These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anonymity For CSM: Common Sense And Safety.

First post First post First post
Author
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#181 - 2013-02-21 20:24:31 UTC
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#182 - 2013-02-21 21:11:57 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.

Why?

What do they base that one??


That sounds like a crock of cow patties to me, even if somebody appeared in those why does it need to be more than the in game name, thats still not an answer, its shifting the cop out somewhere else.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#183 - 2013-02-22 04:18:35 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.

Why?

What do they base that one??


That sounds like a crock of cow patties to me, even if somebody appeared in those why does it need to be more than the in game name, thats still not an answer, its shifting the cop out somewhere else.


Well one would say EVE-TV or EON are pretty well made, respectable media. If CCP thinks you are worthy to put on their media sites and streams. They would not think anyone would try to harm you. Since you should be a cool person.

I mean we see EVE as a tainted place, so we have to watch out. But CCP sees some EVE and their media as being blessed moonwells, where no one can taint them. If the moonwells aren't tainted, why should they worry? Its a good thought, most people just troll the people on those sites or shows, but nothing ever serious really before. I mean in a serious way, the worse there could be is protesters showing up.




EDIT: Sorry for the WoW references, or am I?...........

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Scooter McCabe
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#184 - 2013-02-22 06:07:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Scooter McCabe
Okay even if CCP puts someone on TV how hard is it to only identify that person as CSM [Your Character Name Here]? Further more does anyone actually know CCP Xhagen's name? I mean if CCP Xhagen is working with the CSM and its such a core requirement for the CSM to have their public names outed publicly, why not him? He gets paid by CCP and the CSM's are just volunteers and they have a higher burden by having to put their names out there. I mean really he doesn't have to worry about harassing phone calls because he doesn't have to hang his full name out there.

As far as CCP Xhagen will go. He converses openly with EVE players, self identifies as CCP Xhagen but doesn't go so far as to share his full name. Why? He is using his CCP title which is owned by CCP in his tweeter feed. He publicly makes declaration for anyone to find, albeit only his first name.

If CCP won't share the burden that it asks of its CSM members then that burden should not be placed upon those in the CSM. Clearly if CCP Xhagen felt completely safe and believed in "the police will protect you" argument he would toss his name out there like he tossed himself out their in drag. I will give him props he can rock a bra better than I can, but still the fact remains we have a serious hypocrisy taking place here.

Further more I will call CCP Xhagen's attention back to the legal concern here. If CCP Xhagen is taking precautions here that he won't afford to the volunteers that make up the CSM some lawyer will eat CCP alive in an eventual lawsuit. I get why CCP Xhagen states he wants "behavioral controls" on CSM members but its wrong. The people elect who they think will best represent them and when you actively go out of your way to limit the pool from which the player base can elect people because of candidate intimidation then you are wrong, and you are defeating the purpose of the CSM.

As it stands we have had CSM members stalked, had their pets threatened and CCP has shown a depraved indifference by not being proactive on the matter. No one is asking CCP to anything they don't already do, or for that matter what CCP Xhagen does for himself in shielding his full name. CCP doesn't enable someone harassing a CCP employee because its not that hard to look up someone in the Icelandic phonebook, but CCP will enable a CSM member to be harassed because their full name and nationality can be tossed out there.

The game EVE is based on ethical shades of grey because that's part of theme to the game. Real life is black and white, there is right and wrong. If you're extending protection for some, denying it to others and ignoring harm by making prima facie arguments where do you think that stacks up in the right versus wrong column?
Scooter McCabe
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#185 - 2013-02-22 06:50:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Scooter McCabe
Further more I would call attention to the irony of CCP Xhangen's Twitter background of Boxxy. If he understood what can happen when someone gets a hold of your personal information I don't think he would use her as his background.


http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/boxxy
(May need to copy paste link its buggy apparently)

Further reading on how serious this actually got.

His background is Che Guevara Boxxy. A girl that got stalked off the internet because people got their hands on her information. Its hypocritical to talk about player safety being accounted for and then having the background image of the poster child for the dangers of the wrong information getting into the wrong hands.

