These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Off grid boosting fix is like waiting for a miracle?

Author
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#1 - 2013-01-24 16:15:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
EDIT: CCP FOZZIE is addressing some questions here:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=197430&find=unread

It will probably be more productive to post there. Blink




Requiring boosters be on grid is one of the most player upvoted proposals on the csm's assembly hall.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=10444

Yet it seems it didn't get much attention from the csm meeting:

"Seleene brought up the topic of off-grid boosting, and Fozzie responded that technical limitations were the only reason it continued to exist. Fozzie could not comment on when this issue would be resolved and stated that “one day Veritas will come up to me and say ‘hey I fixed off-grid boosting’”, but he had no idea on a potential timeframe for this sort of miracle."

And that seems all that was said about it. (If this was then addressed somewhere else in the minutes please feel free to let me know.)
http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2012/CSM_CCP_Meetings_December_2012.pdf

"Technical limitations" so getting this fixed is like hoping on a miracle??

Is Veritas actually assigned to fix this, or is this something he may, or may not do, in his spare time?

Can we get some sort of description of the technical limitation?

Can the technical limitation be avoided by doing something other than requiring them to be on grid say only give boosts up to fleet members in an area of effect?

Some sort of follow up would be appreciated.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#2 - 2013-01-24 16:20:19 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Requiring boosters be on grid is one of the most player upvoted proposals on the csm's assembly hall.
Yet it seems it didn't get much attention from the csm meeting:


That's because it's stupid to remove them. (Unless ofc, they allow the linky tech 3 cruisers to be supertanked, which will then get whined at).
Period
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2013-01-24 16:22:44 UTC
Buhhdust Princess wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Requiring boosters be on grid is one of the most player upvoted proposals on the csm's assembly hall.
Yet it seems it didn't get much attention from the csm meeting:


That's because it's stupid to remove them. (Unless ofc, they allow the linky tech 3 cruisers to be supertanked, which will then get whined at).
Period


CCP have already stated on several occasions that OGB is going away - they dislike the mechanic. Also, the tech 3 cruisers are going to stop being the over powered boost machines they are now when the revamp of command ships goes through this year. So whether you agree with the idea or don't, it's happening.

Period.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#4 - 2013-01-24 16:27:18 UTC
I totally agree with the nerfing of the boosts, theyre SO overpowered thats why people choose them over the command ship.

What CCP have to remember is the cost effectiveness, are u going to just counter this lack of use of command ships, by turning it on it's head and making t3s unusable, for the same cost.

Removing offgrid boosters is a bad move, and will surely mean that they have to give some boost back to Solo/Small-Gang PvPers, otherwise they've just totally nerfed that mechanic even more, and EVE becomes much, much less of a "sandbox".
-Buhh
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2013-01-24 16:30:01 UTC
Buhhdust Princess wrote:

Removing offgrid boosters is a bad move, and will surely mean that they have to give some boost back to Solo/Small-Gang PvPers


Past revisions over the last four years that I've been playing would seem to indicate that expecting this kind of reciprocity for the Solo/SG player is akin to expecting the second coming of Christ. You can hope for it all you like, but don't hold your breath.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#6 - 2013-01-24 16:35:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Buhhdust Princess
I guess that's because really, CCP are a business, and will go with the masses to create the most profit. It's a shame to wave goodbye to such an adrenaline pumping, exciting game, and welcome this "Not-so-sandbox" they're slowly creating.

And yeah, CCP have only boosted solo in 3 ways the last few years.
1. Tech 3 Cruiser Boosts
2. Ancilliary Shield Boosters
3. Making blasters good again.

For that i'm thankful, however, for what we're about to recieve, I am not.

P.S. CCP, If 1 person could change your mind, DO NOT REMOVE OFF GRID BOOSTING. You're nerfing it enough already.
P.P.S. Sorry for completely hi-jacking your thread OP.
-Buhhd
Scrindle Kavees
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2013-01-24 16:39:00 UTC
Buhhdust Princess wrote:
I guess that's because really, CCP are a business, and will go with the masses to create the most profit. It's a shame to wave goodbye to such an adrenaline pumping, exciting game, and welcome this "Not-so-sandbox" they're slowly creating.

And yeah, CCP have only boosted solo in 3 ways the last few years.
1. Tech 3 Cruiser Boosts
2. Ancilliary Shield Boosters
3. Making blasters good again.

For that i'm thankful, however, for what we're about to recieve, I am not.

P.S. CCP, If 1 person could change your mind, DO NOT REMOVE OFF GRID BOOSTING. You're nerfing it enough already.
-Buhhd


Aren't T3 cruisers currently only good for 'solo' flying when you happen to own an OGB or two?
Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#8 - 2013-01-24 16:39:52 UTC
Scrindle Kavees wrote:
Buhhdust Princess wrote:
I guess that's because really, CCP are a business, and will go with the masses to create the most profit. It's a shame to wave goodbye to such an adrenaline pumping, exciting game, and welcome this "Not-so-sandbox" they're slowly creating.

And yeah, CCP have only boosted solo in 3 ways the last few years.
1. Tech 3 Cruiser Boosts
2. Ancilliary Shield Boosters
3. Making blasters good again.

For that i'm thankful, however, for what we're about to recieve, I am not.

P.S. CCP, If 1 person could change your mind, DO NOT REMOVE OFF GRID BOOSTING. You're nerfing it enough already.
-Buhhd


Aren't T3 cruisers currently only good for 'solo' flying when you happen to own an OGB or two?


