These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

What is the goal of nerfing? and why should a new player get excited about this game?

Author
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-02-05 06:30:03 UTC
Kaethe Kollwitz wrote:
nerfing. I once knew someone that quit playing having spent months training for a Gallente T2 BC that then got nerfed. True story.

That said, nerfing is good. It accomplishes the following:

deters players from training FOTM
stops weapon power creep through buffs

nerfs are nearly always better than buffs in this game.

shouldn't be only nerfs tho.

tbh I prefer buffs to nerfs, but I do consider nerfs to be a necessary evil.


biggest issue I have with nerfs however is not the nerfs themselves, but how CCP usually handles them. many times nerfing one aspect of the game totally breaks another one, or is either too inconsequential, or they nerf it so hard it makes them useless. nano nerf is one of such cases. while it was necessary, it broke blaster ships so hard it took some 2 years to fix them, and even then it's still not perfect.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Archer Codename Duchess
Doomheim
#22 - 2013-02-05 06:33:28 UTC
Caldari isn't good at pvp? Thank God. I would still like the double nerf on the tengu it's currently OP in relation to other Caldari ships.
Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
#23 - 2013-02-05 06:34:57 UTC
Airmid Abellio wrote:
As I browse the forums I read post after post of the player base that is extremely unhappy with the recent nerfs/future nerfs occurring in this game.


Browse the forums of any other PVP game and you will see the same thing.

Sometimes the complaints of nerfs are justified, but very rarely. It is much more common that a player wants to retain his powerful item/skill/position/etc. or that the player has become so accustomed to such an imbalanced game mechanic that he no longer realizes how imbalanced it is.


Apocryphal Noise
The Harpooner's Rest
#24 - 2013-02-05 06:49:20 UTC
Power creep man
Hir Miriel
Elves In Space
#25 - 2013-02-05 06:56:47 UTC
Gamers game.

They will find the best ratio of minimum effort, maximum reward for themselves.

So gameplay tends to cluster on certain parts of any game.

To help all game content be used devs have to go through and tweak content, much like a regular service for your car.

(Actually the real reason is that nerfs are minor tweaks to keep game devs busy so they don't introduce revolutionary game destroying content. Shhh. Keep it secret.)

~ ~~ Thinking inside Schrodinger's sandbox. ~~ ~

SmilingVagrant
Doomheim
#26 - 2013-02-05 22:25:43 UTC
Archer Codename Duchess wrote:
Caldari isn't good at pvp? Thank God. I would still like the double nerf on the tengu it's currently OP in relation to other Caldari ships.


The tengu is pretty well in line with the other T3's now. Maybe you should be calling for buffs for the garbage ships.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#27 - 2013-02-05 22:58:23 UTC
That's a whole lot of nerfs to keep track of.

I always wondered what a nerf herder was... now I know.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

NEONOVUS
Mindstar Technology
Goonswarm Federation
#28 - 2013-02-06 05:08:54 UTC
SmilingVagrant wrote:
Archer Codename Duchess wrote:
Caldari isn't good at pvp? Thank God. I would still like the double nerf on the tengu it's currently OP in relation to other Caldari ships.


The tengu is pretty well in line with the other T3's now. Maybe you should be calling for buffs for the garbage ships.

Listen to the Goon he speaks what we are all thinking!
And seriously is that blonde hair or did you get an eggshell stuck on your head?
You never answered last time.
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#29 - 2013-02-06 08:31:02 UTC  |  Edited by: JC Anderson
One of the primary reasons I trained all four races frigate, cruiser, and BS to 5 was so that I'd be able to fly whatever the current fotm is and to have options whenever a nerf comes along.

I suggest most people should do the same. Makes things much easier in the long run.
Doctor Ungabungas
Doomheim
#30 - 2013-02-06 10:33:09 UTC
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:
Nerfing is the sad, misguided attempt to make things that are not equal...equal. Unfortunately, more often than not, it breaks some things, or removes a niche use from a ship or mod, essentially rendering it useless. Some nerfs are necessary, yes, but a good three-quarters are knee-jerk reactions by CCP in response to a chicken little, easy mode, strawman argument.


Oh yeah? I heard that nine elevenths weren't all those things.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#31 - 2013-02-06 14:38:07 UTC
I'm of the opinion that when someone comes to the forums and raises an issue on the premise that it "hurts new player" that that individual is full of ****.

They're just upset that whatever overpowered thing they were using or doing got nerfed.

Especially when everything CCP has done over the years has been nothing but good for new players.

