These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Bane Nucleus for CSM8!!!!!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kuning
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2013-01-28 02:10:37 UTC
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Docking in w-space or you won't have my vote.


I apologize for this massive oversight.

that's more like it.
while you're at it, i want SOV and supercaps. And sleepers should have bounties. I see no need for all that blue loot bullshit.
And whatever happened to the wormhole stabilizers idea? that was some good stuff.


Wormhole Stabilizers ended up not being a good idea.

A better idea would be to allow a nullsec like structure (ihub, sbu, etc) that you install on a wormhole which keeps that wormhole open 24/7. This device would have the same tank and durability as an IHUB
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#42 - 2013-01-28 02:45:03 UTC
Kuning wrote:
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Docking in w-space or you won't have my vote.


I apologize for this massive oversight.

that's more like it.
while you're at it, i want SOV and supercaps. And sleepers should have bounties. I see no need for all that blue loot bullshit.
And whatever happened to the wormhole stabilizers idea? that was some good stuff.


Wormhole Stabilizers ended up not being a good idea.

A better idea would be to allow a nullsec like structure (ihub, sbu, etc) that you install on a wormhole which keeps that wormhole open 24/7. This device would have the same tank and durability as an IHUB


Better add a 36 hour reinforce timer too.
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#43 - 2013-01-28 04:14:27 UTC
Seriously, these ideas just keep getting better and better.

http://www.wormholes.info
Kuning
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2013-01-28 04:40:05 UTC
Paikis wrote:
Kuning wrote:
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Asayanami Dei wrote:
Docking in w-space or you won't have my vote.


I apologize for this massive oversight.

that's more like it.
while you're at it, i want SOV and supercaps. And sleepers should have bounties. I see no need for all that blue loot bullshit.
And whatever happened to the wormhole stabilizers idea? that was some good stuff.


Wormhole Stabilizers ended up not being a good idea.

A better idea would be to allow a nullsec like structure (ihub, sbu, etc) that you install on a wormhole which keeps that wormhole open 24/7. This device would have the same tank and durability as an IHUB


Better add a 36 hour reinforce timer too.


Done.


3 of them.
Taz Edenrunner
Kit TBR
#45 - 2013-01-28 13:29:36 UTC
these have great advantages for the attackers/higher end corps with plenty of imcome (assuming that sov & montly iHub costs apply) but little that provides the smaller corps any benefits

maybe some reverse bonus on incoming K162s into their system, it would counter the increased mass/time limit. In doing so provides the smaller corps a reason to invest in something like this.

oh and yea Bane for CSM......love the platform points.......
Nash MacAllister
Air
The Initiative.
#46 - 2013-01-28 14:20:24 UTC
Nix Anteris wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
herp derp derp derp


Get back under your bridge.

I mean, I'm sure you'd have great support from your giant blob-warfare centric alliance if this wasn't a troll, since the changes seem specifically designed to benefit yourselves.

I'll give you 2/10 for troll effort, you didn't even attempt to make it look legit.


So angry... Lol

Yes, if you have to ask yourself the question, just assume we are watching you...
Nash MacAllister
Air
The Initiative.
#47 - 2013-01-28 14:25:32 UTC
I am extremely disappointed in Bane. He knows w-space got screwed when CCP couldn't even be bothered to code local properly, and the fact he proposed no fix? We DESERVE what the other people have, to make us safer. Unacceptable. -1 Bane, -1...

Yes, if you have to ask yourself the question, just assume we are watching you...
Meytal
Doomheim
#48 - 2013-01-28 17:02:47 UTC
At first, I was all excited, thinking that we finally had a candidate who really understood the needs of W-space residents in all classes of W-space. But then when the ongoing bug with Local chat was mentioned, and Bane's complete lack of acknowledgment of that problem, I was heartbroken. We have suffered with that bug for years now!

Now I don't think Bane is serious about representing us on the CSM. I think he just wants a free trip to Iceland for beer and hookers. He doesn't care about our needs at all! :(
DJ P0N-3
Table Flippendeavors
#49 - 2013-01-28 18:29:47 UTC  |  Edited by: DJ P0N-3
Bane Nucleus wrote:
4) Modular POS's that can warp. Yes, you will hear "there is a POS camping this wormhole", and it will be fantastic.


I am envisioning a POS rolling around a system with all the ships inside bouncing around the force field. It is a beautiful picture. Perhaps it could even barge through the wormhole using that fancy mass reduction thing. Make it so.
Kais Murtan
Samurai Salvaging
#50 - 2013-01-28 19:48:12 UTC
I, too, support this platform on the basis of POS camping a wh, with one caveat: There must be a new modular/anchorable module that will allow us to launch bombs through the wh. It's so annoying to jump through a hole only to find some pesky afk drake or boosting loki just sitting there, and you don't know if they have hostile intentions! Better to clear em out ahead of time, i say!
Matrim Fidard
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2013-01-28 20:06:35 UTC
Great ideas Bane. But Ihvae one trouble, people keep mining out my asteroid belts in my home system so much so that I cant find them at all. So we need bigger belts. And the same goes for ice fields. How come wormhole ice fields are so small compared to hisec that they can mined right out too?
Kalel Nimrott
Caldari Provisions
#52 - 2013-01-28 20:19:46 UTC
If I wasn't threatened to vote for Nathan Jameson at Gun point, I would vote for Bane.

Bob Artis, you will be missed.

O7
Kuning
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#53 - 2013-01-28 20:47:29 UTC
Kalel Nimrott wrote:
If I wasn't threatened to vote for Nathan Jameson at Gun point, I would vote for Bane.


I wouldn't worry about Nathan having a gun
Tecear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#54 - 2013-01-29 01:37:24 UTC
9/10.

Would vote if I could hear more about a plan to implement super caps in wormhole space. Also your plan on creating a POS mod which will extended the time of wormhole space. (End Sarcasm).
Winthorp
#55 - 2013-01-29 05:09:43 UTC
I love how random people chime in all mad at Banes platform, cause he is actually serious right...... Slow the rando's are.
tgl3
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2013-01-29 11:20:43 UTC
3/10

Sleeper drive-bys do sound hilarious, though.
Edward Harris
Inner Geek
#57 - 2013-01-29 13:01:10 UTC
As an additional point, please also have sleeper supercaps added , which warp to your pos and attack it the moment the site is triggered.
Sorany
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#58 - 2013-01-29 13:30:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Sorany
+2
Kuning
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#59 - 2013-01-29 17:32:20 UTC
Sorany wrote:
+2


What the hell? You can't do that.
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#60 - 2013-01-29 17:36:01 UTC
THAT'S NOT HOW YOU EAT A KIT KAT BAR!!!!

http://www.wormholes.info