Try reading what i said again.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#9 - 2013-01-24 16:42:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Buhhdust Princess wrote:


Removing offgrid boosters is a bad move, and will surely mean that they have to give some boost back to Solo/Small-Gang PvPers, otherwise they've just totally nerfed that mechanic even more, and EVE becomes much, much less of a "sandbox".
-Buhh





Boosts are killing solo pvp. If you are using a booster alt you are not solo anymore than if you use a logistics alt or a falcon alt. (at least those need to be on grid.)

EVE is becoming ALTSONLINE.

Face it, as OGBs proliferate eve gets worse.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Xuse Senna
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#10 - 2013-01-24 16:45:12 UTC
These boost allow small/Solo pilots the ability to engage those massive blobs people always complain about xD

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7501/mindgamesceptionfinaldr.jpg

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#11 - 2013-01-24 16:45:58 UTC
I have command ships trained to V.

I support the change to nerfing OGB. This however MUST lead to two options:

1) A significant increase in the durability of Boosting ships
(not likely going to happen as it creates imbalance elsewhere)

2) A tenfold increase in the effectiveness of boosts while I remain on-grid, going back to EVE's famous trailers this would support a style of gameplay demonstrated, When a command ship enters the field the enemy FC screams "KILL THAT COMMAND SHIP" and while the command pilot realizes he is doomed he remains steadfast for every second he stays on the field he holds significant sway over the flow of conflict. You will be primaried... but your time on the battlefield will be legend.

Also in order to make option 2 an actual power-play he must be unable to receive reps while boosting, he can still run and self-rep but if this caveat is not added we will have 8 Archons repping a damnation =P

Now with 100% less Troll.

Ginger Barbarella
#12 - 2013-01-24 16:48:23 UTC
Well, if it isn't going to be fixed I might as well move a couple booster alts into my FW world. :) If you see any unknown Lokis, Tengu's, or Absolution's in the Amarr war zone say Hi! Twisted

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#13 - 2013-01-24 16:51:28 UTC
Xuse Senna wrote:
These boost allow small/Solo pilots the ability to engage those massive blobs people always complain about xD


Exactly this.

At the moment you very rarely see "Fkin blobbers" or anything like that in local (You do, but theyre just scrubs).

EVE is supposed to be fun, unfortunately now, people are so risk averse that they only fight in huge numbers, OGB allow you to do things like this:
http://cyn0.syn-dot.com/index.php/kill_related/12833/ (Please allow the KB link it's to prove a point).

Without the tengu boost, we would've ALL died, and without the loki we couldn't of caught anything. Tell me how that is going to IMPROVE this game? So now blobs can dominate you with a push of a button? At this moment, blobs have to think about what they're going to do tactically, and not underestimate their opponent, after the OGB nerf, its instadeath
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-01-24 16:52:11 UTC
Buhhdust Princess wrote:

Removing offgrid boosters is a bad move, and will surely mean that they have to give some boost back to Solo/Small-Gang PvPers, otherwise they've just totally nerfed that mechanic even more, and EVE becomes much, much less of a "sandbox".
-Buhh

Lol

Solo/Small-gang pvpers already got big gift from CCP: cheap T1 logi ships.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#15 - 2013-01-24 16:53:12 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Well, if it isn't going to be fixed I might as well move a couple booster alts into my FW world. :) If you see any unknown Lokis, Tengu's, or Absolution's in the Amarr war zone say Hi! Twisted



They already plague low sec so much, I would have no idea which are yours. Pretty much you would be fool to pvp in low sec without your booster alt.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Xuse Senna
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#16 - 2013-01-24 16:53:17 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Buhhdust Princess wrote:

Removing offgrid boosters is a bad move, and will surely mean that they have to give some boost back to Solo/Small-Gang PvPers, otherwise they've just totally nerfed that mechanic even more, and EVE becomes much, much less of a "sandbox".
-Buhh

Lol

Solo/Small-gang pvpers already got big gift from CCP: cheap T1 logi ships.


We're bored of them already :P

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7501/mindgamesceptionfinaldr.jpg

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#17 - 2013-01-24 16:53:26 UTC
If OGB goes away, shouldn't fleet bonuses also only apply when being on grid and not just in the same system? Surely the knowledge from a skill cannot have longer range than an active module? Lol

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#18 - 2013-01-24 16:56:28 UTC
Buhhdust Princess wrote:
Xuse Senna wrote:
These boost allow small/Solo pilots the ability to engage those massive blobs people always complain about xD


Exactly this.




Again solo means 1.

Not 1 + 1 falcon alt; Nor 1 + 1 logistics alt; Nor 1 + 1 booster alt.

The math shouldn't be that hard.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Othran
Route One
#19 - 2013-01-24 16:58:07 UTC
Cearain wrote:

EVE is becoming ALTSONLINE.


Eve became altsonline years ago matey. I know one person in Eve who has a single account, everyone else has at least two accounts.

I don't believe its technically possible for CCP to prevent OGB. Prevent boosting from a POS yes, but not applying the boosts to one grid in a system.

I think the changes to boosts will help a little but the bottom line is T3s are still overpowered as they require max skills to probe down. I think that'll have to be the next change - increase their sig radius when they're pushing boosts - to ensure that the T3 pilot is actually at the keyboard.

I'm not holding my breath, frankly CCP take a ridiculous amount of time to deal with problems like this and always have.
Xuse Senna
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#20 - 2013-01-24 16:58:51 UTC
Or I could argue that a Single pilot is controlling them all... Still Solo.

And anyway, We're talking about boosts, not ******* Falcon/Logi

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7501/mindgamesceptionfinaldr.jpg

123Next pageLast page