I believe every player, employee and person related to EVE Online, CCP and the CSM deserves the same level of privacy and protection. I condemn in the strongest terms someone who DOXes private information of anyone, as a community we should afford each other privacy. In game you can scam, grief, marketeer and blow each other up to your hearts content. I'm steadfast in my belief that most of you are decent human beings of sound mind and body in real life, but not all of you. Its that small group we are protecting against, its not a condemnation of the player base at large. I hope CCP Xhagen will see this and consider the argument on its merit and not as a personal attack, its not meant to be that. It is however meant to be a strong argument that encourages a deeper reflection of the issue than what has occurred several pages earlier.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#186 - 2013-02-22 07:00:48 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
Well I am sure his mom knows, his real life name. And isn't that enough for the most part?

Also your second link doesn't work, only links to this thread. (EDI: ah I used the untested open link option that shows up when I highlighted it, was hoping to do what you reposted. Suppose my skills are rusty.)

Also I am not catching the Boxxy part, it seems like a normal picture of Che Guevara, which a lot of people find popular. And as long as he is using it for a background instead of a T-shirt, shouldn't we all be thankful?

My internet sources came up with his first name as Petur. My guess its icelandic for Peter. Judging from popular Icelandic last names I will go with Petur longmountain, Petur Oceanbreeze or Petur hurfelssensdeightakdhftiagdsonsonsonsonadondft.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#187 - 2013-02-22 07:06:38 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
If I had enough underground computer resources available, that included a Twitter account, I might be tempted to ask for his real name I suppose. Or is that gonna be too dastardly to keep a teen rating on the forums?

Actually too distracted now, Yes, life complete, a picture of a man in the leia outfit while also having a pink mohawk. Life complete, underground connection and computer destroyed.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#188 - 2013-02-22 07:14:42 UTC
Scooter McCabe wrote:
Further more I would call attention to the irony of CCP Xhangen's Twitter background of Boxxy. If he understood what can happen when someone gets a hold of your personal information I don't think he would use her as his background.


http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/boxxy
(May need to copy paste link its buggy apparently)

Further reading on how serious this actually got.

His background is Che Guevara Boxxy. A girl that got stalked off the internet because people got their hands on her information. Its hypocritical to talk about player safety being accounted for and then having the background image of the poster child for the dangers of the wrong information getting into the wrong hands.

I believe every player, employee and person related to EVE Online, CCP and the CSM deserves the same level of privacy and protection. I condemn in the strongest terms someone who DOXes private information of anyone, as a community we should afford each other privacy. In game you can scam, grief, marketeer and blow each other up to your hearts content. I'm steadfast in my belief that most of you are decent human beings of sound mind and body in real life, but not all of you. Its that small group we are protecting against, its not a condemnation of the player base at large. I hope CCP Xhagen will see this and consider the argument on its merit and not as a personal attack, its not meant to be that. It is however meant to be a strong argument that encourages a deeper reflection of the issue than what has occurred several pages earlier.


Well CCP Xhagen his link does go straight to porno. You are gonna have to work very hard to defeat Scooter McGabe now.

You tried to trick us with your fancy star wars, and hair coloring technology, but boobs are boobs, and no one can defeat them.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#189 - 2013-02-22 07:18:45 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
Also like Scooter I stand against this moral outrage, of forcing us to come out with real life names, when CCP doesn't have to.

But they also go so far to create events (Described on the twitter account as for icelanders only, no one else included.) then when I try to read more about it, he Visually encrypted the whole page so I cannot read it or attempt to crash his party.

The dire evidence

How far will they push us, when they don't even follow their own rules!!!!!!!

EDIT: Okay, I found it, a part wasn't encrypted, thank god. Its the Lebowski bar. the Lebowski bar, now we know everything.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Scooter McCabe
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#190 - 2013-02-22 07:24:04 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Also like Scooter I stand against this moral outrage, of forcing us to come out with real life names, when CCP doesn't have to.

But they also go so far to create events (Described on the twitter account as for icelanders only, no one else included.) then when I try to read more about it, he Visually encrypted the whole page so I cannot read it or attempt to crash his party.

The dire evidence

How far will they push us, when they don't even follow their own rules!!!!!!!

EDIT: Okay, I found it, a part wasn't encrypted, thank god. Its the Lebowski bar. the Lebowski bar, now we know everything.


