These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Has forum discussion ever resulted in a major change in EvE's gameplay?

Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#21 - 2013-02-03 09:27:20 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.


They were. The problem is that CCP were fooled into thinking the mack needed an EHP buff. They were also fooled into thinking a tanked exhumer/barge was profitable to gank.
Ai Shun
#22 - 2013-02-03 09:51:28 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I'm sitting here typing like mad on occasion and it dawned on me. Only a fraction of the game population uses the forums for various personal reasons and is only logical that CCP not use the forums to make drastic game changes.


Where is Walking in Stations?
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#23 - 2013-02-03 10:22:56 UTC
CCP uses the forums all the time, but their decisions aren't determined solely by them nor are their priorities. This doesn't mean forums can't greatly influence that decision making or raise issues to urgent priorities. More often it's a case of CCP deciding to tackle some issue or feature and using the existing forum discussions as a tool to gauge peoples reaction, argument for and against, get feedback and get ideas. Forum discussion also lets us to spread ideas among ourselves, which can then influence CCP through outside channels. It's a powerful tool for spreading your ideas, but ignoring other information sources and relying solely on forum noise would be a pretty dumb thing for CCP to do.

For example the clone system, both medical and jump, will be reworked at some point. CCP will be the one to determine the goals of that change, but even that will be partly based on the discussions people have had about those system and the means to achieve them will certainly be influenced by forum discussions about them. It's just unrealistic to expect a forum discussion to immediately lead to drastic changes to the game even if every player and every devs reading it agreed on an issue. There are hundreds of good ideas and thousands of bad ones being suggested and CCP can maybe tackle a few dozen of them per expansion.

A lot of ideas do get to be implemented even if the method isn't exactly what was suggested. Just from the top of my head Wormhole space as it is in the game today was requested many years before it was implemented. The skillqueue was debated for years on a constant basis before the pressure mounted enough for CCP to get around to adding it. Getting CCP to nerf nanofags was also a glorious moment in forum drama. Changing the mission agents system from the old complex/random one to a system close the the current one was suggested by many. I'm sure large number of the changes made to the game have been influenced by the forums in one form or another.

I think it pretty clear, that the forums have a great influence on how this game is being developed. It just doesn't mean CCP relies only on the forums to make design decisions or that every stupid idea that gets spammed over and over again is ever going to be implemented. Genuinely good ideas tend to get integrated to the game in some form sooner or later though.
Turelus
Utassi Security
#24 - 2013-02-03 10:23:24 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs

Miners complained about dying, CCP took the chance to make all mining ships have their own roles and rework the entire ship line... miners still get ganked every day... sound like a happy ending to me!

Now if only instead of complaining about how goons have ruined eve and non-reinforced nodes can't support 2700poeple in lowsec people would complain about something which could lead to a change.

Turelus CEO Utassi Security

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#25 - 2013-02-03 10:26:07 UTC
The Device

It does stuff.
Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
#26 - 2013-02-03 10:29:00 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs
I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.
They were. The problem is that CCP were fooled into thinking the mack needed an EHP buff. They were also fooled into thinking a tanked exhumer/barge was profitable to gank.
No, what some people tried to fool them into thinking, was that people really cared if it was a couple of million below or above the profitability line to gank them.

"No CCP, really, if people go full tank we wont destroyer-gank just for lulz. We swear! Please!" Roll
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#27 - 2013-02-03 10:34:27 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


Worst then then the EHP buff is the ridiculous new Ore Cargo hold.

The Ore Thief career is extinct.

The Tears Must Flow

Dave Stark
#28 - 2013-02-03 10:35:52 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


shame they totally failed at rebalancing the ships, though.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#29 - 2013-02-03 10:43:38 UTC
Pohbis wrote:
No, what some people tried to fool them into thinking, was that people really cared if it was a couple of million below or above the profitability line to gank them.

"No CCP, really, if people go full tank we wont destroyer-gank just for lulz. We swear! Please!" Roll


Funny how the ganking more or less vanished when it became unprofitable to do.
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2013-02-03 10:58:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Akita's "thousand papercuts" project had a massive influence on EVE.

Maybe not one massive change to EVE's core gameplay but many, many small changes that affected overall gameplay significantly.

.

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2013-02-03 11:24:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
an example that is probably more along the lines of what OP is thinking about (a forum outcry that actually changed ccp's opinion on some issue) would be "free ccp abathur"

(also shows that ccp is not one monolithic entity and that whatever the players are asking for generally already has some supporters within ccp - but the forums can influence which faction inside the company gains the upper hand)

.

Gerard Hareka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-02-03 11:34:37 UTC
Yes

All the carebaers whining makes game safer and safer.
All the goons trolling stop any change in 0.0 mechanics and status Quo.

