more lucrative

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#192 - 2013-02-06 22:59:05 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:


I was so close to logging off and going to bed but you just HAD to post.
Right, stay with me dear Andski, when i am talking about empty systems I mean ratting.

The other goon said that ratting is inferior to anomalies.

BUT, you are still with me right ? BUT there are more empty systems in null that competition does not matter.

It would be funny to see someone run missions in null......it would also make no sense. Again, fark logic.


We ran lvl 4s in venal. It made us a lot more than ratting in belts.
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#193 - 2013-02-06 23:02:20 UTC
Anndy wrote:
Scatim Helicon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet the area of space with the highest concentration of bots also contains two of the most popular mission systems

Have we got to the 'CCP are manipulating the figures and lying about the enthusiastic highsec missioners to cover up for the massive nullsec RMT botfarms' part of the delusion yet?


i seriously doubt it

BUT since you decided to bring it up i honestly wouldn't be to surprised, people accused ccp of helping bob for years too and bob said the same things your saying now but look what happened with that, we even got the CSM created in part because of the T20 thing and look who happens to control the CSM now




That's good enough as a "goons r ccmcsprmt" for me.

I got GD idiot bingo. I win.

Also reported for rumour-mongering.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal
Anndy
The Evocati
#194 - 2013-02-06 23:06:51 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Anndy wrote:


you call November 29, 2011 a very long time?


Its 2013.


yep and 16 months ago it was Nov 2011, now i wonder how exactly the map looked back then??? oh wait i already know
Malik Doom
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#195 - 2013-02-06 23:07:29 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Anndy wrote:
Scatim Helicon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet the area of space with the highest concentration of bots also contains two of the most popular mission systems

Have we got to the 'CCP are manipulating the figures and lying about the enthusiastic highsec missioners to cover up for the massive nullsec RMT botfarms' part of the delusion yet?


i seriously doubt it

BUT since you decided to bring it up i honestly wouldn't be to surprised, people accused ccp of helping bob for years too and bob said the same things your saying now but look what happened with that, we even got the CSM created in part because of the T20 thing and look who happens to control the CSM now




That's good enough as a "goons r ccmcsprmt" for me.

I got GD idiot bingo. I win.

Also reported for rumour-mongering.




LMAO
Anndy
The Evocati
#196 - 2013-02-06 23:10:21 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Anndy wrote:
Scatim Helicon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet the area of space with the highest concentration of bots also contains two of the most popular mission systems

Have we got to the 'CCP are manipulating the figures and lying about the enthusiastic highsec missioners to cover up for the massive nullsec RMT botfarms' part of the delusion yet?


i seriously doubt it

BUT since you decided to bring it up i honestly wouldn't be to surprised, people accused ccp of helping bob for years too and bob said the same things your saying now but look what happened with that, we even got the CSM created in part because of the T20 thing and look who happens to control the CSM now




That's good enough as a "goons r ccmcsprmt" for me.

I got GD idiot bingo. I win.

Also reported for rumour-mongering.



meh they called it rumor-mongering with bob too
Xinivrae
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#197 - 2013-02-06 23:11:00 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:

I like watching you post.

You've gone from some self proclaimed highsec carebear who claims to know very little about bots, to a supposed mastermind who can detail the most efficient use of bots in nullsec.

Amazing.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#198 - 2013-02-06 23:13:28 UTC
Anndy wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Anndy wrote:


you call November 29, 2011 a very long time?


Its 2013.


yep and 16 months ago it was Nov 2011, now i wonder how exactly the map looked back then??? oh wait i already know


Ah 16 months ago. When the evil russian supercarrier blob was about to wipe out all of null sec and the only hope was the hero goons who made their stand in VFK agaist a force that wiped out NC in a matter of weeks.

My how evil empires change.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#199 - 2013-02-06 23:18:25 UTC
Anndy wrote:
Varius Xeral wrote:
Anndy wrote:
Scatim Helicon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet the area of space with the highest concentration of bots also contains two of the most popular mission systems

Have we got to the 'CCP are manipulating the figures and lying about the enthusiastic highsec missioners to cover up for the massive nullsec RMT botfarms' part of the delusion yet?


i seriously doubt it

BUT since you decided to bring it up i honestly wouldn't be to surprised, people accused ccp of helping bob for years too and bob said the same things your saying now but look what happened with that, we even got the CSM created in part because of the T20 thing and look who happens to control the CSM now




That's good enough as a "goons r ccmcsprmt" for me.

I got GD idiot bingo. I win.

Also reported for rumour-mongering.



meh they called it rumor-mongering with bob too

And because of the BoB thing created a team whos sole purpose is to prevent that from happening again.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#200 - 2013-02-06 23:18:52 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Whatayoke wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Whatayoke wrote:
1. Find out how much marauders/any good L4 ships do an hour.
2. a is the amount from 1. a * 23 = b, profit per day
3. b * 30 = c, profit per month
4. lets say an RMTer runs 40 copies of eve in highsec: c * 40, profit from 40 copies per month
5. question solved?



You make way more in good areas of null... so no. Not at all. Nice try though.

But this can be done by any guy, you dont need to have connections to stay/live in 0.0 or something. Just all by yourself


Yes, any guy can bot rat in an empty spot of nullsec and make way more isk then missions.




I've popped into nullsec systems from wormholes and have actually seen the quintessential "Ratting Carrier".


Bring back DEEEEP Space!