These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Evelopedia is in serious need of more editors.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#21 - 2013-01-25 07:47:25 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
There is a difference between targeting and targeting.

CCP does recognise griefing as persistently harassing a particular player, thus "targeting" a player. This is very different to the ingame mechanic of "targeting" a ship.

If i fell in love with your avatar and sent you ISK and a love letter every day,
containing all the pods i've killed for you, to show you my affection,
and told every single one of my victims that i did it for you and you only,
would that be considered as griefing or harrassment ?


You can send me all the ISK and love letters you want. Exercise your inner psychotic serial killer poet.

If your poetry isn't of sufficiently high quality I might ask you to stop (bad poetry is painful). If your continued display of affection annoys me, I'll ask you to stop. If you don't stop, that is when your behaviour crosses the line from "cute" into "harassment".

I can handle a little unwanted attention, but I'd expect the GMs to step in at some time and tell you that enough is enough.

Day 0 Advice for New Players
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#22 - 2013-01-25 09:57:15 UTC
Wescro[quote wrote:
The wiki should not be a personal soapbox for people to broadcast their opinions as official EVE gospel.


Whereas the forums are, as you have just proven.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0
Terrorfrodo
Interbus Universal
#23 - 2013-01-25 10:04:48 UTC
Bias is bad, but the main problem with the wiki is that half of it is simply outdated, wrong information. How is a player supposed to know which information is wrong and which is right? If you can tell (and I think I usually can), then you don't need a wiki anyway. But if you are a new player looking for new information, the wiki does more harm than good because so much of it is wrong.

CCP should either employ people who incorporate changed things into the wiki after every patch, or they should just remove the wiki.

.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#24 - 2013-01-25 11:10:02 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Wescro wrote:
The wiki should not be a personal soapbox for people to broadcast their opinions as official EVE gospel.


Whereas the forums are, as you have just proven.

They quite clearly are, though, and I'm not sure what's wrong with that. It's not like you yourself are at all shy about broadcasting your own opinion.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2013-01-25 12:19:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Mara Rinn wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
There is a difference between targeting and targeting.

CCP does recognise griefing as persistently harassing a particular player, thus "targeting" a player. This is very different to the ingame mechanic of "targeting" a ship.

If i fell in love with your avatar and sent you ISK and a love letter every day,
containing all the pods i've killed for you, to show you my affection,
and told every single one of my victims that i did it for you and you only,
would that be considered as griefing or harrassment ?


You can send me all the ISK and love letters you want. Exercise your inner psychotic serial killer poet.

If your poetry isn't of sufficiently high quality I might ask you to stop (bad poetry is painful). If your continued display of affection annoys me, I'll ask you to stop. If you don't stop, that is when your behaviour crosses the line from "cute" into "harassment".

I can handle a little unwanted attention, but I'd expect the GMs to step in at some time and tell you that enough is enough.
:D

Roses are red,
Violence is blue ...
If i shoot enough pods,
I'll gain some love from you. ^_^

XD
Call Rollard
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-01-28 21:31:52 UTC
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Thorax

This is outdated and someone wrote a note at the bottom saying to edit the Thorax.

I don't know if its possible to change the sheet.
Whitehound
#27 - 2013-01-28 21:51:25 UTC
Call Rollard wrote:
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Thorax

This is outdated and someone wrote a note at the bottom saying to edit the Thorax.

I don't know if its possible to change the sheet.

These info pages will have been created by a script. It should only take another run to update them all. You could try reporting it as a bug.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Ginger Barbarella
#28 - 2013-01-28 21:58:55 UTC
I edited some of the COSMOS entries based on missions I had just run, and someone came along and wiped out my edits.

Haven't even considered doing anything with the Wiki since (even though some things are in SERIOUS need of updating).

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Ginger Barbarella
#29 - 2013-01-28 22:00:31 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
There is a difference between targeting and targeting.

CCP does recognise griefing as persistently harassing a particular player, thus "targeting" a player. This is very different to the ingame mechanic of "targeting" a ship.

If i fell in love with your avatar and sent you ISK and a love letter every day,
containing all the pods i've killed for you, to show you my affection,
and told every single one of my victims that i did it for you and you only,
would that be considered as griefing or harrassment ?


Neither. It would just be damned creepy, ya stalker.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2013-01-31 06:43:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
UPDATE: a new editor has stepped up

[b wrote:
Goonswarm[/b]]

Goonswarm was founded on 06/07/06 with the intention of causing the game to fail. They have been mostly unsuccessful at this with a few noteworthy exceptions. This corporation/alliance should be banned for their actions and continued ruining of the Eve community/economy. The alliance originally consisted of the sister corporations Goonfleet, GoonWaffe and GoonPlatoon, as well as allied corporations, since CCP had not yet seeded the Sovereignty skill. After the skill was seeded, Remedial, former Alliance Leader, merged GoonWaffe and GoonPlatoon into Goonfleet.


but who is this noble content adder?

Quote:
Illdryn
The Inf1dels [JSUS]
The Retirement Club [401k]


fair and balanced
Hannah Flex
#31 - 2013-01-31 06:49:25 UTC
Trying to keep wikis up to date is griefing Oops
Ildryn
IDLE INTENTIONS
#32 - 2013-02-01 06:01:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Ildryn
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
UPDATE: a new editor has stepped up

[b wrote:
Goonswarm[/b]]

Goonswarm was founded on 06/07/06 with the intention of causing the game to fail. They have been mostly unsuccessful at this with a few noteworthy exceptions. This corporation/alliance should be banned for their actions and continued ruining of the Eve community/economy. The alliance originally consisted of the sister corporations Goonfleet, GoonWaffe and GoonPlatoon, as well as allied corporations, since CCP had not yet seeded the Sovereignty skill. After the skill was seeded, Remedial, former Alliance Leader, merged GoonWaffe and GoonPlatoon into Goonfleet.


but who is this noble content adder?

Quote:
Illdryn
The Inf1dels [JSUS]
The Retirement Club [401k]


fair and balanced


Read the rest of it and see how biased it is....i was just trying to add balance :)
And for your information. 401k has nothing to do with this. The corp left that alliance before i joined.
Previous page12