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#33 - 2013-02-03 11:50:54 UTC
Lets see here, the Nano Nerf came about because of the players posting.

Supercarriers and Titan changes recently were due to the players posting complaints.


About 4 years ago they tried to put in a change to supers that got about 100 pages in 24 hours, the change was scrapped.


The dumping of Incarna was due largely to actions and forum efforts by players.


You see a long long time ago, the Devs used to be MUCH more active in and around the forums, they were regular posters and one could ask a question and actually get a Dev response within a few days.

With Nathan moving on and some of the older devs stepping back, as well as the size of the game increasing so much most of that is gone the way of the dodo, but yes, the forums do help give CCP ideas and let them know things that players want and or need.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
#34 - 2013-02-03 11:56:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Pohbis
baltec1 wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
No, what some people tried to fool them into thinking, was that people really cared if it was a couple of million below or above the profitability line to gank them.

"No CCP, really, if people go full tank we wont destroyer-gank just for lulz. We swear! Please!" Roll


Funny how the ganking more or less vanished when it became unprofitable to do.
Funny how you skate over the "couple of million" part.

If you want to continue arguing that it was done for the chance of a measy profit, and not because it was a low-cost, low-effort way to get some lulz, please, go ahead.

We both know that it hasn't dropped significantly because it became unprofitable, but because it became too unprofitable. More importantly, it requires more people, hence ::effort::, now.

But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits Roll
Vexen Lyre
Doomheim
#35 - 2013-02-03 12:53:07 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers?

you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary.

Docked in Jita - Moon 4 - Caldari Navy Assembly Plant

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#36 - 2013-02-03 12:59:20 UTC
Pohbis wrote:
But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits Roll


Hulkageddon was about profits. Besides the prizes on offer to the gankers, and the wonderful benefits to hulk manufacturers, the people holding Technetium moons made even more ludicrous profits than normal. When the prizes and bounties were available, ganking increased. When the money disappeared, the ganking decreased.

But please, explain to me how Hulkageddon was not about profits.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#37 - 2013-02-03 13:00:28 UTC
Vexen Lyre wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


I thought it was because your alliance sponsored a massive in-game event that demonstrated just how easy and cheap it was to gank barges with T1 destroyers?

you burned that candle to a stump, meight. that's why they buffed barges, forum whine was mostly ancillary.


You abuse it, you lose it. Miners should be thanking goons for their EHP boost.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2013-02-03 13:05:40 UTC
I would have to disagree that discussions limited to the forum ever got anything changed in Eve. To my knowledge all changes occurred in this order:

1) Whine threads ad nauseam. To which CCP's reply was typically, "We value you as a loyal customer. Here's a rubik's cube, now go F*$( yourself.

2) Subs start to drop.

3) CCP makes changes.

The changes to the barges cited as a change due to discussion can be directly correlated to YEARS of whine threads discussing how no tank could be successfully added to them without ganking their ability to mine making some non-mining ships competitive w/ better tanks. Coupled with this were years to whine threads about being ganked so easily. And finally, at the height of the gankage dedicated miners just dropping subs. I know many who left and were never seen again because CCP continued to ignore the rampant abuse of miners on multiple fronts:bots, ganking, etc.


Don't ban me, bro!

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
#39 - 2013-02-03 13:10:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Pohbis
Mara Rinn wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
But go on, keep explaining to us how Hulkageddon was all about profits Roll
But please, explain to me how Hulkageddon was not about profits.
Oh dear Lord.

Does the fact that it required a 3rd party to sponsor the event for it to become profitable for the people doing the ganking, give you any sort of clue you might apply to this discussion?

....

No? I'll give you a hint: People never ganked barges because it was profitable.
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2013-02-03 13:15:18 UTC
Mr Kidd wrote:
I would have to disagree that discussions limited to the forum ever got anything changed in Eve. To my knowledge all changes occurred in this order:

1) Whine threads ad nauseam. To which CCP's reply was typically, "We value you as a loyal customer. Here's a rubik's cube, now go F*$( yourself.

2) Subs start to drop.

3) CCP makes changes.

The changes to the barges cited as a change due to discussion can be directly correlated to YEARS of whine threads discussing how no tank could be successfully added to them without ganking their ability to mine making some non-mining ships competitive w/ better tanks. Coupled with this were years to whine threads about being ganked so easily. And finally, at the height of the gankage dedicated miners just dropping subs. I know many who left and were never seen again because CCP continued to ignore the rampant abuse of miners on multiple fronts:bots, ganking, etc.



Grath and me already mentioned it above - the implementation of Abathur's changes to supercapitals over Nozh's plan (never not target paint motherships) was - as far as anyone can tell - only due to massive forum outrage.

As the whole controversy happened before any changes were deployed to TQ it seems unlikely that cancelled subscriptions played a role in CCP's decision.

.