Go to bed you're drunk or going a little crazy due to lack of sleep.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#191 - 2013-02-22 07:26:20 UTC
Scooter McCabe wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Also like Scooter I stand against this moral outrage, of forcing us to come out with real life names, when CCP doesn't have to.

But they also go so far to create events (Described on the twitter account as for icelanders only, no one else included.) then when I try to read more about it, he Visually encrypted the whole page so I cannot read it or attempt to crash his party.

The dire evidence

How far will they push us, when they don't even follow their own rules!!!!!!!

EDIT: Okay, I found it, a part wasn't encrypted, thank god. Its the Lebowski bar. the Lebowski bar, now we know everything.


Go to bed you're drunk or going a little crazy due to lack of sleep.


Aw, come on, just having some fun.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Styx Sertan
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#192 - 2013-02-22 08:13:02 UTC
Scooter McCabe wrote:
There are a number of safety issues being ignored, and few common sense justifications for not maintaining a CSM's anonymity.

I do believe people trying to swat The Mittani was pretty much a perfect example of a common sense justification
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#193 - 2013-02-22 08:48:05 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Well I am sure his mom knows, his real life name. And isn't that enough for the most part?


It sure is and it should be good enough for the candidates too.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Forlorn Wongraven
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#194 - 2013-02-22 09:43:04 UTC
For legal reason CCP should have a copy of the passport of a candidate. I don't think that the voters need to know the real name of a person if the candidate doesn't want to.

Winner ATXI , 3rd place ATXII, winner ATXIII, 2nd ATXIV - follow me on twitter: @ForlornW

Shadoo
North Eastern Swat
#195 - 2013-02-22 18:17:45 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.


And that's not true -- we never agreed as part of EVE-TV signup to be referred by our real-life identities. And why would anyone ask for that -- since we were there as representatives of the game player community commentating on events occurring in a game player eSport event.

All people are asking here is that the CSM process is a fair, balanced body of GAME PLAYERS -- and all people are asking for is that CCP does not make an official link between an in-game character and a player body representative. You can include in the private NDA/Legal agreements a paragraph about how CCP is not responsible for your real-life identity all you want to cover the legal aspects.

Unless, CCP Hagen, your reason to publish the RL identities have nothing to do with legal requirements - but more to do with ensuring potential future Game Industry employees "behave" and do not break their NDAs. Because this -- this I would understand. I would hope by now it's very obvious there have been, and there will always be very good candidates who this disclosure will restrict from applying - and so it'd be good to give it to those people straight if there are actual reasons for you to require this official disclosure of identity.
Lallante
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
#196 - 2013-02-22 18:42:30 UTC
At the very least this topic needs to be properly discussed again at the next CSM meeting, with someone who knows what they are talking about advocating the anonymity position.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#197 - 2013-02-22 19:06:09 UTC
Shadoo wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.


And that's not true -- we never agreed as part of EVE-TV signup to be referred by our real-life identities. And why would anyone ask for that -- since we were there as representatives of the game player community commentating on events occurring in a game player eSport event.

All people are asking here is that the CSM process is a fair, balanced body of GAME PLAYERS -- and all people are asking for is that CCP does not make an official link between an in-game character and a player body representative. You can include in the private NDA/Legal agreements a paragraph about how CCP is not responsible for your real-life identity all you want to cover the legal aspects.

Unless, CCP Hagen, your reason to publish the RL identities have nothing to do with legal requirements - but more to do with ensuring potential future Game Industry employees "behave" and do not break their NDAs. Because this -- this I would understand. I would hope by now it's very obvious there have been, and there will always be very good candidates who this disclosure will restrict from applying - and so it'd be good to give it to those people straight if there are actual reasons for you to require this official disclosure of identity.


Well I think this and Lallante's comments are very good comments. The problem I see though, that once an anonymous supporter successfully proves their point. CCP just isn't gonna accept the world is ******, so they shouldn't have any rules or standards.

Most likely they are gonna want to combat how bad it is, then reinstate their rules.

So far it seems two groups keep people from the CSM. The criminals in a way, as well as peer pressure or wanting a business relationship. (Hopefully someone can add other reasons to it as well.)