Not to mention almost everything the op listed has nothing to do with "new players".
Akiyo Mayaki
Perkone
Caldari State
#32 - 2013-02-06 14:40:25 UTC
Some things are buffed too, but people tend to care only about what is nerfed.

No

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#33 - 2013-02-06 15:03:56 UTC
Balancing for dummies:

nerf something
buff something
profit

.

Mathrin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2013-02-06 16:59:04 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
CCP should nerf threads that have to do with nerfing.


OP made a thread about a bunch of nerfs. Does this make him a nerf herder?
Mathrin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2013-02-06 17:01:48 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
That's a whole lot of nerfs to keep track of.

I always wondered what a nerf herder was... now I know.


Dang it. Should have read page two before posting haha
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#36 - 2013-02-06 18:43:12 UTC
Mathrin wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
CCP should nerf threads that have to do with nerfing.


OP made a thread about a bunch of nerfs. Does this make him a nerf herder?

Looks kinda scruffy, too.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Archer Codename Duchess
Doomheim
#37 - 2013-02-07 05:37:56 UTC
SmilingVagrant wrote:
Archer Codename Duchess wrote:
Caldari isn't good at pvp? Thank God. I would still like the double nerf on the tengu it's currently OP in relation to other Caldari ships.


The tengu is pretty well in line with the other T3's now. Maybe you should be calling for buffs for the garbage ships.


Maybe I should.....but instead I'm calling for you to gag on a meat puppet.
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#38 - 2013-02-07 05:55:29 UTC
I don't hate nerfing. I hate when they nerf the wrong things.

The 2 most broken things in the game are 1) off-grid links and 2) movement options for the 'blob'

If CCP wants to nerf something, why haven't they nerfed either of those?

You nerfed my solo tengu, I can live with that if you also nerf the blue donut. Oh wait, half of CCP is ex-goon, I guess that won't happen anytime soon.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#39 - 2013-02-07 06:02:56 UTC
Off-grid links will be nerfed first by reducing the max bonus to 3%, and they will remove off-grid links the moment they find a technical solution (according to Fozzie the actual code implementation is the only thing holding back OGB nerf).

But what are these "wrong things they nerfed"? Is that an objective "wrong", or just Tengu-related?

.

Sky Marshal
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2013-02-07 06:09:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Sky Marshal
Nerfs are the "easy way" for a video game company to contentate some players or "correct" some broken gameplay rules.

Unfortunately we are speaking about CCP, and that is why nerfs are bad. Most of the time, they nerf too hard and the worst consequence of this is that they remove diversity from the game because they make their "victim" useless by doing it. Also, they are proud of their nerfs and refuse to correct when it is wrong, and even if they want to correct sometimes, their patching politic make it nearly impossible.

There was speed tanking in Eve. Pretty overpowered in his time yes, but they couldn't easily kill big ships and it required to be specialized. They nerfed it so much that it was removed from Eve until the boost of afterburners who permit to do some kind of speed tanking, but still now it is mostly buffer tanked blobs...

Today, when we speak about some modules like Remote Sensor Dampener or Nosferatus etc, most of the players don't know that this modules exist. They was nerfed too, and too much of course.

And one big exemple of broken gameplay nerfing was the so-called "amarr boost". To boost Amarr weapons, they removed some resistance points on the shield (explosive) and on armor (EM), this on mostly all ships of ALL races... but by doing that, they made a boost of Amarr AND Matar, and they nerfed more the shield than the armor giving so a kick to Caldari. Of course, players told them what was flawed in it, but CCP are/was too proud to make few correction to make it ok... Why just boost Amarr ammunitions when you can nerf everything ?

And last exemple, if I remember well, the Quantum expansion made some changes on missiles. Not really bad changes, but the rockets was hit too hard that they was nearly totaly broken. CCP corrected it... nearly FOUR YEARS after the release of the expansion, even if they knew it from the beginning... The trouble of the update politic of CCP is that there is a risk that they forget some needed balancing changes, or at best, don't permit them to make it fastly. If only there was frequent, small patchs dedicated to balancing, it wouldn't be a problem.

Now there are about to give ships a "role" and balancing the game this way, making a ship in a category pretty much the same than the ones of the others races. I can understand that, as they made too much bad nerfs before that they don't have a choice, it would require too much time to correct everything they broke.

The trouble is not about nerfing, as it is needed to permit some needed corrections with small time and effort. It is about nerfing BY CCP.
Previous page123Next page