So if the anonymous viewpoint won, CCP would try to address how bad the criminals, blackmail, stalking and threats are. As well as how a business would take it learning about how they play so much EVE. Or even how a relative would take it learning a member of their family plays so much EVE, or how seriously they take it.

I mean maybe a anonymous person could run for the CSM, but if they take the easy road, and don't even try to address the hard issues, like the ones above, it will be hard to take them seriously at all.

(Personally I feel the business relations one is very strong or too big, to make much leeway, so I don't have too much hope in that regards personally, but other players probably will have more experience then I do.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#198 - 2013-02-23 07:48:31 UTC
Shadoo wrote:


Unless, CCP Hagen, your reason to publish the RL identities have nothing to do with legal requirements - but more to do with ensuring potential future Game Industry employees "behave" and do not break their NDAs. Because this -- this I would understand. I would hope by now it's very obvious there have been, and there will always be very good candidates who this disclosure will restrict from applying - and so it'd be good to give it to those people straight if there are actual reasons for you to require this official disclosure of identity.


Well do you find it important that Game Industry (Employees is almost too strong of a word) "behave"?

Also if you do agree, what do you know about those very good candidates, that show they would behave well if elected?

I mean it does seem awfully strong to publish a persons real life name. Who knows if anything can ever measure up to how strong that is.

But I don't have anything to compare really, so it would be interesting to see some examples.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#199 - 2013-02-23 17:33:24 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.

The BBC and MSNBC have run eve articles where they interviewed players and used only their in-game names.

I'm pretty sure if they can do it, then no one is going to give a **** what EON do or don't publish.

This argument is junk.

Speaking of the media, CCP really need to consider what happens if someone is harassed 'IRL' due to them being a CSM; no matter what legal position CCP think they're sitting on the media will take a **** on CCP like you wouldn't believe if they tied the release of personal information by CCP and the harassment as an inevitable consequence of it (which it is, by the way, it has already happened).
CCP commenting and saying "but we always do this because we are creating accountability" is just not going to win that one.
I'm being sarcastic. If anything serious happened and someone passed Xhagen's quote to the press there would be no end to the flames it would cause.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#200 - 2013-02-24 03:54:46 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Lallante wrote:
I'm keen to see if CCP has anything else to say now I've called out their legal argument.
Their argument is now based on media. Since a CSM member may appear on EVE-TV or EON magazine, your real-life identity must be known.

The BBC and MSNBC have run eve articles where they interviewed players and used only their in-game names.

I'm pretty sure if they can do it, then no one is going to give a **** what EON do or don't publish.

This argument is junk.

Speaking of the media, CCP really need to consider what happens if someone is harassed 'IRL' due to them being a CSM; no matter what legal position CCP think they're sitting on the media will take a **** on CCP like you wouldn't believe if they tied the release of personal information by CCP and the harassment as an inevitable consequence of it (which it is, by the way, it has already happened).
CCP commenting and saying "but we always do this because we are creating accountability" is just not going to win that one.
I'm being sarcastic. If anything serious happened and someone passed Xhagen's quote to the press there would be no end to the flames it would cause.


But those media organizations or the anchors do like giving their names out, as well as their background and what they did before they joined up.

If anything, those news site, will agree to allow a person to stay anonymous as well on a general bases outside of EVE, to help protect them and such. Of course, none of those people, were ever hired afterwards, to be an anchor on the show and stuff. Usually the people who need to stay anonymous are involved in pretty heavy stuff, and it would be hard for the company to shoulder that burden.

Like lets say a team member of seal team six, has an interview but would be anonymous. Would MSNBC hire him afterwards? Well that member would bring all the drama of a muslim backlash and attacks that MSNBC would have a hard time dealing with.

Of course being a member of team seal six, is a great thing, and they are probably trustworthy as well and most places would think it would be cool to hire one, or see one as an asset.

Of course the seal member will feel bad for not being hired, but most likely a company will feel bad as well for not being able to hire them.

So perhaps CCP does feel bad at least for not allowing cool people in EVE to run, but it might be too much extra drama and burden then the company can really deal with. Of course we will never know if CCP does feel bad, it can't allow certain people to run, because CCP Xhagen doesn't post here anymore, but who knows.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne